From:  Effects of sugar and confectionery consumption on serum testosterone levels in males: a narrative review

 Methodological characteristics and hormonal outcomes of human studies evaluating the impact of dietary sugar intake on serum testosterone levels in males.

StudyStudy typePopulationSugar exposureFasting status/Sampling contextTestosterone assay methodConfounder adjustmentMain hormonal finding
Acute studies: Single glucose load or short-term postprandial feeding
Iranmanesh et al., 2012 [10]Acute physiological interventional study57 healthy adult men (19–78 years)75 g oral glucose load vs. waterOvernight fast; intensive 10-min interval sampling for 6.5 hChemiluminescent immunoassayMultivariate regression for age, BMI, visceral fat, and metabolic hormonesBasal T secretion: 5,256 → 4,608 ng·dL−1·6.5 h−1 (↓12.3%, p < 0.0001). Total T secretion: 6,065 → 5,474 ng·dL−1·6.5 h−1 (↓9.7%, p < 0.001). T concentration slope 5.5× steeper after glucose vs. water (p < 0.001). Pulsatile LH secretion: 20 → 18 IU·L−1·6.5 h−1 (p = 0.043).
Gagliano-Jucá et al., 2019 [11]Acute metabolic interventionHealthy eugonadal men (aging OGTT cohort + young MMTT cohort)OGTT and carbohydrate-rich mixed meal10–12 h overnight fast; serial early-morning sampling every 20 minLC-MS/MSWithin-subject paired design (no covariate adjustment required)~20–30% transient decline in serum total testosterone within 60–90 min of glucose ingestion.
Van de Velde et al., 2020 [6]Observational postprandial physiology study43 adult men across the age/BMI spectrumStandardized mixed meal tolerance test≥ 8 h fast; sampling at baseline, 30, 60, 120 minLC-MS/MSLinear mixed-effects modelling including metabolic variablesMean total T decrease: 13 ± 12% at 30 min; 15 ± 15% at 60 min (p < 0.001 at all timepoints). Free T decrease: 15 ± 13% at 30 min; 17 ± 16% at 60 min. Younger men (≤ 40 years) showed an additional 2.7 nmol/L steeper decline at 60 min vs. older men (p < 0.001). SHBG unchanged.
Pearce and Tremellen, 2019 [3]Dietary metabolic pilot interventionOverweight/obese men (18–50 years)Macronutrient feeding protocols, including the refined carbohydrate arm (orange juice)Overnight fast; baseline and hourly sampling over 5 hNot explicitly specified in methodsAdjustments for age, BMI, habitual diet, sleep, and activityCarbohydrates alone (orange juice): no significant change vs. fasting (p = NS). Carbohydrates + PUFA: significantly reduced T vs. fasting (p = 0.040). Mean baseline T: 11.7 ± 3.0 nmol/L. PUFA alone: ↓3.2 nmol/L at 1 h (p = 0.023), persisting to 5 h (p = 0.012).
Chronic/Epidemiological studies: habitual dietary patterns or long-term dietary intervention
Chen et al., 2018 [12]Cross-sectional epidemiological study (NHANES)991 US men aged 20–39 yearsSSB intake (24-h recall)Single blood sampling; timing accounted for circadian variationElectrochemiluminescence immunoassayMultivariable adjustment (age, BMI, race, lifestyle, socioeconomic factors)Highest SSB quartile (≥ 442 kcal/day) vs. lowest (≤ 137 kcal/day): aOR for low testosterone = 2.29 (p = 0.041). BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2: aOR = 3.68 (p = 0.044) as an independent risk factor.
Nassan et al., 2021 [5]Cross-sectional fertility cohort study~2,935 Danish young men (~18 years)Soft drink intake via validated FFQMorning venous sampling; time-of-day adjustment in modelsTime-resolved fluoroimmunoassay/ELISA (platform changed during study)Extensive adjustment (age, BMI, lifestyle, diet patterns, SES, substance use)Total testosterone: p-trend = 0.15 (not statistically significant across SSB quartiles). Primary significant effects: sperm concentration –13.0 million/mL in the highest SSB quartile vs. non-consumers (95% CI: –21.0, –5.5; p-trend = 0.001); inhibin-B –12 pg/mL (95% CI: –21, –4).
Corsetti et al., 2023 [18]Prospective dietary lifestyle intervention50 subfertile men (35–45 years)Low-carbohydrate organic Mediterranean diet (3 months)Post-intervention hormonal assessment; fasting status not clearly specifiedNot specifiedMinimal reported adjustmentTestosterone: 3.2 ± 0.3 ng/mL → 6.92 ± 1.16 ng/mL (↑116%; p = 0.011; n = 30). Sperm DFI: 44.2 ± 3.02% → 23.2 ± 3.57% (↓47.5%; p = 0.001; n = 20 in low-carb subgroup).

aOR: adjusted odds ratio; BMI: body mass index; DFI: DNA fragmentation index; ELISA: enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; FFQ: food frequency questionnaire; LC-MS/MS: liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry; LH: luteinizing hormone; MMTT: mixed meal tolerance test; NHANES: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey; OGTT: oral glucose tolerance test; PUFA: polyunsaturated fats; SES: socioeconomic status; SHBG: sex hormone binding globulin; SSB: sugar-sweetened beverages.