Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is the leading cause of disability and one of the top causes of mortality worldwide. The current standard of care is reperfusion therapy including intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) and thrombectomy. However, these treatments have limitations as they have a limited therapeutic window. Hence, there is a vital need to develop neuroprotective agents to prevent brain injury, extend the reperfusion window, improve mortality, and reduce disability in AIS patients. Neuroprotective agents work by counteracting the detrimental biochemical and molecular events that result in irreversible ischemic damage. Numerous preclinical studies and clinical trials have been done on different agents. Thus far, all have been definitively unsuccessful in large trials. Currently, there are several challenges in translation from animal studies to human trials. It is important to understand the current evidence as well as past challenges in the development of neuroprotective strategies in AIS in order for a more strategic selection of agents to be studied, improve study designs and thus contribute to the development of effective neuroprotective agents. Newer agents have shown promise in neuroprotection, and human trials are ongoing. In this review, the mechanisms of action of different families of neuroprotective agents were discussed. The evidence for the efficacy of different drugs in each family of neuroprotective agents was also evaluated and the current research landscape in neuroprotection for AIS was summarized. The past challenges and limitations in clinical trials and proposed possible ways to address these issues were highlighted.

Small fiber neuropathy (SFN) is a relatively common, but largely understudied neurological syndrome which has affected the lives of many globally. The common symptoms of SFN include pain, dysesthesia, and autonomic dysfunction, which are caused by damage to small nerve fibers. Due to its heterogeneous nature, SFN causes a multitude of symptoms which makes the disease and its subtypes difficult to diagnose. Furthermore, as the pathophysiology of SFN remains largely enigmatic, no cause is found in around 50% of the cases and these are classified as idiopathic SFN (iSFN). The difficult task of diagnosing SFN, and the even more elusive feat of hunting for the underlying etiology, demands accurate, precise, preferably noninvasive, and affordable tools, or a combination of them. Accordingly, appropriate biomarkers for SFN are needed to stratify patients and develop cause-centered treatments in addition to symptomatic treatments. As peripheral axons grow and repair, identifying underlying causes of SFN and intervening early may spur axonal regeneration in young patients, which can greatly improve their symptoms and improve quality of life. This narrative review aims to objectively highlight functional, histological, and molecular biomarkers to aid clinicians in discerning the diagnostic tests they should use to diagnose, confirm and determine the etiology of SFN. The strengths and limitations of each potential biomarker will be discussed. Clearer diagnostic criteria, guidelines, and work-up for SFN are required for clinicians to better identify the disease in patients presenting with non-specific symptoms.

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a rare auto-immune neuromuscular junction (NMJ) disorder which is caused by formation of autoantibodies and destruction of NMJ components. The MG diagnosis is based on the symptoms, autoantibodies detection and paraclinical tests. Given that MG patients have so many differential diagnosis and various medication responses, choosing an accurate diagnosis and the therapy plan in MG is challenging. According to the studies, there are the immunologic, genetic, microRNAs, gut microbiome, and other established or newly proposed biomarkers for diagnosis and prognosis of MG. More studies are needed to provide better collection of biomarkers in MG patients and evaluate their role in MG pathology.