Monogenic muscular dystrophies (MDs), such as Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) and limb-girdle muscular dystrophy (LGMD), are characterized by chronic inflammation, progressive fibrosis, and impaired muscle regeneration. Central to these pathological processes are macrophages, which exhibit dynamic polarization states that influence the dystrophic microenvironment. In early disease stages, macrophages support tissue repair and regeneration, but chronic inflammation skews their activity toward pro-fibrotic phenotypes, driving excessive extracellular matrix (ECM) deposition and muscle dysfunction. Macrophages also interact with other immune cells, such as T cells and neutrophils, and non-immune cells, including fibroblasts and satellite cells, to regulate inflammatory and fibrotic responses. These interactions establish a dysregulated immune environment that exacerbates muscle damage and impairs effective regeneration. Preclinical studies using the mdx mouse model of DMD highlight the critical role of macrophages in sustaining inflammation and fibrosis, particularly through transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β) signaling and fibro-adipogenic progenitor (FAP) activation. Therapeutically, targeting macrophages offers significant potential to mitigate disease progression. Strategies include modulating macrophage polarization toward a pro-regenerative M2 phenotype, inhibiting macrophage recruitment via chemokine signaling, and reprogramming macrophage metabolism to support oxidative phosphorylation and mitochondrial function. Additionally, anti-fibrotic interventions targeting TGF-β signaling or macrophage-FAP crosstalk have shown promise in reducing ECM deposition and preserving muscle architecture. In this review, we curate relevant studies and provide insights into the molecular mechanisms governing macrophage behavior in dystrophic muscle. Herein, we discuss how emerging therapeutic strategies targeting macrophage-mediated pathways can be leveraged to mitigate inflammation and fibrosis, enhance muscle regeneration, and improve clinical outcomes.

Diet plays a complex role in the management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), significantly influencing the microbiome and metabolome. Three key metabolites implicated in IBD are short chain fatty acids, bile acids and tryptophan, all of which can be modulated through diet. This study analyses the impact of various diets on these metabolites. Despite the anti-inflammatory effects of short chain fatty acids, their levels do not increase during successful remission with exclusive enteral nutrition. Additionally, changes in tryptophan and bile acids are non-specific across different diets, suggesting these metabolic shifts are secondary to dietary efficacy in IBD. Dietary therapies vary in efficacy across individuals, as the established microbiome may not produce the desired metabolites. This variability is further compounded by differences in immune responses influenced by genetic factors and disease duration. Furthermore, inflammation and symptom resolution do not always coincide, revealing a discrepancy in dietary impacts on IBD. These limitations highlight the need for a deeper understanding of the interconnectedness of disease heterogeneity, dietary effects, the microbiome, and their influence on the mucosal immune system to develop more personalised dietary therapies. While no single diet is universally effective for all IBD patients, future research should focus on establishing a more rigid definition of dietary interventions for IBD and their long-term effects on clinical outcomes.

Neoantigen vaccines are a promising strategy in cancer immunotherapy that leverage tumor-specific mutations to elicit targeted immune responses. Although they have considerable potential, development challenges related to antigen prediction accuracy, manufacturing complexity, and scalability remain key obstacles to their widespread clinical use. This literature review was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases to identify relevant studies. Keywords included “neoantigen vaccines,” “personalized cancer immunotherapy,” “tumor heterogeneity,” “bioinformatics pipelines,” and “prediction algorithms”. Clinical trial data were sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov, Trialtrove, and other publicly available registries. Eligible studies included peer-reviewed research articles, systematic reviews, and clinical trials focusing on neoantigen vaccine development, bioinformatic strategies, and immunotherapy. Tumor heterogeneity and clonal evolution significantly impact vaccine efficacy, necessitating multi-epitope targeting and adaptive vaccine design. Current neoantigen prediction algorithms suffer from high false-positive and false-negative rates, requiring further integration with multi-omics data and machine learning to enhance accuracy. Manufacturing remains complex, time-intensive, and costly, necessitating advancements in standardization and automation. Combination therapies, such as immune checkpoint inhibitors and adoptive cell therapies, counteract the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment, improving treatment outcomes. Neoantigen vaccines hold great potential for personalized cancer therapy but require advancements in bioinformatics, manufacturing scalability, and immunomodulatory strategies to enhance clinical efficacy. Continued research and interdisciplinary collaboration are essential for refining clinical applications.

Cutaneous reactions present a diagnostic challenge, mainly when multiple factors, such as infections, medications, and environmental triggers, contribute to the clinical picture. Erythema multiforme (EM) is an acute, self-limiting mucocutaneous disorder that is most commonly triggered by herpes simplex virus (HSV) but can also be associated with drug-induced hypersensitivity reactions. Diagnosing EM becomes even more complex in patients taking photosensitizing medications, such as doxycycline, which can cause phototoxic or photoallergic reactions. Differentiating between drug-induced and infection-associated EM, as well as distinguishing it from more severe conditions like Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS), is crucial for appropriate management. This case report presents a case of a 57-year-old Caucasian female with a history of penicillin allergy who developed a phototoxic reaction to doxycycline following sun exposure. She was treated with silver sulfadiazine for her skin lesions but subsequently developed EM, with target-like lesions predominantly on the legs and a concurrent herpes simplex labialis infection. Laboratory findings were unremarkable, and there was no mucosal involvement. Given the suspected drug-induced nature of the reaction and the presence of HSV, a cautious approach was taken. Treatment with oral prednisone led to the resolution of symptoms without recurrence. Patch testing for doxycycline and silver sulfadiazine was omitted due to the risk of severe cutaneous adverse drug reactions (SCARs) and their non-essential status. Instead, penicillin testing was prioritized due to its clinical importance, and the patient successfully passed the oral amoxicillin challenge. This case highlights the diagnostic challenges of differentiating between drug-induced, infection-triggered, and photosensitivity-related cutaneous reactions. A careful evaluation of medication history, infection status, and clinical presentation is essential to guide the management of this condition.

Immune response, inflammation, and lipid metabolism have important effects on cancer development and progression. Several proteins in tumoral cells and/or tumor microenvironment are involved in any of these processes, whereas some of them participate in all three, such as the zinc finger E-box-binding homeobox 1 (ZEB1) protein. This protein has been proposed to have an important role in invasion and metastasis of cancer cells, as well as to be involved in malignant transformation and resistance to cancer treatments. So, in this study, we present the participation of ZEB1 in immune, inflammatory, and membrane remodeling (lipid metabolism) processes, as well as its interaction with proteins that participate in them. Due to the importance of ZEB1 in cancer progression, it may be a potential biomarker of cancer prognosis and a target for the development of new cancer therapies.