From:  Fructo-oligosaccharides as a healthier sugar alternative in granola bars: impact on physical, chemical, and sensory attributes

 Proximate and sugar analyses of granola bar samples.

AnalysisFormulation
F0F1F2F3F4
Moisture (%)5.05d ± 0.065.17d ± 0.075.73c ± 0.086.05b ± 0.126.25a ± 0.02
Ash (%)1.10b ± 0.131.13b ± 0.141.29a ± 0.130.92c ± 0.141.07b ± 0.15
Fat (%)18.25a ± 0.2417.39b ± 0.3517.04b ± 0.1015.80c ± 0.1915.61c ± 0.26
Crude fiber (%)3.22e ± 0.144.47d ± 0.165.47c ± 0.185.83b ± 0.186.16a ± 0.16
Protein (%)8.26c ± 0.539.97b ± 0.4110.25a ± 0.1510.71a ± 0.2411.01a ± 0.12
Carbohydrate (%)64.12a ± 0.5961.87b ± 0.4260.22c ± 0.3460.69c ± 0.3959.90c ± 0.55
Energy (kcal/100 g)453.77a ± 0.54443.87b ± 0.39436.14b ± 0.41427.80c ± 0.69424.13c ± 0.81
Sugar concentration in extract (g/100 mL)211.15a ± 17.30173.05ab ± 11.45169.29b ± 11.18163.66b ± 20.72158.96b ± 9.87

Data are presented as mean ± SD of three independent replicates. One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s HSD post-hoc test was used to determine significant differences among samples (p < 0.05). Means with different superscript letters in the same row indicate statistically significant differences. F0—control, F1—25% FOS, F2—50% FOS, F3—75% FOS, F4—100% FOS. ANOVA: analysis of variance; HSD: honestly significant difference; FOS: fructo-oligosaccharides.