From:  Prospective associations of allostatic load with heart failure incidence and prognosis: findings from two national cohorts

 Association between AL and incident heart failure in the HRS cohort.

ALN/Case (%)OR95% CIP value
Model 1
Low AL (0–2)Reference
Medium AL (3)1,059/29 (2.7)1.440.94–2.210.090
High AL (≥ 4)1,002/103 (10.28)2.171.46–3.21< 0.001
P for trend3,814/151 (4.0)1.471.21–1.79< 0.001
Per unit increment3,814/151 (4.0)1.491.21–1.82< 0.001
Model 2
Low AL (0–2)Reference
Medium AL (3)1,058/29 (2.7)1.500.98–2.320.064
High AL (≥ 4)999/103 (10.3)2.211.47–3.33< 0.001
P for trend3,807/151 (4.0)1.491.21–1.82< 0.001
Per unit increment3,807/151 (4.0)1.451.28–1.61< 0.001
Model 3
Low AL (0–2)Reference
Medium AL (3)842/22 (2.6)1.260.75–2.110.391
High AL (≥ 4)823/81 (9.8)2.071.29–3.320.002
P for trend2,951/115 (3.90)1.461.14–1.840.002
Per unit increment2,951/115 (3.90)1.301.13–1.49< 0.001

Model 1 was unadjusted; Model 2 adjusted for age, sex, education level, marital status, race/ethnicity, and income; Model 3 further adjusted for smoking, drinking, serum creatinine, coronary heart disease, antihypertensive medication, and diabetes. HRS: Health and Retirement Study; AL: allostatic load; OR: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval.