From:  Defatting method shapes nutritional quality, oxidative stability, and techno-functional properties of Rhynchophorus phoenicis larvae

 Effect of defatting methods on the physicochemical properties of Rhynchophorus phoenicis larvae powders.

Defatting treatmentAV (mg·KOH/g powder)PV (meq·O2/kg powder)p-AnVTBARS (mg·MDA/kg powder)
CPDP0.05 ± 0.01b0.62 ± 0.22a0.93 ± 0.08b0.23 ± 0.03b
EDP0.11 ± 0.01c0.85 ± 0.11a1.25 ± 0.09c0.12 ± 0.01a
HDP0.01 ± 0.00a1.74 ± 0.31b3.56 ± 0.88d0.32 ± 0.02c
HIPDP0.01 ± 0.01a3.97 ± 0.17c0.39 ± 0.06a0.22 ± 0.02b

Values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (n = 3). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey’s post-hoc test was used for comparisons. Within the same column, values followed by different letters are significantly different (Tukey, p < 0.05). AV: acid value; PV: peroxide value; p-AnV: p-anisidine value; TBARS: thiobarbituric acid reactive substances; HIPDP: hexane:isopropanol defatted powder; HDP: hexane-defatted powder; EDP: ethanol-defatted derived powder; CPDP: cook-press defatted powder.