• Open Access
    Review

    Fight fire with fire: the need for a vaccine based on intrinsic disorder and structural flexibility

    Vladimir N. Uversky *

    Explor Immunol. 2022;2:731–748 DOI: https://doi.org/10.37349/ei.2022.00079

    Received: June 01, 2022 Accepted: August 05, 2022 Published: October 31, 2022

    Academic Editor: Dominique J. Charron, Hospital Saint Louis, France

    This article belongs to the special issue Old and New Paradigms in Viral Vaccinology

    Abstract

    The absence of advancement in finding efficient vaccines for several human viruses, such as hepatitis C virus (HCV), human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1), and herpes simplex viruses (HSVs) despite 30, 40, and even 60 years of research, respectively, is unnerving. Among objective reasons for such failure are the highly glycosylated nature of proteins used as primary vaccine targets against these viruses and the presence of neotopes and cryptotopes, as well as high mutation rates of the RNA viruses HCV and HIV-1 and the capability to establish latency by HSVs. However, the lack of success in utilization of the structure-based reverse vaccinology for these viruses is likely to be related to the presence of highly flexible and intrinsically disordered regions in human antibodies (Abs) and the major immunogens of HIV-1, HCV, and HSVs, their surface glycoproteins. This clearly calls for moving from the rational structure-based vaccinology to the unstructural vaccinology based on the utilization of tools designed for the analysis of disordered and flexible proteins, while looking at intrinsically disordered viral antigens and their interactions with intrinsically disordered/flexible Abs.

    Keywords

    Reverse vaccinology, intrinsically disordered protein, antibody, antigen, structural flexibility

    Introduction

    Among the various techniques utilized by rational vaccine design the special place is given to the structure-based reverse vaccinology [1, 2] that uses information from the crystallographic structure of a complex between a neutralizing monoclonal antibody (mAb) and a complementary epitope to rationally design better antigens capable of acting as vaccine immunogens. This computational methodology, which utilizes docking and molecular modeling, is deeply rooted in the knowledge of the high-resolution structures of the pathogenic proteins and the antigen-antibody (Ab) complexes and is expected to reconstruct epitopes capable of mAb binding. In the corresponding experiments, a process similar to the rational drug design is used, where the structure of a highly neutralizing mAb serves as a template, to which modeled epitopes are docked to design molecules with high potential for the selective binding to and specific inhibition of the biological activity of the mAb [3]. It is expected that such computationally reconstructed antigens, which are “rationally” designed to fit the mAb, would have desired antigenic properties and induce polyclonal Abs with the neutralizing potential similar to that of the mAb used as a template for designing the antigen.

    In an alternative approach, instead of rationally designing epitopes using docking-based structural modeling, computational approaches are used to predict potential antigens that are located on the surface of the pathogens and that could serve as vaccine candidates. Since it is likely that antigens are present in any protein from a pathogenic microorganism, specialized computational tools can be used to predict them. Based on these premises, the corresponding in silico techniques are used to search entire proteomes of query microbial pathogens (bacteria, fungi, and viruses) for potential antigens [1, 2]. Thus found potent antigens are further studied by the means of structural vaccinology to find and characterize potential structural epitopes. A crucial step that follows these computational analyses is experimental validation of the ability of found antigens to elicit immunity in animal models [4, 5].

    There are many examples of the successful utilization of the reverse vaccinology tools for the identification of the novel vaccine antigens and for the improvement of the safety and antigenicity of vaccine antigens [15]. Among those are the highly potent vaccine candidates designed using the detailed structural knowledge of the viral fusion mechanisms and structural analysis of the glycoprotein from the respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) [6] and the spike protein from the Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) [7]. The structure-guided design and high-throughput in vitro assays were successfully used to discover the broadly neutralizing Abs (bNAbs) against the dengue envelope protein and influenza hemagglutinin stalk [810]. Linear and discontinuous human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) epitopes grafted onto the computationally designed scaffolds represent an impressive illustration of the successful utilization of the rational structure-based vaccinology, where structural information pertaining to the existing bNAbs-antigen complexes was utilized in the development of the designer antigens [11, 12]. A culmination of the success of this strategy was given by the remarkable speed of the vaccine development against the causative agent of current coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), where the fertile soil was created by the aggregation of three decades of scientific research in the fields of reverse vaccinology, structural vaccinology, synthetic biology, and vaccine adjuvants [13, 14].

    However, despite many success stories, these promising technologies have serious limitations. The founding principles of the structure-based rational design in general and the rational structural vaccinology in particular are rooted in the consideration of protein-ligand, protein-nucleic acid, protein-protein, and antigen-Ab complexes as rigid, motionless structures with steric “lock-and-key”-type complementarity to each other. However, this is clearly an oversimplification, as biological molecules are not akin to crystals, being instead pliable entities characterized by conformational fluctuations of different amplitudes happening at multiple time-scales. Therefore, protein-based interactions rely on the mutual adjustments of the partners via coordinated induced complementarity and fit; i.e., are better described by the flexible keys and adjustable locks model [15]. Therefore, binding site is not fixed in space and time, being instead a relational entity. This means that the specific features of a binding site are not solely defined by the independently determined unique/rigid three-dimensional (3D)-structure of a protein, but show relational association with a particular partner. In other words, binding sites of all the partners involved in the complex formation are engaged in mutual tuning, the scale of which can vary from rather minimal structural adjustments to global binding-induced folding. Unfortunately, these important aspects are mostly ignored in structure-based rational design, and rational structural vaccinology continues to rely on known 3D-structures of Abs and antigens. However, as it is shown in this article, many antigens are not suitable for such structure-based analysis as they either contain noticeable levels of intrinsic disorder or at least are characterized by high conformational plasticity. Furthermore, antigen-binding sites of Abs are flexible/disordered themselves. These important observations clearly indicate that intrinsic disorder and structural flexibility of antigens and Abs cannot be ignored and future vaccine design should include techniques of unstructural biology. It is very likely that the past inability (or unwillingness) to consider and apply these aspects of unstructural vaccinology is at least in part responsible for the absence of advancement in finding efficient vaccines for several human viruses, such as hepatitis C virus (HCV), HIV-1, and herpes simplex viruses (HSVs) despite 30, 40, and even 60 years of research, respectively. To illustrate these points, this article represents an overview of the intrinsic disorder status of the surface glycoproteins, which are considered as major antigens of these three viruses, and discusses conformational flexibility of Abs.

    HIV-1

    HIV-1, a causative agent of the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS), is a small enveloped RNA virus with genome of 9.75 kb. It belongs to the genus Lentivirus within the family of Retroviridae, subfamily Orthoretrovirinae [16]. HIV genome consists of two copies of noncovalently linked, unspliced, positive-sense single-stranded RNAs (ssRNA+) that contains nine genes encoding fifteen viral proteins [17] which are enclosed within the core of the virus particle. The surface of the HIV-1 is decorated by 14 trimeric spikes formed by the envelope protein (Env) heterodimers of the gp41 and gp120 glycoproteins, which originate as a result of the cleavage of the full-length gp160 protein by a protease and which serve as the major immunogens of HIV-1 [18, 19].

    The HIV/AIDS epidemic continues to be one of the major global health threats, and in 2020, 38 million people were living with HIV, 1.5 million people became newly infected with HIV, and 680,000 people died from AIDS-related diseases [20]. Although significant progress is reached in the development of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) that can reduce the risk of AIDS and transmission of HIV [21], the medications are expensive, and access to treatment remains a substantial barrier, especially in low- and medium-income countries. Therefore, a prophylactic vaccine represents an important means in attempts to end the epidemics. However, the search for the efficient anti-HIV vaccine utilizing various approaches including structure-based reverse vaccinology has spanned nearly four decades without much success [2228], although several broadly neutralizing anti-HIV-1 Abs were found [29, 30].

    The high glycosylation levels of the HIV surface are taken as one of the most probable explanations for these failures to find an efficient anti-HIV vaccine. In fact, HIV is known as the most glycosylated virus [31], and glycans constitute half of the mass of the only surface HIV-1 protein, the Env protein [32]. This is illustrated by Figure 1A and 1B showing the extent of the dynamic glycan shield of this protein, which efficiently covers almost the entire protein, making it almost inaccessible to neutralizing Abs [33]. As discussed below (see section HCV), similar situation is observed for the HCV envelope glycoproteins E1 and E2, which are also heavily glycosylated (see Figure 1C, 1D, and 1E).

    Dynamic glycan shield of viral surface glycoproteins. (A) Single snapshot of the modeled natively glycosylated structure of the soluble HIV-1 Env trimer, BG505 SOSIP.664 gp140, with each glycan taking up a particular conformation; (B) cumulative shielding effect over time due to the dynamic nature of the glycans. Plot shows one hundred randomly selected models from the 1,000-structure ensemble (plots A and B are modified from [33]); (C) schematic representation of the N-glycosylation sites on HCV envelope glycoproteins E1 and E2, where the relative position of the glycosylation site in the sequence is indicated with the letter “N” followed by a number. The numbers in brackets represent the position of the glycosylation sites according to the HCV genotype 1a consensus sequence (GenBank: AF009606.1). Sites conserved across all HCV genotypes are shown in red. Genotype-specific E1 glycans are shown in orange. E2 N-glycans are conserved across most genotypes, with the exception of genotype 1b (E2N5) and genotypes 3 and 6 (E2N7), which are shown in yellow. (D) and (E) glycan shielding of the HCV E2 glycoprotein. N-glycans are extensively shielding the CD81 binding loop and antigenic domains of E2 (D), whereas there are fewer shielding effects on the non-antigenic face of E2 (E). (plots C, D, and E are adopted from [34]). HVR1: Hyper variable region 1; CD81: CD81 binding loop; TMD: transmembrane domain

    Note. Figure 1A and 1B are adapted from “Quantification of the resilience and vulnerability of HIV-1 native glycan shield at atomistic detail,” by Chakraborty S, Berndsen ZT, Hengartner NW, Korber BT, Ward AB, Gnanakaran S. iScience. 2020;23:101836 (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2020.101836). CC BY; figure 1C, 1D and 1E are adapted from “Hepatitis C virus glycan-dependent interactions and the potential for novel preventative strategies,” by LeBlanc EV, Kim Y, Capicciotti CJ, Colpitts CC. Pathogens. 2021;10:685 (https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10060685). CC BY.

    Another reason for the difficulty to develop a vaccine is the presence of neotopes (or neo-antigenic sites, which do not exist in the viral protein monomers but are formed as a result of conformational changes induced in the protein by the intersubunit interactions or some other means) in the HIV-1 gp120 trimers, where they are rather common [3543]. There are several anti-HIV-1 Abs that can recognize neotopes. An illustrative example of such Abs is given by a highly strain-specific mAb 2902 Ab directed to a neotope of the Env protein [44, 45], which uses its 21-residue-long complementarity determining region (CDR) H3 loop (one of the six CDRs that form paratopes of Abs, see below) protruding from the paratope surface to recognize a neotope comprising portions of the V2 and V3 loops of the Env protein [46, 47]. Among other examples of Env neotope recognizing Abs are PG9 and PG16 mAbs, which also recognize a V2/V3 neotope and are capable of neutralization of ∼80% of primary HIV-1 isolates [40, 42, 48], with the neotope recognized by PG9 representing a β-strand and two glycans organized in a canyon-like structure, which accommodates the long CDR H3 loop of mAb PG9 [49].

    Importantly, pathogens might also contain cryptotopes or cryptic epitopes, which are potential antigenic sites hidden by surface subunits in the quaternary structure of protein complexes or within the 3D-structures, or epitopes normally existing in a low-affinity binding conformation. Such cryptotopes become displayed only after the dissociation of protein complexes or due to structural changes in a protein. An example of the cryptotope in HIV-1 is given by a capsid protein p24, for which it was shown that the affinity of an anti-p24 mAb can be dramatically increased by chemical modification of the lysine residues of rp24 with different amounts of maleic anhydride [50]. Another example of HIV-1 cryptotopes is given by the gp120 neutralization epitopes, which become exposed upon gp120-CD4 binding [51]. Despite the fact that B-cell response to neotopes and cryptotopes may be of high immunological relevance [52, 53], unfortunately, neither neotopes nor cryptotopes attracted sufficient attention from researchers. As a result, only a few cryptotopes have been identified so far on flaviviruses [54], HCV [55], HIV [51], and influenza viruses [56, 57]. Furthermore, as it was rightly pointed out [36], the utilization of structure-based design for finding or reconstructing neotopes (and, as a matter of fact, for finding or reconstructing cryptotopes) is challenging if not impossible task, as these would involve working with the highly dynamic systems, which are transiently populated and accessible only for a limited time.

    Other difficulties in the search for the HIV vaccine were attributed to the high mutation rate of this virus due to the utilization of the error-prone polymerase for replication [2628]. As a result, infected persons are characterized by a high degree of HIV genetic variability and typically contain a complex mixture of heterogeneous strains, “quasispecies” [58]. Finally, in the HIV infection, the immune response is mostly generated against the highly variable immunodominant epitopes, such as the V1, V2, and V3 loops of the envelope glycoprotein gp160, and such immune response does not provide protection against diverse HIV strains [4].

    What is completely neglected in these considerations is the potential role of intrinsic disorder and structural flexibility, which can further contribute to the ability of HIV-1 to evade the immune response by generating another level of the flexible shield in this virus. The disorder profile of the envelope glycoprotein gp160 from the HIV-1 group M subtype B (isolate HXB2) is shown in Figure 2A. This protein, after the removal of the 33-residue-long signal peptide and before the furin-mediated cleavage in the trans-Golgi to generate the surface protein gp120 (residues 1–479) and transmembrane protein gp41 (residues 480–824), exists as an 824-residue-long surface protein.

    Intrinsic disorder predisposition of HIV-1 surface glycoprotein gp160 (A) and the HCV glycoproteins E2 (B) and E1 (C). Disorder profiles are generated using the RIDAO platform designed to aggregate the results from a number of well-known disorder predictors, such as PONDR® VL3 [59], PONDR® VLXT [60], PONDR® FIT [61], PONDR® VLS2 [62], IUPred2 (Short), and IUPred2 (Long) [6365]. Dotted lines show the disordered threshold of 0.5 that separates ordered residues [predicted disorder scores (PDS) < 0.5] and intrinsically disordered residues (PDS ≥ 0.5). Based on their PDS values, ordered residues are further subdivided to highly ordered [PDS (0.15) and flexible (0.15 ≤ PDS < 0.5)]. Locations of functional regions and sites of N-glycosylation in all three proteins are shown by colored boxes and dark brown ticks. σMDP: mean disorder prediction; CD4: CD4-binding loop; IGH526: region capable of binding to the cross-neutralizing Ab IGH526; IUP2(L): IUPred2 (long); IUP2(S): IUPred2 (short); PONDR-FIT: PONDR® FIT; V1, V2, V3, V4, and V5: variable regions V1 through V5 of the gp120; VL3: PONDR® VL3; VLXT: PONDR® VLXT; VSL2B: PONDR® VSL2

    Glycoprotein gp120 contains variable regions V1 through V5 (residues 98–122, 123–160, 260–293, 348–373, and 416–426), which are the most genetically diverse regions of the entire HIV-1 genome, as well as a CD4-binding loop (residues 327–337). As shown in Figure 2A, all these functional regions of gp120 as well as the site of the gp160 cleavage by cellular furin or furin-like proteases and all N-linked glycosylation sites are located within or in the close proximity to the intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs). This indicates that intrinsic disorder is crucial for the function of gp120 and gp41. This also emphasizes that the local disorder of the polypeptide backbone, being combined with the structural flexibility of glycans, might generate a dramatic increase in the efficiency and space coverage of the resulting glycan-IDR shield. In other words, the impressive flexibility and space coverage of the glycan-only shield proposed based on the molecular dynamics simulation experiments [33] are noticeably underestimated, since the local protein flexibility and disorder were not taken into account.

    Ignoring intrinsic disorder further complicates the application of structure-based reverse vaccinology to the development of the gp120-based vaccine. It was pointed out that to generate “crystallizable” variants, various short forms of this protein are typically used instead of the full-length gp120 protein, where some disordered and/or flexible regions are removed [66]. Curiously, even these truncated forms of the gp120 core were shown to be characterized by noticeable structural variability, as between 20% and 30% of each structurally characterized gp120 core form contained some unique structural features, not seen in other forms [66]. All these observations clearly indicate that intrinsic disorder in the viral antigens should be taken into account.

    HCV

    HCV is an enveloped, single-stranded, ssRNA+ virus [67]. This member of the genus Hepacivirus in the family Flaviviridae is a small RNA virus with a 9,600-nucleotide-long genome [68] encoding polyprotein precursor of ∼3,100 amino acids, which is subsequently processed to ten HCV proteins by the action of viral and cellular proteases [69]. According to the World Health Organization (WHO) [70], HCV chronically infects 58 million people worldwide, with about 1.5 million new infections occurring per year. Furthermore, HCV continues to be a leading cause of liver-related mortality worldwide, causing 333,000, 499,000, and 704,000 deaths in 1990, 2010, and 2013, respectively [7173]. Despite serious efforts of multiple researchers worldwide, a hunt for the vaccines against this virus, which was identified in 1989 (i.e., more than 30 years ago), continues to be mostly unsuccessful. One of the major reasons why the development of an HCV vaccine has proven challenging is given by high genetic diversification of this virus. In fact, one can find seven major HCV genotypes (1–7), each differing by 30% in nucleotide sequence [74], which are further subdivided into 86 subtypes with 15% sequence variation [75]. Most vaccines aiming at raising neutralizing Abs against the HCV target its envelope glycoproteins E1 (or gp35) and E2 (or gp70), which form E1–E2 dimer in the host-derived lipid membrane of the HCV envelope. These transmembrane proteins are heavily glycosylated (see Figure 1C), and Figure 1D and 1E clearly show that the E2 glycoprotein is covered by the dense glycan shield, which makes its potential epitopes poorly accessible to the neutralizing Abs. Furthermore, a hypervariable region of the E2 protein (residues 1–27) is believed to shield the more conserved epitopes of this protein from neutralizing Abs [76]. Importantly, this hypervariable region, as well as N-linked glycosylation sites is predicted to be disordered (see Figure 2B), providing further support to the importance of the conformational flexibility for the efficiency of the glycan-IDR shield. Similarly, in the E1 glycoprotein, sites of the N-linked glycosylation and the antigenic region capable of binding to the cross-neutralizing Ab IGH526 [77] are predicted to be disordered or flexible (see Figure 2C).

    HSV

    HSV-1 and HSV-2 are enveloped viruses from the human Herpesviridae family, which have relatively large, double-stranded, linear DNA genome. This genome is encased within a capsid, contains at least 74 genes, and encodes at least 84 unique proteins [78]. HSV-1 and HSV-2 cause a prevalent sexually transmitted infection, which is manifested in orofacial cold sores, severe ocular disease and blindness, and genital ulcers. As of 2016, 13.2% and 66.6% of the global population aged 15–49 were living with HSV-2 and HSV-1 infections, respectively [79, 80]. An important feature of HSV-1 and HSV-2 shared with other alphaherpes viruses is their ability to infect neurons and establish latency in the trigeminal ganglionic and dorsal root neurons, respectively [81]. Diseases caused by HSV are incurable, difficult to prevent, and clearly require efficient HSV vaccine, which does not exist yet despite more than 60 years of research [8183].

    HSV-1 and HSV-2 entry to the host cells via fusion of the viral envelope with the host plasma membranes. Entry of the HSVs is a complex process that involves a set of 12 surface viral glycoproteins (gB, gC, gD, gE, gG, gH, gI, gJ, gK, gL, gM, and gN), with fusion alone requiring at least five proteins, gB (the sole fusogenic viral glycoprotein), gD (defines HSV entry by binding to one of its many cell surface receptors), gH/gL heterodimer (absolutely required for viral entry) [84, 85], and gK (plays accessory roles in controlling gB-mediated membrane fusion) [81, 86]. Remaining surface glycoproteins have other roles: gC is responsible for adsorption to cell-surface heparan sulfate and provides a shield against neutralizing Abs that interfere with gB-gD, gB-gH/gL, or gD-gH/gL interactions [85], the gE/gI heterodimer is required for the cell-to-cell spread of the virus [87], gG is a chemokine-binding protein found in HSV-2 only [88], gJ is located in membranes of Golgi apparatus, endoplasmic reticulum, and endosome and acts as an activator of viral protein expression and virus production and spread [89], gM is important for virion assembly and egress, interacts with gN, and controls the correct incorporation of gH/gL into virion membrane [90], whereas gN partners with gM to modulate the viral fusion machinery [91].

    Since these 12 glycoproteins are located on the surface of the viral particle and play a crucial role in viral entry, they serve attractive targets for vaccine development. In line with this idea, gD from HSV-2 was recently used in the design of a multi-epitope protein vaccine against sexually transmitted diseases caused by infection with HSV, human papillomavirus, and Chlamydia trachomatis [92]. Similarly, gE, gB, and gD from HSV-1 were used to design polyvalent subunit vaccines in a recent study that utilized reverse vaccinology and bioinformatics (note, these three candidates were selected from nine envelope glycoproteins, gM, gH, gI, gE, gB, gL, gD, gK, and gC) [93]. The same group of authors used the tools of reverse vaccinology and immunoinformatics to develop several polyvalent subunit vaccines against multiple strains of HSV-1 and HSV-2, targeting the gE, gB, and gD [94]. An obvious step in reverse vaccinology is the utilization of the antigen structure. As shown in Figures 3 and 4, all 12 surface glycoproteins are predicted to contain high levels of intrinsic disorder and based on their disorder content can be arranged as follows: gG > gN > gE > gI > gC > gL > gJ > gB > gM > gH > gD > gK, with disorder content ranging from > 70% in gG to ∼10% in gK. It is also seen that 50%, 31%, and 25% residues in gE, gB, and gD used in the aforementioned reverse vaccinology experiments are predicted as intrinsically disordered.

    Intrinsic disorder status of 12 surface glycoproteins from HSV-1. The disorder predisposition of 12 glycoproteins from human HSV-1 (strain 17) based on disorder score and percent of disordered residues. Larger values of each parameter indicate increasing disorder. Color blocks show regions in which one can find mostly ordered (blue and light blue), moderately disordered (pink and light pink), or mostly disordered (red) proteins. If the two parameters agree, the corresponding part of the background is dark (blue or pink), whereas light blue and light pink reflect areas in which only one of these criteria applies

    Intrinsic disorder status of 12 surface glycoproteins from HSV-1. Per-residue disorder profiles of the individual glycoproteins from HSV-1: (A) gG (UniProt ID: P06484); (B) gN (UniProt ID: O09800); (C) gE (UniProt ID: P04488); (D) gI (UniProt ID: P06487); (E) gC (UniProt ID: P10228); (F) gL (UniProt ID: P10185); (G) gJ (UniProt ID: P06480); (H) gB (UniProt ID: P10211); (I) gM (UniProt ID: P04288); (J) gH (UniProt ID: P06477); (K) gD (UniProt ID: Q69091); (L) gK (UniProt ID P68331)

    These observations raise a question on the robustness and validity of structures used for the reverse vaccinology based on any HSV glycoprotein. Once again, many important functional features of HSV glycoproteins and their N-glycosylation sites overlap or are located within or in close proximity to IDRs. This not only indicates the functional importance of intrinsic disorder in these proteins but emphasizes once again the potential role of intrinsic disorder in establishing a flexible glycan-IDR shield protecting potential epitopes from neutralizing Abs.

    Dynamic nature of the Ab structure

    Another side of the dynamic antigen-Ab dances is given by the highly flexible structure of Abs. Details of this structural flexibility were discussed in a recent opinion article dedicated to the analysis of the bottlenecks of the anti-HIV vaccine development [66]. Brief summary of the related considerations is presented below. Structural dynamics of the immunoglobulin G (IgG), which is an illustrative example of five different classes of Abs, IgM, IgD, IgG, IgA, and IgE that all have comparable structural organization, go well beyond the structural malleability of this Y-shaped molecule provided by the flexible linkers between the antigen-binding fragments (Fab) (arms) and the constant fragment (Fc) (stem), which by itself represents a major reason for the dearth of the resolved crystal structures of the full-length immunoglobulins. In fact, due to this high conformational flexibility of hinges connecting Fab fragments with the Fc fragment Abs exist as highly dynamic conformational ensembles and the known crystal Ab structures represent “snapshots” of these ensembles [95]. The next level of structural flexibility is given by the conformational dynamics of the Ab discontinuous “active sites”, which are formed by the 50–70 hypervariable residues containing paratopes (binding sub-sites with chemical and structural complementary to the epitopes) built from the short stretches of residues located on six CDRs [L1, L2, L3 on the light (L) chain and H1, H2, and H3 on the heavy (H) chain] [96].

    Although the antigen-binding sites of anti-protein Abs are typically relatively flat, the H3 loops located in the center of the binding sites are often extended in human Abs [95, 9799] providing them with the capability to embed into the canyons and clefts on the antigen surface [95, 100]. Furthermore, these H3 loops in human Abs are characterized by a very broad spectrum of distinctive structural features containing on average 10 times more unique conformations than the other loops, as evidenced by the comprehensive analysis of known 3D-structures of human Abs [101]. This structural polymorphism reflects highly flexible if not disordered nature of this region in solution. This hypothesis is supported by the results of the intrinsic disorder predisposition analysis of both H and L chains of a typical IgG, according to which CDRs are predicted to be either flexible or disordered (i.e., as regions with the PDS ≥ 0.5 and 0.15 ≤ PDS < 0.5, respectively) (see Figure 5).

    Intrinsic disorder predisposition of H and L chains of a typical human IgG. (A) Intrinsic disorder profile of human immunoglobulin gamma-1 H chain (UniProt ID: P0DOX5); (B) intrinsic disorder profile of human immunoglobulin gamma-1 L chain (UniProt ID: P0DOX7). Positions of CDRs in each chain are shown by colored boxes

    Furthermore, analysis of several anti-HIV Abs of human or bovine origin [66] revealed that the length of the H3 loop can vary in a very broad range, from 4 residues in a non-neutralizing HIV Ab 13H11 [protein databank (PDB) ID: 3MO1] to 16 residues in a broadly reactive and potent HIV-1 neutralizing human Ab PG9 (PDB ID: 3U1S; [49]), and to 60 residues in a potent HIV-1 bNAb NC-Cow1 (PDB ID: 6OO0; [102]) (see Figure 6A, 6B, and 6C, respectively). As shown in Figure 6C, the exceptionally long CDR H3 of the NC-Cow1 bNAb is folded into a particular structure representing a mini domain (knob) on an extended stalk [102]. This is a very important feature that allows the efficient binding of the Fab NC-Cow1 to the HIV Env trimer BG505 SOSIP, where knob on the stalk “navigates through the dense glycan shield on Env to target a small footprint on the gp120 CD4 receptor binding site with no contact of the other CDRs to the rest of the Env trimer” [102]. Furthermore, it seems that the length of a CDR H3 loop correlates with the neutralization potential of a given Ab, as bNAbs are typically characterized by the long CDR H3 loops [103, 104]. The high neutralization potential of these Abs is defined by the capability of their long CDR H3 loops to breach the dense glycan shield of HIV Env thereby ensuring the access to the protein surface of this viral glycoprotein [104, 105]. Since extra-long CDR H3 loops can protrude up to 40 Å above the tips of the other CDR loops [102], the “knob on an extended stalk” structure of an extra-long CDR H3 acts as a perfect “penetrator” capable of navigating through the glycan shield on Env. Since the CDR H3 loops of different Abs were all predicted to be flexible or disordered with the degree of disorderedness being increasing with the length of the H3 loop, it is likely that the neutralizing efficiency of bNAbs is driven by the intrinsic disorder. Therefore, it is likely that the structures reported for this region in different Abs represent snapshots of dynamic conformational ensembles, with some observed structures being stabilized (or even induced) by the Ab interaction with the antigens or by the crystal lattice. All these observations are in line with the important hypothesis that the functionality of the Abs depends on conformational flexibility and intrinsic disorder (at least of their long H3 loops). Furthermore, although many anti-HIV-1 Abs have been found to possess long CDR H3 regions [46, 106108], it is unclear at the moment how one can induce such Abs containing long CDR H3 by immunization [36].

    Structural characterization of anti-HIV Abs of human or bovine origin. (A) Non-neutralizing HIV Ab 13H11 (PDB ID: 3MO1); (B) broadly reactive and potent HIV-1 neutralizing human Ab PG9 (PDB ID: 3U1S; [49]); (C) potent HIV-1 bNAb NC-Cow1 (PDB ID: 6OO0; [102])

    Concluding remarks: fight fire with fire

    The lack of success in finding efficient vaccines for HCV, HIV, and HSV despite 30, 40, and even 60 years of research is daunting. Although HIV, HCV, and HSV belong to different viral families, they have some similarities, such as the appearance of the quaternary structure-dependent neotopes and the high glycosylation degree of their surface proteins, which are used as primary vaccine targets as they are essential to viral fusion with the cell membrane and can contribute to immune system evasion. On the other hand, HIV and HCV, being RNA viruses, are characterized by high mutation rates, whereas the evolution of HSVs (which are DNA viruses) is slow. Furthermore, the capability of HSVs to establish latency contributes to the challenges associated with the anti-HSV vaccine development, as “an effective vaccine must not only prevent active clinical disease but ideally latent infection as well” [79].

    Curiously, many of these seemingly structure-related features are in fact deeply intertwined with intrinsic disorder and structural flexibility. For example, quaternary structure, the formation of which is associated with the appearance of neotopes, is often linked to binding-induced folding, where flexible or disordered regions of protomers undergo transition to a more ordered state as a result of oligomerization or complex formation. This suggests connection of such binding-induced folding to the origin of at least some of the neotopes. Catalyzed protein posttranslational modifications in general and glycosylation in particular are frequently happening within disordered and flexible regions [48, 109]. As it was emphasized in this article, the fact that glycosylation most often happens within disordered regions can be related to the creation of a highly mobile glycan-IDR shield providing high efficiency and space coverage needed for the establishing efficient protection of viral epitopes from the neutralizing Abs. Furthermore, flexible or disorder regions are targeted by mutations more frequently than ordered domains, suggesting that disorder/flexibility plays a role in the viral evolution as well.

    All these observations and considerations bring serious doubts about the overall applicability of the rational structural vaccinology computational methods. These concerns are further elaborated and enhanced by an important fact that when the proteins interact, they often undergo mutual adaptation and induced fit/folding [36, 110112], indicating that epitopes and paratopes are fuzzy binding sites devoid of clear-cut structural boundaries [113]. As a result, the structures of the binding sites in the unbound molecules may dramatically differ from the static structures of antigen-Ab complexes used in the rational structural vaccinology [113116]. Furthermore, since neither Abs nor antigens have static rigid structures, the attempts of using rational structure-based design for the development of (at least) HIV, HCV, and HSV vaccines are rather spurious. In fact, due to the presence of intrinsic disorder and high structural flexibility, Abs and antigens are located within the passage to the dark proteome that comprises mostly disordered/flexible proteins not amenable to the traditional experimental structure determination by existing means and inaccessible to homology modeling [117]. Curiously, since antigen-binding sites of Abs are flexible/disordered themselves, it seems that the immune system follows the “if you can’t fight them join them” principle and “fights fire with fire” by utilizing intrinsic disorder/structural flexibility of Abs to overcome intrinsic disorder-based “invisibility” of viral antigens.

    These are very important considerations that cannot be ignored. We should stop playing with the motionless toys, as the reality is much more complex than static picture drawn by classic “lock-and-key” model. In fact, it is even more complex than an intricate interplay of the “flexible keys and adjustable locks”. It is time for the emergence of unstructural vaccinology, where the phenomenon of intrinsic disorder is taken into account while thinking about novel approaches for designing vaccines against “flexible” viruses that act as dynamic “shape-shifters” [28]. In other words, we need to start using experimental and computational tools designed for the analysis of disordered and flexible proteins, while looking at intrinsically disordered viral antigens and their interactions with intrinsically disordered/flexible Abs. Regrettably, despite the obvious need to move away from the rational structural vaccinology and corresponding computational and experimental methods, the transition to the unstructural or non-structure-based vaccinology is not even started yet. This is illustrated by the fact that the literature on unstructural vaccinology is non-existent. Although in PubMed, one can find almost 1,000 papers dedicated to the structural vaccinology, the search for “unstructural vaccinology” retrieved no results. The situation is not improved if “non-structure-based vaccinology” is used as a search term. Although papers containing the phrase “non-structural vaccinology” were not found in PubMed as well, there were 36 hits, when the database was searched for “non-structural AND vaccinology”. Unfortunately, all retrieved papers were dedicated to vaccinology targeting non-structural viral proteins.

    Abbreviations

    3D:

    three-dimensional

    Abs:

    antibodies

    AIDS:

    acquired immunodeficiency syndrome

    bNAbs:

    broadly neutralizing Abs

    CD4:

    CD4-binding loop

    CDR:

    complementarity determining region

    Env:

    envelope protein

    Fab:

    antigen-binding fragments

    H:

    heavy

    HCV:

    hepatitis C virus

    HIV:

    human immunodeficiency virus

    HIV-1:

    human immunodeficiency virus type 1

    HSVs:

    herpes simplex viruses

    IDRs:

    intrinsically disordered regions

    IgG:

    immunoglobulin G

    L:

    light

    mAb:

    monoclonal antibody

    PDB:

    protein databank

    PDS:

    predicted disorder scores

    Declarations

    Author contributions

    The author contributed solely to the work.

    Conflicts of interest

    The author declares that he has no conflicts of interest.

    Ethical approval

    Not applicable.

    Consent to participate

    Not applicable.

    Consent to publication

    Not applicable.

    Availability of data and materials

    Not applicable.

    Funding

    Not applicable.

    Copyright

    © The Author(s) 2022.

    References

    Masignani V, Rappuoli R, Pizza M. Reverse vaccinology: a genome-based approach for vaccine development. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2002;2:895905. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Rappuoli R. Reverse vaccinology, a genome-based approach to vaccine development. Vaccine. 2001;19:268891. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Burton DR. Antibodies, viruses and vaccines. Nat Rev Immunol. 2002;2:70613. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Rinaudo CD, Telford JL, Rappuoli R, Seib KL. Vaccinology in the genome era. J Clin Invest. 2009;119:251525. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Burton DR. Scaffolding to build a rational vaccine design strategy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107:1785960. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Krarup A, Truan D, Furmanova-Hollenstein P, Bogaert L, Bouchier P, Bisschop IJM, et al. A highly stable prefusion RSV F vaccine derived from structural analysis of the fusion mechanism. Nat Commun. 2015;6:8143. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Pallesen J, Wang N, Corbett KS, Wrapp D, Kirchdoerfer RN, Turner HL, et al. Immunogenicity and structures of a rationally designed prefusion MERS-CoV spike antigen. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017;114:E734857. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Shriver Z, Trevejo JM, Sasisekharan R. Antibody-based strategies to prevent and treat influenza. Front Immunol. 2015;6:315. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Robinson LN, Tharakaraman K, Rowley KJ, Costa VV, Chan KR, Wong YH, et al. Structure-guided design of an anti-dengue antibody directed to a non-immunodominant epitope. Cell. 2015;162:493504. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Krammer F, Palese P. Influenza virus hemagglutinin stalk-based antibodies and vaccines. Curr Opin Virol. 2013;3:52130. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Azoitei ML, Ban YEA, Julien JP, Bryson S, Schroeter A, Kalyuzhniy O, et al. Computational design of high-affinity epitope scaffolds by backbone grafting of a linear epitope. J Mol Biol. 2012;415:17592. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Azoitei ML, Correia BE, Ban YEA, Carrico C, Kalyuzhniy O, Chen L, et al. Computation-guided backbone grafting of a discontinuous motif onto a protein scaffold. Science. 2011;334:3736. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Pack SM, Peters PJ. SARS-CoV-2–specific vaccine candidates; the contribution of structural vaccinology. Vaccines (Basel). 2022;10:236. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Rappuoli R, De Gregorio E, Del Giudice G, Phogat S, Pecetta S, Pizza M, et al. Vaccinology in the post-COVID-19 era. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021;118: e2020368118. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Edmundson AB, Ely KR, Herron JN, Cheson BD. The binding of opioid peptides to the Mcg light chain dimer: flexible keys and adjustable locks. Mol Immunol. 1987;24:91535. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Luciw PA. Human immunodeficiency viruses and their replication. In: Fields BN, Knippe DM, Howley PM, editors. Field virology. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; 1996. pp. 1881952. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Li G, Piampongsant S, Faria NR, Voet A, Pineda-Peña AC, Khouri R, et al. An integrated map of HIV genome-wide variation from a population perspective. Retrovirology. 2015;12:18. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Behrens AJ, Crispin M. Structural principles controlling HIV envelope glycosylation. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2017;44:12533. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Schiller J, Chackerian B. Why HIV virions have low numbers of envelope spikes: implications for vaccine development. PLoS Pathog. 2014;10:e1004254. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Global HIV & AIDS statistics — fact sheet [Internet]. Switzerland: UNAIDS; c2022 [cited 2022 May 30]. Available from: https://www.unaids.org/en/resources/fact-sheet
    Cohen MS, Chen YQ, McCauley M, Gamble T, Hosseinipour MC, Kumarasamy N, et al.; HPTN 052 Study Team. Antiretroviral therapy for the prevention of HIV-1 transmission. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:8309. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Barré-Sinoussi F, Ross AL, Delfraissy JF. Past, present and future: 30 years of HIV research. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2013;11:87783. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Mu Z, Haynes BF, Cain DW. HIV mRNA vaccines—progress and future paths. Vaccines (Basel). 2021;9:134. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Trovato M, D’Apice L, Prisco A, De Berardinis P. HIV vaccination: a roadmap among advancements and concerns. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19:1241. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Esparza J. A brief history of the global effort to develop a preventive HIV vaccine. Vaccine. 2013;31:350218. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Ward B. Antiviral vaccines. In: Acheson NH, editor. Fundamentals of molecular virology. Hoboken: Wiley; 2007. pp. 42855.
    Goh GKM, Dunker AK, Foster JA, Uversky VN. HIV vaccine mystery and viral shell disorder. Biomolecules. 2019;9:178. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Goh GKM. Viral shapeshifters: strange behavoirs of HIV and other viruses. Singapore: Simplicity Research Institute; 2017.
    Zhou T, Xu L, Dey B, Hessell AJ, Van Ryk D, Xiang SH, et al. Structural definition of a conserved neutralization epitope on HIV-1 gp120. Nature. 2007;445:7327. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    West AP Jr, Galimidi RP, Foglesong CP, Gnanapragasam PNP, Huey-Tubman KE, Klein JS, et al. Design and expression of a dimeric form of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 antibody 2G12 with increased neutralization potency. J Virol. 2009;83:98104. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Vigerust DJ, Shepherd VL. Virus glycosylation: role in virulence and immune interactions. Trends Microbiol. 2007;15:2118. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Leonard CK, Spellman MW, Riddle L, Harris RJ, Thomas JN, Gregory TJ. Assignment of intrachain disulfide bonds and characterization of potential glycosylation sites of the type 1 recombinant human immunodeficiency virus envelope glycoprotein (gp120) expressed in Chinese hamster ovary cells. J Biol Chem. 1990;265:1037382. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Chakraborty S, Berndsen ZT, Hengartner NW, Korber BT, Ward AB, Gnanakaran S. Quantification of the resilience and vulnerability of HIV-1 native glycan shield at atomistic detail. iScience. 2020;23:101836. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    LeBlanc EV, Kim Y, Capicciotti CJ, Colpitts CC. Hepatitis C virus glycan-dependent interactions and the potential for novel preventative strategies. Pathogens. 2021;10:685. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Khattar SK, Samal S, LaBranche CC, Montefiori DC, Collins PL, Samal SK. Comparative immunogenicity of HIV-1 gp160, gp140 and gp120 expressed by live attenuated newcastle disease virus vector. PLoS One. 2013;8:e78521. Retraction in: Khattar SK, Samal S, LaBranche CC, Montefiori DC, Collins PL, Samal SK. PLoS One. 2020;15:e0244046. Erratum in: PLoS One. 2014;9. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Van Regenmortel MHV. Basic research in HIV vaccinology is hampered by reductionist thinking. Front Immunol. 2012;3:194. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Wu X, Changela A, O’Dell S, Schmidt SD, Pancera M, Yang Y, et al. Immunotypes of a quaternary site of HIV-1 vulnerability and their recognition by antibodies. J Virol. 2011;85:457885. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Pantophlet R. Antibody epitope exposure and neutralization of HIV-1. Curr Pharm Des. 2010;16:372943. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Zolla-Pazner S, Cardozo T. Structure-function relationships of HIV-1 envelope sequence-variable regions refocus vaccine design. Nat Rev Immunol. 2010;10:52735. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Pancera M, McLellan JS, Wu X, Zhu J, Changela A, Schmidt SD, et al. Crystal structure of PG16 and chimeric dissection with somatically related PG9: structure-function analysis of two quaternary-specific antibodies that effectively neutralize HIV-1. J Virol. 2010;84:8098110. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Robinson JE, Franco K, Elliott DH, Maher MJ, Reyna A, Montefiori DC, et al. Quaternary epitope specificities of anti-HIV-1 neutralizing antibodies generated in rhesus macaques infected by the simian/human immunodeficiency virus SHIVSF162P4. J Virol. 2010;84:344353. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Walker LM, Phogat SK, Chan-Hui PY, Wagner D, Phung P, Goss JL, et al. Broad and potent neutralizing antibodies from an African donor reveal a new HIV-1 vaccine target. Science. 2009;326:2859. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Broder CC, Earl PL, Long D, Abedon ST, Moss B, Doms RW. Antigenic implications of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 envelope quaternary structure: oligomer-specific and -sensitive monoclonal antibodies. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994;91:11699703. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Kimura T, Wang XH, Williams C, Zolla-Pazner S, Gorny MK. Human monoclonal antibody 2909 binds to pseudovirions expressing trimers but not monomeric HIV-1 envelope proteins. Hum Antibodies. 2009;18:3540. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Gorny MK, Stamatatos L, Volsky B, Revesz K, Williams C, Wang XH, et al. Identification of a new quaternary neutralizing epitope on human immunodeficiency virus type 1 virus particles. J Virol. 2005;79:52327. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Changela A, Wu X, Yang Y, Zhang B, Zhu J, Nardone GA, et al. Crystal structure of human antibody 2909 reveals conserved features of quaternary structure-specific antibodies that potently neutralize HIV-1. J Virol. 2011;85:252435. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Honnen WJ, Krachmarov C, Kayman SC, Gorny MK, Zolla-Pazner S, Pinter A. Type-specific epitopes targeted by monoclonal antibodies with exceptionally potent neutralizing activities for selected strains of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 map to a common region of the V2 domain of gp120 and differ only at single positions from the clade B consensus sequence. J Virol. 2007;81:142432. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Pejaver V, Hsu WL, Xin F, Dunker AK, Uversky VN, Radivojac P. The structural and functional signatures of proteins that undergo multiple events of post-translational modification. Protein Sci. 2014;23:107793. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    McLellan JS, Pancera M, Carrico C, Gorman J, Julien JP, Khayat R, et al. Structure of HIV-1 gp120 V1/V2 domain with broadly neutralizing antibody PG9. Nature. 2011;480:33643. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Ehrhard B, Misselwitz R, Welfle K, Hausdorf G, Glaser RW, Schneider-Mergener J, et al. Chemical modification of recombinant HIV-1 capsid protein p24 leads to the release of a hidden epitope prior to changes of the overall folding of the protein. Biochemistry. 1996;35:9097105. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Thali M, Moore JP, Furman C, Charles M, Ho DD, Robinson J, et al. Characterization of conserved human immunodeficiency virus type 1 gp120 neutralization epitopes exposed upon gp120-CD4 binding. J Virol. 1993;67:397888. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Van Regenmortel MHV. Structure of viral B-cell epitopes. Res Microbiol. 1990;141:74756. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Rieder FJJ, Biebl J, Kastner MT, Schneider M, Jungbauer C, Redlberger-Fritz M, et al. Microbial cryptotopes are prominent targets of B-cell immunity. Sci Rep. 2016;6:31657. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Stiasny K, Kiermayr S, Holzmann H, Heinz FX. Cryptic properties of a cluster of dominant flavivirus cross-reactive antigenic sites. J Virol. 2006;80:955768. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Sabo MC, Luca VC, Ray SC, Bukh J, Fremont DH, Diamond MS. Hepatitis C virus epitope exposure and neutralization by antibodies is affected by time and temperature. Virology. 2012;422:17484. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Ekiert DC, Bhabha G, Elsliger MA, Friesen RHE, Jongeneelen M, Throsby M, et al. Antibody recognition of a highly conserved influenza virus epitope. Science. 2009;324:24651. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Sui J, Hwang WC, Perez S, Wei G, Aird D, Chen L, et al. Structural and functional bases for broad-spectrum neutralization of avian and human influenza A viruses. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2009;16:26573. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Meyerhans A, Cheynier R, Albert J, Seth M, Kwok S, Sninsky J, et al. Temporal fluctuations in HIV quasispecies in vivo are not reflected by sequential HIV isolations. Cell. 1989;58:90110. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Peng K, Radivojac P, Vucetic S, Dunker AK, Obradovic Z. Length-dependent prediction of protein intrinsic disorder. BMC Bioinformatics. 2006;7:208. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Romero P, Obradovic Z, Li X, Garner EC, Brown CJ, Dunker AK. Sequence complexity of disordered protein. Proteins. 2001;42:3848. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Xue B, Dunbrack RL, Williams RW, Dunker AK, Uversky VN. PONDR-FIT: a meta-predictor of intrinsically disordered amino acids. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2010;1804:9961010. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Peng K, Vucetic S, Radivojac P, Brown CJ, Dunker AK, Obradovic Z. Optimizing long intrinsic disorder predictors with protein evolutionary information. J Bioinform Comput Biol. 2005;3:3560. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Dosztányi Z, Csizmok V, Tompa P, Simon I. IUPred: web server for the prediction of intrinsically unstructured regions of proteins based on estimated energy content. Bioinformatics. 2005;21:34334. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Dosztányi Z, Csizmók V, Tompa P, Simon I. The pairwise energy content estimated from amino acid composition discriminates between folded and intrinsically unstructured proteins. J Mol Biol. 2005;347:82739. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Mészáros B, Erdős G, Dosztányi Z. IUPred2A: context-dependent prediction of protein disorder as a function of redox state and protein binding. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46:W32937. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Uversky VN. On the irrationality of rational design of an HIV vaccine in light of protein intrinsic disorder. Arch Virol. 2021;166:128396. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Rosen HR. Clinical practice. Chronic hepatitis C infection. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:242938. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Ray SC, Thomas DL. Chapter 154: Hepatitis C. In: Bennett JE, Dolin R, Blaser MJ, editors. Mandell, Douglas, and Bennett’s principles and practice of infectious diseases. Philadelphia, PA: Churchill Livingstone; 2009. pp. 215786.
    Dubuisson J. Hepatitis C virus proteins. World J Gastroenterol. 2007;13:240615. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Hepatitis C [Internet]. Switzerland: WHO; c2022 [cited 2022 May 19]. Available from: https://www.who.int/en/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/hepatitis-c
    Lanini S, Easterbrook PJ, Zumla A, Ippolito G. Hepatitis C: global epidemiology and strategies for control. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2016;22:8338. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Global Burden of Disease Study 2013 Collaborators. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 301 acute and chronic diseases and injuries in 188 countries, 1990–2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet. 2015;386:743800. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Lozano R, Naghavi M, Foreman K, Lim S, Shibuya K, Aboyans V, et al. Global and regional mortality from 235 causes of death for 20 age groups in 1990 and 2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2012;380:2095128. Erratum in: Lancet. 2013;381:628. [DOI]
    Smith DB, Bukh J, Kuiken C, Muerhoff AS, Rice CM, Stapleton JT, et al. Expanded classification of hepatitis C virus into 7 genotypes and 67 subtypes: updated criteria and genotype assignment web resource. Hepatology. 2014;59:31827. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Palladino C, Ezeonwumelu IJ, Marcelino R, Briz V, Moranguinho I, Serejo F, et al. Epidemic history of hepatitis C virus genotypes and subtypes in Portugal. Sci Rep. 2018;8:12266. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology. The hunt for a vaccine for hepatitis C virus continues. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021;6:253. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Kong L, Kadam RU, Giang E, Ruwona TB, Nieusma T, Culhane JC, et al. Structure of hepatitis C virus envelope glycoprotein E1 antigenic site 314–324 in complex with antibody IGH526. J Mol Biol. 2015;427:261728. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    McGeoch DJ, Rixon FJ, Davison AJ. Topics in herpesvirus genomics and evolution. Virus Res. 2006;117:90104. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Krishnan R, Stuart PM. Developments in vaccination for herpes simplex virus. Front Microbiol. 2021;12:798927. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    James C, Harfouche M, Welton NJ, Turner KME, Abu-Raddad LJ, Gottlieb SL, et al. Herpes simplex virus: global infection prevalence and incidence estimates, 2016. Bull World Health Organ. 2020;98:31529. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Stanfield B, Kousoulas KG. Herpes simplex vaccines: prospects of live-attenuated HSV vaccines to combat genital and ocular infections. Curr Clin Microbiol Rep. 2015;2:12536. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Wijesinghe VN, Farouk IA, Zabidi NZ, Puniyamurti A, Choo WS, Lal SK. Current vaccine approaches and emerging strategies against herpes simplex virus (HSV). Expert Rev Vaccines. 2021;20:107796. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Sandgren KJ, Truong NR, Smith JB, Bertram K, Cunningham AL. Vaccines for herpes simplex: recent progress driven by viral and adjuvant immunology. Methods Mol Biol. 2020;2060:3156. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Turner A, Bruun B, Minson T, Browne H. Glycoproteins gB, gD, and gHgL of herpes simplex virus type 1 are necessary and sufficient to mediate membrane fusion in a Cos cell transfection system. J Virol. 1998;72:8735. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Arii J, Kawaguchi Y. The role of HSV glycoproteins in mediating cell entry. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2018;1045:321. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Jambunathan N, Chowdhury S, Subramanian R, Chouljenko VN, Walker JD, Kousoulas KG. Site-specific proteolytic cleavage of the amino terminus of herpes simplex virus glycoprotein K on virion particles inhibits virus entry. J Virol. 2011;85:129108. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Farnsworth A, Johnson DC. Herpes simplex virus gE/gI must accumulate in the trans-Golgi network at early times and then redistribute to cell junctions to promote cell-cell spread. J Virol. 2006;80:316779. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Görander S, Harandi AM, Lindqvist M, Bergström T, Liljeqvist JÅ. Glycoprotein G of herpes simplex virus 2 as a novel vaccine antigen for immunity to genital and neurological disease. J Virol. 2012;86:754453. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Liu Y, Guan X, Li C, Ni F, Luo S, Wang J, et al. HSV-2 glycoprotein J promotes viral protein expression and virus spread. Virology. 2018;525:8395. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Striebinger H, Funk C, Raschbichler V, Bailer SM. Subcellular trafficking and functional relationship of the HSV-1 glycoproteins N and M. Viruses. 2016;8:83. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    El Kasmi I, Lippé R. Herpes simplex virus 1 gN partners with gM to modulate the viral fusion machinery. J Virol. 2015;89:231323. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Dorosti H, Eskandari S, Zarei M, Nezafat N, Ghasemi Y. Design of a multi-epitope protein vaccine against herpes simplex virus, human papillomavirus and Chlamydia trachomatis as the main causes of sexually transmitted diseases. Infect Genet Evol. 2021;96:105136. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Sarkar B, Ullah MA. Designing novel subunit vaccines against herpes simplex virus-1 using reverse vaccinology approach. BioRxiv 901678 [Preprint]. 2020 [cited 2022, May 25]. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.01.10.901678
    Sarkar B, Ullah MA, Araf Y, Das S, Rahman MH, Moin AT. Designing novel epitope-based polyvalent vaccines against herpes simplex virus-1 and 2 exploiting the immunoinformatics approach. J Biomol Struct Dyn. 2021;39:6585605. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Saphire EO, Parren PWHI, Pantophlet R, Zwick MB, Morris GM, Rudd PM, et al. Crystal structure of a neutralizing human IgG against HIV-1: a template for vaccine design. Science. 2001;293:11559. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Goldsby RA, Kindt TJ, Osborne BA, Kuby J. Antigens. In: Goldsby RA, Osborne BA, Kuby J, Kindt TJ, Marcus DA, Punt J, editors. Kuby Immunology. New York: W. H. Freeman; 2007. pp. 5775.
    Kunert R, Rüker F, Katinger H. Molecular characterization of five neutralizing anti-HIV type 1 antibodies: identification of nonconventional D segments in the human monoclonal antibodies 2G12 and 2F5. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 1998;14:111528. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Sanna PP, Williamson RA, De Logu A, Bloom FE, Burton DR. Directed selection of recombinant human monoclonal antibodies to herpes simplex virus glycoproteins from phage display libraries. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995;92:643943. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Barbas CF III, Collet TA, Amberg W, Roben P, Binley JM, Hoekstra D, et al. Molecular profile of an antibody response to HIV-1 as probed by combinatorial libraries. J Mol Biol. 1993;230:81223. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Smith TJ, Chase ES, Schmidt TJ, Olson NH, Baker TS. Neutralizing antibody to human rhinovirus 14 penetrates the receptor-binding canyon. Nature. 1996;383:3504. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Regep C, Georges G, Shi J, Popovic B, Deane CM. The H3 loop of antibodies shows unique structural characteristics. Proteins. 2017;85:13118. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Stanfield RL, Berndsen ZT, Huang R, Sok D, Warner G, Torres JL, et al. Structural basis of broad HIV neutralization by a vaccine-induced cow antibody. Sci Adv. 2020;6:eaba0468. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Purtscher M, Trkola A, Gruber G, Buchacher A, Predl R, Steindl F, et al. A broadly neutralizing human monoclonal antibody against gp41 of human immunodeficiency virus type 1. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 1994;10:16518. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Zhou T, Xu K. Structural features of broadly neutralizing antibodies and rational design of vaccine. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2018;1075:7395. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Kong L, Lee JH, Doores KJ, Murin CD, Julien JP, McBride R, et al. Supersite of immune vulnerability on the glycosylated face of HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein gp120. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2013;20:796803. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Burke V, Williams C, Sukumaran M, Kim SS, Li H, Wang XH, et al. Structural basis of the cross-reactivity of genetically related human anti-HIV-1 mAbs: implications for design of V3-based immunogens. Structure. 2009;17:153846. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Huang CC, Tang M, Zhang MY, Majeed S, Montabana E, Stanfield RL, et al. Structure of a V3-containing HIV-1 gp120 core. Science. 2005;310:10258. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Stanfield RL, Gorny MK, Williams C, Zolla-Pazner S, Wilson IA. Structural rationale for the broad neutralization of HIV-1 by human monoclonal antibody 447-52D. Structure. 2004;12:193204. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Iakoucheva LM, Radivojac P, Brown CJ, O’Connor TR, Sikes JG, Obradovic Z, et al. The importance of intrinsic disorder for protein phosphorylation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32:103749. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Van Regenmortel MHV. Design in biology and rational design in vaccinology: a conceptual analysis. Methods. 2021;195:1207. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Van Regenmortel MHV. What does it mean to develop an HIV vaccine by rational design? Arch Virol. 2021;166:2733. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Van Regenmortel MHV. Development of a preventive HIV vaccine requires solving inverse problems which is unattainable by rational vaccine design. Front Immunol. 2018;8:2009. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Van Regenmortel MHV. From absolute to exquisite specificity. Reflections on the fuzzy nature of species, specificity and antigenic sites. J Immunol Methods. 1998;216:3748. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Kim M, Sun ZYJ, Rand KD, Shi X, Song L, Cheng Y, et al. Antibody mechanics on a membrane-bound HIV segment essential for GP41-targeted viral neutralization. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2011;18:123543. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Bosshard HR. Molecular recognition by induced fit: how fit is the concept? News Physiol Sci. 2001;16:1713. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Wilson IA, Stanfield RL. Antibody-antigen interactions: new structures and new conformational changes. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 1994;4:85767. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Kulkarni P, UverskyVN. Intrinsically disordered proteins: the dark horse of the dark proteome. Proteomics. 2018;18:e1800061. [DOI] [PubMed]