In recent years, patient engagement has emerged as a cornerstone in clinical decision-making, medical research, and health policy development, with its multifaceted value widely recognized by stakeholders across the healthcare continuum. However, digital health technologies, which are designed to enhance patient engagement, often fall short of their full potential due to developers’ limited understanding of patients’ needs and preferences. This perspective paper argues for adopting a patient-centered approach, emphasizing the critical importance of developers immersing themselves in patient communities to gain richer insights into patients’ lived experiences. Such an approach can lead to improved usability of digital health tools, enhanced user experience, and increased patient motivation, ultimately fostering more effective patient engagement in medical practice. Although challenges persist in the effective collection, analysis, and implementation of user feedback, prioritizing patient engagement remains crucial for optimizing health outcomes and enhancing the overall patient experience. By embracing this approach, developers can bridge the gap between technological innovation and patient needs, promoting more meaningful interactions and ultimately contributing to the advancement of healthcare systems and improved population health.

This narrative review aims to appraise the evidence on artificial intelligence models for early diagnosis and risk stratification of oral cancer, focusing on data modalities, methodology differences, applications in the diagnostic flow and models’ performance. Models for early diagnosis and screening provide non-invasive diagnosis without the need for specialized instruments, which is ideal for early detection as a low-cost system. Supervised learning with well-annotated data provides reliable references for training the models, and therefore, reliable and promising results. Risk prediction models can be built based on medical record data, demographic data, clinical/histopathological descriptors, highly standardized images or a combination of these. Insights on which patients have a greater chance of malignancy development or disease recurrence can aid in providing personalized care, which can improve the patient’s prognosis. Artificial intelligence models demonstrate promising results in early diagnosis and risk stratification of oral cancer.

Artificial intelligence (AI) increasingly influences biomedical scientific writing and clinical practice. The recent article by Fornalik et al. (Explor Digit Health Technol. 2024;2:235–48. doi: 10.37349/edht.2024.00024) explores AI’s capabilities, challenges, and ethical considerations in scientific communication, particularly highlighting tools like ChatGPT and Penelope.ai. This commentary aims to reflect on and expand the key themes presented by Fornalik et al. (Explor Digit Health Technol. 2024;2:235–48. doi: 10.37349/edht.2024.00024), emphasizing AI’s role in auditory healthcare, particularly in otolaryngology and auditory rehabilitation. The discussion is based on a critical review and synthesis of recent literature on AI applications in scientific writing and auditory healthcare. Key technologies such as generative AI platforms, machine learning algorithms, and mobile-based auditory training systems are highlighted. AI has shown promising results in enhancing manuscript preparation, literature synthesis, and peer review workflows. In clinical practice, adaptive AI models have improved cochlear implant programming, leading to up to 30% gains in speech perception accuracy. Mobile apps and telehealth platforms using AI have also improved listening effort, communication confidence, and access to care in remote settings. However, limitations include data privacy concerns, lack of population diversity in datasets, and the need for clinician oversight. AI presents transformative opportunities across biomedical science and healthcare. To ensure its responsible use, interdisciplinary collaboration among clinicians, researchers, ethicists, and technologists is essential. Such collaboration can help develop ethical frameworks that enhance innovation while safeguarding patient well-being and scientific integrity.

Mental healthcare in a range of countries faces challenges, including rapidly increasing demand at a time of restricted access to services, insufficient mental healthcare professionals and limited funding. This can result in long delays and late diagnosis. The use of artificial intelligence (AI) technology to help to address these shortcomings is therefore being explored in a range of countries, including the UK. The recent increase in reported studies provides an opportunity to review the potential, benefits and drawbacks of this technology. Studies have included AI-based chatbots for patients with depression and anxiety symptoms; AI-facilitated approaches, including virtual reality applications in anxiety disorders; avatar therapy for patients with psychosis; AI humanoid robot-enhanced therapy, for both children and the isolated elderly in care settings; AI animal-like robots to help patients with dementia; and digital game interventions for young people with mental health conditions. Overall, the studies showed positive effects and none reported any adverse side effects. However, the quality of the data was low, mainly due to a lack of studies, a high risk of bias and the heterogeneity of the studies. Importantly also, longer-term effects were often not evident. This suggests that translating small-scale, short-term trials into effective large-scale, longer-term real-world applications may be a particular challenge. While the use of AI in mental healthcare appears to have potential, its use also raises important ethical and privacy concerns, potential risk of bias, and the risk of unintended consequences such as over-diagnosis or unnecessary treatment of normal emotional experiences. More robust, longer-term research with larger patient populations, and clear regulatory frameworks and ethical guidelines to ensure that patients’ rights, privacy and well-being are protected, are therefore needed.