From:  The dual promise of oncolytic viruses: selective targeting and therapeutic enhancement in cancer treatment

 Integrated evaluation of oncolytic virus therapy: strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and limitations

CategoryContent
Strengths
  • Selectively replicates in and lyses cancer cells while sparing healthy tissue

  • Stimulates systemic antitumor immunity

  • Can be genetically engineered to deliver therapeutic genes or immune modulators, with versatility in vector platforms (e.g., adenovirus, reovirus, baculovirus)

Weaknesses
  • Difficult to deliver to solid tumors due to vascular barriers and ECM density

  • Can be neutralized by pre-existing or treatment-induced antiviral immunity

  • Risk of off-target toxicity and immune-related inflammation

  • Manufacturing and scalability challenges

Opportunities
  • Can be combined with immunotherapies (e.g., checkpoint inhibitors) to reprogram “cold” tumors synergy with chemotherapy and radiation therapy

  • Use in precision medicine through tumor-specific targeting or gene circuits

  • Integration with nanotechnology and exosome delivery

Limitations
  • Regulatory complexity and high development costs

  • Risk of evolving resistance or adaptation in tumor cells

  • Long-term safety profiles still under evaluation

  • Potential biosafety concerns with engineered viruses in certain settings

This table provides a consolidated overview of the advantages, barriers, and strategic opportunities associated with oncolytic virus therapy in cancer treatment. Strengths and weaknesses represent current biological and clinical performance characteristics, while opportunities and limitations reflect future directions and implementation challenges. ECM: extracellular matrix