Active site residues of the inosine-5’-monophosphate dehydrogenase enzyme that established contacts with the phytochemicals.
| S. No. | Phytoconstituents | Amino acid residue interactions and their distance | Types of bond formation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| H-bond back chain | H-bond side chain | |||
| 1. | Amaroswerin | GLU 411 (1.61), ASN 273 (1.69), LEU 408 (2.17), MET 384 (2.20), LYS 71 (2.41) | ASN 273, MET384, GLU411 | LEU408, LYS71 |
| 2. | Eriocitrin | VAL 409 (1.82), GLY 385 (2.03), LEU 408 (2.04), GLU 411 (2.19), GLY 296 (2.25) | GLY 296, LEU 408 | VAL 409, GLY 385, GLU 411 |
| 3. | Peganine | GLU 411, GLY 296, THR 303 | GLY 296 | GLU 411, THR 303 |
| 4. | Afzelechin | GLU 411 (1.61), ALA 47 (1.93), ASN 273 (2.69) | - | GLU 411, ALA 47, ASN 273 |
| 5. | Amarogentin | GLU 411 (1.85), MET 384 (1.94), LEU 408 (2.01), LYS 71 (2.39), GLY 294 (2.77) | LEU 408, LYS 71 | - |
| 6. | Naringenin | GLY 411, ALA 47, LYS 71, GLY 294 | - | GLY411, ALA47, LYS71, GLY294 |
The supplementary tables for this article are available at: https://www.explorationpub.com/uploads/Article/file/1010196_sup_1.pdf.
Rengarajan Murugesan sincerely thanks the management of Rajagiri College of Social Sciences for providing the opportunity and necessary support to prepare the manuscript. The author(s) declared that generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript. During manuscript preparation, the authors used Grammarly Premium to correct language errors. This AI-assisted tool checked spelling, grammar, punctuation, clarity, and plagiarism, suggesting corrections where needed. This collaboration enhanced the manuscript’s quality by combining human expertise with AI efficiency, and Turnitin was used to detect plagiarism and AI-generated content.
RM: Methodology, Investigation, Project administration, Supervision, Data curation, Validation, Writing—original draft, Writing—review & editing. KK: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis. RP: Investigation, Methodology, Software, Writing—review & editing. SJ: Conceptualization, Project administration. KD: Resources, Validation. BK: Visualization, Writing—review & editing. SAC: Data curation, Formal analysis, Software. SP: Methodology, Investigation, Project administration, Supervision, Data curation, Validation, Writing—original draft, Writing—review & editing. SS: Validation, Visualization, Writing—original draft, Writing—review & editing. All authors read and approved the submitted version.
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
The data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its Supporting Information. Additional datasets generated during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
This work was financially supported by Rajagiri College of Social Sciences (Autonomous), Kerala, India, under Seed Money/Faculty Minor Research (Grant No. RCSS/IQAC/BB-S74/2026/174). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
© The Author(s) 2026.
Open Exploration maintains a neutral stance on jurisdictional claims in published institutional affiliations and maps. All opinions expressed in this article are the personal views of the author(s) and do not represent the stance of the editorial team or the publisher.