• Open Access
    Original Article

    Small airway disease assessed by parameters of small airway dysfunction in patients with asthma, asthma-chronic obstructive pulmonary disease-overlap, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

    Richard Kraemer 1,2*
    Heinrich Matthys 3

    Explor Asthma Allergy. 2024;2:85–96 DOI: https://doi.org/10.37349/eaa.2024.00031

    Received: September 12, 2023 Accepted: January 22, 2024 Published: April 02, 2024

    Academic Editor: Ken Ohta, Japan Anti-Tuberculosis Association Fukujuji Hospital, NHO Tokyo National Hospital, Japan

    Abstract

    Aim:

    There is an increasing interest in defining the role of small airway disease (SAD) in asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and asthma with coexisting COPD. Based on the specific pathophysiologic components of small airway dysfunction (SAdf) of these diseases, single lung function parameters characterize only fractional aspects of SAdf and that the phenotypic diagnosis of SAD, and therefore, the functional assessment must be based on more than one parameter, reflecting airway dysfunction, pulmonary hyperinflation (PHI), energy costs, trapped gases, and/or gas transfer disturbances.

    Methods:

    The present study was undertaken to define the interactive contribution of several spirometric and plethysmographic parameters such as forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75% of vital capacity (FEF25–75), effective specific airway resistance (sReff), plethysmographic functional residual capacity (FRC; FRCpleth), the parameter defining PHI, the aerodynamic resistive work of breathing at rest (sWOB), the volume of trapped gas at FRC (VTGFRC), and the carbon monoxide diffusion capacity (DLCO) as the parameter of the gas transfer.

    Results:

    The study clearly demonstrates that the diagnosis of SAD cannot be based on one single lung function parameter, especially not on the spirometric FEF25–75 only. Interestingly, sWOB has a high discriminatory power to define SAD in these diseases.

    Conclusions:

    Within a future framework including functional and treatable traits, it is mandatory to define SAdf parameters diagnosing unambiguously SAD, for a successful concept of precision medicine.

    Keywords

    Asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma-COPD overlap, small airway disease, small airway dysfunction, pulmonary hyperinflation, aerodynamic resistive work of breathing at rest

    Introduction

    Small airways are usually defined as having an internal diameter smaller than 2 mm [1] and are generally understood to include the small airway conducting zone involving the terminal bronchus, bronchioles, alveolar ducts, and alveolar sacs. Compared with the large airway, the cross-sectional surface area and airway volume of the small airway are far greater, yet the small airway contributes only 10% of the total airway resistance [2]. Consequently, the small airways are sometimes referred to as the “silent zone” and, therefore, the severity of the disease can be underestimated if only single conventional pulmonary function tests are used for the diagnosis of small airway disease (SAD). However, so far, no unanimously accepted method and/or algorithm is available for the detection of small airway abnormalities. Nevertheless, SAD contributes significantly to the phenotype of asthma, and there is evidence that the magnitude of small airway abnormalities correlates with the severity of the disease [36]. It has been shown to correlate with symptoms [7], and with the Asthma Control Test score even in patients with mild disease [8]. Furthermore, it has been observed that increased small airway resistance correlates with worsening health status, dyspnea [9], and asthma exacerbations [10].

    SAD is not only observed in asthma but also plays an important role in the pathogenesis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or both; asthma and COPD, referred to as asthma-COPD overlap (ACO) [1117]. COPD is a common, complex, and heterogeneous disease, characterized by a few different dysfunctions due to an increased inflammatory response of the lungs [18, 19]. Complexity has been assumed to refer to multiple components and their interactions, while heterogeneity arises from the fact that not all components, especially functional ones, are present in all patients simultaneously [20, 21] throughout life [22].

    Physiologically, these diseases are characterized by a combination of numerous interactive functional deficits such as airway obstruction, small airway dysfunction (SAdf), pulmonary hyperinflation (PHI), air trapping, and gas exchange disturbances [2, 2325]. It is presumed that SAD can build up over time in peripheral zones of the lungs [26]. The characteristics of small airway obstruction include premature airway closure and airway trapping, leading to PHI. Most phenotypes of COPD are slowly progressive in most patients [27] and forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) and the ratio between FEV1 and the forced vital capacity (FVC; FEV1/FVC) lack the diagnostic sensitivity to identify early lung deterioration [28, 29]. Therefore, identifying patients with early lung damage at risk of developing COPD would enable focused efforts to prevent disease progression [30].

    There is, however, a principal question of how SAdf, and hence SAD can accurately be defined by functional parameters. The role of SAdf has been explored already years ago in several studies [3133], and today there is an increasing interest in evaluating different SAdfs as potential predictors of new functional and therapeutical traits within a concept of precision medicine [3444]. From the physiological point of view, the two contents of SAdf versus SAD must be differentiated. It is anticipated that SAdf refers only to a single functional property of a parameter, while SAD indicates that conditionally several functional components of airway destruction prove a specific pathophysiological phenotype of a clinically distinct disease.

    There are several functional parameters that are thought to be surrogates of SAdf. Using spirometry, (i) the forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75% of vital capacity (FEF25–75) is the spirometric variable most commonly cited as an indicator of small airway obstruction and thought to be more accurate in detecting SAdf than FEV1 [4547]. Regarding plethysmographic parameters, (ii) parameters of airway dynamics [48, 49], especially the effective specific airway resistance (sReff) and its inverse measuring the specific airway conductance (sGeff) were closely associated with symptoms of dyspnea [50]. Noteworthy in that context, plethysmographic parameters, such as the sReff and notably also the aerodynamic resistive work of breathing at rest (sWOB), both obtained from the resistive airway resistance loop (sRaw-loop) by the integral method [49, 51], feature SAdf, but have not yet reached enough attention in the literature concerning their potential. Other focusses are (iii) PHI assessed by increased plethysmographic functional residual capacity (FRC; FRCpleth), or the ratio between residual volume (RV) and total lung capacity (TLC; RV/TLC) [47], (iv) expiratory air trapping given by the volume of trapped gas at FRC (VTGFRC) [47], and/or (v) gas exchange disturbances evaluated by carbon monoxide diffusion capacity (DLCO) transfer measurements [52].

    In the present study, we evaluated the role of several spirometric and plethysmographic parameters defining SAD within three diagnostic groups (asthma, ACO, and COPD) to elaborate potential discriminating functional and/or treatable traits in an optimized concept of precision medicine.

    Materials and methods

    Study design

    In the present study, we refer to retrospectively evaluated data obtained from four Swiss centers (University Children’s Hospital, Bern, Switzerland; Center of Pulmonary Diseases, Hirslanden Hospital Group, Salem-Hospital, Bern, Switzerland; Clinic of Pneumology, Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland; Center of Pulmonology, Hirslanden Hospital Group, Clinic Hirslanden, Zürich, Switzerland). The patients have been referred to the centers for extended pulmonary function testing and optimizing therapy. Data were exported from the database systems of each clinic and subdivided into 3 diagnostic classes: (i) bronchial asthma; (ii) COPD, including a group of patients with (iii) ACO. The anamnestic, clinical features, and the diagnosis for each patient were made by well-trained pulmonologists based on history-taking, chest radiographs, high-resolution computed tomography (CT) scans, spirometry, whole-body plethysmography, and measurement of the fraction of exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO); additional detail regarding how the clinical diagnoses have been established was previously given [48, 49, 53].

    Study collective

    From a previous database [48, 49], measurements data of 688 patients (198 with asthma, 89 males, 109 females; 152 with ACO, 83 males, 69 females; and 338 with COPD, 186 males, 152 females) were selected for a discriminating analysis of SAdf and SAD.

    Pulmonary function procedures

    In all four centers, the same type of constant-volume whole-body plethysmographs (MasterScreen Body, Jaeger Würzburg, Germany) were used by standard techniques according to the American Thoracic Society (ATS)-European Respiratory Society (ERS) criteria [52, 5456] and revised Swiss guidelines [57], and the exported data were obtained from the same system software (JLAB version 5.2 and SentrySuite version 1.29, respectively). Inclusion criteria were reproducible baseline measurements with (i) at least 5 shift volume-tidal volume loops of comparable shapes; (ii) especially closed at zero flow points; and (iii) closed inspiratory part in the shift volume-tidal flow loops. All parameters were assessed in absolute values, as a percentage of predicted normal values, and z-scores according to normative equations recently used [58, 59].

    Database, parameter modeling, and statistical approach

    The database on which the present study was completed was a merge sort from previously used databases [48, 49, 60] with the condition that the following parameters must be available: FEF25–75, sWOB, sReff, FRCpleth, FRC obtained by helium dilution (FRCHe) VTGFRC at FRC (computed as FRCpleth-FRCHe), and DLCO, all expressed as z-scores. For the following parameters, SAdf was calculated if the z-scores were < –1.645 for SAdf-FEF25–75 and SAdf-DLCO, or > 1.645 for SAdf-sReff, SAdf-sWOB, SAdf-FRCpleth, and SAdf-VTGFRC. The diagnosis of SAD was established only if 3 functional parameters were out of the upper limit of normal (ULN) or lower limit of normal (LLN). All analyses were done using the IBM Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) software (version 29.0; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA), and the R statistical software (version 4.1.2; R Statistics, Vienna, Austria), together with the extension packages MASS, FactoMineR, caret, rpart, and ade4.

    Results

    Demographics of the patients within the 3 diagnostic groups are given in Table 1. Gender, age, and body mass index (BMI) distributions were similar in the 3 diagnostic groups. The highest baseline z-scores are found for sReff (10.9 ± 6.9), followed by sWOB (9.5 ± 7.3); lowest for FEF25–75 (–1.5 ± 0.9), followed by DLCO (–1.6 ± 1.3). Multi-comparisons between the diagnostic groups revealed (with exception of FEV1 % predicted) significant z-score mean differences between asthma and ACO, highest for sWOB (3.2), followed by sReff (3.0); lowest for FEF25–75 (0.4). Such z-score mean differences were significantly higher between asthma and COPD (sReff: 7.8; sWOB: 7.6).

    Demographics of the patients within the 3 diagnostic groups

    ParametersAsthmaACOCOPDAll
    Measurements (% total)198 (28.8)152 (22.1)338 (49.1)688 (100)
    Gender (male/female, n)89/10983/69186/152358/330
    Age (mean, years)50.9 ± 18.163.1 ± 13.467.9 ± 8.661.9 ± 14.9
    BMI (mean, kg/m2)27.1 ± 5.627.0 ± 5.426.6 ± 6.726.8 ± 6.1
    Spirometry
          FEV1 z-score ± SD–1.3 ± 1.3–2.1 ± 1.5–3.3 ± 1.4–2.5 ± 1.6
          FEV1 % predicted ± SD92.3 ± 12.5085.6 ± 18.6554.9 ± 16.1079.2 ± 22.45
          FEF25–75 z-score ± SD–1.1 ± 1.2–1.4 ± 1.0–1.9 ± 0.7–1.5 ± 0.9
    End-expiratory level
          FRCpleth z-score ± SD0.65 ± 1.291.73 ± 1.602.56 ± 2.061.83 ± 1.95
    Airway dynamics
          sReff z-score ± SD6.43 ± 5.179.38 ± 5.5414.23 ± 6.5210.91 ± 6.86
          sWOB z-score ± SD4.98 ± 5.698.23 ± 6.0912.61 ± 7.069.45 ± 7.27
    Gas exchange
          DLCO z-score ± SD–0.6 ± 0.9–1.5 ± 1.1–2.25 ± 1.2–1.6 ± 1.3
    Display full size

    SD: standard deviation

    The assessment of SAD, based on SAdf of the different lung function parameters is given in Table 2. The three-parameter-criterion for the diagnosis of SAD was reached for all measurements in 72.5% of all measurements (row a: asthma 10.9%; ACO 74.3%; COPD 90.2%). Noteworthy is that the observation for asthma, in 35.4% (row b), one single parameter (mainly sReff) presented with SAdf, however not proving SAD in asthma, and in 20.2% (row c), even 2 single parameters (mainly sReff and VTGFRC) presented with SAdf, however not proving SAD in asthma. In both subgroups, FEF25–75 was in the normal range.

    Assessment of SAD, based on SAdf by the different lung function parameters

    ParametersAsthma (n = 198)ACO (n = 152)COPD (n = 338)All (n = 688)
    SAD [n (%)]a81 (40.9)113 (74.3)305 (90.2)499 (72.5)
    No SAD [n (%)]7 (3.5)1 (0.7)0 (0)8 (1.2)
    One SAdf-parameter [no SAD; n (%)]b70 (35.4)8 (5.3)2 (0.6)80 (11.6)
    Two SAdf-parameters [no SAD; n (%)]c40 (20.2)30 (19.7)31 (9.2)101 (14.7)
    Display full size

    Sensitivity and specificity were best for VTGFRC (row d: 93.8%, 52.4%, respectively) and lowest for FEF25–75 (row d: 28.0%, 3.8%, respectively) (Table 3). It follows that also the accuracy, i.e., the closeness to the diagnosis of SAD within all measurements was best for VTGFRC (row e: asthma: 70.7%; ACO: 82.2%; COPD: 89.9%) followed by sWOB (row e: asthma: 59.1%; ACO: 71.7%; COPD: 91.4%) and sReff (row e: asthma: 59.6%; ACO: 74.3%; COPD: 92.6%) (Table 3). Finally, we have been interested in evaluating by which combination of parameters SAD can be predicted within the 3 diagnostic classes. For asthma in 50 of 81 (row g: 61.7%), measurements by 4 parameters, for ACO in 39 of 113 (row g: 34.5%), measurements by also 4 parameters, and for COPD in 137 of 305 (row i: 44.9%), measurements by 6 parameters are needed for the diagnosis SAD (Table 4).

    Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of lung function parameters within the 3 diagnostic groups

    ParametersReliabilityAsthma (n = 198)ACO (n = 152)COPD (n = 338)All (n = 688)
    VTGFRCdSensitivity (%)77.193.898.493.8
    Specificity (%)66.148.76.552.4
    eAccuracy (%)70.782.289.982.7
    sWOBdSensitivity (%)84.388.596.492.6
    Specificity (%)40.923.141.937.3
    eAccuracy (%)59.171.791.480.5
    sReffdSensitivity (%)10094.798.798.0
    Specificity (%)30.415.432.327.6
    eAccuracy (%)59.674.392.679.1
    FRCplethdSensitivity (%)50.668.169.165.8
    Specificity (%)95.710096.896.8
    eAccuracy (%)76.874.371.674.1
    DLCOdSensitivity (%)84.349.626.441.2
    Specificity (%)10.430.812.915.1
    eAccuracy (%)41.444.725.134.2
    FEF25–75dSensitivity (%)33.730.125.728.0
    Specificity (%)1.7016.13.8
    eAccuracy (%)15.222.424.921.5
    Display full size

    Assessment of SAD by combining 3 or more parameters within the 3 diagnostic groups (based on at least 3 SAdf > 1.645 SDS)

    Number of parameters [n (%)]Asthma [n = 81 (16.2%)]ACO [n = 113 (22.6%)]COPD [n = 305 (61.1%)]All SAD [n = 499 (100%)]
          3      f12 (14.8)14 (12.4)10 (3.3)36 (7.2)
          4      g50 (61.7)39 (34.5)80 (26.2)169 (33.9)
          5      h17 (21.0)31 (27.4)78 (25.6)126 (25.3)
          6      i2 (2.5)29 (25.7)137 (44.9)168 (33.7)
    Display full size

    SDS: SD score

    By which age the onset of the parameters with a z-score over the ULN and under the LLN respectively within the 3 diagnostic groups can be expected, is presented in Figure 1. Most early onset in asthmatic was observed for sReff and sWOB (in 10% at age 22.4 years), in ACO for sReff (in 10% at age 41.5 years), and in COPD for FEF25–75, sReff, and sWOB (in 10% at age 57.3 years).

    Onset of the functional parameters with a z-score over the ULN and under the LLN respectively, within the 3 diagnostic groups. y: years

    Discussion

    The diagnosis of “SAD” in patients with obstructive pulmonary disease is not easy to assess. This study demonstrates that in the present dataset, this diagnosis could not be established based only on one single lung function parameter, especially not only on the spirometric FEF25–75. In contrast to other parameters, the accuracy of FEF25–75 was by the mean only 21.5% compared with VTGFRC with 82.7% accuracy (Table 3, row e). This may be because of different well-known factors: (i) Although easily available, FEF25–75 is hampered by physiological variability and measurement inconsistency issues [54, 61, 62]. (ii) FEF25–75 can be interpreted only when FVC stands within normal value limits [47]. (iii) The main drawback of use of FEF25–75 is that it tends to be less reproducible than other parameters because it is a volume-dependent measurement, afflicted with a high heterogeneity of airflow, even in moderately sized airway, and is altered by the presence of severe obstruction and/or PHI [63]. (iv) Finally, although it has been clearly proposed by both ATS and ERS, to express the degree of flow limitation based on the FEV1, FVC, and FEV1/FVC-ratios by z-scores, several author groups continue to present their data of flow limitation as percent predicted [54, 64, 65]. The advantage of presenting lung function data as z-scores is, that not only parameter mean values are provided, but individual data are corrected for gender, age, height, and ethnicity [48, 49, 6467]. Moreover, according to the findings from the Severe Asthma Research Program of the National Heart Lung and Blood Institute and others, which showed a lack of correlation between FEF25–75 and indices of air trapping [61], the FEF25–75 appears of limited reliability in assessing distal airway function [61, 6870]. To elaborate on the different confounding functional aspects of small airway function, Lipworth et al. [63] recommended that no single outcome should be considered the gold standard. An interpretation based on single SAdf parameters might merely be sensitive indicators of early disease across a range of phenotypes in patients with obstructive airway diseases [63].

    There is a general understanding that SAD plays an important role in asthma, ACO, and COPD [5, 7, 47, 71]. However, there are open questions about how SAD can be assessed by sound, discriminating lung function parameters reflecting the interactive derangements regarding bronchial obstruction, PHI, gas trapping, and gas exchange disturbances in the lungs. The main findings of the present study are, that the diagnosis of SAD can only be claimed if at least 3 specific lung function parameters (mainly sReff, VTGFRC, and DLCO) are interactively assessed. According to our data, the prevalence of SAD in asthma is much lower than reported by others [5, 6, 70, 72, 73]. This may be due to the fact, that in other studies the prevalence of FEF25–75 is erroneously hyper-estimated. Another reason may be that the prevalence of so-called SAD assessed by impulse oscillometry is very high [6, 70, 7274]. We do not dispose of oscillometric data, and to our knowledge, there are no studies comparing the prevalence of plethysmographic and oscillometric parameters defining SAD, at least not based on z-scores. FEF25–75 is thought to be a precursor for early small airway involvement. However, the 10% and 25% onset over age for FEF25–75 is not earlier compared to the other parameters. In fact, the onset of the target parameters (sWOB, sReff, FEF25–75, and VTGFRC) is significantly earlier in asthma than in ACO and COPD (Figure 1).

    Precision medicine features a new personalized approach, to “treatable traits”, suggested to address the limitations of the existing treatment strategies. Assessing SAD by interactive spirometric and plethysmographic lung function parameters may be of great help to better characterize SAD as treatable traits, leading to more targeted asthma management and more individualized patient care [35]. The importance of the peripheral airway in the pathophysiology and clinical manifestations of obstructive lung diseases makes them the intuitive target for long-term pharmacological approaches [75, 76]. In clinical routine practice, the identification of SAD during the diagnostic work-up should guide clinicians towards the treatment choice. Therefore, extended lung function assessment may be of great help to better characterize SAD as a “treatable trait,” leading to more targeted asthma management and individualized patient care.

    In conclusion, our study shows that in a population of clinically stable moderate-to-severe asthma, ACO, or COPD, SAD is quite variably (asthma: 10.9%; ACO: 74.3%; COPD: 90.2%) predictable, and only if at least 3 spirometric or plethysmographic lung function parameters are used. Whether the presence of SAD may influence the long-term outcome of asthma requires prospective studies comparing patients with or without persistent SAD based on sound discriminating criteria. Only on pathophysiological basic principles, such criteria can be embedded into concepts of precision medicine tailoring disease treatment and prevention.

    Abbreviations

    ACO:

    asthma-chronic obstructive pulmonary disease overlap

    COPD:

    chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

    DLCO:

    carbon monoxide diffusion capacity

    FEF25–75:

    forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75% of vital capacity

    FEV1:

    forced expiratory volume in 1 s

    FRC:

    functional residual capacity

    FRCpleth:

    plethysmographic functional residual capacity

    FVC:

    forced vital capacity

    LLN:

    lower limit of normal

    PHI:

    pulmonary hyperinflation

    SAD:

    small airway disease

    SAdf:

    small airway dysfunction

    sReff:

    effective specific airway resistance

    sWOB:

    aerodynamic resistive work of breathing at rest

    ULN:

    upper limit of normal

    VTGFRC:

    volume of trapped gas at functional residual capacity

    Declarations

    Acknowledgments

    The authors are grateful to the staff of all study centers, especially to the study nurses for their excellent and enduring work in data collection, and the authors thank Prof. Sabina Gallati from Human Genetics of Hirslanden Precise, Zürich, for the critical reviews of the manuscript.

    Author contributions

    RK: Conceptualization, Investigation, Writing—original draft, Writing—review & editing. HM: Writing—review & editing. Both authors read and approved the submitted version.

    Conflicts of interest

    The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

    Ethical approval

    The study was planned according to the Federal Law of Human Research, conceptualized according to the Swiss Ethics Committees on research involving humans, and was conducted in accordance with the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki. The study is part of the framework of the project entitled “Functional diversification of the Asthma-ACO-COPD multi-center study” (ID 2017-00259), approved by the Governmental Ethics Committees of the State of Bern, St. Gallen, Solothurn, and Zürich (project KEK-BE PB_2017-00104).

    Consent to participate

    All 4 Ethics Committees exempted the informed consent to participate since the data were retrospectively evaluated and anonymous.

    Consent to publication

    Not applicable.

    Availability of data and materials

    Master-files have been stored and secured in the Clinical Trial Unit (CTU), Hirslanden, Corporate Office, CH-8152 Glattpark, Switzerland, and are available upon request from the corresponding author (richard.kraemer@hirslanden.ch) or the office manager, Mr. Daniel Tschopp, Head Clinical Trial Unit, Hirslanden (ClinicalTrialUnit.Hirslanden@hirslanden.ch).

    Funding

    Not applicable.

    Copyright

    © The Author(s) 2024.

    References

    Weibel ER. Morphometry of the human lung. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg GmbH; 1963.
    Macklem PT, Mead J. Resistance of central and peripheral airways measured by a retrograde catheter. J Appl Physiol. 1967;22:395401. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Contoli M, Kraft M, Hamid Q, Bousquet J, Rabe KF, Fabbri LM, et al. Do small airway abnormalities characterize asthma phenotypes? In search of proof. Clin Exp Allergy. 2012;42:115060. [DOI] [PubMed]
    van der Wiel E, ten Hacken NH, Postma DS, van den Berge M. Small-airways dysfunction associates with respiratory symptoms and clinical features of asthma: a systematic review. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013;131:64657. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Usmani OS, Singh D, Spinola M, Bizzi A, Barnes PJ. The prevalence of small airways disease in adult asthma: a systematic literature review. Respir Med. 2016;116:1927. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Abdo M, Trinkmann F, Kirsten AM, Pedersen F, Herzmann C, von Mutius E, et al.; Study Group. Small airway dysfunction links asthma severity with physical activity and symptom control. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2021;9:335968.E1. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Usmani OS, Barnes PJ. Assessing and treating small airways disease in asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Ann Med. 2012;44:14656. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Scichilone N, Battaglia S, Taormina S, Modica V, Pozzecco E, Bellia V. Alveolar nitric oxide and asthma control in mild untreated asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013;131:15137. Erratum in: J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013;132:1015. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Takeda T, Oga T, Niimi A, Matsumoto H, Ito I, Yamaguchi M, et al. Relationship between small airway function and health status, dyspnea and disease control in asthma. Respiration. 2010;80:1206. [DOI] [PubMed]
    in’t Veen JC, Beekman AJ, Bel EH, Sterk PJ. Recurrent exacerbations in severe asthma are associated with enhanced airway closure during stable episodes. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000;161:19026. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Gibson PG, Simpson JL. The overlap syndrome of asthma and COPD: What are its features and how important is it? Thorax. 2009;64:72835. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Zeki AA, Schivo M, Chan A, Albertson TE, Louie S. The asthma-COPD overlap syndrome: a common clinical problem in the elderly. J Allergy (Cairo). 2011;2011:861926. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Kauppi P, Kupiainen H, Lindqvist A, Tammilehto L, Kilpelainen M, Kinnula VL, et al. Overlap syndrome of asthma and COPD predicts low quality of life. J Asthma. 2011;48:27985. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Diaz-Guzman E, Khosravi M, Mannino DM. Asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and mortality in the U.S. population. COPD. 2011;8:4007. [DOI]
    Louie S, Zeki AA, Schivo M, Chan AL, Yoneda KY, Avdalovic M, et al. The asthma-chronic obstructive pulmonary disease overlap syndrome: pharmacotherapeutic considerations. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2013;6:197219. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    de Marco R, Pesce G, Marcon A, Accordini S, Antonicelli L, Bugiani M, et al. The coexistence of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): prevalence and risk factors in young, middle-aged and elderly people from the general population. PLoS One. 2013;8:e62985. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Milanese M, Di Marco F, Corsico AG, Rolla G, Sposato B, Chieco-Bianchi F, et al.; ELSA Study Group. Asthma control in elderly asthmatics. An Italian observational study. Respir Med. 2014;108:10919. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Global strategy for prevention, diagnosis and management of COPD: 2023 report [Internet]. Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease; c2024 [cited 2023 Feb 17]. Available from: https://goldcopd.org/2023-gold-report-2/
    Agusti A, Vestbo J. Current controversies and future perspectives in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011;184:50713. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Faner R, Agustí Á. Multilevel, dynamic chronic obstructive pulmonary disease heterogeneity. A challenge for personalized medicine. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016;13:S46670. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Han MK, Quibrera PM, Carretta EE, Barr RG, Bleecker ER, Bowler RP, et al.; SPIROMICS investigators. Frequency of exacerbations in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: an analysis of the SPIROMICS cohort. Lancet Respir Med. 2017;5:61926. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Agusti A, MacNee W. The COPD control panel: towards personalised medicine in COPD. Thorax. 2013;68:68790. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Hogg JC, Macklem PT, Thurlbeck WM. The resistance of small airways in normal and diseased human lungs. Aspen Emphysema Conf. 1967;10:43341. [PubMed]
    Hogg JC, Macklem PT, Thurlbeck WM. Site and nature of airway obstruction in chronic obstructive lung disease. N Engl J Med. 1968;278:135560. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Bates JH, Suki B. Assessment of peripheral lung mechanics. Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2008;163:5463. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Bhatt SP, Soler X, Wang X, Murray S, Anzueto AR, Beaty TH, et al.; COPDGene Investigators. Association between functional small airway disease and FEV1 decline in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016;194:17884. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Vestbo J, Edwards LD, Scanlon PD, Yates JC, Agusti A, Bakke P, et al.; ECLIPSE Investigators. Changes in forced expiratory volume in 1 second over time in COPD. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:118492. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Herpel LB, Kanner RE, Lee SM, Fessler HE, Sciurba FC, Connett JE, et al.; National Emphysema Treatment Trial Research Group. Variability of spirometry in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2006;173:110613. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Pennock BE, Rogers RM, McCaffree DR. Changes in measured spirometric indices: What is significant? Chest. 1981;80:979. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Alobaidi NY, Almeshari MA, Stockley JA, Stockley RA, Sapey E. The prevalence of bronchodilator responsiveness of the small airway (using mid-maximal expiratory flow) in COPD - a retrospective study. BMC Pulm Med. 2022;22:493. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    McDonough JE, Yuan R, Suzuki M, Seyednejad N, Elliott WM, Sanchez PG, et al. Small-airway obstruction and emphysema in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:156775. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Hogg JC, McDonough JE, Suzuki M. Small airway obstruction in COPD: new insights based on micro-CT imaging and MRI imaging. Chest. 2013;143:143643. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Mirsadraee M, Boskabady MH, Attaran D. Diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease earlier than current Global Initiative for Obstructive Lung Disease guidelines using a feasible spirometry parameter (maximal-mid expiratory flow/forced vital capacity). Chron Respir Dis. 2013;10:1916. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Agusti A, Bel E, Thomas M, Vogelmeier C, Brusselle G, Holgate S, et al. Treatable traits: toward precision medicine of chronic airway diseases. Eur Respir J. 2016;47:4109. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Agustí A, Bafadhel M, Beasley R, Bel EH, Faner R, Gibson PG, et al. Precision medicine in airway diseases: moving to clinical practice. Eur Respir J. 2017;50:1701655. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Wouters EFM, Wouters BBREF, Augustin IML, Houben-Wilke S, Vanfleteren LEGW, Franssen FME. Personalised pulmonary rehabilitation in COPD. Eur Respir Rev. 2018;27:170125. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Franssen FM, Alter P, Bar N, Benedikter BJ, Iurato S, Maier D, et al. Personalized medicine for patients with COPD: Where are we? Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2019;14:146584. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Brightling C, Greening N. Airway inflammation in COPD: progress to precision medicine. Eur Respir J. 2019;54:1900651. [DOI] [PubMed]
    McDonald VM, Fingleton J, Agusti A, Hiles SA, Clark VL, Holland AE, et al. Treatable traits: a new paradigm for 21st century management of chronic airway diseases: Treatable Traits Down Under International Workshop report. Eur Respir J. 2019;53:1802058. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Leung JM, Obeidat M, Sadatsafavi M, Sin DD. Introduction to precision medicine in COPD. Eur Respir J. 2019;53:1802460. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Brandsma CA, Van den Berge M, Hackett TL, Brusselle G, Timens W. Recent advances in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease pathogenesis: from disease mechanisms to precision medicine. J Pathol. 2020;250:62435. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Cardoso J, Ferreira AJ, Guimarães M, Oliveira AS, Simão P, Sucena M. Treatable traits in COPD – a proposed approach. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2021;16:316782. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Lopez-Campos JL, Centanni S. Current approaches for phenotyping as a target for precision medicine in COPD management. COPD. 2018;15:10817. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Lopes-Pacheco M. CFTR modulators: the changing face of cystic fibrosis in the era of precision medicine. Front Pharmacol. 2019;10:1662. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Chan R, Lipworth BJ. Impact of biologic therapy on the small airways asthma phenotype. Lung. 2022;200:6916. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Qin R, An J, Xie J, Huang R, Xie Y, He L, et al. FEF25-75% is a more sensitive measure reflecting airway dysfunction in patients with asthma: a comparison study using FEF25-75% and FEV1%. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2021;9:364959.E6. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Perez T, Chanez P, Dusser D, Devillier P. Small airway impairment in moderate to severe asthmatics without significant proximal airway obstruction. Respir Med. 2013;107:166774. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Kraemer R, Smith HJ, Gardin F, Barandun J, Minder S, Kern L, et al. Bronchodilator response in patients with COPD, asthma-COPD-overlap (ACO) and asthma, evaluated by plethysmographic and spirometric z-score target parameters. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2021;16:2487500. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Kraemer R, Gardin F, Smith HJ, Baty F, Barandun J, Piecyk A, et al. Functional predictors discriminating asthma–COPD overlap (ACO) from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2022;17:272343. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Mahut B, Caumont-Prim A, Plantier L, Gillet-Juvin K, Callens E, Sanchez O, et al. Relationships between respiratory and airway resistances and activity-related dyspnea in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2012;7:16571. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Matthys H, Orth U. Comparative measurements of airway resistance. Respiration. 1975;32:12134. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Cotes JE, Chinn DJ, Quanjer PH, Roca J, Yernault JC. Standardization of the measurement of transfer factor (diffusing capacity). Eur Respir J. 1993;6:4152. [PubMed]
    American Thoracic Society. Lung function testing: selection of reference values and interpretative strategies. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1991;144:120218. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Pellegrino R, Viegi G, Brusasco V, Crapo RO, Burgos F, Casaburi R, et al. Interpretative strategies for lung function tests. Eur Respir J. 2005;26:94868. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Miller MR, Hankinson J, Brusasco V, Burgos F, Casaburi R, Coates A, et al.; ATS/ERS Task Force. Standardisation of spirometry. Eur Respir J. 2005;26:31938. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Goldman M, Smith HJ, Ulmer WT. Whole-body plethysmography. Eur Respir Mon. 2005;31:1543.
    Stolz D, Barandun J, Borer H, Bridevaux PO, Brun P, Brutsche M, et al. Diagnosis, prevention and treatment of stable COPD and acute exacerbations of COPD: the Swiss recommendations 2018. Respiration. 2018;96:38298. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Stocks J, Quanjer PH. Reference values for residual volume, functional residual capacity and total lung capacity. ATS Workshop on lung volume measurements. Official statement of the European Respiratory Society. Eur Respir J. 1995;8:492506. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Hankinson JL, Odencrantz JR, Fedan KB. Spirometric reference values from a sample of the general U.S. population. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1999;159:17987. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Kraemer R, Smith HJ, Sigrist T, Giger G, Keller R, Frey M. Diagnostic accuracy of methacholine challenge tests assessing airway hyperreactivity in asthmatic patients - a multifunctional approach. Respir Res. 2016;17:154. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Sorkness RL, Bleecker ER, Busse WW, Calhoun WJ, Castro M, Chung KF, et al.; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Severe Asthma Research Program. Lung function in adults with stable but severe asthma: air trapping and incomplete reversal of obstruction with bronchodilation. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2008;104:394403. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Mahut B, Bokov P, Delclaux C. Abnormalities of plethysmographic lung volumes in asthmatic children. Respir Med. 2010;104:96671. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Lipworth B, Manoharan A, Anderson W. Unlocking the quiet zone: the small airway asthma phenotype. Lancet Respir Med. 2014;2:497506. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Pauwels RA, Buist AS, Calverley PM, Jenkins CR, Hurd SS; GOLD Scientific Committee. Global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001;163:125676. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Swanney MP, Ruppel G, Enright PL, Pedersen OF, Crapo RO, Miller MR, et al. Using the lower limit of normal for the FEV1/FVC ratio reduces the misclassification of airway obstruction. Thorax. 2008;63:104651. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Quanjer PH, Enright PL, Miller MR, Stocks J, Ruppel G, Swanney MP, et al. The need to change the method for defining mild airway obstruction. Eur Respir J. 2011;37:7202. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Scholes S, Moody A, Mindell JS. Estimating population prevalence of potential airflow obstruction using different spirometric criteria: a pooled cross-sectional analysis of persons aged 40–95 years in England and Wales. BMJ Open. 2014;4:e005685. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Cosio M, Ghezzo H, Hogg JC, Corbin R, Loveland M, Dosman J, et al. The relations between structural changes in small airways and pulmonary-function tests. N Engl J Med. 1978;298:127781. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Riley CM, Wenzel SE, Castro M, Erzurum SC, Chung KF, Fitzpatrick AM, et al. Clinical implications of having reduced mid forced expiratory flow rates (FEF25-75), independently of FEV1, in adult patients with asthma. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0145476. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Cottini M, Licini A, Lombardi C, Berti A. Prevalence and features of IOS-defined small airway disease across asthma severities. Respir Med. 2021;176:106243. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Burgel PR. The role of small airways in obstructive airway diseases. Eur Respir Rev. 2011;20:2333. Erratum in: Eur Respir Rev. 2011;20:123. Erratum in: Eur Respir Rev. 2011;20:124. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Postma DS, Brightling C, Baldi S, Van den Berge M, Fabbri LM, Gagnatelli A, et al.; ATLANTIS study group. Exploring the relevance and extent of small airways dysfunction in asthma (ATLANTIS): baseline data from a prospective cohort study. Lancet Respir Med. 2019;7:40216. Erratum in: Lancet Respir Med. 2019;7:e28. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Cottini M, Lombardi C, Passalacqua G, Bagnasco D, Berti A, Comberiati P, et al. Small airways: the “silent zone” of 2021 GINA report? Front Med (Lausanne). 2022;9:884679. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Anderson WJ, Zajda E, Lipworth BJ. Are we overlooking persistent small airways dysfunction in community-managed asthma? Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2012;109:1859.E2. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Santus P, Radovanovic D, Pecchiari M, Ferrando M, Tursi F, Patella V, et al. The relevance of targeting treatment to small airways in asthma and COPD. Respir Care. 2020;65:1392412. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Lipworth B. Targeting the small airways asthma phenotype: If we can reach it, should we treat it? Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2013;110:2339. [DOI] [PubMed]
    • Citation
      Cite this Article
      • Article Metrics
      • View: 265
      • Download: 9
      • Times Cited: 0