Open Exploration maintains a neutral stance on jurisdictional claims in published institutional affiliations and maps. All opinions expressed in this article are the personal views of the author(s) and do not represent the stance of the editorial team or the publisher.
COPE position - Editorial independence [Internet].Committee on Publication Ethics; c2025 [cited 2025 Dec 14]. Available from: https://doi.org/10.24318/wTjdIHE5
Teixeira da Silva JA, Dobránszki J, Bhar RH, Mehlman CT. Editors Should Declare Conflicts of Interest.J Bioeth Inq. 2019;16:279–98. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Lee JCL, Watt J, Kelsall D, Straus S. Journal editors: How do their editing incomes compare?F1000Res. 2020;9:1027. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Roberts WC. Stepping down.Am J Cardiology. 2022;178.
Crea F, Guzik T, Kavaney AF. The Journal Citation Indicator: what is the relevance of this new metric?Eur Heart J. 2023;44:243–4. [DOI] [PubMed]
Van Noorden R. Brazilian citation scheme outed.Nature. 2013;500:510–1. [DOI]
Van Noorden R. Highly cited researcher banned from journal board for citation abuse.Nature. 2020;578:200–1. [DOI] [PubMed]
Roberts WC. Reviews of classic books and ineptness of reviewers: lessons for judges of medical manuscripts.Am J Cardiol. 1987;59:922–3. [PubMed]
Di Pasquale G. Il lavoro oscuro del revisore.G Ital Cardiol. 2023;24:935–7. Italian. [DOI]
Lock S. Peer review weighed in the balance.Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1982;285:1224–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Svetlov V. The real dirty secret of academic publishing.Nature. 2004;431:897. [DOI] [PubMed]
Roberts WC. Facts and ideas from anywhere.Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2006;19:73–88. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
