From:  Investigating foodborne pathogen outbreaks: an integrated framework for tracing, detection, and risk assessment in food systems

 Comparative characteristics and roles of analytical methods within the integrated framework.

AspectConventional microbiologyMolecular methods (PCR/WGS)Foodomics approaches
Detection targetViable culturable pathogensSpecific genes, genomes, virulence markersMicrobial communities, metabolites, proteomes
Discriminatory resolutionLow-moderate (serotyping, biochemical)High (SNP-level via WGS)Very high (system-level, culture-independent)
Turnaround time2–5 days (culture) to weeksHours (qPCR) to 1–3 days (WGS)Variable: days (metabolomics) to weeks (metagenomics)
Key strengthsGold standard for viability; essential for AMR testing; regulatory acceptanceHigh sensitivity/specificity; strain-level tracing; real-time surveillance integrationCulture-independent; holistic ecosystem view; characterizes pathogen-food matrix interactions
Key limitationsCannot detect VBNC cells; limited strain discrimination; slowRequires reference genome databases; cannot confirm viabilityBioinformatic complexity; high cost; limited regulatory standardization
Regulatory statusISO/AOAC standardized; fully acceptedIncreasingly accepted; WGS mandated in EU/US for select pathogensResearch-grade; regulatory integration emerging
Role in frameworkFoundation: confirmation, AMR profiling, isolate preservationCore: source attribution, phylogenomics, strain linkageExtended: risk contextualization, contamination ecology, hypothesis generation

AMR: antimicrobial resistance; PCR: polymerase chain reaction; qPCR: quantitative polymerase chain reaction; SNP: single-nucleotide polymorphism; VBNC: viable but non-culturable; WGS: whole-genome sequencing.