Introduction

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a heterogeneous systemic, inflammatory polyarthritis with a significant impact on quality of life, morbidity, and mortality [1]. Reports of an association between so-called cognitive dysfunction and RA, as well as data on its prevalence, have been inconsistent. A few studies of a relatively small number of patients have reported a wide range of formally tested cognitive impairment ranging from 20% to 71% in adults with RA [2–5], but not seen in a recent study [6]. Patients with RA were found to either perform more poorly on a range of cognitive assessment tasks than healthy controls or perform at a level below the age-related norm [7].

The hypothetical pathogenic mechanisms of cognitive impairment in RA are unknown [8]. It has been speculated that systemic inflammation as well as acceleration of the atherosclerotic process [7, 9] may contribute to cognitive dysfunction in RA [10].

There is also limited data available in the literature regarding the overall prevalence, as well as the clinical and sociodemographic factors that may contribute to cognitive dysfunction in RA. While some studies found an association between cognitive dysfunction and disease activity [11, 12], others did not show this association [2, 4, 13].

It is quite important and relevant to this report to note that studies of healthy subjects have noted that subjective cognitive complaints can be a valid indicator of early cognitive impairment not detectable on neurocognitive testing [14, 15]. Subjective cognitive decline (SCD) has been defined by the Center for Disease Control as the self-reported experience of worsening or more frequent confusion or memory loss. It is a form of cognitive impairment and one of the earliest noticeable symptoms of Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias [16].

It is also apparent that completion of comprehensive cognitive testing is not likely to occur in the majority of patients in routine care reporting difficulty thinking. Formal cognitive testing presents challenges as its administration is costly, time intensive, and requires specialized personnel to administer and interpret test results.

We aimed to evaluate the rate of patient-reported difficulty thinking and confusion (SCD) and its association with validated disease activity metrics broken out by age.

Materials and methods

Results

A total of 41,302 patients were identified for analysis using the latest visit for each RA patient in the period January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2019. Forty thousand, four hundred and nine patient visits had complete information on CDAI, self-reported SCD, age, and gender. There were 33,537 patients with complete data (no missing values) on all covariates.

Baseline characteristics of the complete and missing data population showed no meaningful differences other than slightly higher disease activity and a parallel increase in self-reported cognitive dysfunction (Table S1). The comparison of the clinical characteristics and demographics of those with and without reported SCD in the complete data population are seen in Tables 1 and 2. There were 3,041 patients with reported SCD and 30,496 without. Those who reported cognitive dysfunction were more likely to be women (84.1% vs. 76.5%, P < 0.001), disabled (28.7% vs. 12%, P < 0.001), and have a higher CDAI value (mean score 16.16 ± 12.50 vs. 10.11 ± 10.76, P < 0.001; Tables 1 and 2). Patients reporting SCD had a greater history of fibromyalgia (15% vs. 4.7%, P < 0.001), patient-reported depression (37.4% vs. 8.4%, P < 0.001), and patient-reported fatigue (mean score 63.03 ± 27.29 vs. 35.7 ± 29.6, P < 0.001).

The overall rate of SCD was 9.1% (95% CI: 8.8–9.4). It increased from 3.1% for patients in remission to 17.0% for those with severe disease (Table 3). The estimated OR in the series of models that add progressively more variables in a stepwise manner as seen in Table 4. In unadjusted estimates, the OR for reported SCD were 2.69 (95% CI: 2.35–3.09) for LDA category, 4.78 (95% CI: 4.17–5.49) for moderate disease activity category, and 6.53 (95% CI: 5.66–7.53) for high disease activity compared to remission. With adjustment for confounders in model 1 (Table 4), the OR decreases slightly to 2.21 (95% CI: 1.92–2.54) in low disease, 3.41 (95% CI: 2.96–3.92) for moderate disease, and 4.08 (95% CI: 3.52–4.74) for severe disease. In model 2 (Table 4) adjusting for medication use, the OR was 2.17 (95% CI: 1.88–2.50) for LDA, 3.25 (95% CI: 2.81–3.75) for moderate disease activity, and 3.83 (95% CI: 3.29–4.47) for high disease activity (Table 4).

The Table 5 shows estimated unadjusted rates of reported SCD by different CDAI groups within each age group. In the age group of < 55 years, the reported SCD was 2.44% in the remission group and increased to 20.66% in severe disease. In patients ≥ 55, it was 3.25% in patients in remission and increased to 15.45% in severe disease. Unadjusted rates of self-reported SCD in moderate and severe disease groups are higher in younger vs. older patients (18.0% and 20.7% vs. 11.2% and 15.5% respectively). The absolute risk (change in rates of cognitive dysfunction in different CDAI disease categories) is also greater in younger (< 55 years old) vs. older (≥ 55 years old; Table 5).

The interaction analyses of age with SCD using multiple categories of age are seen in Table S2. It can be seen that the cutoff of patients < 55 displayed the highest association with risk and this age was therefore used as a cutoff.

The estimated ORs in each model with age as an interaction (moderating) factor in the logistic regression model and estimates of OR by disease activity are shown within each age group in Tables 6, 7, and 8. The interaction of age and disease activity is significant in unadjusted and adjusted models (P ≤ 0.0004). The Figure 1 illustrates differences in OR estimates by age group using model 2 (Table 4).

Display full size

Figure 1. 

Moderating effect of age and the ORs of SCD by disease category in model 2 (Tables 6, 7, and 8). ORs and 95% CI estimated using logistic regression models with an interaction term for age and CDAI

In the exploratory analysis, models 3–5 examined the impact of adjusting for patient-reported depression and patient fatigue on the association (separately and together, Tables 4, 6, 7, and 8). While the estimated ORs for SCD are somewhat reduced, the association with disease activity remains highly significant along with the moderating effect of age. The moderating effect of age is also seen in Figure 1.

The association of the individual components with SCD broken down into quartile values is seen in Table S3. It is evident that there is a marked association with the patient global component of the CDAI that is significantly greater than the other 3 components.

Discussion

Our study is by far the largest investigation that provides information on the rate of self-reported SCD marked by difficulty thinking and confusion in RA associated with a validated disease activity metric. We were able to examine the effects of disease activity metrics on this phenomenon in this large cohort over a much longer interval than has previously been reported. We found an overall prevalence of self-reported SCD of 9.1% with marked increases in this prevalence in patients with higher CDAI categories of disease.

In this large US observational study, we also sought to characterize the association of a validated measure of disease activity with patient-reported SCD in patients with RA stratified by age. Increasing disease activity as measured by CDAI was associated with a higher likelihood of reporting these problems after adjusting for multiple, simultaneously measured potential confounders. To our surprise, the impact of disease activity on SCD was more pronounced in younger (< 55 years) than older (≥ 55 years) RA patients.

The patient-reported global disease evaluation score was significantly associated with self-reported SCD to a greater extent than other components. To our knowledge, this is the first study to examine the overall prevalence of these patient-reported cognitive complaints from a very large database along with a strong association with provider-measured disease activity after adjustment for multiple simultaneously measured potential confounders. It is also the first study to report that self-reported cognitive complaints are more common in younger patients in association with disease activity.

A similar correlation between high disease activity and cognitive dysfunction as evaluated by objective tests has been inconsistently reported [7, 11, 12]. In a recent systematic review of cognitive impairment in RA, a relationship between disease activity and reduced performance on cognitive function tests was observed in small numbers of patients [7]. A large longitudinal population-based study that evaluated different types of arthritis found that the presence of joint disorders, especially RA, at midlife, was associated with a worse cognitive status later in life, but patients with RA were not broken out from the larger cohort [18]. High cumulative RA disease activity as measured by disease activity score 28 (DAS28) was associated with objectively measured cognitive impairment in a cohort of 464 patients from Thailand [11] that did not include analysis of medications. Lee et al. [12] reported that cognitive dysfunction was related to disease activity and increasing age in a smaller observational study of 70 patients.

We report that SCD was more likely to be associated with higher disease activity in younger patients. The reasons for the differences in the distribution of these complaints with age from the study by Lee et al. [12] are uncertain and may be associated with the smaller number of patients in that report. It is also possible that our report of a greater prevalence of SCD in a younger population was made possible because of the much larger population of patients studied. It is possible that there could be a greater awareness and recognition of cognitive challenges in a younger population, although this is speculative.

The association between disease activity and cognitive complaints was not found in some other studies [2, 13, 19, 20]. Shadick et al. [13] reported that higher disease activity as measured by DAS28 showed a non-statistical trend of associations with self-reported poor concentration although it is possible that this finding may have been affected by differences in the DAS28 metric vs the CDAI, as well as differences in statistical power. Shin et al. [4] studied 115 RA patients and assessed cognitive dysfunction using a battery of standardized neuropsychological measures. In this cohort, the severity of RA as measured by the RA disease activity index (RADAI), a patient-assessed measure of disease activity, and C-reactive protein (CRP), were not significant predictors of cognitive impairment [4] although validated disease activity metrics were not reported.

In an exploratory analysis, we found that the impact of adjusting for patient depression on the association of disease activity and SCD was not likely to be meaningful compared to the impact of patient fatigue on this association. The association of severe disease (compared to remission) decreased by approximately 17% with adjustment for patient depression (OR decreased from 3.83 to 3.19, Table 4), while adjusting for patient fatigue decreased this association by about 61% (OR decreased from 3.83 to 1.50, Table 4). Patient depression has a complex causal association with disease activity in RA [21–24], but whether as a confounder or a mediator, we did not find a large impact of self-reported depression on the association of disease activity and SCD. However, adjusting for patient fatigue—likely a proxy for disease activity in this analysis—has had a large impact on this association. Future longitudinal studies should examine patient fatigue as a potential mediator of patient-reported SCD.

It is possible that cognitive complaints may be associated with clinical features such as pain, fatigue, and sleep disturbance, as reported by research in chronic pain populations [25], or psychological comorbidities such as depression or anxiety [26]. Shin et al. [20] found that higher levels of depression and fatigue were associated with perceived cognitive dysfunction after adjusting for disease severity as measured by RADAI in 120 patients with RA. It should be noted that increased depression in the setting of chronic disease is well-reported [27].

Our study has some limitations. Although we are reporting data on patients’ SCD, we did not perform formal neurocognitive testing. It is possible that there may be a different sensitivity for reporting cognitive problems in a formal cognitive assessment questionnaire [20, 28]. Although we are reporting strong correlations across time in a very large number of patients, we have not demonstrated a direct causative effect of disease activity on these subjective complaints. It is also possible that a single measure of these difficulties does not capture a chronic state or that patient self-reporting of cognitive issues can be related to other non-inflammatory factors not captured.

We found a statistically significant correlation with prednisone treatment and reporting of SCD. Eighteen point five percent of the total of 26.5% of patients on prednisone were on a dose of less than 10 mg daily at the time they reported SCD. We believe that continued long-term observations of the effects of differing doses of glucocorticoid daily dosing and patient perceptions of SCD are warranted.

We also report for the first time that the patient global component of the CDAI score has a marked association with reporting of SCD when broken out into quartiles. We believe that further investigation into the components of standardized physician and patient-derived metrics would be appropriate to confirm that patient global and pain reporting severity could be more closely linked with perceived cognitive challenges than a complete CDAI score. We have been interested in the individual components of standardized metrics like the CDAI and specifically the contribution of patient characteristics like the PGA to a final CDAI metric score [29]. We believe that it is likely that the patient global evaluation represents a range of patient characteristics that go well beyond actual RA disease activity [29].

Formal neuropsychological evaluation would be ideal for most patients with subjective cognitive complaints, but for a variety of reasons these tests are not typically obtained in routine clinical care. While self-reported measures of cognitive difficulties may have limitations, these measures can indeed capture a patient’s experience of cognitive performance and can have the potential to identify cognitive changes not yet detected with conventional neuropsychological assessments [14–16]. In this retrospective analysis, we found a strong association between this distressing personal complaint with a simultaneously measured and validated clinical disease activity metric. Patients with RA who report SCD are more likely to have simultaneously measured greater disease activity than those who do not report this problem.

Even in the absence of formal cognitive testing, a longitudinal study of normal elderly has in fact shown that self-reported cognitive complaints are a valid indicator of formally diagnosed cognitive impairment [30]. Moreover, the importance of patient-reported subjective cognitive complaints as a diagnostic criterion has previously been recognized [31] and formally defined by the CDC [16].

In conclusion, our study adds important new evidence regarding the prevalence and associations of patients’ own perception of cognitive difficulties (SCD). We found a strong association with disease activity in younger patients after extensive modeling that persisted after adjustment for a variety of other variables. Clinicians should be aware of the strong association of cognitive difficulties with increased disease activity in their RA patients which is strongly associated with fatigue and the global DAS. The prevalence of this phenomenon is not rare and is quite likely to be encountered by all clinicians treating RA. These individuals may require more patience in the clinic setting and should not be viewed as being difficult. They may be referred for formal cognitive evaluations. Future investigations will need to focus on the implications of patient-reported cognitive difficulties that can impact the personal, professional, and interpersonal function of patients with RA.