Exploration of Foods and Foodomics

Table 1. Viscosity, physical and microbiological properties of unpasteurized and pasteurized, and stored yellow pea beverage.

Sample/Time (days)		Viscosity (mPa·s)*	pH	Microbial count (log CFU/g)
Sample/Time (days)		Viscosity (mPa·s)*	pH	MRS	NA	YGC
Unpasteurized B		4.311 ± 0.006^α	7.31 ± 0.02^β	nd	nd	nd
Pasteurized B	0	4.381 ± 0.005^α	7.31 ± 0.02^β	nd	nd	nd
	7	7.76 ± 0.04^β	7.27 ± 0.01^β	nd	nd	nd
	14	8.48 ± 0.09^δ	7.29 ± 0.01^β	nd	nd	nd
	21	8.1 ± 0.1^γ	6.53 ± 0.02^α	nd	7.15 ± 0.08	nd

Return to article view

Different letters in the same column indicate significant differences (P < 0.05) among all groups in the table. *: Calculated at a shear rate of 500 s^–1. nd: not detectable at 10 CFU/g.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Bioseminis (https://bioseminis.com/) for providing yellow pea seeds and Dr. Fabricio Lareu (technical staff) for their assistance in handling cell cultures.

The authors M.A.C., S.G.F., and V.A.T. are members of the INNOPROT network (Network of Innovation in the processing of plant proteins endemic to Latin America), funded by CYTED (ref. 124RT0164).

Author contributions

MAC: Investigation, Methodology, Formal analysis, Visualization, Writing—original draft, Writing—review & editing. SFGF: Methodology, Formal analysis. AF: Methodology, Formal analysis, Writing—review & editing. VAT: Conceptualization, Methodology, Supervision, Writing—original draft, Writing—review & editing. All authors read and approved the submitted version.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts to declare.

Ethical approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent to publication

Not applicable.

Availability of data and materials

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this manuscript will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation, to any qualified researcher.

Funding

Support for this research came from grants X870 from Universidad Nacional de La Plata (UNLP) and PICT-2020-1367 from Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica (ANPCyT). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Copyright

Publisher’s note

Open Exploration maintains a neutral stance on jurisdictional claims in published institutional affiliations and maps. All opinions expressed in this article are the personal views of the author(s) and do not represent the stance of the editorial team or the publisher.

References

Benedetti Penha C, De Paola Santos V, Speranza P, Kurozawa L. Plant-based beverages: Ecofriendly technologies in the production process. Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol. 2021;72:102760. [DOI]

Craig WJ, Fresán U. International Analysis of the Nutritional Content and a Review of Health Benefits of Non-Dairy Plant-Based Beverages. Nutrients. 2021;13:842. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]

Fructuoso I, Romão B, Han H, Raposo A, Ariza-Montes A, Araya-Castillo L, et al. An Overview on Nutritional Aspects of Plant-Based Beverages Used as Substitutes for Cow’s Milk. Nutrients. 2021;13:2650. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]

Popova A, Mihaylova D, Lante A. Insights and Perspectives on Plant-Based Beverages. Plants. 2023;12:3345. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]

McClements DJ, Grossmann L. A brief review of the science behind the design of healthy and sustainable plant-based foods. npj Sci Food. 2021;5:17. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]

Research and Markets. Plant-based Milk Market - Global Industry Analysis, Size, Share, Growth, Trends, and Forecast 2024-2031-. The Author; 2024. [DOI]

Mishra S, Singh R, Upadhyay A, Mishra S, Shukla S. Emerging trends in processing for cereal and legume-based beverages: A review. Future Foods. 2023;8:100257. [DOI]

Aydar EF, Mertdinç Z, Demircan E, Koca Çetinkaya S, Özçelik B. Kidney bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) milk substitute as a novel plant-based drink: Fatty acid profile, antioxidant activity, in-vitro phenolic bio-accessibility and sensory characteristics. Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol. 2023;83:103254. [DOI]

Uh S, Kim I, Kim K, Seo Y, Shin K, Li K, et al. Improvement the Resveratrol Content of Germinated Peanut Drink by Lactic Acid Fermentation. Int J Sci Res Sci Eng Technol. 2021;8:262–73. [DOI]

10.

Xie A, Dong Y, Liu Z, Li Z, Shao J, Li M, et al. A Review of Plant-Based Drinks Addressing Nutrients, Flavor, and Processing Technologies. Foods. 2023;12:3952. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]

11.

Duarte CM, Mota J, Assunção R, Martins C, Ribeiro AC, Lima A, et al. New Alternatives to Milk From Pulses: Chickpea and Lupin Beverages With Improved Digestibility and Potential Bioactivities for Human Health. Front Nutr. 2022;9:852907. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]

12.

Jeske S, Zannini E, Arendt EK. Evaluation of Physicochemical and Glycaemic Properties of Commercial Plant-Based Milk Substitutes. Plant Foods Hum Nutr. 2016;72:26–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]

13.

Lopes M, Pierrepont C, Duarte CM, Filipe A, Medronho B, Sousa I. Legume Beverages from Chickpea and Lupin, as New Milk Alternatives. Foods. 2020;9:1458. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]

14.

Boukid F, Rosell CM, Castellari M. Pea protein ingredients: A mainstream ingredient to (re)formulate innovative foods and beverages. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2021;110:729–42. [DOI]

15.

Manassero CA, Añón MC, Speroni F. Development of a High Protein Beverage Based on Amaranth. Plant Foods Hum Nutr. 2020;75:599–607. [DOI] [PubMed]

16.

Rodríguez M, Tironi VA. Chemical and cell antioxidant activity of amaranth flour and beverage after simulated gastrointestinal digestion. Role of peptides. Food Res Int. 2023;173:113410. [DOI] [PubMed]

17.

Cipollone MA, Tironi VA. Yellow pea flour and protein isolate as sources of antioxidant peptides after simulated gastrointestinal digestion. Legume Sci. 2020;2:e59. [DOI]

18.

Gueguen J, Barbot J. Quantitative and qualitative variability of pea (Pisum sativum L.) protein composition. J Sci Food Agric. 1988;42:209–24. [DOI]

19.

Nkonge C, Ballance GM. A sensitive colorimetric procedure for nitrogen determination in micro-Kjeldahl digests. J Agric Food Chem. 1982;30:416–20. [DOI]

20.

AOAC. 24.002 and 24.009. In: Official Methods of Analysis. Association of Official Analytical Chemists. The Author; 1984.

21.

AOAC. 920.39. In: Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists. The Author; 1990.

22.

AOAC. 991.43. In: Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists. The Author; 1995.

23.

Pereira MTL, Cavalcante MP, da Silva SF, Sensheng Y, dos Santos Silva S, de Aquino AC, et al. Effect of Different Carrier Agents on the Yield of Powered Plant Beverage Obtained by Spray Drying and Characterization of Physicochemical Properties. ACS Food Sci Technol. 2024;4:2392–9. [DOI]

24.

Di Giorgio L, Salgado PR, Mauri AN. Encapsulation of fish oil in soybean protein particles by emulsification and spray drying. Food Hydrocoll. 2019;87:891–901. [DOI]

25.

Minekus M, Alminger M, Alvito P, Ballance S, Bohn T, Bourlieu C, et al. A standardised static in vitro digestion method suitable for food – an international consensus. Food Funct. 2014;5:1113–24. [DOI] [PubMed]

26.

Cipollone MA, Abraham AG, Fontana A, Tironi VA. Autochthonous Fermentation as a Means to Improve the Bioaccessibility and Antioxidant Activity of Proteins and Phenolic Compounds of Yellow Pea Flour. Foods. 2024;13:659. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]

27.

Adler-Nissen J. Determination of the degree of hydrolysis of food protein hydrolysates by trinitrobenzenesulfonic acid. J Agric Food Chem. 2002;27:1256–62. [DOI] [PubMed]

28.

Laemmli UK. Cleavage of Structural Proteins during the Assembly of the Head of Bacteriophage T4. Nature. 1970;227:680–5. [DOI] [PubMed]

29.

Lowry O, Rosebrough N, Farr AL, Randall R. PROTEIN MEASUREMENT WITH THE FOLIN PHENOL REAGENT. J Biol Chem. 1951;193:265–75. [DOI]

30.

Cipollone MA, Fontana A, Fillería SG, Tironi VA. Characterization, Bioaccesibility and Antioxidant Activities of Phenolic Compounds Recovered from Yellow pea (Pisum sativum) Flour and Protein Isolate. Plant Foods Hum Nutr. 2024;79:401–9. [DOI] [PubMed]

31.

Singleton VL, Rossi JA. Colorimetry of Total Phenolics with Phosphomolybdic-Phosphotungstic Acid Reagents. Am J Enol Vitic. 1965;16:144–58. [DOI]

32.

Ferreyra S, Bottini R, Fontana A. Tandem absorbance and fluorescence detection following liquid chromatography for the profiling of multiclass phenolic compounds in different winemaking products. Food Chem. 2021;338:128030. [DOI] [PubMed]

33.

Delgado MC, Galleano M, Añón MC, Tironi VA. Amaranth Peptides from Simulated Gastrointestinal Digestion: Antioxidant Activity Against Reactive Species. Plant Foods Hum Nutr. 2015;70:27–34. [DOI] [PubMed]

34.

Tironi VA, Añón MC. Amaranth proteins as a source of antioxidant peptides: Effect of proteolysis. Food Res Int. 2010;43:315–22. [DOI]

35.

Vázquez-Sánchez K, Martinez-Saez N, Rebollo-Hernanz M, Del Castillo MD, Gaytán-Martínez M, Campos-Vega R. In vitro health promoting properties of antioxidant dietary fiber extracted from spent coffee ( Coffee arabica L.) grounds. Food Chem. 2018;261:253–9. [DOI] [PubMed]

36.

García Fillería S, Tironi V. Intracellular antioxidant activity and intestinal absorption of amaranth peptides released using simulated gastrointestinal digestion with Caco-2 TC7 cells. Food Biosci. 2021;41:101086. [DOI]

37.

Kaja S, Payne AJ, Singh T, Ghuman JK, Sieck EG, Koulen P. An optimized lactate dehydrogenase release assay for screening of drug candidates in neuroscience. J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods. 2015;73:1–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]

38.

Bender C, Graziano S. Evaluation of the antioxidant activity of foods in human cells. Nutrafoods. 2015;14:79–85. [DOI]

39.

Perez E, Bahnassey YA, Breene WM. A Simple Laboratory Scale Method for Isolation of Amaranth Starch. Starch. 1993;45:211–4. [DOI]

40.

Yao Y, He W, Cai X, Bekhit AEA, Xu B. Sensory, physicochemical and rheological properties of plant‐based milk alternatives made from soybean, peanut, adlay, adzuki bean, oat and buckwheat. Int J Food Sci Technol. 2022;57:4868–78. [DOI]

41.

McClements DJ, Newman E, McClements IF. Plant‐based Milks: A Review of the Science Underpinning Their Design, Fabrication, and Performance. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2019;18:2047–67. [DOI] [PubMed]

42.

Padan E, Bibi E, Ito M, Krulwich TA. Alkaline pH homeostasis in bacteria: New insights. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2005;1717:67–88. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]

43.

O'Sullivan E, Condon S. Intracellular pH is a major factor in the induction of tolerance to acid and other stresses in Lactococcus lactis. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1997;63:4210–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]

44.

Chalupa-Krebzdak S, Long CJ, Bohrer BM. Nutrient density and nutritional value of milk and plant-based milk alternatives. Int Dairy J. 2018;87:84–92. [DOI]

45.

Erlejman AG, Fraga CG, Oteiza PI. Procyanidins protect Caco-2 cells from bile acid- and oxidant-induced damage. Free Radic Biol Med. 2006;41:1247–56. [DOI] [PubMed]

46.

Cobigo L, Habauzit D, Mehennaoui K, Gutleb AC, Serchi T, Fessard V, et al. Identifying in vitro toxicity testing approaches for (novel) proteins in the context of food and feed risk assessment. EFSA Support Publ. 2024;21:EN-9099. [DOI]

47.

Hidayat M, Prahastuti S, Rakasiwi AS, Prisilia S, Hasan K. Sub-chronic toxicity study of green peas protein hydrolysate in rats. Toxicol Rep. 2022;9:735–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]

48.

Chentouf A, Looten P, Srinivasan M, Srinivas A. Acute oral toxicity of pea protein isolate (Nutralys) in Wistar Rats and Cd1 Mouse. J Toxic Health. 2013;103:180–4.

49.

Cortez-Trejo MC, Mendoza S, Loarca-Piña G, Figueroa-Cárdenas JD. Physicochemical characterization of protein isolates of amaranth and common bean and a study of their compatibility with xanthan gum. Int J Biol Macromol. 2021;166:861–8. [DOI] [PubMed]

50.

Kondrashina A, Arranz E, Cilla A, Faria MA, Santos-Hernández M, Miralles B, et al. Coupling in vitro food digestion with in vitro epithelial absorption; recommendations for biocompatibility. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2023;64:9618–36. [DOI] [PubMed]

51.

Patel N, Forbes B, Eskola S, Murray J. Use of Simulated Intestinal Fluids with Caco-2 Cells and Rat Ileum. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2006;32:151–61. [DOI] [PubMed]

52.

Brayden DJ, Stuettgen V. Sodium glycodeoxycholate and sodium deoxycholate as epithelial permeation enhancers: in vitro and ex vivo intestinal and buccal bioassays. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2021;159:105737. [DOI] [PubMed]

53.

Ferreira PS, Victorelli FD, Fonseca-Santos B, Chorilli M. A Review of Analytical Methods for p-Coumaric Acid in Plant-Based Products, Beverages, and Biological Matrices. Crit Rev Anal Chem. 2018;49:21–31. [DOI] [PubMed]

54.

Konishi Y, Hitomi Y, Yoshioka E. Intestinal Absorption of p-Coumaric and Gallic Acids in Rats after Oral Administration. J Agric Food Chem. 2004;52:2527–32. [DOI] [PubMed]

55.

Wenzel E, Somoza V. Metabolism and bioavailability oftrans-resveratrol. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2005;49:472–81. [DOI] [PubMed]

56.

Rodriguez Lanzi C, Perdicaro DJ, Antoniolli A, Piccoli P, Vazquez Prieto MA, Fontana A. Phenolic metabolites in plasma and tissues of rats fed with a grape pomace extract as assessed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2018;651:28–33. [DOI] [PubMed]

57.

Karković Marković A, Torić J, Barbarić M, Jakobušić Brala C. Hydroxytyrosol, Tyrosol and Derivatives and Their Potential Effects on Human Health. Molecules. 2019;24:2001. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]

58.

Rashed K. Kaempferol-3-od-glucoside bioactivities: a review. Int J Sci Invent Today. 2020;9:213–7.

59.

Aggarwal V, Tuli HS, Tania M, Srivastava S, Ritzer EE, Pandey A, et al. Molecular mechanisms of action of epigallocatechin gallate in cancer: Recent trends and advancement. Semin Cancer Biol. 2022;80:256–75. [DOI] [PubMed]

60.

Shen N, Wang T, Gan Q, Liu S, Wang L, Jin B. Plant flavonoids: Classification, distribution, biosynthesis, and antioxidant activity. Food Chem. 2022;383:132531. [DOI] [PubMed]

61.

Lv Q, Long J, Gong Z, Nong K, Liang X, Qin T, et al. Current State of Knowledge on the Antioxidant Effects and Mechanisms of Action of Polyphenolic Compounds. Nat Prod Commun. 2021;16:e16. [DOI]