Human γδ T cells in colorectal carcinoma: friends or foes
Sections
Open Access Review
Human γδ T cells in colorectal carcinoma: friends or foes

Affiliation:

Molecular Oncology and Angiogenesis Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genoa, Italy

Email: alessandro.poggi@edu.unige.it

ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1860-430X

Alessandro Poggi
*

Explor Immunol. 2026;6:1003262 DOI: https://doi.org/10.37349/ei.2026.1003262

Received: April 10, 2026 Accepted: June 25, 2026 Published: August 09, 2026

Academic Editor: Shubhada Chiplunkar, Tata Memorial Centre, Kharghar, India

Abstract

Human γδ T cells represent a minor subset of lymphocytes present in the peripheral blood. This lymphocyte subset is mainly localized within the mucosae of airways and gut. In the latter context, γδ T cells can represent a key immune cell subset involved both in regulating intestinal homeostasis and in responding to pathogens and colorectal carcinoma (CRC) growth. γδ T cell subsets such as the Vδ2+ respond to phosphate antigens produced by bacteria, while Vδ1+ cells can exert an immune response after mucosal stress stimuli. γδ T cells do not recognize as classical αβ+ T cells the peptide antigens in the context of major histocompatibility complex (MHC). γδ T cells may play a complementary role with αβ+ T cells in mucosal immunity at the gastrointestinal barrier. Colon γδ T cells can exhibit antitumor properties and regulatory functions. Indeed, human γδ T cell subsets present in the gut bear some activatory receptors, such as NKG2D and DNAX Accessory Molecule (DNAM)-1, leading to the elimination of CRC cells. By contrast, γδ T cells producing interleukin (IL)-17, transforming growth factor β, and amphiregulin show pro-tumor activity. This dual property of γδ T cells poses challenges for their use as an immunotherapeutic tool, while the MHC-independent recognition of antigens can support their use as off-the-shelf allogeneic cells.

Keywords

gamma delta T cells 1, tumor microenvironment 2, inhibitory and activatory receptors 3, colorectal carcinomas 4, organoids 5, immunotherapy 6

Introduction

The molecular features of the T cell receptor (TCR) of γδ T cells were identified in the mid-1980s (roughly 1984–1987) by several investigators, before the identification of lymphocytes bearing this TCR [14]. These peripheral blood lymphocytes expressing a putative alternative TCR lacked CD4 and CD8 molecules. This discovery suggested that γδ T cells could exhibit diverse antigen-recognition capabilities independently of the co-stimulatory function of CD4+ and CD8+ accessory molecules. Currently, γδ T cells are considered a key lymphocyte subset that is highly abundant in the airways, gastrointestinal mucosa, and skin [57]. This localization clearly indicates the role of γδ T cells in patrolling interfaces between the host and infectious agents, such as bacteria and viruses [57]. It is well established that γδ T cells exhibit characteristics of both innate and adaptive immunity [8]. Indeed, they express many receptors that sense pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) and danger-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) and are involved in innate immune activation, as well as a TCR that recognizes non-peptide antigens in an MHC-independent manner [8]. Indeed, γδ T cells can recognize phosphoantigen (pAg) such as (E)-4-hydroxy-3-methyl-but-2-enyl pyrophosphate (HMB-PP), isopentenyl pyrophosphate (IPP), heat shock protein (Hsp), and lipid antigens presented in the context of CD1d molecules [8].

Peripheral blood-derived γδ T cells are usually subdivided into Vδ1 and Vδ2 subsets (Figure 1) that can show migratory properties leading to their localization in mucosal tissues and skin [4, 5]. Furthermore, γδ T cells express numerous natural killer (NK) human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class I receptors [9]. These receptors recognize certain HLA-I allele subgroups on healthy and tumor cells and can deliver a negative signal that inhibits γδ T cell activation [9, 10]. The specific localization as intraepithelial cells within the gastrointestinal mucosa suggests a key role for γδ T cells in responding to tumor cell growth in this region [7, 8, 11]. Furthermore, the potential use of γδ T cells as effectors for adoptive immunotherapies has been initially considered in some ongoing clinical trials. Herein, we summarize and discuss recent advances in characterizing γδ T cells in colorectal carcinoma (CRC), and their current and future use as immunotherapeutic tools to address the most aggressive tumors.

Peripheral blood γδ T cell subsets with putative roles in the control of CRC cell growth. Human peripheral blood γδ T cell subsets can be identified because of the expression of specific Vδ chains as Vδ1 (the minority) or Vδ2 (the majority) T cells. It appears that γδ T cell subsets are localized mainly in different tissues, and they may be recruited from the peripheral blood using different adhesion molecules and molecular mechanisms to cross the endothelium and penetrate the tissue matrix. Several chemokines and adhesion molecules are involved in the homing and recirculation of γδ T cells. Importantly, the Vδ1 T cells can respond with TCR to antigens such as heat shock protein (Hsp) or lipids expressed in the context of the CD1 molecule on tumor cells and through NKG2D interacting with the NKG2DL overexpressed by stress stimuli on CRC cells. On the other hand, the Vδ2 T cells respond to small antigen pyrophosphate (pAgs) presented by tumor cells in association with butyrophilin (BTN) molecules. The pAgs can derive from commensal bacteria or from the mevalonate pathway. Note that Vδ2 T cells can respond, like Vδ1, to NKG2DL, but Vδ1 T cells do not respond to pAgs. CRC: colorectal carcinoma; APC: antigen presenting cell. Several other molecules are involved in γδ T cells-tumor cells cross-talk (see next chapters of this review).

γδ T cells in healthy gastrointestinal mucosa

γδ T cells are present in the small and large gastrointestinal tracts [1015], and they interact with gut microbiota at different anatomical sites, such as the epithelial layer, lamina propria, and Peyer’s patches [15]. The most important feature of gut γδ T cells is the expression of the CD8αα homodimer, in contrast to the absence of CD4 and CD8 in peripheral blood γδ T cells. This suggests that γδ T cells present in the gut may respond to microbiota antigens using the CD8 accessory molecules, thereby maintaining gut homeostasis [1520]. In mice, gut γδ T cells are predominantly Vγ5 TCRs, whereas in humans they are Vδ1Vγ2+ TCRs [2123]. It has been shown that γδ intraepithelial lymphocyte (IEL) can release antimicrobial agents such as interferon (IFN)-γ upon cross-talk with intestinal epithelium. These γδ-IEL can protect epithelial cells from invasion by resident bacteria, particularly during initial interactions with microorganisms, suggesting that γδ-IEL are a key component of maintaining intestinal microbiota homeostasis. The key biological significance of γδ-IEL and αβ-IEL has been shown in mice. The localization of murine Vγ5 T cells is associated with the expression of CCR9 and integrin αEβ7, the CCR9 ligand CCL25, and E-cadherin, which is expressed by epithelial cells, thereby favoring their localization in the gut and differentiation in lymphoid tissues [2430]. Importantly, the integrin αE expression is regulated by transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β) and RUNT related transcription factor 3 (RUNX3) [24, 25]. The use of antibodies against α4β7 or mucosal addressin cell adhesion molecule (MAdCAM)-1, or β7-deficient mice, strongly proposes that the homeostatic recruitment of lymphocytes to the gut epithelium is strictly linked to β7 integrins. Indeed, the development of the gut-associated lymphoid tissue (GALT) is impaired in mouse models of β7–/– lymphocytes. This indicates that the absence of this integrin limits lymphocyte extravasation and localization in gut tissues, such as the lamina propria and IEL [2633]. Importantly, αEβ7 improves the retention of effector and memory lymphocytes within epithelial cells and interacts with E-cadherin and mucosal dendritic cells (DCs) [33] similarly to the integrin alpha4beta7 [34, 35]. It is of note that mucosal gut DCs can express retinal dehydrogenase (RALDH) involved in the metabolism of retinoic acid (RA). RA deficiency in mice can reduce α4β7 integrin expression on effector cells. In contrast, this deficiency does not affect the expression of E-selectin or L- or P-selectin ligands on effector cells, nor does it influence skin tropism [34]. Furthermore, the pharmacological inhibition of RALDH with citral and the RA receptor antagonist LE135 can impact the gut-tropism of lymphocytes [34]. In addition, it has been reported that only a subset of murine and human DCs expresses the enzymes (RDH10 and RALDH2) and the cellular transporter (CRABP2) required for all-trans RA (ATRA) to elicit an effective signal. Furthermore, this molecular mechanism appears to be regulated by the fatty acid-sensing nuclear receptor peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPARγ) [35]. Altogether, these findings strongly support the idea that IELs are localized and retained within the gut mucosa by a complex network of adhesion molecules and soluble factors dependent on the presence of hormones such as RA. Pharmacological regulation of RA-mediated signaling may modulate the number and function of effector T cells and, consequently, the extent and nature of a mucosal immune response.

Tissue-resident immune cells, including γδ T cells, have evolved phenotypic and functional features that enable stable tissue residence without recirculation [36]. Some of these cells differentiate within the tissue from immature precursors; for example, γδ T cells mature in the tissue without passing through the thymus for MHC-related selection. However, the definitive contribution of extrathymic IEL development remains controversial [3638]. The γδ T cells expressing chemokine receptors for epithelial-derived chemokines, such as CCL20 and CXCL16, can migrate to mucosal tissues [3941]. In addition, some cytokines favor the localization and retention within intestinal tissue. The role of transforming growth factor (TGF)-β in regulating integrin expression has already been mentioned [24, 25]. Moreover, interleukin (IL)-7 and IL-15 contribute to the differentiation, survival, and functional maturation of γδ T cells in the intestinal tract [15, 40, 41]. IL-15 can be expressed on the cell surface of intestinal epithelial cells (IECs) and lamina propria DCs. The presentation of IL-15 by IECs to γδ T cells is essential for the migration and localization of this lymphocyte subset in the intestine, as demonstrated in both in vitro and in vivo experiments [16]. Similarly, IL-7 administration in adult C57BL/6J mice significantly affected IEL phenotype and function, and close interaction between IEL and IEC is associated with IL-7 expression in IEC [42]. Involved in the location of γδ T cells in the intestine are also the aryl hydrocarbon receptors (AhRs) and orphan G-protein coupled receptors GPR18 and GPR55 [4345]. The AhR is a transcription factor that is a sensor of xenobiotic chemicals, such as aromatic compounds, influencing enzymes involved in their metabolism [45]. In detail, AhR deficiency or the absence of AhR ligands impacts IEL maintenance and the composition and load of the microbiota. This favors the increase of immune activation, dominated by a Th1 pro-inflammatory response, leading to damage to intestinal epithelial cells. Importantly, the absence of AhR does not impact the number of general lymphoid populations or their ability to develop, home to their target organ, or proliferate. However, in IELs without AhR, mice lacking one or both AhR alleles are no longer localized to the intestine; instead, they migrate away (more than 95% of γδ T cells were absent from the intestine). The AhR ligands are derived from cruciferous vegetables. Typically, AhR expression was higher in TCR Vγ5 skin and in TCR Vγ7 intestinal γδ T cells, respectively. Consistent with the reduction of IELs in AhR-deficient mice, intestinal epithelial turnover was reduced compared with that of control mice. The adoptive transfer of AhR+ γδ T cells into AhR-deficient mice induced EC proliferation, suggesting a direct link and interaction between γδ T cells and IECs.

Furthermore, the absence of AhR IEL was associated with reduced expression of granzymes, C-type lectins, and matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-7, possibly indicating diminished control of the intestinal microbial load in mice with reduced or absent AhR activity. Thus, AhRs regulating the cytochrome P450 further influence the immune response to external stimuli [45]. How AhR-mediated signals maintain IELs at epithelial sites is currently unknown and is the subject of further investigation.

Human γδ T cells in CRC

The presence of γδ T cells in the gastrointestinal tract should be considered when looking at homeostatic maintenance, pro-inflammatory diseases, and neoplastic transformation. Thus, the biological role of γδ T cells in the gut should be analyzed keeping in mind that this lymphocyte cell population shares several features with innate and adaptive immune cells, as already mentioned [15, 30, 41]. Herein, we will focus our attention on the γδ T cells present in CRC, while the role and significance of γδ T cells in inflammatory bowel diseases have been reviewed elsewhere [46, 47].

Phenotype and function of γδ T cells in CRC

The detailed analysis of the phenotypic and functional characterization of γδ T cells present in CRC can provide a scenario to understand the biological significance of this lymphocyte subset in this disease. This analysis can be performed by immunohistochemistry (IHC), flow cytometry, and molecular single-cell mRNA techniques [11, 4854]. The cross-talk of γδ T cells with the diverse components of the tumor microenvironment (TME) is the context in which the engagement of specific receptors on γδ T cells may lead to pro-tumor and anti-tumor effects [5255]. Schematically, the γδ T cells producing IL-17 represent the main subset with pro-tumor effects, while γδ T cells have an antitumor effect through tumor cell elimination [5658]. This last effect is mediated by the release of perforins and granzymes, surface and soluble death receptors such as Fas and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL), and triggering of antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) [30, 39, 41, 59]. IL-17-producing γδ T cells are usually Vδ1, whereas killing properties are shared by both Vδ1 and Vδ2 T cells [30, 39, 41, 59]. However, this skewed subdivision is instrumental in trying to understand the complex interactions between the TME and the immune system. IL-17 is a pleiotropic cytokine that has pro-inflammatory effects linking the innate and the adaptive immune response, favoring the recruitment of neutrophils, and its dysregulation can provoke some autoimmune diseases [57]. In principle, the triggering of autoimmunity should be considered as a positive event in the context of a tumor [60, 61]. Indeed, the anti-tumor therapy with the so-called immune checkpoint blockers (ICB) can induce the exacerbation or appearance of autoimmune reactivity and diseases as an undesired side effect in association with an optimal antitumor response [62, 63]. It has been demonstrated that Vδ1 T cells can recruit myeloid cells in the tumor [58]. These cells can differentiate in the TME as myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), inhibiting the activation of CD8+ T cells through many inhibitory mechanisms, such as arginase 1 (ARG-1) and indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) [64, 65]. Notably, IDO expression is triggered by pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IFN-γ [66, 67]. On the other hand, IFN-γ can increase the expression in tumor cells and tumor-associated fibroblasts/mesenchymal cells of the programmed cell death protein ligand 1 (PD-L1) ligand of programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) [6870]. The interaction between the PD-1 on cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) and PD-L1 present on the TME leads to further inhibition of CD8+ T cell antitumor activity. In conclusion, the IL-17 produced by Vδ1 T cells can strongly impair the adaptive response against tumors [58].

Although reported in breast adenocarcinoma and prostate cancer, instead of CRC, tumor-infiltrating Vδ1 T cells exerted a potent suppressor function on DC maturation and function controlled by the TLR8 signaling pathway. Indeed, the use of Poly-G3 and ssRNA40 as ligands for TLR8 expressed on Vδ1 reversed their suppressive functions. These findings suggest that innate ligands can shape the suppression activity of Vδ1, further complicating the cross-talk among the different components of the TME [71].

Rodin and coworkers [51] used mass and flow cytometry, mRNA quantification, and TCR sequencing to show that the composition of γδ T cells in the macroscopically healthy and CRC mucosa is heterogeneous among patients, and it is composed of Vδ1, Vδ2, and non-Vδ1-Vδ2 γδ T cells. This double-negative cell population expresses mainly the Vδ3 gene and minority Vδ4, Vδ5, Vδ7, and Vδ8 TCR genes [51]. Vδ2 T cells paired with Vγ9 mainly, although some Vδ2 T cells were Vγ9 negative. Overall, this analysis of TCR repertoire indicates a wide variety of γδ T cells in the CRC among the diverse patients. The key feature in CRC, compared to healthy colon mucosa, is the detection of an increase in non-Vδ1-Vδ2 T cells expressing Vδ3. However, in the relatively small group of patients analyzed (n = 49), there was no statistically significant correlation between the proportion of non-Vδ1-Vδ2 cells and microsatellite status, grade of differentiation, stage, location (right vs. left-sided), or patient age.

The mass spectrometry analysis indicated that peripheral blood and CRC mucosa γδ T cells formed distinct clusters. Furthermore, Vδ1 and Vδ2 cells express markers associated with cytotoxic effector functions. On the other hand, the non-Vδ1-Vδ2 cells appeared to express genes for proteins with tumor-promoting functions, such as neutrophil-recruiting chemokines, Galectin 3, and transforming growth factor-beta [51]. Importantly, the functional analysis of non-Vδ1-Vδ2 cells (mainly Vδ3) indicated that these cells express lower levels of IFN-γ and TNF than Vδ2 cells. Furthermore, IL-17 was expressed in non-Vδ1-Vδ2 cells in line with what was reported by other authors [72] and in murine systems [54, 73]. Altogether, these findings suggest that subsets of γδ T cells may play different roles in the CRC TME. It should also be noted that the number of γδ T cells present in the CRC mucosa is limited compared to other T cells, such as CD4+ Th17 [74]. This finding would indicate that CD4+ Th17 may have a preeminent role in pro-tumor effects compared to γδ T cells expressing IL-17. Importantly, the intraepithelial, but not stromal, localization of IL-17-producing CD4+ T cells positively correlated with improved survival [74]. Furthermore, IL-17 may trigger CRC angiogenesis [75]. On the other hand, IL-17 may recruit cytotoxic CD8+ T lymphocytes into the tumor [74, 76]. These findings indicate that it is not correct to assign a specific pro- or anti-tumor activity to IL-17. IL-17-producing cells may show different effects on the growth of CRC tumors depending on their localization, frequency, and intrinsic features.

It has been reported in CRC that high levels of the TRDV1 gene were not associated with a positive prognosis. Furthermore, gene expression correlation indicated that γδ T cells were more closely related to NK and innate lymphoid cells (ILCs) than CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. The Vδ1 T cells expressed low levels of some inhibitory receptors, such as PD-1, LAG-3, and T-cell immunoglobulin and mucin-domain containing-3 (TIM-3), but were positive for T cell immunoreceptor with Ig and ITIM domains (TIGIT) [72]. Importantly, the Vδ1 T cells in CRC can produce IFN-γ or amphiregulin (AREG). AREG is an EGF-family ligand that plays a key role in epithelial cell proliferation, differentiation, and tissue regeneration via the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)/mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathway. This factor was found to be associated with microsatellite stability (MSS) compared to microsatellite instability (MSI) and the consensus molecular subtype 2 (CMS2) of CRC or a wound-healing phenotype of CRC. It is of note that γδ T cells were the only leukocyte population increasing the expression of AREG in CRC compared to healthy tissue. In addition, the AREG produced by Vδ1 T cells can trigger the proliferation of the two CRC cell lines SW480 and HCT116, as well as migration in a wound healing assay. These effects were inhibited with the anti-EGFR antibody cetuximab (Cet), which in turn blocks the interaction of AREG with the EGFR. It is of note that some Vδ1 T cells present in CRC can produce both AREG and IFN-γ or IFN-γ only. This would suggest that Vδ1 in the TME can show pro- and/or anti-tumor features. It is of note that the use of IL-15 can downregulate the production of AREG, increasing that of IFN-γ by Vδ1 T cells, while IL-1β is a potent stimulator for AREG production. These findings indicated that the cultivation of tumor-infiltrating and peripheral blood Vδ1 T cells with some specific cytokines can skew the type of Vδ1 T cells. Indeed, the possible use of Vδ1 T cells for antitumor therapy should avoid the presence of Vδ1 T cells producing AREG and favoring the growth of the tumor, and this can be accomplished with cultivation in IL-15 [72]. These considerations may explain the heterogeneity of function of Vδ1 T cells in CRC and highlight the role of the cytokine microenvironment in determining the properties of infiltrating cells. In the cohort of CRC analyzed, the Vδ2 T cells were reduced in CRC mucosa compared to the healthy one, and some of them can produce AREG, although the majority produced IFN-γ and a minority both AREG and IFN-γ. This would suggest that Vδ2 T cells may produce AREG, and this property should be considered for adoptive immunotherapy.

However, not all reports are in line with the apparent role as suppressor/pro-tumor cells of Vδ1 T cells. Indeed, the expression of the activating receptor NKp46 identified the largest fraction of IEL subset [77]. Importantly, the gut tropism and the ontogeny of these cells are linked to the ontogeny and gut-tropism of NKp46+ Vδ1 IELs depends on gut-environmental factors and some specific features. Low frequencies of the NKp46+ Vδ1 T cells in healthy gut specimens of patients affected by CRC were associated with faster tumor progression and development of metastatic diseases. These contrasting results with the other reports above can be explained by the different technical approaches, reagents, and gene or protein level to analyze the IL-17+ T cells as well as the intra- and inter-donor heterogeneity (IDH) of CRC tumors.

Besides Vδ1 T cells, the Vδ2 T cells have been described as important anti-CRC effector cells associated with a better prognosis in MSI CRC [78, 79]. Indeed, using a deconvoluted CIBERSORT matrix to investigate the abundance of Vγ9Vδ2 T cells, it has been reported that CRC with a high infiltration of this cell subset had better survival than those with a low infiltration. Importantly, it appears that a better overall survival (OS) was also associated with αβ T cells. In this case, a clear enrichment in gene sets for “response to IFN-α”, “inflammatory response”, “antigen processing and presentation”, “T cell activation”, and “cytolytic activity” was found with αβ T cells but not with γδ T cells. These findings suggest that the infiltration with either αβ or γδ T cells can always lead to a better anti-CRC response, but in a different immunological context.

Looking at what is described in this review regarding Vδ1, Vδ2, non-Vδ1-Vδ2, and Vδ3 lymphocytes, it appears that some subsets of CRC mucosa γδ T cells may have protumor and antitumor effects (Figure 2).

γδ T cell subsets and their putative roles in the CRC tumor microenvironment (TME). Human γδ T cell subsets present in the gut can be identified because of the expression of specific Vδ chains of the γδ TCR, including Vδ1, Vδ2, Vδ3, and non-Vδ1/Vδ2. It appears that γδ T cell subsets are localized mainly in different anatomical sites such as intraepithelial cells, lamina propria cells, and lymphocytes associated with lymphoid aggregates. γδ T cells may also be recruited from the peripheral blood, as shown in Figure 1. A. Vδ1 and Vδ2 colon resident T cells can show potent antitumor properties by killing CRC cells and producing pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IFN-γ and TNF-α. B. On the other hand, resident Vδ1, Vδ3, and non-Vδ1/Vδ2 T cells can produce TGF-β, IL-17, and amphiregulin (AREG). These cytokines exert various pro-tumor effects. Indeed, TGF-β is a potent immunosuppressor of antitumor immune response; IL-17 can recruit myeloid cells into the tumor, and this event favors their differentiation into myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs). AREG is a ligand of the epidermal growth factor receptor, leading to proliferation of CRC. C. The subsets of γδ T cells can exert their anti-tumor or pro-tumor effects depending on the TME composition and the molecular/phenotypic features of CRC cells. Typically, some subgroups of microsatellite stability (MSS) CRC show an immunosuppressive milieu composed of MDSCs, tumor-associated fibroblasts (TAFs) or mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC), regulatory T cells (Treg), and immunosuppressive cytokines. This TME favors the presence of γδ T cells producing IL-17 and other immunosuppressive factors, leading to tumor escape. The presence of BTN and pAgs on CRC can stimulate the response of Vδ2 T cells. Microsatellite instability (MSI) CRC can show a greater immune infiltration than MSS, together with a less immunosuppressive TME. This can favor the antitumor immune response. Furthermore, some mutations of oncogenes such as Kras and Braf or oncosuppressor genes such as p53 can influence CRC proliferation. The therapeutic approach is different depending on the presence of WT or mutated EGFR-mediated biochemical pathways. Overall, γδ T cells can play opposite roles in CRC only partially related to the expression of a specific TCR Vδ chain.

The pro-tumor effects are associated with IL-17 expression in mucosal Vδ1/Vδ3 T cells, while anti-tumor effects are associated with Vδ2 T cells. This clear-cut subdivision is challenged by what has been recently reported by Ran and colleagues [49]. These authors analyzed nine published gene datasets of single-cell RNA from 18,483 γδ T cells out of 951,785 total cells from the neoplastic or adjacent healthy tissue of 165 human CRCs. The bioinformatics analysis revealed that γδ T cells overall exhibited a cytotoxic-related transcriptional pattern in both CRC and healthy mucosa. Unexpectedly, none of the γδ T cell clusters showed an IL-17-related pattern, including master transcription factor RAR-related orphan receptor gamma (RORC), IL-23R, CCR6, and MAF, suggesting the inability to produce IL-17. Different subsets of γδ T cells could be defined as effector, tissue-resident memory, progenitor exhausted, and exhausted cells, and the authors noted an increased expression of cytotoxic molecules [49]. To identify γδ T cells from unsorted whole tissue, the combination of CD3D, CD3E, CD3G, CD247, and TRDC was considered as the minimal set of markers to be applied [49]. Overall, these findings propose that datasets from mice or humans may differ in their typical features for identifying specific T cell subsets or that the purity of selected lymphocyte subsets may be insufficient for single-cell analysis, potentially yielding misleading results [49, 80].

Notably, γδ T cells infiltrating different types of tumors do not show the exhausted functional behavior typical of CD8+ TCR αβ T cells, although they express several immune checkpoint molecules [81, 82]. Furthermore, it is to be noted that there are many possible explanations for these inconsistent findings. Firstly, the methods of detecting IL-17-producing cells may have different sensitivities, as well as detecting a different step for showing the relevance of IL-17. Typically, single-cell RNA sequencing (sc-RNA-seq) can detect tiny cell subsets comprised in the whole cell population analyzed, as in the case of γδ T cells. The mRNA presence does not mean the protein presence, and on the other hand, the antibodies used in IHC and flow cytometry (FC) can lack the good avidity and affinity for the low amount of IL-17 present in the CRC TME. The isolation procedures to analyze either sc-mRNA or IHC/FC can select some subsets of a given population, thus leading to misinterpretation of data. Finally, the huge amount of data coming from omics analyses needs well-established and controlled pipelines. To avoid any misleading message, it would be necessary to validate each other’s data obtained with advanced molecular or more classical protein-based approaches.

Table 1 is a summary of the main features of γδ T cells in healthy colon and CRC both in mice and humans, to point out the experimental model and the major differences among γδ T cells in these two species.

 Main features of γδ T cells in humans and mice with pro- or anti-tumor activity.

γδ T cell populationSpeciesModel studyMain featuresMolecules on lymphocytesMolecules/Factors on epithelial cellsRef.
Vγ5MouseHealthy colon β7–/– mice mAb to α4β7 or MAdCAM-1 RALDH deficiencyImpaired localizationCCR9, αEβ7CCL25, E-cadherin[24, 25]
γδ T cells
Vγ7+
MouseHealthy colon, AhR deficient allelesImpaired localizationGranzymes, C-type lectins, GPR18, GPR55IL-7, IL-15, MMP-7[4345]
non-Vδ1-Vδ2
Vγ7
Vγ6
Mouse/HumanSuppressor antitumor cellsCD8α+ PD-1[54, 73]
Vδ1Vγ2+
Vδ1
HumanCRC, FC, IHCIL-17 producer, MDSC recruitmentARG1–2, IDO[48, 50, 5255]
Vδ1 in breast and prostate cancersHumanFC, regulatory activity in vitro and in vivo NOD SCID miceSuppressor cells
IKKα, IKKβ mediated
TLR11, TLR7, TLR8, MyD88TLR8L Poly-G3
ssRNA40
Reversed suppression
[71]
Vδ1HumanCRC, healthy mucosa, FC, TCR seq, IHC, functional in vitro experimentsPotent cytotoxic cells
IFN-γ
NKp46+ NKp44+ NKp30+ NKG2C+
NKG2D CD8α+ CD56 CD16low
Ligands for activatory receptors
IL-2
IL-15
[78]
non-Vδ1-Vδ2
Vδ1, Vδ4
Vδ5, Vδ7
Vδ8
HumanHumanized CRC, MS, FC, TCR seqTGF-β, Galectin 3, AREGLow production of IFN-γNo correlation with stage, MSS or MSI[51, 72]

AhR: aryl hydrocarbon receptor; αEβ7: integrin αE integrin β7; ARG1–2: arginase 1, 2; CCL25: chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 25; CCR9: CC chemokine receptor type 9; FC: flow cytometry; GPR18: G-protein coupled receptor 18; GPR55: G-protein coupled receptor 55; IDO: indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase; IHC: immunohistochemistry; IKKα: inhibitor of nuclear factor-κB (IκB) kinase α; IKKβ: inhibitor of nuclear factor-κB (IκB) kinase β; MAdCAM: mucosal addressin cell adhesion molecule; MDSC: myeloid derived suppressor cells; MMP-7: matrix metalloproteinase 7; MS: mass spectrometry; MSI: microsatellite instability; MSS: microsatellite stability; Poly-G3: a guanosine-rich, phosphorothioate-modified oligodeoxynucleotide; NOD-SCID: non obese diabetic severe combined immunodeficiency; RALDH: retinal dehydrogenase; ssRNA40: GU-rich single-stranded RNA; TCR-seq: T cell receptor sequencing; TGF: transforming growth factor; TLR8L: toll-like receptor 8 ligand.

Human γδ T cells in peripheral blood as a potential effector against CRC

Immunotherapy of cancer is characterized by the attempt to trigger the immune response of the patient against the tumor cells and the TME [8183]. A possible advantage of using γδ T cells for immunotherapy is the ability of this cell population to recognize tumor cells independently of the presence of HLA-I antigens [84, 85]. Importantly, it should be pointed out in evidence that γδ T cells can express several HLA-I receptors typical of innate cells, such as NK cells [8689]. The mainstream opinion on this point is that γδ T cells express inhibitory receptors for HLA-I, such as killer-cell immunoglobulin-like receptor (KIR) and C-type lectin inhibitory receptor (CLIR) [8689]. These receptors linking the corresponding HLA-I antigen allele expressed on self-cells, should deliver, in principle, an inhibitory signal that can impair the activating signals delivered through the activating receptors of γδ T cells [86, 89]. To clarify this scenario better, it is necessary to describe in detail the features of both inhibitory and activating receptors on γδ T cells [9092]. In addition, it is conceivable that suitable numbers of γδ T cells can be obtained by culturing peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) [10, 30, 40, 93].

Inhibitory and activating receptors of γδ T cells potentially relevant in CRC

The frequency of γδ T cells is usually low in the PBMC, ranging from 1–10% roughly. The two main subsets in humans are represented by Vδ2 (the majority) and Vδ1 T cells (the minority). To generate a good enough number of γδ T cells from PBMC, it is necessary to expand them using appropriate culture conditions [94, 95]. Ideally, the use of an antigen could be a better means to achieve this aim. It is unclear whether γδ T cells can respond to specific polymorphic antigens; at least they do not respond to classical antigen peptides presented by antigen presenting cells (APCs) as αβ T cells [30, 41, 96, 97]. The γδ T cells recognize monomorphic molecules that function as the superantigens for some groups of αβ T cells [98, 99]. Among the molecules recognized by the TCR of γδ T cells are microbial metabolites such as HMB-PP, isoprenoid precursors such as IPP or dimethylallyl pyrophosphate (DMAPP), Hsps (Hsp60 in humans and Hsp65 in mice, Hsp70, and Hsp90), and lipid antigens presented in the context of CD1d molecules [100109] and other specific molecules among which EphA2 [97, 110117] (Table 2).

 Antigens recognized by human γδ T cells and main molecules involved in CRC cell-γδ T cell interaction.

Localizationγδ TCR main activatory moleculesTCR ligandMain molecules involved in presentation/activationPutative molecules involved in inhibition
BloodVγ9Vδ2
NKG2D
DNAM-1
HMB-PP, IPP, DMAPP TGM1
hMSH2
BTN2A1, BTN3A1 MR1 MICA/MICB ULBP1-6PD-1 TIGIT
TIM-3
BloodVδ1 NKG2D
DNAM-1
Hsp lipidsCD1a, b, d
MICA/MICB ULBP1-6
PD-1 TIGIT
TIM-3
IntraepithelialVγ4Vδ1 NKG2D
DNAM-1
BTNL3, BTNL8MICA/MICB ULBP1-6PD-1 TIGIT
TIM-3
Lamina propriaVδ1 Vγ9Vδ2
NKG2D
DNAM-1
Hsp
Lipids
pAg
IL23 MICA/MICB
ULBP1-6
PD-1 TIGIT
TIM-3
Tumors, CRC, medulloblastoma
Tissue resident
Vγ9Vδ1EphA2MICA/MICB ULBP1-6PD-1 TIGIT
TIM-3
Tumors
Tissue resident
Vγ8Vδ3
Non-Vγ9Vδ2
MR1
Annexin A2
PD-1 TIGIT
TIM3
Tumors (kidney)Vγ4Vδ5
Non-Vγ9Vδ2
EPCR
Anti-CMV response
CD16PD-1 TIGIT
TIM-3

BTN: butyrophilin; CMV: cytomegalovirus; CRC: colorectal carcinoma; DMAPP: dimethylallyl pyrophosphate; EPCR: endothelial protein C receptor; EphA2: ephrin type-A receptor 2; HMB-PP: (E)-4-hydroxy-3-methyl-but-2-enyl pyrophosphate; hMSH2: human MutS homologue 2 (DNA mismatch repair enzyme); Hsp: heat shock protein; IPP: isopentenyl pyrophosphate; MICA: MHC class I chain-related protein A; MR1: MHC class I-related protein 1; pAg: phosphoantigen; PD-1: programmed cell death protein 1; TCR: T cell receptor; TGM1: protein-glutamine γ-glutamyl transferase K; TIGIT: T cell immunoreceptor with Ig and ITIM domains; TIM-3: T-cell immunoglobulin and mucin-domain containing-3; ULBP1-6: UL-16 binding proteins 1-6.

It is well known that human Vδ2+ T cells can be expanded using IPP or DMAPP. These phosphate antigens (pAg) are intermediates of the cholesterol synthesis that can be produced in epithelial cells, monocytes, and mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC) [118120]. These pAgs can trigger both the activation and consequent proliferation of Vδ2+ T cells as well as the triggering of cytolysis directed to the pAg-producing cells or the production and release of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IFN-γ and TNF-α [121, 122]. For presentation, some molecules belonging to the butyrophilin (BTN) family are necessary [123126]. In particular, it has been demonstrated that BTN3A1 and BTN2A1 are the cell surface ligands presenting pAgs undergoing structural rearrangement. Specifically, BTN2A1 binds the Vγ9 domain, and BTN3A1 binds the Vδ2 and Vγ9 chains of the Vγ9Vδ2 TCR, rapidly triggering activation [123126].

Conceivably, the stimulation of Vγ9Vδ2 T cells with pAgs will take place when BTN2A1 and BTN3A1 are expressed [120, 127129]. Thus, the two components of the stimulatory armamentarium should be present: pAgs and BTN [124]. Practically, Vγ9Vδ2 T cells can be expanded from unseparated PBMC by adding IPP to the culture medium and exogenous IL-2 [118, 130]. This system, which needs the use of a purified chemical compound such as IPP, can be easily substituted by culture with micromolar concentrations of aminobisphosphonates (N-BPs) such as zoledronic acid (ZA) or risedronic acid (RIS) [131134]. The N-BPs can interfere with cholesterol biosynthesis, inhibiting the enzyme farnesyl pyrophosphate synthase (FPPS) in the mevalonate pathway, preventing the prenylation of small GTPases. The effects of N-BPs are mainly of two types: an increase in the intracellular content of IPP and DMAPP, together with interference with the cytoskeleton arrangements by affecting the activation of Rho, Rac, and Cdc42 proteins [135137]. Starting from unseparated PBMCs with a low percentage of Vγ9Vδ2 at the onset of the culture, the use of ZA and the addition of low doses of IL-2 (30 IU/mL) can induce a strong proliferation of Vγ9Vδ2. This can reach 60–90% of the culture after 10–12 days and more than 95% on day 14. This can be an easy method to obtain enough Vγ9Vδ2 for making immunotherapy. The expansion of Vγ9Vδ2 can be triggered using other cytokine cocktails containing IL-15 and other stimuli [138, 139]. In principle, TCR triggering by pAgs can be considered an easy way to generate large numbers of Vγ9Vδ2 T cells for immunotherapy. Importantly, the type of Vγ9Vδ2 T cell expanded cells is mainly composed of effector memory (EM) CD45RACD27 and central memory (CM) CD45RACD27+/CCR7+ cells, while naive (N) and terminally differentiated effector memory (TEMRA) cells CD45RA+CD27/CCR7 represent a minority [95, 140, 141]. These cells express functional activating receptors such as Natural Killer Group 2, member D (NKG2D, CD314), and DNAX Accessory Molecule (DNAM)-1 involved in the killing of tumor target cells in different cancers [142145]. The ligands of NKG2D are the major histocompatibility complex class I (MIC)-related molecules A and B, as well as UL-16 binding proteins 1-6 (ULBP1-6) [146148]. These molecules are upregulated on tumor cells, and the NKG2D-NKG2DL interaction can deliver signals leading to proliferation, cytotoxic granule exocytosis, and cytokine production [146148]. Also, NKG2DL can be shed through the action of a disintegrin and metalloproteinase (ADAM) 10 or MMP downregulating the immune function [148]. Furthermore, DNAM-1 is physically and functionally linked to lymphocyte function associated antigen 1 (LFA1) adhesion molecule [149]. It can interact with CD155 (poliovirus receptor) and CD112 (Nectin-2) expressed on stressed tumor cells, leading to similar effects mediated by NKG2D engagement [150]. Importantly, CD112 can interact with poliovirus receptor related immunoglobulin domain containing (PVRIG/CD112R) and TIGIT, while CD155 can interact with TIGIT and T cell activation, increased late expression (TACTILE/CD96). TIGIT, TACTILE, and PVRIG are potent inhibitory receptors expressed on effector lymphocytes, and consequently their engagement can strongly inhibit the signal mediated by activating receptors such as TCR, NKG2D, and DNAM-1 [151154]. Overall, the final results after the interaction between γδ T cells [88, 89, 91, 92] and tumor cells may depend on the balance between the positive and negative signals delivered into effector cells such as NK cells [154] (Figure 3).

Either activatory or inhibitory receptors are expressed on γδ T cells, and their ligands on healthy colon or CRC cells. Schematic representation of some surface molecules involved in the cross-talk among γδ T cells and healthy colon cells or CRC cells. The activatory (green) and inhibitory (red) receptor-ligand pairs are shown. A. γδ T cell interaction with healthy cells in colon mucosa leads to signals in γδ T cells that do not induce killing and release of pro-inflammatory cytokines, triggering the damage of healthy colon mucosa. Instead, γδ T cells may be involved in supporting tissue homeostasis. B. On the other hand, the overexpression of some ligands for activatory molecules on CRC cells, such as NKG2D ligand (indicated by the green arrows), can trigger the activation of γδ T cells, leading to CRC cell killing and release of pro-inflammatory cytokines. The release by CRC cells of NKG2DL can interfere with the recognition of CRC cells. CRC cells can escape from γδ T cell-mediated killing by upregulating inhibitory molecules and releasing inhibitory cytokines. The presence of soluble HLA-I can influence the survival of γδ T cells. The induction of expression of ligands for activating receptors triggered by stress signals such as tumor transformation is one of the molecular mechanisms responsible for the specific killing of CRC cells instead of healthy colon mucosa cells. Note that just some examples of activating or inhibitory molecules are shown, and this representation is not exhaustive of all the known interactions demonstrated.

It is to be noted that Vγ9Vδ2 shows a very low level of expression of PD-1 with a peak at days 3 and 4, with a consequent decrease to baseline levels after 7 days [155]. On day 14, the large majority of Vγ9Vδ2 T cells are negative for PD-1 expression [156]. The upregulation of PD-1 and TIM-3 appeared to be related to the dose of ZA used, but this inhibitory molecule was not induced using the mycobacterium Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) [157]. Importantly, the cytotoxic activity of Vγ9Vδ2 T cells expanded with 10 µM ZA was impaired, but not that of those expanded with low doses such as 0.5–1 µM ZA [157]. In our hands, the optimal stimulation and expansion of Vγ9Vδ2 T cells can be achieved only with low doses of ZA (0.5–1 µM), while higher doses (more than 5 µM) can result in reduced expansion of Vγ9Vδ2 T cells [158]. These findings suggest that the optimal dose to trigger proliferation of Vγ9Vδ2 T cells is quite low and is associated with very low, transient PD-1 expression. This supports the idea that the expansion with pAgs is a good choice to plan adoptive immunotherapy [159163]. As already mentioned, γδ T cells express HLA-I receptors involved in the regulation of activation and tumor cell killing [164166]. While the CLIR type of inhibitory receptors NKG2A/CD94 complex is expressed on a large fraction of γδ T cells [89, 164167], the expression of KIR is more discrete on peripheral blood γδ T cells [88, 167, 168]. Importantly, the functional role of KIR on γδ T cells is controversial [10, 93]. The presence of inhibitory receptors such as KIR should deliver a negative signal blocking activation [9, 10, 88, 91, 93]. However, it is evident that Vδ1 and Vδ2 T cells can express isoforms of KIR that do not deliver an inhibitory signal into γδ T cells but can trigger activation [93]; likewise, it can happen in NK cells [169171]. In detail, we have shown that γδ T cells can express KIR2DS1 and KIR2DS2 based on reactivity with monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) that recognize the extracellular portion of both inhibitory and activating discrete HLA-I alleles. The presence of the activating isoform is functionally demonstrated by the activation of target cell killing of the mouse FcγR (such as the murine mastocytoma P815, Figure 4) using the specific murine anti-human KIR mAb [93].

Experimental models to study anti-tumor activity of γδ T cells and 3D culture systems. The identification of activatory molecules at the cell surface of γδ T cells can be achieved by testing murine antibodies in a redirected killing assay (A). This assay is based on the ability of an antibody to make a bridge between the receptor on γδ T cells and the tumor target expressing the FcγR for murine immunoglobulins. If this bridge leads to the killing of the target, the receptor involved is of the activating type. This assay has allowed the identification of several HLA-I receptors specific for some MHC alleles such as activating KIR and CLIR. This assay is different from the ADCC (B) in which a human mAb is specific for a target molecule expressed on tumor cells and the FcγR is expressed on effector γδ T cells. In this case, the FcγR triggers the killing of the target cell. This assay can be used to determine whether a humanized antibody such as the therapeutic anti-EGFR cetuximab can trigger the killing of EGFR+ CRC cells. 3D culture systems such as organoids (C) or spheroids (D) can be used in vitro to study the interaction with γδ T cells. These models can be employed to define the sensitivity to therapeutic drugs. In the case of patient-derived organoids, it is possible to identify and select appropriate drugs to tailor the therapy to a specific patient. These studies can be performed by applying imaging systems. (E) Organoid + γδ T cells, with indicated by the arrow the destructive effect of γδ T cells at the periphery of the organoid. (F) Spheroid analysis with confocal microscopy after labelling with specific probes for nuclei. The analysis of images is performed using specific software, some of which is associated with artificial intelligence, to appropriately define any interaction between lymphocytes and tumor cells. The use of specific mAbs to TCR Vδ2 can be added to the 3D culture system and determine whether the recognition of small antigen pyrophosphates (pAg) is downregulated (G and H). The use of the therapeutic anti-EGFR humanized mAb can show the sensitivity of CRC cells to ADCC in 3D models.

It is of note that the γδ T cell clones (either Vδ1 or Vδ2) expressing KIR2DS1 or KIR2DS2 can interact with the soluble HLA-I molecule alleles Cw4 or Cw3, respectively. This interaction with their natural ligands can deliver an apoptotic signal leading to the death of γδ T cells [93]. Overall, these findings would indicate that the presence of activating KIR on γδ T cells can regulate their survival [93]. In addition, sizeable fractions of γδ T cells express the CD8 receptor for the invariant portion of HLA-I [93]. Similarly to activating KIR, this receptor engaged with soluble HLA-I can trigger apoptosis of γδ T cells through the Fas-L-Fas interaction [93]. Altogether, these findings suggest that γδ T cells bear several HLA-I receptors that can regulate their activation and survival [93]. There is no direct evidence that these receptors can play a role in the context of CRC. It is possible to speculate that within the TME, the soluble (s) or surface-expressed HLA-I on CRC cells, MSCs, or regulatory monocytic cells may regulate the γδ T cell antitumor response. Theoretically, the function of sHLA-I, possibly derived from CRC cell killing, interacting with either activating or inhibitory receptors on γδ T cells may influence, depending on the rate of positive and negative signals delivered, their anti-tumor effect by interfering with the direct binding to CRC cells. This effect could be present with MSCs and other stromal cells such as monocyte-derived suppressors or dendritic cells. It is still undefined whether the amount of sHLA-I may indeed deliver a signal in the CRC TME. However, the lower physical interaction with tumor cells and TME stromal cells can reduce the signals delivered upon the engagement of activating or inhibitory receptors expressed on γδ T cells, modifying the outcome of γδ T cell-mediated activities. Finally, the results of the whole signaling mediated by either sHLA or surface HLA-I may be heterogeneous in different sites of the CRC mass. This heterogeneity can lead to the associated production of different cytokines, which in turn may influence the behavior of the TME. These hypotheses further complicate a very intricate scenario. The idea of blocking the activity of γδ T cells expressing receptors for HLA-I can be a solution to reduce the undesired effects of apoptosis mediated by CD8 and/or KIR2DS1/S2 and other activatory HLA-I receptors. This can be accomplished using γδ T cells lacking these receptors for immunotherapy or by blocking the HLA-I-γδ TCRs with monovalent anti-KIR2DS1/2 antibody-derived fragments to limit the apoptotic signal delivered by the receptor crosslinking with HLA-I [93]. However, all these considerations need an experimental demonstration to support tools targeting molecules that can influence at the same time the antigen-specific activity of αβ T cells.

In vitro three-dimensional cultures to study the γδ T cells antitumor response

Some phenotypic and functional features of γδ T cells are different in murine models from what happens in humans [8, 172176]. Overall, the role of Vδ1 T cells is similar in mice and humans, while it is difficult to mimic in a mouse model the role of Vδ2 T cells, as this cell subset is almost absent in mice [174]. Furthermore, the human Vδ2 T cells, compared to Vδ1 T cells, can be more easily expanded and used as effectors in vitro, and they can be considered the more suitable subset of γδ T cells for immunotherapy. The functional features of Vδ2 T cells during the interaction between CRC epithelial cells can be studied in the three-dimensional (3D) culture systems such as patient-derived tumor spheroids and organoids [120, 129, 134, 158, 177183] (Figure 3). These two 3D culture systems show some important differences to consider [184187]. Spheroids are usually composed by the aggregation of a single cell type in a few days, and they generally do not need the presence of extracellular matrix to grow. On the other hand, organoids are more complex 3D structures forming crypts and a lumen and require specific matrix proteins for growth, besides several peculiar medium components. The organoids are composed of different cell types coming from stem cells differentiating into epithelial cells lining intestinal crypts, enterochromaffin neuroendocrine cells, and goblet cells. Intuitively, the growth of an organoid is slow and typical for each donor if they are derived from CRC mucosa specimens, and it is more difficult to standardize the culture conditions of organoids than those of spheroids. Importantly, both CRC spheroids from established cell lines and CRC organoids from several patients can be used as targets for γδ T cells. These models are ideal to study the molecular mechanisms of target cell recognition and the means of killing exerted by cytotoxic effector cells. In addition, these 3D structures can be used to select the drugs that are efficient both in single and combo administration and to analyze the mechanisms of insurgence of resistant cells [184187]. It is of note that these analyses need advanced microscopy tools and appropriate bioinformatic analysis of many images to study these interactions. The inter-tumor heterogeneity (ITH) is related to the large variety in phenotype and treatment response of each patient. While the IDH is due to the cell products derived from PBMC of different donors. These two heterogeneities have been studied using “phenoscaping” during the interaction between CRC organoids and γδ T cells [177]. This advanced experimental approach uses high-dimensional single-cell analysis employing sc-RNA-seq and/or cytometry to determine how perturbation of a cellular system leads toward a specific state.

Applying thiol-reactive organoid barcoding in situ mass cytometry [188192], it has been studied the posttranslational modification signaling, cell activation state, apoptosis, and immunophenotype of γδ T cells interacting with patient-derived organoids (PDO) at the single-cell level resolution [177]. Overall, the analysis of more than 1,000 γδ T cells in these 3D culture systems showed that tumor cells can suppress γδ T cell-mediated cytotoxicity, but γδ T cells can overcome this immune suppression by using multimodal tumor cell killing. Indeed, phenoscaping indicated that unmodified γδ T cells showed poor cytotoxicity against CRC PDO. On the other hand, γδ T cells expressing an IL-15Rα–IL-15 fusion protein can efficiently kill PDO, but this cytotoxicity can be downmodulated by specific PDO, indicating an ITH-specific immune modulation. This effect was overcome through anti-B7-H3 mAb obtained from a murine single-chain variable fragment (scFv) phage-display library [177]. This was associated with an hIgG1 format using a G1m1, 17 heavy chain allotype and produced as a full antibody able to trigger ADCC. Furthermore, the engineered γδ T cells can kill PDO enriched in cancer stem cells refractory to chemotherapy. Overall, the ADCC can overcome the immunomodulation due to PDO, and it suggests that γδ T cells can kill PDO CRC targets through different molecular mechanisms. This notion is further supported by several experimental evidence obtained using co-cultures of γδ T cells and PDO from CRC mucosa [129]. In fact, it has been demonstrated that CRC PDO can trigger the expansion of Vδ2 T cells when exposed to 5 µM ZA starting from highly purified peripheral blood T lymphocytes. Furthermore, this effect was evident using the antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) composed of the anti-EGFR therapeutic antibody Cet conjugated with ZA (Cet-ZA) [129]. The Vδ2 T cells obtained in the co-cultures with PDO killed PDO cells in the absence of any additional stimulus at quite a high effector-target cell ratio (E:T ratio 20:1), while at a low E:T ratio Vδ2 T cells did not kill PDO cells spontaneously. However, at a low E:T ratio, the addition to the cell cultures of either soluble ZA, Cet, or Cet-ZA can trigger the CD107a degranulation and killing of tumor cells. Importantly, the effect of the Cet-ZA can be partly inhibited through anti-TCR mAb specific for the Vδ2 chain and anti-CD16 antibody. These findings strongly suggest that the Vδ2 T cells can use both TCR and FcγR to target CRC PDO, supporting again the multimodal ability of Vδ2 T cells to kill tumor cells [129]. Importantly, the single-cell analysis has allowed the identification in a murine model of the key role of IL-17-producing γδ T cells [178]. This was associated with the analysis of organoids at different stages of evolution of damage at anorectal junctions representing hyperplasia, dysplasia, and carcinoma stages [178].

On the other hand, the use of spheroids from well-established CRC cell lines can provide important information on the functional features of tumor cells in 3D masses. Indeed, we have shown that CRC cell lines can generate spheroids with peculiar physical features by evaluating the spheroid mass density. This mass density was relevant during the killing of tumor cells exerted by NK cells [193].

The killing of CRC tumor cells induced upon the interaction with γδ T cells was mediated by both the engagement of TCR and ADCC. Furthermore, the CRC spheroids and organoids can be used as a target of nanoparticles carrying N-BPs to study novel putative therapeutic tools to trigger γδ T cells’ anti-tumor activity [181]. Figure 3 shows some of the features and applications of spheroids and organoids.

Microbiota and interaction with γδ T cells: relevance in CRC growth and progression

γδ T cells maintain gut homeostasis by interacting with the microbiome, as reported in the Introduction, and the dysbiosis present in CRC can influence the response of γδ T cells [6, 1419]. The finding that commensal microbiota can promote the development of lung cancer in mouse models indicates that the role of γδ T cells is essential in cancer cell growth [194]. Indeed, local airway mucosal bacteria, through the Myd88-dependent IL-1β and IL-23 production from myeloid cells, can trigger proliferation and activation of Vγ6+Vδ1+ γδ T cells that produce IL-17. Furthermore, these γδ T cells expressed CXCL2, a neutrophil chemoattractant, and prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase 2 (PTGS2) to promote inflammation and tumor cell proliferation [194]. It is of note that γδ T cells and resident memory T cells expressing CD39 regulatory molecules have been found at lower frequencies in the colonic tissue of CRC donors compared to healthy controls [195]. Furthermore, it has been reported in murine models that γδ T cells are selected by microbiota to promote mucosal tolerance. On the other hand, T cell secretion of fecal miRNAs such as miR-let-7f may be linked to restoration of mucosal immune responses [196]. These findings, together with the different reported properties of γδ T cell subsets (Introduction, and γδ T cells in healthy gastrointestinal mucosa chapters and Table 1), support that microbiome-γδ T cell cross-talk can greatly influence the dysregulation of immune response present in CRC.

Clinical application of γδ T cells in CRC

The administration of γδ T cells in solid tumors extrapolated from the number of clinical trials present on https://clinicaltrials.gov/ is limited (Table 3). This is in comparison with the large use of other kinds of immune cells, such as αβ T cells [50, 197200]. Similarly, the use of γδ T cells in treating CRC in a clinical setting has been reviewed recently [200], and it is evident that this immune cell subset is not intensively employed and is under study. This could be related to the above-mentioned pro-tumor and anti-tumor effects of γδ T cells in the context of the gut. However, it is clear that the Vδ2 T cells are highly cytotoxic against CRC cell lines and primary CRC cells, as shown before.

 Administration of γδ T cells in clinical trials as an immunotherapeutic tool for CRC and some solid tumors.

Study titleNCT number conditionsPhase of study statusMechanism of actionInterventions,
route of administration, lymphodepletion, enrollment estimated
Sponsor, study type, first posted, last verifiedPrimary and secondary endpoints
A Safety and Efficacy Study of Allogeneic CAR Gamma-Delta T Cells in Subjects with Relapsed/Refractory Solid TumorsNCT06150885
Solid tumors
CRC, TNBC, GBM, NSCLC
Phase I
Phase IIa
Recruiting
Nanobodies CAR BiTe targeting PD-L1, HLAG
Elimination of tumor cells bearing inhibitory receptors PD-L1 and/or HLA-G
CAR001: HLA-G-CAR. BiTE allo γδ T cells
Intravenous
LD: NR
N = 60
Ever Supreme Bio Technology Co., Ltd.
Interventional
2023-11-29
2024-09
Safety
Potential efficacy
ACE2016 in Adult Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors Expressing Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR)NCT06415487
Locally advanced metastatic solid tumors
Phase I
Recruiting
Killing tumor cells and inhibition ICBACE2016: allo γδ T cells
Pembrolizumab: anti-PD-1
Intravenous
LD: Cyclo, Flud
N = 30
Acepodia Biotech, Inc.
Interventional
2024-05-16
2025-06
Safety
Haplo/Allogeneic NKG2DL-targeting Chimeric Antigen Receptor-grafted γδ T Cells for Relapsed or Refractory Solid TumourNCT04107142
CRC
TNBC
GC
Sarcoma
Phase I
Unknown status
NKG2DL (MICA/B, ULBP1-6)
Killing tumor cells
CTM-N2D: alloNKG2DL-CAR-γδ T cells
Intravenous
LD: NR
N = 10
CytoMed Therapeutics Pte Ltd.
Interventional
2019-09-27
2019-09
Safety
DLT
Adverse effects
Study of SUPLEXA in Patients With Metastatic Solid Tumours and Haematologic MalignanciesNCT05237206
Metastatic solid tumors CRC, PC, others
Phase I
Completed
WITH RESULTS
Serious AE n = 6/35
Other AE n = 25/35
Antitumor activityBiological: SUPLEXA
A cell mixture comprised predominantly of NK, NK-T, αβ T and γδ T cells stored in cryogenic media
Intravenous
LD: NR
N = 46
Alloplex Biotherapeutics Inc.
Interventional
2022-02-14
2025-08
Safety and tolerability
efficacy
First-in-Human Study of ICT01 in Patients With Advanced CancerNCT04243499
Solid tumor
CRC, bladder cancer, BC, GC, melanoma, PDAC hematological malignancies
Phase I
Phase II
Actively enrolled
N = 292
Activation of γδ T cells and inhibition of ICBIV ICT01
hBTN3A mAb plus anti-PD-1 pembrolizumab
Intravenous
LD: NR
N = 292
ImCheck Therapeutics
Interventional
2020-01-28
2026-01
Safety
Tolerability
DCR using RECIST
Control rate using RECIL
Phase 1/2a Study of ICT01 Plus Low Dose SC IL-2 in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors (EVICTION-2)NCT05307874
Solid tumor
CRC, bladder cancer, BC, GC, melanoma, PDAC hematological malignancies
Phase I
Phase II
Actively enrolled
Activation of γδ T cells and inhibition of ICB PD-1IV ICT01
hBTN3A mAb plus low doses of IL-2 subcutaneously plus anti-PD-1 pembrolizumab
Intravenous
LD: NR
N = 56
ImCheck Therapeutics
Interventional
Safety
AE
DCR
Safety Study for a Gamma Delta T Cell Product Used With Low Dose Radiotherapy in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic NSCLC or Solid Tumors With Bone MetastasesNCT06069570
Carcinoma, NSCLC, bone metastasis
Phase I
Recruiting
Killing of tumor cellsKB-GDT-01 allo-γδ T cells
Low dose of radiotherapy
Intravenous
LD: NR
N = 48
Kiromic BioPharma Inc.
Interventional
2023-10-06
2025-03
Safety tolerability
AE, MTD, MAD
ORR, PFS
OS, TTP
TTR, DCR
Allogeneic NKG2DL-targeting CAR γδ T Cells (CTM-N2D) in Advanced Cancers (ANGELICA)NCT05302037
Refractory cancers
Solid tumor hematological malignancies
Phase I
Recruiting
Killing of tumor cells expressing NKG2DL (MICA/B, ULBP1-6)Allogeneic NKG2DL-targeting chimeric antigen receptor-grafted γδ T cells (CTM-N2D)
Intravenous
LD: NR
N = 12
CytoMed Therapeutics Pte Ltd.
Interventional
2022-03-31
2024-11
Safety
DLT
AE
PFS
OS
A Study of PF-08046052/SGN-EGFRd2 in Advanced Solid TumorsNCT05983133
CRC
HNSCC
NSCLC
PDAC
Phase I
Recruiting
Killing of EGFR+ tumor cells activating specifically Vδ2 TCRBispecific γδ T-cell engager
LAVA1223 anti-EGFR-Vδ2 TCR
Intravenous
N = 68
Seagen, a subsidiary of Pfizer
2023-08-09
2026-04
Safety
PFS
OS
UTAA06 Injection for Treatment of Advanced Malignant Solid TumorsNCT06372236
Advanced solid tumors
Phase ITargeting B7-H3+ tumor cellsB7-H3 CAR-Vδ1 T cells
Intravenous
N = 10
Peking University
2024-04-17
2025-05
Safety
MTD
PK

The table has been obtained from the https://clinicaltrials.gov/ website, accessed on 26th May 2026. AE: adverse events; BC: breast carcinoma; Cyclo: cyclophosphamide; DCR: disease control rate; DLT: dose limiting toxicity; Flud: fludarabine; GC: gastric cancer; GBM: glioblastoma; HNSCC: head and neck squamous cell carcinoma; ICB: immune check point; LD: lymphodepletion; MTD: maximum tolerated dose; MDA: maximum administered dose; NSCLC: non-small cell lung cancer; NR: not reported; ORR: objective response rate; PDAC: pancreatic adenocarcinoma; PC: prostate carcinoma; PFS: progression free survival; PK: pharmacokinetics; OS: overall survival; TTR: Time to Treatment Response; TTP: Time to Progression; TNBC; triple negative breast carcinoma; MICA/B: major histocompatibility complex class I (MIC) related molecules A and B; ULBP1-6: UL-16 binding proteins 1-6.

The NCT04107142 clinical trial is a phase I study aimed at investigating the safety and tolerability of allogeneic/haploidentical NKG2DL-targeting chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-grafted γδ T cells (CTM-N2D) in refractory/relapsing solid tumors, including patients suffering from CRC. As CTM-N2D is obtained starting from PBMC-derived γδ T cells (see https://w2.cytomed.sg/car-gamma-delta-t-cell/), which are highly purified and transduced with an NKG2DL-specific CAR, it is conceivable that the large majority of these CAR γδ T cells are Vδ2+. Importantly, the CTM-N2D could recognize on tumor cells several molecules, such as NKG2DL, DNAM-1L, and pAgs overexpressed by stress signals [201, 202], while these molecules are expressed at a lower level on healthy cells. In addition, this product is coming from PBMC of healthy donors, and it may be considered applicable to many patients as an affordable off-the-shelf product pending manufacturing scale-up and regulatory approval. The target dose is 3 × 108–3 × 109 transduced cells, and four doses are scheduled for each patient at an interval of a week. While a 3 + 3 dose regimen is used to determine the safe regimen on the incidence of dose limiting toxicity (DLT). At present, data regarding this trial have not been published, and it is still to be defined whether γδ T cells with CAR specific for NKG2DL will counteract the progression of solid tumor cells as demonstrated in murine models [202]. However, the safety profile is good without cases of cytokine release syndrome (CRS), immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), and tumor lysis syndrome. To employ Vδ1 T cells, it has been reported that using the erythroleukemia K562 expressing IL-21 at the cell surface as feeder cells, it is possible to activate and induce a strong proliferation of Vδ1 T cells [203]. The transduction with an anti-HER2 CAR increased the antitumor activity of these Vδ1 T cells in vitro and in vivo murine models. Importantly, it appeared that the blocking of NKG2D, DNAM-1, and γδ TCR did not affect the cytotoxicity of these Vδ1 T cells, supporting the idea of the involvement of other activating molecules in the anti-tumor cytotoxicity. Altogether, it is evident that both Vδ1 and Vδ2 T cells could be transduced with specific CAR and potentially used as potent immunotherapeutic tools, as shown in several other reports using bispecific antibodies or nanobodies [204206].

However, the clinical efficacy of γδ T cells in CRC as well as other solid tumors is not reported (Table 3). The clinical translation of the different therapeutic tools based on γδ T cells or on activation of this immune cell subset should face several obstacles. The number of γδ T cells is low in PBMC, while isolation and expansion from solid tumors is a challenge, and we have already reported the methods to expand them quickly [118, 130]. The γδ T cells expanded in vitro should be infused and migrate through the endothelial cells, progressing into the extracellular matrix components to reach tumor tissues. Surface receptors such as CD31 and NKRP1A can help this process, and at the same time the expression of very late antigens (VLA) can increase the binding with matrix components, modulating the γδ T cell progression into the tissue. In the TME, γδ T cells find surface and soluble enzymes such as ADAMs and MMPs of tumor and stromal cells that can trigger the shedding of ligands for activating receptors such as NKG2DL. This may lead to a competition for the engagement of the same ligand expressed at the tumor cell surface. In addition, the direct tumor cell recognition through the γδ TCR may be reduced due to the heterogeneity of expression of accessory molecules such as BTN and BTN-like members on CRC cells.

It is unsurprising that the clinical efficacy of γδ T cells is restricted in light of these hindrances [207]. Some results from the Suplexa-101 trial (NCT05237206) on both hematological and solid malignancies are encouraging (http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2024-SITC2024.0608) [208]. Indeed, a certain efficacy in some solid tumors comprising CRC-MSI-H with complete or partial remission besides stable disease maintenance for a long time beyond 80 weeks have been reported. However, the composition of the autologous cell preparations infused in patients is not only of γδ T cells but also quite heterogeneous, with the large majority of NK and NKT cells besides some CD8+ or CD4+ αβ T cells. This would imply that cells with innate features and not dependent on the expression of HLA-I can respond efficiently to advanced refractory tumors. If this interpretation of results is correct, the use of γδ T cells would be appropriate in refractory/resistant CRC.

Future perspectives for using γδ T cells in immunotherapy of CRC

CRC is the third most commonly diagnosed cancer and the second leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, with increasing rates in young adults and developing countries [207214]. It is evident that the mortality together with the incidence is increasing in adults younger than 65 years. This identifies the CRC burden in individuals born after 1950, suggesting the exposure to still undefined triggers for the generation of CRC. The CMS identification and the study of the TME composition have provided insights into the possibility of using immunotherapy in CRC patients [215219]. Typically, CRCs are subdivided into MSI and MSS, with either a clear pro-inflammatory lymphocyte infiltrate in the former or more non-inflammatory/regulatory immune cells in the latter [218220]. It is difficult to well-define the biological significance and the immunotherapeutic role of γδ T cells in either MSI or MSS. Focusing on MSS CRC, because the αβ T cell-mediated response in MSI is well-established, it is unclear which is the more suitable target to increase the immune response [218223]. The broad and HLA-I-independent tumor cell recognition would suggest that γδ T cells are good antitumor effectors against MSS CRC expressing ligands for the activating molecules listed in Inhibitory and activating receptors of γδ T cells potentially relevant in CRC. On the other hand, it is conceivable that a good immune response in MSS CRC could also be related to the presence of a plethora of inhibitory receptors.

Besides the general subdivision into MSI and MSS CRC, the CMS subclassification into CMS1 (MSI, immune-enriched), CMS2 (canonical), CMS3 (metabolic), and CMS4 (mesenchymal, high TGF-β/stroma) possesses different clinical value regarding the therapy applied [224]. In addition, they may show different types and amounts of infiltrating γδ T cells as well as different influences on adoptive γδ T cell immunotherapy [225, 226]. Generally, the better clinical outcome is associated with CMS1, while the worse one is associated with CMS4. The CMS1 subtype is characterized by strong immune infiltration together with MSI status. On the contrary, CMS4 has plenty of stromal cells, collagen extracellular matrix, and cytokines delivering inhibitory signals in immune cells, impairing the localization and function of antitumor effector cells. The use of γδ T cells is conceivable in CMS1 to further support the β T cell response and limit the generation of resistant CRC cells with low expression of HLA-I and impaired antigen presentation [227]. The finding that several CMS1 CRCs can downregulate HLA-I both in a reversible and irreversible manner is relevant to support the reconstitution with IFN-γ in the former situation [227]. This IFN-γ can be produced by γδ T cells upon engagement with activating receptors. On the other hand, CMS2, CMS3, and CMS4 are mainly represented by MSS types and can downregulate HLA-I by similar molecular mechanisms to CMS1 [227]. In these CRCs, the antitumor effects of γδ T cells may be markedly impaired by the hostile TME associated with inhibitory cytokines and immunosuppressive cells. Moreover, the metabolic state of CRC TME, typical of the CMS3 subtype, can play a role in regulating the γδ T cells’ functions. Indeed, in glioblastomas (GBMs), γδ T cells need oxygen to function, as low oxygen levels downregulate NKG2D expression, impairing tumor cell killing, while the use of inhibitors of HIF1α and metformin can reinvigorate the elimination of tumors [228, 229]. It is conceivable that the γδ T cells should be used in appropriate combinations with pharmacological inhibition of some immunosuppressive cellular and molecular mechanisms responsible for the refractoriness to killing of these CRCs. Conceivably, hypoxia-associated acidosis, glucose reduction, and the alteration of amino acid metabolism can further contribute to the impairment of tryptophan and/or glutamine metabolisms in innate cells, IEL, and γδ T cells [230234].

It has been shown that the heterogeneous expression of PD-L1 in both MSI and MSS CRC, and that PD-L1 expression was an independent factor for a better prognosis of CRC [222]. In addition, some subtypes of CRC, such as the mesenchymal subtype CMS4 with prominent stromal components associated with high TGF-β and angiogenesis expression, would propose that several regulating molecular mechanisms are relevant in CRC [215]. Overall, these findings strongly suggest that combo therapies using different drugs hitting several and not overlapping target molecules would support the rationale of using γδ T cells in immunotherapy.

Furthermore, this is increasing the interest in other regulatory receptors other than classical immune checkpoints PD-1 and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) [153, 154, 235]. We have shown that MSCs as tumor-associated fibroblasts can express BTN and trigger the expansion of Vδ2 T cells using soluble or anti-EGFR mAb Cet-ZA [120]. The expanded Vδ2 T cells can kill CRC MSCs, potentially relieving their immunosuppressive behavior. In addition, stromal cells in the TME express and secrete collagens, besides vasculogenic growth factors such as VEGF. Both collagen and VEGF, in turn, may have potent anti-immune cell effects by interacting with collagen receptors and favoring tumor cell vascularization. In detail, the Vδ2 T cells can express the leukocyte-associated immunoglobulin-like receptor (LAIR)-1 collagen receptor [236, 237]. LAIR-1 is an inhibitory receptor able to downregulate different activation signals in various leukocyte subsets. The possible direct involvement of LAIR-1 in downregulating the anti-tumor immune response in CRC has not been demonstrated. However, it is conceivable that this receptor can play a role in the immune suppression mediated by the CRC TME as well as in other kinds of tumors [238, 239]. For instance, MSC can impair the upregulation of NKG2D induced by IL-2 in NK cells, and this impairment can downregulate the NKG2D-mediated recognition of CRC cells [240]. Furthermore, the LAIR-1 engagement can markedly inhibit the proliferation of peripheral blood γδ T cells triggered with anti-Vδ2 mAb and, to a low extent, the cytolytic activity of γδ T cell clones [240]. Altogether, these findings would suggest that LAIR-1 expressed on γδ T cells can deliver an inhibitory signal impairing, at least in part, the antitumor activities of this cell subset. This suggests that other unconventional immune checkpoint receptors on γδ T cells should be targeted to increase their antitumor effect. Table 4 provides some features for the selection of CRC patients grouped in molecular subtypes for future immunotherapy approaches with γδ T cells based on the findings reported in this review.

 Features of CRC cells and TME to select patient immunotherapy with γδ T cells and possible combos with drugs or immune cells.

CRC subtypes, main featuresγδ T cell infiltration (degree and features)Targeting molecules for γδ T cell activation on CRC cellsCombinations of drugs/cells with γδ T cells
CMS1: MSI immune
MSI, SCNAlow, BRAFm, TIL
GoodEGFR
BTN and BTN-like, NKG2DL, DNAM-1L functional APC
Anti-EGFR-mAb linked to N-BPs or pAgs
CMS2: canonical
WNT, MYC, SCNAhigh
Medium/LowEGFR
BTN and BTN-like, NKG2DL, DNAM-1L functional APC
Anti-EGFR mAb
CMS3: metabolic
SCNAlow, KRAS
Low/Impaired by TMEEGFR
BTN and BTN-like, NKG2DL, DNAM-1L functional APC
Anti-EGFR mAb, metformin, HIF1α inhibitors
CMS4: mesenchymal
TGF-β, stromal, EMT, SCNAhigh
Low/Strongly impaired by TMEEGFR
BTN and BTN-like, NKG2DL, DNAM-1L functional APC
Anti-VEGF mAb, anti-TGF mAb, anti-MSC mAb, anti-LAIR-1 mAb

BRAFm: mutation gene for serine/threonine-protein kinase B-Raf; CMS: consensus molecular subtype; N-BPs: aminobisphosphonates; MSI: microsatellite instability; SCNA: somatic copy number alteration; EMT: epithelial-mesenchymal transition; TGF: transforming growth factor; TIL: tumor infiltrating lymphocyte.

Another key point to be considered it is the localization and persistence of immune effector cells within the TME to induce a good immunotherapeutic effect [241243]. Several experimental approaches have been attempted for improving CAR T cells, such as peculiar genetic manipulation, association with drugs, selection of the origin of T cells, and improving culture conditions, well reviewed elsewhere [242]. Regarding γδ T cells, it is to note that Vδ1 and Vδ2 T cell clones may use different surface receptors, chemokine receptors such as C-X-C motif chemokine receptor 3 (CXCR3) and CXCR4, and biochemical pathways to migrate through endothelial cells [244246]. These properties should be considered when using γδ T cell populations for adoptive immunotherapy, either as unmodified or genetically modified cells.

It should also be considered the ability of γδ T cell subsets to recognize the MHC class I-related gene protein (MR1), CD1b, CD1c, and CD1d. This, together with the possible interaction with regulatory T cells of a TME characterized by the heterogeneous expression of several transcription factors [115, 247254]. Importantly, MR1 can present bacterial metabolites of vitamins B2 and B9 to mucosal-associated invariant T (MAIT) cells and T cells expressing different Vδ and Vγ chains [115, 250, 252, 253]. Likewise, CD1 can trigger γδ T cells [115], suggesting that polyclonal γδ T cells used for immunotherapy can find at the CRC mucosa several antigens and presenting molecules able to trigger their functional activities. This should be considered, as the response can possibly have the desired antitumor effect but also protumor stimulation, as described in this review and reported elsewhere [49, 54, 56] (see Tables 1 and 5). Figure 5 shows two of the possible immunotherapeutic applications of γδ T cells for different CRC subtypes.

 Pros and cons of the human γδ T cells.

FeatureVδ1Vδ2Vδ3, non-Vδ1- Vδ2Context dependency
FriendsCytotoxic, NKp46+Cytotoxic, IFN-γ, TNF-α, pAg, ADCCMSI, high immune infiltration
IL-15
FoesIL-17, AREG, TGF-β, Galectin 3
LAIR-1, other inhibitory receptors
LAIR-1, other inhibitory receptorsIL-17, AREG, TGF-β, Galectin 3Stromal-rich CRC (CMS4)
Low infiltration
IL-1β

Possible future applications of γδ T cells for immunotherapy. The use of humanized (cetuximab) therapeutic mAbs directed to the EGFR linked to the aminobisphosphonate zoledronic acid (ZA) can trigger the proliferation and activation of anti-tumor activity of γδ T cells (A). This activation will depend on the expression of BTN and EGFR on CRC cells. It is of note that cetuximab can trigger ADCC and release of pro-inflammatory anti-tumor cytokines. The TME of an MSI/CMS1 subtype CRC can only partly inhibit the immune response, as the immunosuppressive components (Treg, MDSC, TAFs) are less represented. (B) In the case of the MSS/CMS4 subtype, the γδ T CAR-T cells should target the EGFR family (EGFR or HER2; the case of HER2 is shown) or other targeting molecules expressed on CRC cells. In this case, the TME is strongly immunosuppressive, as the components such as MDSCs, Tregs, TAFs, and immunosuppressive cytokines are well represented. The use of anti-EGFR therapeutic antibodies conjugated to ZA is conceivable if these CRCs express BTN and EGFR. It is to be noted that γδ T cells show both innate and adaptive immunity features. To plan their application for cell therapy, it is necessary to better know their functional features, such as whether they show anti-tumor or pro-tumor activities and in which context these properties can be elicited.

Conclusion

A leading problem for therapeutic approaches to CRC is present for local unresectable and metastatic forms [255, 256]. Surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy, either alone or in combination, are the standard and conventional therapeutic tools for resectable forms in early stages, while immunotherapy has potential for late stages of CRC disease [254256]. Although the therapeutic armamentarium is wide and advanced, CRC is still incurable in a large proportion of patients [254256]. Immunotherapy of CRC comprises mAbs and their derivatives, immune checkpoint inhibitors, adoptive T cell therapy with CAR-T cells or tumor infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL), vaccines, and oncolytic viruses [255, 256]. What is the place of γδ T cells in this context? The gut microbial community may play a role, together with environmental factors and genetic/epigenetic specific features of a patient, in CRC pathogenesis, response to immunotherapy, and generation of resistant tumor cells [257, 258]. γδ T cells can sense gut microbes and modulate their function in response to bacterial products, suggesting a key role for γδ T cells in shaping a correct response of colon mucosa to external stimuli [7, 109, 250]. γδ T cells possess innate and adaptive features, and they are important for intestinal homeostasis [6, 7]. Unfortunately, our present knowledge on γδ T cell biology is limited, and the murine models do not correspond to what can happen in humans [21, 252, 254]. Ideally, γδ T cells can respond to tumor growth without HLA-I specificity, and the use of γδ T cells can be easier than that of αβ T cells [259], showing fewer adverse effects than CAR-T cells [260, 261]. The use of mAbs linked to either pAgs or N-BPs or dual-payload ADC could be the first step to analyze in human beings the effect of therapeutic mAbs in CRC eliciting a γδ T cell response in patients [129, 262]. These mAbs can trigger both the TCR-mediated killing of BTN+ CRC cells and the ADCC through the CD16 receptor expressed on Vδ2 T cells. This antitumor activity can complement the αβ T cell antigen-specific response in MSI. The same approach can be applied for MSS CRC, as anti-EGFR mAb linked to N-BPs can kill both EGFR+ CRC and also TAFs/MSCs, limiting their immunosuppressive effect. The main matter to be resolved is represented by the correct identification of the markers and functional behavior of γδ T cells within the colon in health and CRC, which could help to design and plan the appropriate immunotherapeutic means based on the use of these cells. The concept that inhibitory receptors are present to downregulate antitumor response should be challenged with the possibility that inhibitory signals through these inhibitory receptors can promote effector cell survival, as happens with sHLA-I interacting with KIR. Indeed, it is conceivable that inhibitory receptors are present to favor the switch-off of the inflammatory reaction, favoring repair and limiting autoreactivity. Overall, the γδ T cells playing a role in the homeostasis of the colon can play a role in checking CRC cell growth. However, little is known about their plasticity and molecular mechanisms to enhance antitumor activities while conserving their protective function of colon mucosa.

Abbreviations

ADAM: a disintegrin and metalloproteinase

ADC: antibody-drug conjugate

ADCC: antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity

AE: adverse events

AhRs: aryl hydrocarbon receptors

APCs: antigen presenting cells

AREG: amphiregulin

ARG-1: arginase 1

BC: breast carcinoma

BCG: Bacillus Calmette-Guérin

BTN: butyrophilin

CAR: chimeric antigen receptor

Cet: cetuximab

CLIR: C-type lectin inhibitory receptor

CMS2: consensus molecular subtype 2

CRC: colorectal carcinoma

CTLA-4: cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4

CTLs: cytotoxic T lymphocytes

CXCR3: C-X-C motif chemokine receptor 3

Cyclo: cyclophosphamide

DAMPs: danger-associated molecular patterns

DCR: disease control rate

DLT: dose limiting toxicity

DMAPP: dimethylallyl pyrophosphate

DNAM: DNAX Accessory Molecule

EGFR: epidermal growth factor receptor

EMT: epithelial-mesenchymal transition

FC: flow cytometry

FcγR: receptor for the Fc (fragment crystallizable) of γ chain immunoglobulin

Flud: fludarabine

GALT: gut-associated lymphoid tissue

GBM: glioblastoma

GC: gastric cancer

HLA: human leukocyte antigen

HMB-PP: (E)-4-hydroxy-3-methyl-but-2-enyl pyrophosphate

Hsp: heat shock protein

IDH: inter-donor heterogeneity

IDO: indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase

IEL: intraepithelial lymphocyte

IFN: interferon

IHC: immunohistochemistry

IKKα: inhibitor of nuclear factor-κB (IκB) kinase α

IKKβ: inhibitor of nuclear factor-κB (IκB) kinase β

IL: interleukin

ILCs: innate lymphoid cells

IPP: isopentenyl pyrophosphate

ITH: inter-tumor heterogeneity

KIR: killer-cell immunoglobulin-like receptor

mAbs: monoclonal antibodies

MAdCAM: mucosal addressin cell adhesion molecule

MAIT: mucosal-associated invariant T

MAPK: mitogen activated protein kinase

MDSCs: myeloid-derived suppressor cells

MICA/B: major histocompatibility complex class I (MIC) related molecules A and B

MMP: matrix metalloproteinase

MSI: microsatellite instability

MSS: microsatellite stability

N-BPs: aminobisphosphonates

NK: natural killer

OS: overall survival

pAg: phosphoantigen

PAMPs: pathogen-associated molecular patterns

PBMC: peripheral blood mononuclear cells

PD-1: programmed cell death protein 1

PD-L1: programmed cell death protein ligand 1

PDO: patient-derived organoids

PFS: progression free survival

PVRIG: poliovirus receptor related immunoglobulin domain containing

RA: retinoic acid

RALDH: retinal dehydrogenase

RIS: risedronic acid

RORC: RAR-related orphan receptor gamma

RUNX3: RUNT related transcription factor 3

scFv: single-chain variable fragment

SCID: severe combined immunodeficiency

SCNA: somatic copy number alteration

sc-RNA-seq: single-cell RNA sequencing

TACTILE: T cell activation, increased late expression

TCR: T cell receptor

TGF: transforming growth factor

TIGIT: T cell immunoreceptor with Ig and ITIM domains

TIL: tumor infiltrating lymphocyte

TIM-3: T-cell immunoglobulin and mucin-domain containing-3

TME: tumor microenvironment

TNBC: triple negative breast carcinoma

TNF: tumor necrosis factor

TTP: Time to Progression

TTR: Time to Treatment Response

ULBP 1-6: UL-16 binding proteins 1-6

VLA: very late antigens

ZA: zoledronic acid

Declarations

Acknowledgments

All the figures have been designed from the templates of Anatomy and Human Body and Cellular Biology series of Smart Servier Medical Art (https://smart.servier.com/).

Author contributions

AP: Conceptualization, Investigation, Validation, Supervision, Writing—original draft, Writing—review & editing. The author read and approved the submitted version.

Conflicts of interest

The author declares that he has no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent to publication

Not applicable.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Funding

The manuscript has been supported by the grant AIRCIG21648 to AP. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2026.

Publisher’s note

Open Exploration maintains a neutral stance on jurisdictional claims in published institutional affiliations and maps. All opinions expressed in this article are the personal views of the author(s) and do not represent the stance of the editorial team or the publisher.

References

Saito H, Kranz DM, Takagaki Y, Hayday AC, Eisen HN, Tonegawa S. Complete primary structure of a heterodimeric T-cell receptor deduced from cDNA sequences. Nature. 1984;309:75762. [DOI] [PubMed]
Hayday AC, Saito H, Gillies SD, Kranz DM, Tanigawa G, Eisen HN, et al. Structure, organization, and somatic rearrangement of T cell gamma genes. Cell. 1985;40:25969. [DOI] [PubMed]
Lefranc MP, Rabbitts TH. Two tandemly organized human genes encoding the T-cell gamma constant-region sequences show multiple rearrangement in different T-cell types. Nature. 1985;316:4646. [DOI] [PubMed]
Brenner MB, McLean J, Dialynas DP, Strominger JL, Smith JA, Owen FL, et al. Identification of a putative second T-cell receptor. Nature. 1986;322:1459. [DOI] [PubMed]
Li GQ, Xia J, Zeng W, Luo W, Liu L, Zeng X, et al. The intestinal γδ T cells: functions in the gut and in the distant organs. Front Immunol. 2023;14:1206299. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Mohamed AA, Al-Ramadi BK, Fernandez-Cabezudo MJ. Interplay between Microbiota and γδ T Cells: Insights into Immune Homeostasis and Neuro-Immune Interactions. Int J Mol Sci. 2024;25:1747. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Ismail AS, Severson KM, Vaishnava S, Behrendt CL, Yu X, Benjamin JL, et al. Gammadelta intraepithelial lymphocytes are essential mediators of host-microbial homeostasis at the intestinal mucosal surface. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108:87438. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Chien YH, Meyer C, Bonneville M. γδ T cells: first line of defense and beyond. Annu Rev Immunol. 2014;32:12155. [DOI] [PubMed]
Bakker AB, Phillips JH, Figdor CG, Lanier LL. Killer cell inhibitory receptors for MHC class I molecules regulate lysis of melanoma cells mediated by NK cells, gamma delta T cells, and antigen-specific CTL. J Immunol. 1998;160:523945. [PubMed]
Mingari MC, Vitale C, Cambiaggi A, Schiavetti F, Melioli G, Ferrini S, et al. Cytolytic T lymphocytes displaying natural killer (NK)-like activity: expression of NK-related functional receptors for HLA class I molecules (p58 and CD94) and inhibitory effect on the TCR-mediated target cell lysis or lymphokine production. Int Immunol. 1995;7:697703. [DOI] [PubMed]
Karjalainen H, Härkönen J, Sirniö P, Elomaa H, Äijälä VK, Kastinen M, et al. Characteristics and significance of γδ T cells in colorectal cancer. Oncoimmunology. 2025;14:2532231. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Chen Y, Chou K, Fuchs E, Havran WL, Boismenu R. Protection of the intestinal mucosa by intraepithelial gamma delta T cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99:1433843. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Ismail AS, Behrendt CL, Hooper LV. Reciprocal interactions between commensal bacteria and gamma delta intraepithelial lymphocytes during mucosal injury. J Immunol. 2009;182:304754. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Edelblum KL, Singh G, Odenwald MA, Lingaraju A, El Bissati K, McLeod R, et al. γδ Intraepithelial Lymphocyte Migration Limits Transepithelial Pathogen Invasion and Systemic Disease in Mice. Gastroenterology. 2015;148:141726. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Rampoldi F, Prinz I. Three Layers of Intestinal γδ T Cells Talk Different Languages With the Microbiota. Front Immunol. 2022;13:849954. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Hu MD, Ethridge AD, Lipstein R, Kumar S, Wang Y, Jabri B, et al. Epithelial IL-15 Is a Critical Regulator of γδ Intraepithelial Lymphocyte Motility within the Intestinal Mucosa. J Immunol. 2018;201:74756. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Martínez-Vargas IU, Sánchez-Bello ME, Miguel-Rodríguez CE, Hernández-Cázares F, Santos-Argumedo L, Talamás-Rohana P. Myo1f has an essential role in γδT intraepithelial lymphocyte adhesion and migration. Front Immunol. 2023;14:1041079. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Bonneville M, Janeway CA Jr, Ito K, Haser W, Ishida I, Nakanishi N, et al. Intestinal intraepithelial lymphocytes are a distinct set of gamma delta T cells. Nature. 1988;336:47981. [DOI] [PubMed]
Goodman T, Lefrançois L. Expression of the gamma-delta T-cell receptor on intestinal CD8+ intraepithelial lymphocytes. Nature. 1988;333:8558. [DOI] [PubMed]
Lin T, Matsuzaki G, Umesue M, Omoto K, Yoshida H, Harada M, et al. Development of TCR-gamma delta CD4-CD8+ alpha alpha but not TCR-alpha beta CD4-CD8+ alpha alpha i-IEL is resistant to cyclosporin A. J Immunol. 1995;155:422430. [PubMed]
Takagaki Y, DeCloux A, Bonneville M, Tonegawa S. Diversity of gamma delta T-cell receptors on murine intestinal intra-epithelial lymphocytes. Nature. 1989;339:7124. [DOI] [PubMed]
Di Marco Barros R, Roberts NA, Dart RJ, Vantourout P, Jandke A, Nussbaumer O, et al. Epithelia Use Butyrophilin-like Molecules to Shape Organ-Specific γδ T Cell Compartments. Cell. 2016;167:20318.e17. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Kenna T, Golden-Mason L, Norris S, Hegarty JE, O’Farrelly C, Doherty DG. Distinct subpopulations of gamma delta T cells are present in normal and tumor-bearing human liver. Clin Immunol. 2004;113:5663. [DOI] [PubMed]
El-Asady R, Yuan R, Liu K, Wang D, Gress RE, Lucas PJ, et al. TGF-{beta}-dependent CD103 expression by CD8(+) T cells promotes selective destruction of the host intestinal epithelium during graft-versus-host disease. J Exp Med. 2005;201:164757. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Grueter B, Petter M, Egawa T, Laule-Kilian K, Aldrian CJ, Wuerch A, et al. Runx3 regulates integrin alpha E/CD103 and CD4 expression during development of CD4-/CD8+ T cells. J Immunol. 2005;175:1694705. [DOI] [PubMed]
Ericsson A, Svensson M, Arya A, Agace WW. CCL25/CCR9 promotes the induction and function of CD103 on intestinal intraepithelial lymphocytes. Eur J Immunol. 2004;34:27209. [DOI] [PubMed]
Chennupati V, Worbs T, Liu X, Malinarich FH, Schmitz S, Haas JD, et al. Intra- and intercompartmental movement of gammadelta T cells: intestinal intraepithelial and peripheral gammadelta T cells represent exclusive nonoverlapping populations with distinct migration characteristics. J Immunol. 2010;185:51608. [DOI] [PubMed]
Uehara S, Grinberg A, Farber JM, Love PE. A role for CCR9 in T lymphocyte development and migration. J Immunol. 2002;168:28119. [DOI] [PubMed]
Wurbel MA, Malissen M, Guy-Grand D, Meffre E, Nussenzweig MC, Richelme M, et al. Mice lacking the CCR9 CC-chemokine receptor show a mild impairment of early T- and B-cell development and a reduction in T-cell receptor gammadelta(+) gut intraepithelial lymphocytes. Blood. 2001;98:262632. [DOI] [PubMed]
Kabelitz D, Wesch D. Features and functions of gamma delta T lymphocytes: focus on chemokines and their receptors. Crit Rev Immunol. 2003;23:33970. [DOI] [PubMed]
Wagner N, Löhler J, Kunkel EJ, Ley K, Leung E, Krissansen G, et al. Critical role for beta7 integrins in formation of the gut-associated lymphoid tissue. Nature. 1996;382:36670. [DOI] [PubMed]
Butcher EC, Williams M, Youngman K, Rott L, Briskin M. Lymphocyte trafficking and regional immunity. Adv Immunol. 1999;72:20953. [DOI] [PubMed]
Xu W, Bergsbaken T, Edelblum KL. The multifunctional nature of CD103 (αEβ7 integrin) signaling in tissue-resident lymphocytes. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2022;323:C11617. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Iwata M, Hirakiyama A, Eshima Y, Kagechika H, Kato C, Song SY. Retinoic acid imprints gut-homing specificity on T cells. Immunity. 2004;21:52738. [DOI] [PubMed]
Gyöngyösi A, Szatmari I, Pap A, Dezso B, Pos Z, Széles L, et al. RDH10, RALDH2, and CRABP2 are required components of PPARγ-directed ATRA synthesis and signaling in human dendritic cells. J Lipid Res. 2013;54:245874. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Li J, Xiao C, Li C, He J. Tissue-resident immune cells: from defining characteristics to roles in diseases. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2025;10:12. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Oida T, Suzuki K, Nanno M, Kanamori Y, Saito H, Kubota E, et al. Role of gut cryptopatches in early extrathymic maturation of intestinal intraepithelial T cells. J Immunol. 2000;164:361626. [DOI] [PubMed]
Porter BO, Malek TR. Thymic and intestinal intraepithelial T lymphocyte development are each regulated by the gammac-dependent cytokines IL-2, IL-7, and IL-15. Semin Immunol. 2000;12:46574. [DOI] [PubMed]
Gray JI, Farber DL. Tissue-Resident Immune Cells in Humans. Annu Rev Immunol. 2022;40:195220. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Fischer MA, Golovchenko NB, Edelblum KL. γδ T cell migration: Separating trafficking from surveillance behaviors at barrier surfaces. Immunol Rev. 2020;298:16580. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Hu Y, Hu Q, Li Y, Lu L, Xiang Z, Yin Z, et al. γδ T cells: origin and fate, subsets, diseases and immunotherapy. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2023;8:434. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Yang H, Spencer AU, Teitelbaum DH. Interleukin-7 administration alters intestinal intraepithelial lymphocyte phenotype and function in vivo. Cytokine. 2005;31:41928. [DOI] [PubMed]
Wang X, Sumida H, Cyster JG. GPR18 is required for a normal CD8αα intestinal intraepithelial lymphocyte compartment. J Exp Med. 2014;211:23519. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Sumida H, Lu E, Chen H, Yang Q, Mackie K, Cyster JG. GPR55 regulates intraepithelial lymphocyte migration dynamics and susceptibility to intestinal damage. Sci Immunol. 2017;2:eaao1135. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Li Y, Innocentin S, Withers DR, Roberts NA, Gallagher AR, Grigorieva EF, et al. Exogenous stimuli maintain intraepithelial lymphocytes via aryl hydrocarbon receptor activation. Cell. 2011;147:62940. [DOI] [PubMed]
Xu B, Ji J, Ma L, Wang C, Pang L, Song Q, et al. γδT Cells in IBD: Beneficial or Detrimental? Immunology. 2025;176:33748. [DOI] [PubMed]
Parthasarathy A, Li T, Edelblum KL. Crosstalk between the microbiota and intestinal γδ T cell compartments in health and IBD. Gut Microbes. 2026;18:2604908. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Ran R, Brubaker DK. A ligand-centered framework for γδ T cell activation in colorectal cancer revealed by single-cell and transformer-based perturbation. Front Immunol. 2026;16:1715827. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Ran R, Trapecar M, Brubaker DK. Systematic analysis of human colorectal cancer scRNA-seq revealed limited pro-tumoral IL-17 production potential in gamma delta T cells. Neoplasia. 2024;58:101072. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Corsale AM, Di Simone M, Lo Presti E, Dieli F, Meraviglia S. γδ T cells and their clinical application in colon cancer. Front Immunol. 2023;14:1098847. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Rodin W, Szeponik L, Rangelova T, Tamiru Kebede F, Österlund T, Sundström P, et al. γδ T cells in human colon adenocarcinomas comprise mainly Vδ1, Vδ2, and Vδ3 cells with distinct phenotype and function. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2024;73:174. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Andreu-Ballester JC, Cuéllar C, Colmena-Zaragoza J, Galindo-Regal L, Hurtado-Marcos C, González-Fernández J, et al. Anti-Anisakis antibodies in colon cancer patients and their relationship with γδ T-cells. Parasitol Res. 2024;123:196. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Pan L, Zhou Y, Kuang Y, Wang C, Wang W, Hu X, et al. Progress of research on γδ T cells in colorectal cancer (Review). Oncol Rep. 2024;52:160. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Reis BS, Darcy PW, Khan IZ, Moon CS, Kornberg AE, Schneider VS, et al. TCR-Vγδ usage distinguishes protumor from antitumor intestinal γδ T cell subsets. Science. 2022;377:27684. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Zhao Y, Niu C, Cui J. Gamma-delta (γδ) T cells: friend or foe in cancer development? J Transl Med. 2018;16:3. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Li Y, Li G, Zhang J, Wu X, Chen X. The Dual Roles of Human γδ T Cells: Anti-Tumor or Tumor-Promoting. Front Immunol. 2021;11:619954. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Saran A, Nishizaki D, Lippman SM, Kato S, Kurzrock R. Interleukin-17: A pleiotropic cytokine implicated in inflammatory, infectious, and malignant disorders. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2025;83:3544. [DOI] [PubMed]
Wu P, Wu D, Ni C, Ye J, Chen W, Hu G, et al. γδT17 cells promote the accumulation and expansion of myeloid-derived suppressor cells in human colorectal cancer. Immunity. 2014;40:785800. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Ferrarini M, Ferrero E, Dagna L, Poggi A, Zocchi MR. Human gammadelta T cells: a nonredundant system in the immune-surveillance against cancer. Trends Immunol. 2002;23:148. [DOI] [PubMed]
Masetti R, Tiri A, Tignanelli A, Turrini E, Argentiero A, Pession A, et al. Autoimmunity and cancer. Autoimmun Rev. 2021;20:102882. [DOI] [PubMed]
Poggi A, Zocchi MR. Human natural killer lymphocytes through the engagement of natural cytotoxicity receptors and NKG2D can trigger self-aggression. Autoimmun Rev. 2007;6:2959. [DOI] [PubMed]
Burke KP, Grebinoski S, Sharpe AH, Vignali DAA. Understanding adverse events of immunotherapy: A mechanistic perspective. J Exp Med. 2021;218:e20192179. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Chamoto K, Yaguchi T, Tajima M, Honjo T. Insights from a 30-year journey: function, regulation and therapeutic modulation of PD1. Nat Rev Immunol. 2023;23:68295. [DOI] [PubMed]
Fujiwara Y, Kato S, Nesline MK, Conroy JM, DePietro P, Pabla S, et al. Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) inhibitors and cancer immunotherapy. Cancer Treat Rev. 2022;110:102461. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Sieminska I, Baran J. Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells in Colorectal Cancer. Front Immunol. 2020;11:1526. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Mellor AL, Lemos H, Huang L. Indoleamine 2,3-Dioxygenase and Tolerance: Where Are We Now? Front Immunol. 2017;8:1360. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Ishihara S, Yamada Y, Iwasaki T, Yoshimoto M, Toda Y, Kohashi K, et al. PD-L1 and IDO-1 expression in undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma: The associations with tumor infiltrating lymphocytes, dMMR and HLA class I. Oncol Rep. 2021;45:37989. [DOI] [PubMed]
Leonard NA, Corry SM, Reidy E, Egan H, O’Malley G, Thompson K, et al. Tumor-associated mesenchymal stromal cells modulate macrophage phagocytosis in stromal-rich colorectal cancer via PD-1 signaling. iScience. 2024;27:110701. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Chen YL, Wang GX, Lin BA, Huang JS. MicroRNA-93-5p expression in tumor tissue and its tumor suppressor function via targeting programmed death ligand-1 in colorectal cancer. Cell Biol Int. 2020;44:122436. [DOI] [PubMed]
Lin KX, Istl AC, Quan D, Skaro A, Tang E, Zheng X. PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors in cold colorectal cancer: challenges and strategies. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2023;72:387593. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Peng G, Wang HY, Peng W, Kiniwa Y, Seo KH, Wang RF. Tumor-infiltrating gammadelta T cells suppress T and dendritic cell function via mechanisms controlled by a unique toll-like receptor signaling pathway. Immunity. 2007;27:33448. [DOI] [PubMed]
Harmon C, Zaborowski A, Moore H, St Louis P, Slattery K, Duquette D, et al. γδ T cell dichotomy with opposing cytotoxic and wound healing functions in human solid tumors. Nat Cancer. 2023;4:112237. [DOI] [PubMed]
Szeponik L, Akeus P, Rodin W, Raghavan S, Quiding-Järbrink M. Regulatory T cells specifically suppress conventional CD8αβ T cells in intestinal tumors of APCMin/+ mice. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2020;69:127992. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Amicarella F, Muraro MG, Hirt C, Cremonesi E, Padovan E, Mele V, et al. Dual role of tumour-infiltrating T helper 17 cells in human colorectal cancer. Gut. 2017;66:692704. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Numasaki M, Fukushi J, Ono M, Narula SK, Zavodny PJ, Kudo T, et al. Interleukin-17 promotes angiogenesis and tumor growth. Blood. 2003;101:26207. [DOI] [PubMed]
Wu S, Rhee KJ, Albesiano E, Rabizadeh S, Wu X, Yen HR, et al. A human colonic commensal promotes colon tumorigenesis via activation of T helper type 17 T cell responses. Nat Med. 2009;15:101622. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Mikulak J, Oriolo F, Bruni E, Roberto A, Colombo FS, Villa A, et al. NKp46-expressing human gut-resident intraepithelial Vδ1 T cell subpopulation exhibits high antitumor activity against colorectal cancer. JCI Insight. 2019;4:e125884. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Tosolini M, Pont F, Poupot M, Vergez F, Nicolau-Travers ML, Vermijlen D, et al. Assessment of tumor-infiltrating TCRVγ9Vδ2 γδ lymphocyte abundance by deconvolution of human cancers microarrays. Oncoimmunology. 2017;6:e1284723. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Meraviglia S, Lo Presti E, Tosolini M, La Mendola C, Orlando V, Todaro M, et al. Distinctive features of tumor-infiltrating γδ T lymphocytes in human colorectal cancer. Oncoimmunology. 2017;6:e1347742. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Mestas J, Hughes CC. Of mice and not men: differences between mouse and human immunology. J Immunol. 2004;172:27318. [DOI] [PubMed]
Bejarano L, Jordāo MJC, Joyce JA. Therapeutic Targeting of the Tumor Microenvironment. Cancer Discov. 2021;11:93359. [DOI] [PubMed]
Arner EN, Rathmell JC. Metabolic programming and immune suppression in the tumor microenvironment. Cancer Cell. 2023;41:42133. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Al Zein M, Boukhdoud M, Shammaa H, Mouslem H, El Ayoubi LM, Iratni R, et al. Immunotherapy and immunoevasion of colorectal cancer. Drug Discov Today. 2023;28:103669. [DOI] [PubMed]
Ganapathy T, Radhakrishnan R, Sakshi S, Martin S. CAR γδ T cells for cancer immunotherapy. Is the field more yellow than green? Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2023;72:27786. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Saura-Esteller J, de Jong M, King LA, Ensing E, Winograd B, de Gruijl TD, et al. Gamma Delta T-Cell Based Cancer Immunotherapy: Past-Present-Future. Front Immunol. 2022;13:915837. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Uhrberg M, Valiante NM, Young NT, Lanier LL, Phillips JH, Parham P. The repertoire of killer cell Ig-like receptor and CD94:NKG2A receptors in T cells: clones sharing identical alpha beta TCR rearrangement express highly diverse killer cell Ig-like receptor patterns. J Immunol. 2001;166:392332. [DOI] [PubMed]
Barakonyi A, Kovacs KT, Miko E, Szereday L, Varga P, Szekeres-Bartho J. Recognition of nonclassical HLA class I antigens by gamma delta T cells during pregnancy. J Immunol. 2002;168:26838. [DOI] [PubMed]
Dolstra H, Fredrix H, van der Meer A, de Witte T, Figdor C, van de Wiel-van Kemenade E. TCR gamma delta cytotoxic T lymphocytes expressing the killer cell-inhibitory receptor p58.2 (CD158b) selectively lyse acute myeloid leukemia cells. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2001;27:108793. [DOI] [PubMed]
Poccia F, Cipriani B, Vendetti S, Colizzi V, Poquet Y, Battistini L, et al. CD94/NKG2 inhibitory receptor complex modulates both anti-viral and anti-tumoral responses of polyclonal phosphoantigen-reactive V gamma 9V delta 2 T lymphocytes. J Immunol. 1997;159:600917. [PubMed]
Rong L, Li K, Li R, Liu HM, Sun R, Liu XY. Analysis of tumor-infiltrating gamma delta T cells in rectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2016;22:357380. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Halary F, Peyrat MA, Champagne E, Lopez-Botet M, Moretta A, Moretta L, et al. Control of self-reactive cytotoxic T lymphocytes expressing gamma delta T cell receptors by natural killer inhibitory receptors. Eur J Immunol. 1997;27:281221. [DOI] [PubMed]
Takamizawa M, Fagnoni F, Mehta-Damani A, Rivas A, Engleman EG. Cellular and molecular basis of human gamma delta T cell activation. Role of accessory molecules in alloactivation. J Clin Invest. 1995;95:296303. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Poggi A, Contini P, Catellani S, Setti M, Murdaca G, Zocchi MR. Regulation of gammadelta T cell survival by soluble HLA-I: involvement of CD8 and activating killer Ig-like receptors. Eur J Immunol. 2005;35:26708. [DOI] [PubMed]
Kondo M, Izumi T, Fujieda N, Kondo A, Morishita T, Matsushita H, et al. Expansion of human peripheral blood γδ T cells using zoledronate. J Vis Exp. 2011:3182. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Musso A, Catellani S, Canevali P, Tavella S, Venè R, Boero S, et al. Aminobisphosphonates prevent the inhibitory effects exerted by lymph node stromal cells on anti-tumor Vδ 2 T lymphocytes in non-Hodgkin lymphomas. Haematologica. 2014;99:1319. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Rossjohn J, Gras S, Miles JJ, Turner SJ, Godfrey DI, McCluskey J. T cell antigen receptor recognition of antigen-presenting molecules. Annu Rev Immunol. 2015;33:169200. [DOI] [PubMed]
Loureiro JP, Vacchini A, Berloffa G, Devan J, Schaefer V, Nosi V, et al. Recognition of MR1-antigen complexes by TCR Vγ9Vδ2. Front Immunol. 2025;16:1519128. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Eberl M, Mata Forsberg M, McLaren JE, Sverremark-Ekström E. Microbe-responsive human γδ T cells: the peculiar case of Staphylococcus aureus. Immunol Cell Biol. 2025;103:93844. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Tuffs SW, Dufresne K, Rishi A, Walton NR, McCormick JK. Novel insights into the immune response to bacterial T cell superantigens. Nat Rev Immunol. 2024;24:41734. [DOI] [PubMed]
Mocchegiani E, Giacconi R, Cipriano C, Gasparini N, Bernardini G, Malavolta M, et al. The variations during the circadian cycle of liver CD1d-unrestricted NK1.1+TCR gamma/delta+ cells lead to successful ageing. Role of metallothionein/IL-6/gp130/PARP-1 interplay in very old mice. Exp Gerontol. 2004;39:77588. [DOI] [PubMed]
Xi C, Jia Z, Xiaoli W, Na Z, He W, Hao J. New Aspect of Liver IL-17+γδ T Cells. Mol Immunol. 2019;107:413. [DOI] [PubMed]
Jameson J, Witherden D, Havran WL. T-cell effector mechanisms: gammadelta and CD1d-restricted subsets. Curr Opin Immunol. 2003;15:34953. [DOI] [PubMed]
Kaufmann SH, Kabelitz D. Gamma/delta T lymphocytes and heat shock proteins. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 1991;167:191207. [DOI] [PubMed]
Mohammed SS, Alkhalifah AKS, Mirza R, Okinedo SO, Inampudi RA, Bibi A, et al. Follicular helper-like γδ T cells promote plasma cell differentiation in Behçet’s disease. Front Immunol. 2026;17:1763174. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Wang S, Li H, Chen T, Zhou H, Zhang W, Lin N, et al. Human γδ T cells induce CD8+ T cell antitumor responses via antigen-presenting effect through HSP90-MyD88-mediated activation of JNK. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2023;72:180321. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Eberl M, Hintz M, Reichenberg A, Kollas AK, Wiesner J, Jomaa H. Microbial isoprenoid biosynthesis and human gammadelta T cell activation. FEBS Lett. 2003;544:410. [DOI] [PubMed]
Eberl M, Engel R, Aberle S, Fisch P, Jomaa H, Pircher H. Human Vgamma9/Vdelta2 effector memory T cells express the killer cell lectin-like receptor G1 (KLRG1). J Leukoc Biol. 2005;77:6770. [DOI] [PubMed]
Iwasaki M, Tanaka Y, Kobayashi H, Murata-Hirai K, Miyabe H, Sugie T, et al. Expression and function of PD-1 in human γδ T cells that recognize phosphoantigens. Eur J Immunol. 2011;41:34555. [DOI] [PubMed]
Lafont V, Liautard J, Sable-Teychene M, Sainte-Marie Y, Favero J. Isopentenyl pyrophosphate, a mycobacterial non-peptidic antigen, triggers delayed and highly sustained signaling in human gamma delta T lymphocytes without inducing eown-modulation of T cell antigen receptor. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:159617. [DOI] [PubMed]
Jauhiainen M, Mönkkönen H, Räikkönen J, Mönkkönen J, Auriola S. Analysis of endogenous ATP analogs and mevalonate pathway metabolites in cancer cell cultures using liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2009;877:296775. [DOI] [PubMed]
Couzi L, Pitard V, Moreau JF, Merville P, Déchanet-Merville J. Direct and Indirect Effects of Cytomegalovirus-Induced γδ T Cells after Kidney Transplantation. Front Immunol. 2015;6:3. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Willcox CR, Vantourout P, Salim M, Zlatareva I, Melandri D, Zanardo L, et al. Butyrophilin-like 3 Directly Binds a Human Vγ4+ T Cell Receptor Using a Modality Distinct from Clonally-Restricted Antigen. Immunity. 2019;51:81325.e4. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Harly C, Joyce SP, Domblides C, Bachelet T, Pitard V, Mannat C, et al. Human γδ T cell sensing of AMPK-dependent metabolic tumor reprogramming through TCR recognition of EphA2. Sci Immunol. 2021;6:eaba9010. [DOI] [PubMed]
You H, Zhang X, Chen H, Liu C, Teng D, Han J, et al. γδ T-cell autoresponses to ectopic membrane proteins: a new type of pattern recognition. Cell Mol Immunol. 2025;22:35670. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Van Rhijn I, Le Nours J. CD1 and MR1 recognition by human γδ T cells. Mol Immunol. 2021;133:95100. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Dai Y, Chen H, Mo C, Cui L, He W. Ectopically expressed human tumor biomarker MutS homologue 2 is a novel endogenous ligand that is recognized by human γδ T cells to induce innate anti-tumor/virus immunity. J Biol Chem. 2012;287:168129. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Sakuraba S, Koizumi A, Iwasawa T, Ito T, Kato K. Serum EphA2 as a Promising Biomarker for the Early Detection and Diagnosis of Colorectal Cancer. Biomolecules. 2024;14:1504. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Roelofs AJ, Jauhiainen M, Mönkkönen H, Rogers MJ, Mönkkönen J, Thompson K. Peripheral blood monocytes are responsible for gammadelta T cell activation induced by zoledronic acid through accumulation of IPP/DMAPP. Br J Haematol. 2009;144:24550. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Okuno D, Sugiura Y, Sakamoto N, Tagod MSO, Iwasaki M, Noda S, et al. Comparison of a Novel Bisphosphonate Prodrug and Zoledronic Acid in the Induction of Cytotoxicity in Human Vγ2Vδ2 T Cells. Front Immunol. 2020;11:1405. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Fernandez JLC, Benelli R, Costa D, Campioli A, Tavella S, Zocchi MR, et al. Priming of Colorectal Tumor-Associated Fibroblasts with Zoledronic Acid Conjugated to the Anti-Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Antibody Cetuximab Elicits Anti-Tumor Vδ2 T Lymphocytes. Cancers (Basel). 2023;15:610. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Lv J, Liu Z, Ren X, Song S, Zhang Y, Wang Y. γδT cells, a key subset of T cell for cancer immunotherapy. Front Immunol. 2025;16:1562188. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Serrano R, Wesch D, Kabelitz D. Activation of Human γδ T Cells: Modulation by Toll-Like Receptor 8 Ligands and Role of Monocytes. Cells. 2020;9:713. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Vavassori S, Kumar A, Wan GS, Ramanjaneyulu GS, Cavallari M, El Daker S, et al. Butyrophilin 3A1 binds phosphorylated antigens and stimulates human γδ T cells. Nat Immunol. 2013;14:90816. [DOI] [PubMed]
Rigau M, Ostrouska S, Fulford TS, Johnson DN, Woods K, Ruan Z, et al. Butyrophilin 2A1 is essential for phosphoantigen reactivity by γδ T cells. Science. 2020;367:eaay5516. [DOI] [PubMed]
Vantourout P, Laing A, Woodward MJ, Zlatareva I, Apolonia L, Jones AW, et al. Heteromeric interactions regulate butyrophilin (BTN) and BTN-like molecules governing γδ T cell biology. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018;115:103944. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Fulford TS, Soliman C, Castle RG, Rigau M, Ruan Z, Dolezal O, et al. Vγ9Vδ2 T cells recognize butyrophilin 2A1 and 3A1 heteromers. Nat Immunol. 2024;25:135566. [DOI] [PubMed]
Cano CE, Pasero C, De Gassart A, Kerneur C, Gabriac M, Fullana M, et al. BTN2A1, an immune checkpoint targeting Vγ9Vδ2 T cell cytotoxicity against malignant cells. Cell Rep. 2021;36:109359. [DOI] [PubMed]
Karunakaran MM, Subramanian H, Jin Y, Mohammed F, Kimmel B, Juraske C, et al. A distinct topology of BTN3A IgV and B30.2 domains controlled by juxtamembrane regions favors optimal human γδ T cell phosphoantigen sensing. Nat Commun. 2023;14:7617. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Benelli R, Costa D, Salvini L, Tardito S, Tosetti F, Villa F, et al. Targeting of colorectal cancer organoids with zoledronic acid conjugated to the anti-EGFR antibody cetuximab. J Immunother Cancer. 2022;10:e005660. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Cipriani B, Knowles H, Chen L, Battistini L, Brosnan CF. Involvement of classical and novel protein kinase C isoforms in the response of human V gamma 9V delta 2 T cells to phosphate antigens. J Immunol. 2002;169:576170. [DOI] [PubMed]
Idrees AS, Sugie T, Inoue C, Murata-Hirai K, Okamura H, Morita CT, et al. Comparison of γδ T cell responses and farnesyl diphosphate synthase inhibition in tumor cells pretreated with zoledronic acid. Cancer Sci. 2013;104:53642. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Wang H, Sarikonda G, Puan KJ, Tanaka Y, Feng J, Giner JL, et al. Indirect stimulation of human Vγ2Vδ2 T cells through alterations in isoprenoid metabolism. J Immunol. 2011;187:5099113. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Das H, Wang L, Kamath A, Bukowski JF. Vgamma2Vdelta2 T-cell receptor-mediated recognition of aminobisphosphonates. Blood. 2001;98:16168. [DOI] [PubMed]
Pisheh L, Matis S, Taglieri M, Di Gregorio L, Benelli R, Poggi A. EGFR-Targeted Antibody-Drug Conjugate to Different Aminobisphosphonates: Direct and Indirect Antitumor Effects on Colorectal Carcinoma Cells. Cancers (Basel). 2024;16:1256. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Ebetino FH, Hogan AM, Sun S, Tsoumpra MK, Duan X, Triffitt JT, et al. The relationship between the chemistry and biological activity of the bisphosphonates. Bone. 2011;49:2033. [DOI] [PubMed]
Ohno K, Mori K, Orita M, Takeuchi M. Computational insights into binding of bisphosphates to farnesyl pyrophosphate synthase. Curr Med Chem. 2011;18:22033. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Russell RG, Watts NB, Ebetino FH, Rogers MJ. Mechanisms of action of bisphosphonates: similarities and differences and their potential influence on clinical efficacy. Osteoporos Int. 2008;19:73359. [DOI] [PubMed]
Ferry GM, Agbuduwe C, Forrester M, Dunlop S, Chester K, Fisher J, et al. A Simple and Robust Single-Step Method for CAR-Vδ1 γδT Cell Expansion and Transduction for Cancer Immunotherapy. Front Immunol. 2022;13:863155. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Vyborova A, Gasull-Celades L, Brazda P, Bedate AM, Karaiskaki F, Sanders J, et al. Pre-existing activation states shape functional heterogeneity of human Vγ9Vδ2 T cells. Front Immunol. 2026;17:1696469. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Bruni E, Cazzetta V, Donadon M, Cimino M, Torzilli G, Spata G, et al. Chemotherapy accelerates immune-senescence and functional impairments of Vδ2pos T cells in elderly patients affected by liver metastatic colorectal cancer. J Immunother Cancer. 2019;7:347. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Caccamo N, Meraviglia S, Ferlazzo V, Angelini D, Borsellino G, Poccia F, et al. Differential requirements for antigen or homeostatic cytokines for proliferation and differentiation of human Vgamma9Vdelta2 naive, memory and effector T cell subsets. Eur J Immunol. 2005;35:176472. [DOI] [PubMed]
Deniger DC, Maiti SN, Mi T, Switzer KC, Ramachandran V, Hurton LV, et al. Activating and propagating polyclonal gamma delta T cells with broad specificity for malignancies. Clin Cancer Res. 2014;20:570819. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Knight A, Mackinnon S, Lowdell MW. Human Vdelta1 gamma-delta T cells exert potent specific cytotoxicity against primary multiple myeloma cells. Cytotherapy. 2012;14:11108. [DOI] [PubMed]
Niu C, Jin H, Li M, Zhu S, Zhou L, Jin F, et al. Low-dose bortezomib increases the expression of NKG2D and DNAM-1 ligands and enhances induced NK and γδ T cell-mediated lysis in multiple myeloma. Oncotarget. 2017;8:595464. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Poggi A, Zancolli M, Boero S, Catellani S, Musso A, Zocchi MR. Differential survival of γδT cells, αβT cells and NK cells upon engagement of NKG2D by NKG2DL-expressing leukemic cells. Int J Cancer. 2011;129:38796. [DOI] [PubMed]
Bauer S, Groh V, Wu J, Steinle A, Phillips JH, Lanier LL, et al. Activation of NK cells and T cells by NKG2D, a receptor for stress-inducible MICA. Science. 1999;285:7279. [DOI] [PubMed]
Kyrysyuk O, Wucherpfennig KW. Designing Cancer Immunotherapies That Engage T Cells and NK Cells. Annu Rev Immunol. 2023;41:1738. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Zocchi MR, Catellani S, Canevali P, Tavella S, Garuti A, Villaggio B, et al. High ERp5/ADAM10 expression in lymph node microenvironment and impaired NKG2D ligands recognition in Hodgkin lymphomas. Blood. 2012;119:147989. [DOI] [PubMed]
Shibuya K, Lanier LL, Phillips JH, Ochs HD, Shimizu K, Nakayama E, et al. Physical and functional association of LFA-1 with DNAM-1 adhesion molecule. Immunity. 1999;11:61523. [DOI] [PubMed]
Tahara-Hanaoka S, Shibuya K, Onoda Y, Zhang H, Yamazaki S, Miyamoto A, et al. Functional characterization of DNAM-1 (CD226) interaction with its ligands PVR (CD155) and nectin-2 (PRR-2/CD112). Int Immunol. 2004;16:5338. [DOI] [PubMed]
Drewniak-Świtalska M, Fortuna P, Krzystek-Korpacka M. Negative Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors. Pharmaceutics. 2025;17:713. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Roussot N, Kaderbhai C, Ghiringhelli F. Targeting Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Beyond PD-1/PD-L1 Monoclonal Antibodies. Cancers (Basel). 2025;17:906. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Zamani P, Barootchi E, Firouzabadi A, Tonekaboni MS, Saleki K, Yazdanpanah N, et al. Targeting T cell exhaustion in colorectal cancer: emerging roles of LAG-3, TIM-3, and TIGIT signaling in overcoming immunotherapy resistance. Cell Commun Signal. 2026;24:81. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Poggi A, Zocchi MR. Natural killer cells and immune-checkpoint inhibitor therapy: Current knowledge and new challenges. Mol Ther Oncolytics. 2021;24:2642. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Zumwalde NA, Sharma A, Xu X, Ma S, Schneider CL, Romero-Masters JC, et al. Adoptively transferred Vγ9Vδ2 T cells show potent antitumor effects in a preclinical B cell lymphomagenesis model. JCI Insight. 2017;2:e93179. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Nada MH, Wang H, Hussein AJ, Tanaka Y, Morita CT. PD-1 checkpoint blockade enhances adoptive immunotherapy by human Vγ2Vδ2 T cells against human prostate cancer. Oncoimmunology. 2021;10:1989789. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Fenn J, Ridgley LA, White A, Sarfas C, Dennis M, Dalgleish A, et al. Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) induces superior anti-tumour responses by Vδ2+ T cells compared with the aminobisphosphonate drug zoledronic acid. Clin Exp Immunol. 2022;208:30115. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Varesano S, Zocchi MR, Poggi A. Zoledronate Triggers Vδ2 T Cells to Destroy and Kill Spheroids of Colon Carcinoma: Quantitative Image Analysis of Three-Dimensional Cultures. Front Immunol. 2018;9:998. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Hoeres T, Smetak M, Pretscher D, Wilhelm M. Improving the Efficiency of Vγ9Vδ2 T-Cell Immunotherapy in Cancer. Front Immunol. 2018;9:800. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Xu Y, Xiang Z, Alnaggar M, Kouakanou L, Li J, He J, et al. Allogeneic Vγ9Vδ2 T-cell immunotherapy exhibits promising clinical safety and prolongs the survival of patients with late-stage lung or liver cancer. Cell Mol Immunol. 2021;18:42739. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Wu D, Wu P, Wu X, Ye J, Wang Z, Zhao S, et al. Ex vivo expanded human circulating Vδ1 γδT cells exhibit favorable therapeutic potential for colon cancer. Oncoimmunology. 2015;4:e992749. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Rancan C, Arias-Badia M, Dogra P, Chen B, Aran D, Yang H, et al. Exhausted intratumoral Vδ2- γδ T cells in human kidney cancer retain effector function. Nat Immunol. 2023;24:61224. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Sandoz PA, Kuhnigk K, Szabo EK, Thunberg S, Erikson E, Sandström N, et al. Modulation of lytic molecules restrain serial killing in γδ T lymphocytes. Nat Commun. 2023;14:6035. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Nakajima H, Tomiyama H, Takiguchi M. Inhibition of gamma delta T cell recognition by receptors for MHC class I molecules. J Immunol. 1995;155:413942. [PubMed]
Carena I, Shamshiev A, Donda A, Colonna M, Libero GD. Major histocompatibility complex class I molecules modulate activation threshold and early signaling of T cell antigen receptor-gamma/delta stimulated by nonpeptidic ligands. J Exp Med. 1997;186:176974. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Cazzetta V, Bruni E, Terzoli S, Carenza C, Franzese S, Piazza R, et al. NKG2A expression identifies a subset of human Vδ2 T cells exerting the highest antitumor effector functions. Cell Rep. 2021;37:109871. [DOI] [PubMed]
Catafal-Tardos E, Dachicourt L, Baglioni MV, Fares da Silva MGF, Secci D, Donia M, et al. Dynamics of checkpoint receptors in γδ T cell subsets are associated with clinical response during anti-PD-1 immunotherapies. EMBO Mol Med. 2026;18:91119. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Ou L, Wang H, Huang H, Zhou Z, Lin Q, Guo Y, et al. Preclinical platforms to study therapeutic efficacy of human γδ T cells. Clin Transl Med. 2022;12:e814. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Guillamón CF, Martínez-Sánchez MV, Gimeno L, Campillo JA, Server-Pastor G, Martínez-García J, et al. Activating KIRs on Educated NK Cells Support Downregulation of CD226 and Inefficient Tumor Immunosurveillance. Cancer Immunol Res. 2019;7:130717. [DOI] [PubMed]
Chen C, Busson M, Rocha V, Appert ML, Lepage V, Dulphy N, et al. Activating KIR genes are associated with CMV reactivation and survival after non-T-cell depleted HLA-identical sibling bone marrow transplantation for malignant disorders. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2006;38:43744. [DOI] [PubMed]
Feng J, Garrity D, Call ME, Moffett H, Wucherpfennig KW. Convergence on a distinctive assembly mechanism by unrelated families of activating immune receptors. Immunity. 2005;22:42738. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Qu G, Wang S, Zhou Z, Jiang D, Liao A, Luo J. Comparing Mouse and Human Tissue-Resident γδ T Cells. Front Immunol. 2022;13:891687. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
McDonald BD, Jabri B, Bendelac A. Diverse developmental pathways of intestinal intraepithelial lymphocytes. Nat Rev Immunol. 2018;18:51425. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Fichtner AS, Ravens S, Prinz I. Human γδ TCR Repertoires in Health and Disease. Cells. 2020;9:800. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Karunakaran MM, Göbel TW, Starick L, Walter L, Herrmann T. Vγ9 and Vδ2 T cell antigen receptor genes and butyrophilin 3 (BTN3) emerged with placental mammals and are concomitantly preserved in selected species like alpaca (Vicugna pacos). Immunogenetics. 2014;66:24354. [DOI] [PubMed]
Papadopoulou M, Sanchez Sanchez G, Vermijlen D. Innate and adaptive γδ T cells: How, when, and why. Immunol Rev. 2020;298:99116. [DOI] [PubMed]
Nattress CB, O’Sullivan R, Fowler D, Hutton C, Vlckova P, Sufi J, et al. Phenoscaping Reveals Multimodal γδ T-cell Cytotoxicity as a Strategy to Overcome Cancer Cell-Mediated Immunomodulation. Cancer Res. 2025;85:441532. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Petitpas C, Mitoyan L, Thevin V, Martin M, Hernandez-Vargas H, Chevrier V, et al. Injury and inflammation promote cancer progression at the anorectal junction. Cell Rep. 2025;44:116552. [DOI] [PubMed]
van Renterghem AWJ, Parra-Martinez M, Witsen M, Verkerk K, Steur M, Zeverijn LJ, et al. Liver metastases dampen IL18-driven γδ T cell activity and immunotherapy responsiveness in colorectal cancer. Cell Rep Med. 2026;7:102579. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Pscheid R, Drent E, Wienke J, Strijker JGM, Throsby M, Molenaar JJ. Three-Dimensional Modeling of Solid Tumors and Their Microenvironment to Evaluate T Cell Therapy Efficacy In Vitro. J Immunol. 2023;211:22940. [DOI] [PubMed]
Di Mascolo D, Varesano S, Benelli R, Mollica H, Salis A, Zocchi MR, et al. Nanoformulated Zoledronic Acid Boosts the Vδ2 T Cell Immunotherapeutic Potential in Colorectal Cancer. Cancers (Basel). 2019;12:104. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Tardito S, Matis S, Zocchi MR, Benelli R, Poggi A. Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Targeting in Colorectal Carcinoma: Antibodies and Patient-Derived Organoids as a Smart Model to Study Therapy Resistance. Int J Mol Sci. 2024;25:7131. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Zhou J, Wu M, Yang G. Decoding γδ T cell anticancer therapies: integrating CRISPR screens with tumor organoids. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2023;8:423. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Gunti S, Hoke ATK, Vu KP, London NR Jr. Organoid and Spheroid Tumor Models: Techniques and Applications. Cancers (Basel). 2021;13:874. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Ishiguro T, Ohata H, Sato A, Yamawaki K, Enomoto T, Okamoto K. Tumor-derived spheroids: Relevance to cancer stem cells and clinical applications. Cancer Sci. 2017;108:2839. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Shukla P, Yeleswarapu S, Heinrich MA, Prakash J, Pati F. Mimicking tumor microenvironment by 3D bioprinting: 3D cancer modeling. Biofabrication. 2022;14. [DOI] [PubMed]
Ahmad Zawawi SS, Salleh EA, Musa M. Spheroids and organoids derived from colorectal cancer as tools for in vitro drug screening. Explor Target Antitumor Ther. 2024;5:40931. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Qin X, Sufi J, Vlckova P, Kyriakidou P, Acton SE, Li VSW, et al. Cell-type-specific signaling networks in heterocellular organoids. Nat Methods. 2020;17:33542. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Sufi J, Qin X, Rodriguez FC, Bu YJ, Vlckova P, Zapatero MR, et al. Multiplexed single-cell analysis of organoid signaling networks. Nat Protoc. 2021;16:4897918. [DOI] [PubMed]
Zunder ER, Finck R, Behbehani GK, Amir el-AD, Krishnaswamy S, Gonzalez VD, et al. Palladium-based mass tag cell barcoding with a doublet-filtering scheme and single-cell deconvolution algorithm. Nat Protoc. 2015;10:31633. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Qin X, Cardoso Rodriguez F, Sufi J, Vlckova P, Claus J, Tape CJ. An oncogenic phenoscape of colonic stem cell polarization. Cell. 2023;186:555468.e18. [DOI] [PubMed]
Ramos Zapatero M, Tong A, Opzoomer JW, O’Sullivan R, Cardoso Rodriguez F, Sufi J, et al. Trellis tree-based analysis reveals stromal regulation of patient-derived organoid drug responses. Cell. 2023;186:560619.e24. [DOI] [PubMed]
Sargenti A, Musmeci F, Bacchi F, Delprete C, Cristaldi DA, Cannas F, et al. Physical Characterization of Colorectal Cancer Spheroids and Evaluation of NK Cell Infiltration Through a Flow-Based Analysis. Front Immunol. 2020;11:564887. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Jin C, Lagoudas GK, Zhao C, Bullman S, Bhutkar A, Hu B, et al. Commensal Microbiota Promote Lung Cancer Development via γδ T Cells. Cell. 2019;176:9981013.e16. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Noble A, Pring ET, Durant L, Man R, Dilke SM, Hoyles L, et al. Altered immunity to microbiota, B cell activation and depleted γδ/resident memory T cells in colorectal cancer. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2022;71:261929. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Rezende RM, Cox LM, Moreira TG, Liu S, Boulenouar S, Dhang F, et al. Gamma-delta T cells modulate the microbiota and fecal micro-RNAs to maintain mucosal tolerance. Microbiome. 2023;11:32. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Zhu D, Ren X, Xie W, Chen J, Liang S, Jiang M, et al. Potential of gamma/delta T cells for solid tumor immunotherapy. Front Immunol. 2024;15:1466266. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Hayday A, Dechanet-Merville J, Rossjohn J, Silva-Santos B. Cancer immunotherapy by γδ T cells. Science. 2024;386:eabq7248. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Yazdanifar M, Barbarito G, Bertaina A, Airoldi I. γδ T Cells: The Ideal Tool for Cancer Immunotherapy. Cells. 2020;9:1305. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Zhao Y, Dong P, He W, Zhang J, Chen H. γδ T cells: Major advances in basic and clinical research in tumor immunotherapy. Chin Med J (Engl). 2024;137:2133. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Du SH, Li Z, Chen C, Tan WK, Chi Z, Kwang TW, et al. Co-Expansion of Cytokine-Induced Killer Cells and Vγ9Vδ2 T Cells for CAR T-Cell Therapy. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0161820. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Ang WX, Ng YY, Xiao L, Chen C, Li Z, Chi Z, et al. Electroporation of NKG2D RNA CAR Improves Vγ9Vδ2 T Cell Responses against Human Solid Tumor Xenografts. Mol Ther Oncolytics. 2020;17:42130. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Portillo AL, Mehboob M, Snyder G, Moinuddin A, Ritchie TM, Balint E, et al. IL-21-reprogrammed Vδ1 T cells exert killing against solid tumors which is enhanced by CAR arming for off-the-shelf immunotherapy. Oncoimmunology. 2025;14:2562210. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
van Diest E, Hernández López P, Meringa AD, Vyborova A, Karaiskaki F, Heijhuurs S, et al. Gamma delta TCR anti-CD3 bispecific molecules (GABs) as novel immunotherapeutic compounds. J Immunother Cancer. 2021;9:e003850. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
de Bruin RCG, Veluchamy JP, Lougheed SM, Schneiders FL, Lopez-Lastra S, Lameris R, et al. A bispecific nanobody approach to leverage the potent and widely applicable tumor cytolytic capacity of Vγ9Vδ2-T cells. Oncoimmunology. 2017;7:e1375641. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Devaud C, Rousseau B, Netzer S, Pitard V, Paroissin C, Khairallah C, et al. Anti-metastatic potential of human Vδ1(+) γδ T cells in an orthotopic mouse xenograft model of colon carcinoma. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2013;62:1199210. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Bustos X, Snedal S, Tordesillas L, Pelle E, Abate-Daga D. γδ T Cell-Based Adoptive Cell Therapies Against Solid Epithelial Tumors. Cancer J. 2022;28:2707. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Agbuduwe C, Maher J, Anderson J. Harnessing the immunotherapeutic potentials of gamma delta T cells against hematological malignancies. Hemasphere. 2025;9:e70182. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Xi Y, Xu P. Global colorectal cancer burden in 2020 and projections to 2040. Transl Oncol. 2021;14:101174. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Siegel RL, Wagle NS, Star J, Kratzer TB, Smith RA, Jemal A. Colorectal cancer statistics, 2026. CA Cancer J Clin. 2026;76:e70067. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Murphy CC, Zaki TA. Changing epidemiology of colorectal cancer - birth cohort effects and emerging risk factors. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024;21:2534. [DOI] [PubMed]
Matsuda T, Fujimoto A, Igarashi Y. Colorectal Cancer: Epidemiology, Risk Factors, and Public Health Strategies. Digestion. 2025;106:919. [DOI] [PubMed]
Zhou J, Yang Q, Zhao S, Sun L, Li R, Wang J, et al. Evolving landscape of colorectal cancer: Global and regional burden, risk factor dynamics, and future scenarios (the Global Burden of Disease 1990-2050). Ageing Res Rev. 2025;104:102666. [DOI] [PubMed]
Morgan E, Arnold M, Gini A, Lorenzoni V, Cabasag CJ, Laversanne M, et al. Global burden of colorectal cancer in 2020 and 2040: incidence and mortality estimates from GLOBOCAN. Gut. 2023;72:33844. [DOI] [PubMed]
Guinney J, Dienstmann R, Wang X, de Reyniès A, Schlicker A, Soneson C, et al. The consensus molecular subtypes of colorectal cancer. Nat Med. 2015;21:13506. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Das A, Chetta PM, Zhang ML. Molecular Advances in Gastrointestinal Pathology. Semin Diagn Pathol. 2026;43:150990. [DOI] [PubMed]
Keivany MR, Shojae Asrami E, Besharatloo M, Latifi H, Barjasteh AH. Advances in immunotherapy for colorectal cancer: overcoming resistance in mismatch repair-proficient tumors. Cancer Cell Int. 2026;26:151. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Sahin IH, Saridogan T, Kim R. Predictive biomarkers for immune checkpoint inhibition for patients with colorectal cancer: a comprehensive review. Immunotherapy. 2025;17:72734. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Wang Q, Yu M, Zhang S. The characteristics of the tumor immune microenvironment in colorectal cancer with different MSI status and current therapeutic strategies. Front Immunol. 2025;15:1440830. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Chen E, Zhou W. Immunotherapy in microsatellite-stable colorectal cancer: Strategies to overcome resistance. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2025;212:104775. [DOI] [PubMed]
Trahearn N, Sakr C, Banerjee A, Lee SH, Baker AM, Kocher HM, et al. Computational pathology applied to clinical colorectal cancer cohorts identifies immune and endothelial cell spatial patterns predictive of outcome. J Pathol. 2025;265:198210. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Lee KS, Kwak Y, Ahn S, Shin E, Oh HK, Kim DW, et al. Prognostic implication of CD274 (PD-L1) protein expression in tumor-infiltrating immune cells for microsatellite unstable and stable colorectal cancer. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2017;66:92739. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Sun F, Yao F, Zeng C, Zhao Y, Liang B, Li S, et al. Targeting adenosine enhances immunotherapy in MSS colorectal cancer with EGFRvIII mutation. J Immunother Cancer. 2025;13:e010126. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Ten Hoorn S, de Back TR, Sommeijer DW, Vermeulen L. Clinical Value of Consensus Molecular Subtypes in Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2022;114:50316. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Kantha A, Das D, Pai E, Kumar T, Pandey M. Consensus Molecular Subtypes (CMS) Classification: a progress towards Subtype-Driven treatments in colorectal cancer. World J Surg Oncol. 2025;24:1. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Zhang J, Zhu H, Liu W, Miao J, Mao Y, Li Q. Prognostic and predictive molecular biomarkers in colorectal cancer. Front Oncol. 2025;15:1532924. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Anderson P, Aptsiauri N, Ruiz-Cabello F, Garrido F. HLA class I loss in colorectal cancer: implications for immune escape and immunotherapy. Cell Mol Immunol. 2021;18:55665. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Barsoum IB, Koti M, Siemens DR, Graham CH. Mechanisms of hypoxia-mediated immune escape in cancer. Cancer Res. 2014;74:718590. [DOI] [PubMed]
Yan J. Antitumor γδ T cells need oxygen to function. Nat Immunol. 2021;22:2689. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
He W, Hu Y, Chen D, Li Y, Ye D, Zhao Q, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma-infiltrating γδ T cells are functionally defected and allogenic Vδ2+ γδ T cell can be a promising complement. Clin Transl Med. 2022;12:e800. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Jonescheit H, Oberg HH, Gonnermann D, Hermes M, Sulaj V, Peters C, et al. Influence of Indoleamine-2,3-Dioxygenase and Its Metabolite Kynurenine on γδ T Cell Cytotoxicity against Ductal Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Cells. Cells. 2020;9:1140. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Piñeiro Fernández J, Luddy KA, Harmon C, O’Farrelly C. Hepatic Tumor Microenvironments and Effects on NK Cell Phenotype and Function. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20:4131. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Lockhart A, Mucida D, Bilate AM. Intraepithelial Lymphocytes of the Intestine. Annu Rev Immunol. 2024;42:289316. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Konjar Š, Ferreira C, Carvalho FS, Figueiredo-Campos P, Fanczal J, Ribeiro S, et al. Intestinal tissue-resident T cell activation depends on metabolite availability. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022;119:e2202144119. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Dunne PD, Arends MJ. Molecular pathological classification of colorectal cancer-an update. Virchows Arch. 2024;484:27385. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Poggi A, Matis S, Uras CRM, Raffaghello L, Benelli R, Zocchi MR. The Role of LAIR1 as a Regulatory Receptor of Antitumor Immune Cell Responses and Tumor Cell Growth and Expansion. Biomolecules. 2025;15:866. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Pascoal Ramos MI, van der Vlist M, Meyaard L. Inhibitory pattern recognition receptors: lessons from LAIR1. Nat Rev Immunol. 2025;25:71124. [DOI] [PubMed]
Costa D, Venè R, Benelli R, Romairone E, Scabini S, Catellani S, et al. Targeting the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Can Counteract the Inhibition of Natural Killer Cell Function Exerted by Colorectal Tumor-Associated Fibroblasts. Front Immunol. 2018;9:1150. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Wu F, Yang J, Liu J, Wang Y, Mu J, Zeng Q, et al. Signaling pathways in cancer-associated fibroblasts and targeted therapy for cancer. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2021;6:218. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Poggi A, Tomasello E, Revello V, Nanni L, Costa P, Moretta L. p40 molecule regulates NK cell activation mediated by NK receptors for HLA class I antigens and TCR-mediated triggering of T lymphocytes. Int Immunol. 1997;9:12719. [DOI] [PubMed]
Du B, Qin J, Lin B, Zhang J, Li D, Liu M. CAR-T therapy in solid tumors. Cancer Cell. 2025;43:66579. [DOI] [PubMed]
Liu Y, An L, Huang R, Xiong J, Yang H, Wang X, et al. Strategies to enhance CAR-T persistence. Biomark Res. 2022;10:86. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Wang CQ, Lim PY, Tan AH. Gamma/delta T cells as cellular vehicles for anti-tumor immunity. Front Immunol. 2024;14:1282758. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Poggi A, Zocchi MR, Costa P, Ferrero E, Borsellino G, Placido R, et al. IL-12-mediated NKRP1A up-regulation and consequent enhancement of endothelial transmigration of V delta 2+ TCR gamma delta+ T lymphocytes from healthy donors and multiple sclerosis patients. J Immunol. 1999;162:434954. [PubMed]
Poggi A, Carosio R, Fenoglio D, Brenci S, Murdaca G, Setti M, et al. Migration of V delta 1 and V delta 2 T cells in response to CXCR3 and CXCR4 ligands in healthy donors and HIV-1-infected patients: competition by HIV-1 Tat. Blood. 2004;103:220513. [DOI] [PubMed]
Poggi A, Zocchi MR, Carosio R, Ferrero E, Angelini DF, Galgani S, et al. Transendothelial migratory pathways of V delta 1+TCR gamma delta+ and V delta 2+TCR gamma delta+ T lymphocytes from healthy donors and multiple sclerosis patients: involvement of phosphatidylinositol 3 kinase and calcium calmodulin-dependent kinase II. J Immunol. 2002;168:60717. [DOI] [PubMed]
Huang X, Feng D, Mitra S, Andretta ES, Hooshdaran NB, Ghelani AP, et al. Opposing functions of distinct regulatory T cell subsets in colorectal cancer. Immunity. 2026;59:14560.e9. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Chen Y, Liu T, Min G, Wang C, Xi D, Jiang L. Single-cell transcriptome analysis reveals regulatory programs associated with tumor resistance during immunotherapy in colorectal cancer. Int J Surg. 2026;112:694708. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Chen Z, Song W, Li Q, Li C, Wen W, Huyghe JR, et al. Mixed-model and transcriptome-wide association analyses identify transcription factors and genes associated with colorectal cancer susceptibility. Nat Commun. 2026;17:1377. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Li S, Simoni Y, Becht E, Loh CY, Li N, Lachance D, et al. Human Tumor-Infiltrating MAIT Cells Display Hallmarks of Bacterial Antigen Recognition in Colorectal Cancer. Cell Rep Med. 2020;1:100039. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Gherardin NA, Waldeck K, Caneborg A, Martelotto LG, Balachander S, Zethoven M, et al. γδ T Cells in Merkel Cell Carcinomas Have a Proinflammatory Profile Prognostic of Patient Survival. Cancer Immunol Res. 2021;9:61223. [DOI] [PubMed]
Rice MT, von Borstel A, Chevour P, Awad W, Howson LJ, Littler DR, et al. Recognition of the antigen-presenting molecule MR1 by a Vδ3+ γδ T cell receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021;118:e2110288118. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Maerz MD, Cross DL, Seshadri C. Functional and biological implications of clonotypic diversity among human donor-unrestricted T cells. Immunol Cell Biol. 2024;102:47486. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
McWilliam HE, Villadangos JA. MR1: a multi-faceted metabolite sensor for T cell activation. Curr Opin Immunol. 2020;64:1249. [DOI] [PubMed]
Kumar A, Gautam V, Sandhu A, Rawat K, Sharma A, Saha L. Current and emerging therapeutic approaches for colorectal cancer: A comprehensive review. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2023;15:495519. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Huo Z, Liu G, Li J. Recent research progress and clinical status of immunotherapy for colorectal cancer. J Adv Res. 2026;82:72950. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Scott AJ, Alexander JL, Merrifield CA, Cunningham D, Jobin C, Brown R, et al. International Cancer Microbiome Consortium consensus statement on the role of the human microbiome in carcinogenesis. Gut. 2019;68:162432. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Yu Y, Zhao W, Yang M, Wu B, Yuan X. Tumor-Promoting Gut Microbes in Colorectal Cancer: Mechanisms and Translational Perspectives. Int J Med Sci. 2026;23:6375. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Cappell KM, Kochenderfer JN. Long-term outcomes following CAR T cell therapy: what we know so far. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2023;20:35971. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Saleh OM, Albakri KA, Alabdallat YJ, Dajani MH, El Gazzar WB. The safety and efficacy of CAR-T cells in the treatment of prostate cancer: review. Biomarkers. 2022;27:2234. [DOI] [PubMed]
Jeyakumar N, Smith M. Custom CARs: Leveraging the Adaptability of Allogeneic CAR Therapies to Address Current Challenges in Relapsed/Refractory DLBCL. Front Immunol. 2022;13:887866. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Tao Y, Lu Y, Yu B, Wang Y. Molecular glue meets antibody: next-generation antibody-drug conjugates. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2025;46:52034. [DOI] [PubMed]
Cite this Article
Export Citation
Poggi A. Human γδ T cells in colorectal carcinoma: friends or foes. Explor Immunol. 2026;6:1003262. https://doi.org/10.37349/ei.2026.1003262
Article Metrics

View: 188

Download: 8

Times Cited: 0