From:  SVZonChip: a paradigm shift in hydrocephalus research and treatment

 Comparative evaluation of various models of hydrocephalus listing their respective strengths and weaknesses

Model typeAdvantagesLimitationsReferences
Genetic mouse modelsReplicates genetic mutationsLacks human-specific ECM, limited CSF flow analysis[9, 14]
iPSC-derived brain organoidsHuman-relevant cellular architectureHeterogeneous differentiation, lacks CSF dynamics[11, 12]
Hydrocephalic rat modelsVentricular enlargement mimicryFails to capture the mechanobiological effects of CSF[13, 15]
SVZonChipMimics SVZ-specific ECM and CSF flow, integrates microfluidic technologyRequires further validation for clinical translation[7]

Genetic mouse models reflect hydrocephalus-related mutations but lack human-specific extracellular matrix (ECM) composition and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) flow dynamics. Induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived brain organoids have a human-relevant cellular organization but are plagued by heterogeneous differentiation and cannot mimic CSF dynamics. Hydrocephalic rat models simulate ventricular dilation but cannot capture the mechanobiological consequences of CSF dynamics for ependymal cilia. SVZonChip, an organ-on-a-chip system based on subventricular zone (SVZ)-specific ECM and dynamic CSF flow, has the potential for clinical translation but needs further verification