From:  Pneumococcal live attenuated vaccine: strategies, challenges and future perspectives

 Comparative immune protection by LAVs and conventional vaccines.

Immune componentLAVsPolysaccharide vaccinesProtein/Subunit vaccinesReference(s)
Mucosal immunitySecretory IgA induction via nasal colonization, for example, with a ΔhtrA strain, elicited potent mucosal antibodies and blocked recolonization. SPY1 induced mucosal IgA and protected against colonization.Minimal mucosal response; poor induction of IgA at colonization sites.Limited mucosal activation; mainly systemic antibody responses.[77, 81, 82, 84]
Humoral immunityBroad antibody repertoire against capsular and protein antigens. ΔhtrA induced systemic antibodies with cross-strain protection. SPY1 elicited systemic antibodies and cytokine responses (IFN-γ, IL-17A, IL-10, IL-4). Double-mutant strains broaden protein antigen coverage.Capsule-specific antibodies; narrow protection, serotype-dependent.Protein-specific antibodies: moderate breadth but limited durability.[74, 77, 82, 85, 86, 93]
Cellular immunity (Th17/Th2)Strong IL-17 response recruits neutrophils for mucosal clearance. Δlgt and ΔendA mutants modulate inflammatory signals. SPY1 induced Th17-mediated phagocyte recruitment and Th2 subsets for protection against lethal challenge.Weak T-cell activation; poor cellular memory.Variable T-cell activation; depends on adjuvant use.[87, 88, 91]
Regulatory balance (Treg)Balanced immune regulation; Treg cells prevent excessive inflammation while maintaining clearance.Minimal Treg modulation; risk of poor regulation.Partial regulation; adjuvant-dependent.[87]
Microbiota interactionEnhances long-term immunity via ecological interplay with commensals.No microbiota engagement.Limited microbiota effects.[76]

LAVs: live attenuated vaccines; Treg: T regulatory.