From:  SGLT2 inhibitors in chronic kidney disease: cardiorenal outcomes, safety, and implementation in primary care

 Characteristics of the studies included in the qualitative synthesis.

StudyFirst authorCountryStudy designStudy populationInterventionKey findings
EMPA-KIDNEYHerrington et al.MultinationalRandomized controlled trialAdults with CKD with or without diabetesEmpagliflozinReduced kidney disease progression, cardiovascular death, and all-cause hospitalization.
DAPA-CKDHeerspink et al.MultinationalRandomized controlled trialAdults with CKD with or without diabetesDapagliflozinReduced sustained eGFR decline, kidney failure, and cardiovascular death or hospitalization for heart failure.
EMPA-REG OUTCOMEZinman et al.MultinationalRandomized controlled trialAdults with type 2 diabetes and established cardiovascular diseaseEmpagliflozinReduced cardiovascular mortality, hospitalization for heart failure, and progression of kidney disease.
CANVAS ProgramNeal et al.MultinationalRandomized controlled trialAdults with type 2 diabetes at high cardiovascular riskCanagliflozinImproved cardiovascular outcomes and reduced progression of albuminuria.
DECLARE-TIMI 58Wiviott et al.MultinationalRandomized controlled trialAdults with type 2 diabetes with or at risk for cardiovascular diseaseDapagliflozinReduced hospitalization for heart failure and improved renal outcomes.
CREDENCEPerkovic et al.MultinationalRandomized controlled trialAdults with type 2 diabetes and CKDCanagliflozinReduced kidney failure, sustained eGFR decline, and cardiovascular events.
Underuse of cardiorenal protective agentsHao et al.United StatesCross-sectional studyHigh-risk adults with type 2 diabetesSGLT2 inhibitorsDemonstrated substantial underuse of SGLT2 inhibitors among eligible patients.
CAREPRO-T2DSimões de Carvalho et al.PortugalCross-sectional studyAdults with type 2 diabetesSGLT2 inhibitorsIdentified significant underprescription of SGLT2 inhibitors despite guideline eligibility.
ATLAS studyLindhardt et al.DenmarkCross-sectional studyAdults with CKD managed in primary careSGLT2 inhibitorsHighlighted opportunities to improve CKD management and implementation of evidence-based therapies.
Kidney outcomes associated with SGLT2 inhibitorsNagasu et al.JapanRetrospective cohort studyAdults with type 2 diabetesSGLT2 inhibitors versus other glucose-lowering agentsSGLT2 inhibitors were associated with improved kidney outcomes in routine clinical practice.
Outcomes in new user cohortsLayton et al.United StatesRetrospective cohort studyAdults with CKD and type 2 diabetesSGLT2 inhibitors or GLP-1 receptor agonistsDemonstrated favorable kidney and cardiovascular outcomes with SGLT2 inhibitor therapy.
Cardiorenal protective effects in CREDENCECharytan et al.MultinationalSecondary analysis of the CREDENCE trialAdults with type 2 diabetes and CKDCanagliflozinCardiorenal benefits were consistent regardless of baseline glycemic control.
Low use of guideline-recommended cardiorenal protective agentsMarasinghe et al.AustraliaCross-sectional studyAdults with type 2 diabetes in primary careCardiorenal protective therapiesIdentified persistent underutilization of guideline-recommended therapies.
Factors affecting prescription of SGLT2 inhibitorsNg et al.Hong Kong, ChinaQualitative studyPrimary care physiciansSGLT2 inhibitorsIdentified physician-related barriers and facilitators influencing SGLT2 inhibitor prescribing.
Real-world prescriptions of GLP-1RAs and SGLT2 inhibitorsTuccinardi et al.ItalyRetrospective observational cohort studyAdults with type 2 diabetesGLP-1 receptor agonists and SGLT2 inhibitorsPrescribing decisions were influenced more by BMI and age than by cardiorenal risk.

GLP-1: glucagon-like peptide-1; GLP-1RAs: glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists; BMI: body mass index; CKD: chronic kidney disease; eGFR: estimated glomerular filtration rate; SGLT2: sodium-glucose cotransporter-2. The table summarizes the study name, first author, country, study design, study population, intervention, and key findings for the 15 primary studies included in this systematic review. References: [115].