Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease that primarily affects the barrier function of the skin in patients. The condition has been documented to cause xerosis in patients from birth onwards. In order to protect the skin barrier in AD, it is of the utmost importance to moisturize the skin. Moisturizers and emollients play a pivotal role in the prevention and treatment of AD. Concordantly, the use of moisturizers and emollients can facilitate the reduction in the necessity for the application of topical treatments such as corticosteroids. An understanding of the use of moisturizers and emollients, in conjunction with an appreciation of the pathophysiology of the skin barrier, will prove invaluable in the treatment of AD.

Allergic and immunologic skin diseases are becoming increasingly common and this requires clinicians to be able to recognize and diagnose them. A joint meeting (GET TOGETHER 2022) of the Italian Society of Allergy, Asthma and Clinical Immunology (SIAAIC) and the Italian Society of Allergological, Occupational and Environmental Dermatology (SIDAPA) aimed to review the current knowledge on the differential diagnosis of contact dermatitis, atopic dermatitis, hereditary angioedema, urticaria, and cutaneous mastocytosis. The most important aspects to take into consideration when faced with a new cutaneous manifestation are the clinical features of the lesions, their distribution, age of onset, and comorbidities/aggravating factors. The document does not aim to provide an exhaustive and comprehensive description of all allergic and immunologic skin diseases. Instead, it should be a reference tool for the clinician who is faced with the onset of a new skin manifestation and its differential diagnosis.

A granulomatous vasculitis of the medium and large vessels, giant cell arteritis (GCA) is a persistent, idiopathic condition. The overlapping phenotypes of this condition include conventional cranial arteritis and extra-cranial GCA, also known as large-vessel GCA. Vascular problems linked with considerable vessel involvement may partly be caused by delayed diagnosis, emphasizing the necessity of early detection and the fast beginning of appropriate therapy. The cornerstone of treatment for GCA is glucocorticoids, but using them for an extended period has numerous, often severe, side effects. We aim to explore the most recent literature on GCA therapies to investigate the current and potential therapeutic options for induction and maintaining treatment in GCA. By now, only tocilizumab is approved for GCA treatment, but several other biological drugs may be efficient and safe for GCA patients, like abatacept, baricitinib and upadacitinib, mavrilimumab, secukinumab, ustekinumab, and anakinra.

Asthma is a common chronic inflammatory disease of the airways that affects more than 330 million people globally. Severe asthma, despite being 5–10% of the total asthmatic population presents significant morbidity and high cost due to health care utilization. The management of severe asthma has dramatically changed with the use of biologics. However, biologics have been approved only for patients with severe asthma with type-2 mediated inflammation. Eosinophils are central in the T2 inflammatory process in asthma and this stands true for the severe form of the disease as well. In this review, we discuss basic insights into the pathogenesis of severe asthma related to eosinophilic inflammation and the pivotal role of T2 cytokines which have also become along with eosinophils the target of biologics. Novel biologics such as tezepelumab have demonstrated efficacy regardless of the blood eosinophil count and have shown promise for T2 low asthma, although to a lesser degree.

Atopic dermatitis (AD) represents the most common inflammatory skin disease with a highly intricated immune fingerprint. Until recently, AD management mostly relied on topical corticosteroids, calcineurin inhibitors, and systemic immunosuppressants, with a range of safety and tolerability concerns including toxicity, drug interactions, and contraindications. With the onset of biologics, safer and more targeted therapeutics have become available, displaying various degrees of success in treating AD, but not yet able to meet all the needs of AD patients. Some of the challenges encountered included variability of responses among patients, long-term safety, and limited access due to prohibitive costs. As the pathophysiology of AD has been increasingly understood within the last years, new approaches are explored, leading to an unprecedented diversification of therapeutic options to address these hurdles. This review highlights current immunotherapeutic strategies developed towards AD, whether already in the clinical pipeline or still in preclinical exploration.

Multiple chemical sensitivity (MCS) is an unexplained acquired medical condition that includes multiple, vague, recurrent, and non-specific symptoms in different organs. They are attributed to exposures to various and structurally unrelated environmental chemicals at concentration levels that are well tolerated by the majority of people and normally considered not to have toxic effects in humans. The aim of this review is to examine the multiple explanatory hypotheses for the pathophysiology of MCS: genetic, metabolic, neurological, immunological, and psychological. Several publications suggest a neurological and immunological activation. However, this neurological and immunological hyperresponse is not always observed when performing challenge tests. This suggests that behavioral conditioning could be an important mechanism in the pathogenesis of MCS. Even if psychiatric conditions appear not to be a major cause of MCS, in the case of genuine psychiatric disease, psychotherapeutic therapy is mandatory. Because of the complexity of the pathophysiology, there is no specific drug to treat MCS. However, the use of cognitive behavioral therapy is encouraged, as it has a significant positive impact on patients’ perception of their illness.

In recent decades, atopic diseases, such as atopic dermatitis (AD), allergic asthma (AA), allergic rhinitis (AR), and food allergy (FA) have been estimated rapidly increasing in prevalence. These diseases are characterized by the presence of specific immunoglobulin E (sIgE) and often relate to each other and develop in sequence (the so-called “atopic march”). AD may be the first early manifestation in infants followed by FA often within the first year of life. Moreover, AD is a risk factor for developing sensitization to airborne allergens later in life that can cause clinical manifestations of AA and AR. According to the dual-allergen exposure hypothesis, allergic sensitization to food allergens is promoted through cutaneous exposure, rather than the oral route. Moreover, there is evidence that exposure to food allergens, in particular peanuts, in the airway would also lead to food sensitization. The most frequent route of sensitization for inhalant allergens is still debated. Of note, a recent case report supports the development of sensitization to cat dander through a cat bite. Our review aims to provide an overview of current knowledge and unmet needs in the pathophysiology of respiratory and FAs.

Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a prevalent and burdensome condition worldwide, characterized by inflammation of the paranasal sinuses. Ideally, instead of treating CRS, we would identify ways to prevent the development of this chronic condition. Occupational exposures may be an excellent target for prevention. Occupational exposures have been shown to play a critical role in the pathogenesis of multiple lower airway diseases, such as asthma, silicosis, asbestosis, and hypersensitivity pneumonitis. However, evidence for the association between occupational exposures and the development of upper airway disease, like CRS, is less well-defined. This manuscript examines the association between occupational exposures and CRS. A scoping review of the literature following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines identified 19 relevant studies. The populations examined and the methods and criteria used for defining CRS diagnosis and occupational variables significantly varied between the studies. Diagnosis of CRS was most often determined by self-reported symptoms or medical record review. Occupational variables ranged from employment status to occupation type to specific exogenous compounds encountered. Overall, substantial evidence demonstrates a general association between occupational exposures and CRS diagnosis; however, limitations in study methodologies, including variations in CRS diagnostic criteria, occupational exposures, assessment methods, and populations, hinder drawing more specific conclusions. Moving forward, rigorous research methodologies and standardized criteria are essential to draw conclusions supported by multiple studies. Critical components of future studies should include large, diverse populations, use of consensus CRS diagnostic criteria, and inclusion of many specific and quantitatively defined exposures. Ultimately, such efforts can help inform preventative measures and interventions for CRS, thus mitigating the burden of CRS on individuals and populations worldwide.

As a novel respiratory viral infection, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has influenced asthma in unpredictable ways. In the post-COVID era, there is a need to review asthma care and the new challenges and opportunities that are presented. Long COVID is a new and complex syndrome that has arisen. Treatable traits (TTs) have already been developed to address complex asthma and can be adapted to manage long COVID. Consumers are seeking more information on and answers to what to expect with a dual diagnosis of asthma and COVID-19. People with asthma identify a strong need for research into COVID and asthma. Completion of a national survey (n = 593) resulted in a list of research themes. From these, participants prioritized 10 asthma research themes. Among the top 10 asthma research priorities, the theme of COVID and asthma was ranked as the second priority in the overall rank list. Addressing these issues has the potential to improve global asthma health.

Over the last two decades, the emergence of lethal virulent strains of coronavirus (CoV), including the severe acute respiratory syndrome CoV 2 (SARS-CoV-2), which is responsible for the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, has become a matter of great attention to the scientific community. Despite the implementation of preventive measures throughout the world, the spread of this disease and associated co-morbidities and mortality continue in all countries, continents, and populations of all ages. COVID-19 is highly contagious. Clinical manifestations are diverse and range from asymptomatic, mild to severe, life-threatening complications in the elderly and patients with underlying conditions such as cardiovascular disease, diabetes, obesity, and asthma. In addition, viral infections can trigger asthma attacks. To date, there is no specific treatment schema to combat COVID-19 disease. Current patient care revolves around disease severity and supportive treatment of symptoms from home-rest in mild disease to anti-viral therapy, oxygen support, anti-inflammatories, and anti-coagulants in severe COVID-19. Regarding prevention, the World Health Organization recommends vaccination, social distancing, quarantine, the wearing of surgical masks, and handwashing. In many countries, vaccination is optional, and given that parents are often reluctant to vaccinate themselves and their children for fear of side effects, identifying ways to enhance or support the immune system to prevent infection or improve recovery in vulnerable populations is worth investigating. Furthermore, research has focused on the pharmacological management of COVID-19 symptoms and much less has been published on nutrition therapy. Therefore, the scope of this review is to summarize the latest evidence on the use of vitamin D to support the metabolism and the immune system of asthma patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. A brief overview of asthma and COVID-19 pathophysiology, COVID-19 treatment guidelines for asthma patients, and the role of vitamin D in lung health, including the optimal blood level required to enhance immunity, will be suggested.

Recent data has resulted in an interest in the metabolic shift in cellular metabolism to aerobic glycolysis, increased reactive oxygen species (ROS), and mitochondrial dysfunction associated with asthma. There has been a push to better understand the immune and metabolic changes in allergy to improve understanding of disease pathology and treatment. Aerobic glycolysis seen in epithelial cells in asthma promotes chronic inflammation and the production of inflammatory cytokines. Asthma epithelial cells share a number of features proposed in the stages of cancer initiation including aerobic glycolysis and increased apoptosis with proliferation, all within a chronic inflammatory microenvironment. Metabolic reprogramming in malignant cells has been widely investigated since the glycolytic characteristics were first described last century. It is still debated whether these metabolic changes are the cause or consequence of carcinogenesis and oncogenic cell-selective pressures. Although historic results have been conflicting, recent data has found an increased lung cancer risk in asthma patients, independent of risk factors. A review of emerging research on the metabolic changes seen in asthma helps us to propose a pathway between the initiation of aerobic glycolysis and the selective pressures of the epithelial microenvironment and resulting malignant transformation risk.

There are no plausible arguments to consider that the best evidence-based asthma treatment should be different in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). A few decades ago, the recognition of asthma as an inflammatory disease of the airways positioned the inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) as the cornerstone of the treatment of this disease, maintaining bronchodilators, especially the short-acting beta-agonists (SABA), as symptom-reliever medications for use as needed. However, adherence to regular use of ICS is very low, especially in LMICs, favoring the overuse of SABA, which has been related to an excess of exacerbations and mortality. Recently, the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) strategy has recommended the mandatory use of ICS every time a bronchodilator is used as needed (for symptoms relief), whether only as needed or with a background of regular dose of ICS, and has named it: anti-inflammatory reliever (AIR) therapy. This form of therapy, which has been related to a significant reduction of asthma exacerbations, is very attractive for LMICs where patients do not have guaranteed a proper medical follow-up and the access to on-the-counter medications is high. However, the implementation of AIR therapy in LMICs will face many of the already recognized barriers for the diagnosis and treatment of asthma in these countries, especially related to limited access to care in very different health systems, low education level of patients and communities, insufficient health personnel training in asthma in primary care, the unfordable cost of medications, and the lack of political commitment. This review analyzes some of these challenges and strategies for facing them in LMICs.

Eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases (EGIDs) are a group of chronic conditions, characterized by an excessive accumulation of eosinophils in various areas of the mucosal of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. EGIDs encompass a spectrum of diseases, including eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), eosinophilic gastritis (EoG), eosinophilic enteritis (EoN), and eosinophilic colitis (EoC), each affecting different segments of the GI tract. The pathogenesis of EGIDs is multifaceted and involves an intricate interplay between genetic predisposition, environmental triggers, and dysregulated immune responses. Although the exact etiology behind EGIDs is not fully understood, it is clear that they are immune-mediated, with eosinophils having a central role in inflammation and tissue damage of GI mucosal. Clinical manifestations depend on the organ that is affected by the disease and on the depth of the eosinophil infiltration of the bowel wall. They range from mild discomfort to severe dysphagia, abdominal pain, malnutrition, and growth failure, particularly in pediatric cases. Regarding EGID management, it is a challenging issue to achieve clinical and histologic remission using pharmacotherapy and dietary elimination. Corticosteroids and proton pump inhibitors can be selected as an effective first-line treatment for certain patients and six-food elimination diet (6-FED) has been proven effective in inducing remission. Furthermore, biologic therapies have emerged as essential tools in controlling eosinophilic-driven inflammation. This review focuses on the complex pathogenesis and treatment of these inflammatory diseases, especially EoE.