From:  Inflammatory bowel disease in Africa: the current landscape of pharmacological treatments and the promise of emerging innovations

 The differences between NPs and conventional therapies for IBD treatment

AspectNPs for IBD treatmentType of NPs usedConventional therapies for IBDReference
Targeted drug deliveryNPs precisely deliver drugs to inflamed areas, reducing systemic exposurePolymeric NPsSystemic drug administration may affect healthy tissues[60]
Enhanced drug solubility & bioavailabilityImprove the solubility and absorption of poorly soluble drugsCore-shell NPsLimited solubility can reduce drug absorption and efficacy[1]
Reduction of side effectsMinimized exposure to healthy tissues reduces systemic side effectsLipid NPsWidespread side effects due to systemic circulation[16]
Controlled and sustained releaseProvides continuous therapeutic effects with reduced dosing frequencyMetal NPsRequires frequent dosing, leading to fluctuating drug levels[61]
Improved drug stabilityProtects drugs from degradation, extending shelf lifeLiposomesConventional drugs may degrade quickly, losing effectiveness[62]
Stimulation of natural defense mechanismsSome nanoparticles promote natural healing and reduce inflammationDendrimersMainly focus on symptom suppression rather than healing[63]

IBD: inflammatory bowel disease; NPs: nanoparticles