Examples of SARS-CoV-2 variants and COVID-19 vaccine efficacy.
| Vaccine | Variants | Findings |
|---|---|---|
| WV | ||
| VLA2001 | Delta, omicron | Improved VE for homologous/ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 boosters [126] |
| Protein subunit | ||
| NVX-CoV2373 | D614G, BQ1.1, XBB.1 | High PsVNA for D614G, low for BQ.1 and XBB.1 after booster in persons previously vaccinated with Ad and mRNA vaccines [127] |
| Viral | ||
| ChAdOx1 | Beta | No protection against mild-to-moderate COVID-19 [128] |
| nCoV-19 | Alpha, delta | Lower transmission reduction for delta than alpha, better VE for BNT162b2 than for ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 [129] |
| Ad26.COV2.S | Beta, gamma | Reduced nAb responses compared to original strain [130] |
| Ad26.COV2.S | Delta | Durability of VE for at least 6 months [131] |
| DNA | ||
| INO-4800 | Delta, alpha, beta, gamma | Comparable nAb responses for gamma and original strain, 2.1-fold (alpha) and 6.9-fold (beta) reduction [132] |
| INO-4802 | Alpha, beta, gamma | Enhanced nAb responses for variants and original strain [133] |
| RNA | ||
| BNT162b2 | Delta | 67% VE in Spain [134], 90% in the UK [135] |
| BNT162b2 | BA.1, BA.2 | VE 25% in US [136], 30% in Israel [137], 51% in Qatar [138] |
| mRNA-1273 | Alpha, beta, gamma, delta | 1.2-fold (alpha), 2.1- to 8.4-fold (beta, gamma, delta) reduction in nAb titers compared to D614G [139] |
| mRNA-1273.214 | BA.1, alpha, beta, gamma, delta | Enhanced nAb titers against omicron, higher binding activity against alpha, beta, gamma, and delta [140] |
| XBB.1.5 | XBB.1.5, EG5 | 27-fold enhanced nAbs levels against XBB.1.5 and EG5 [141] |
| LNP-nCoVsaRNA | D614G, alpha | Protection against D614G and alpha in hamsters [142] |
Ad26: adenovirus serotype 26; COVID-19: Coronavirus disease 2019; LNP: lipid nanoparticle; nAbs: neutralizing antibodies; PsVNA: pseudovirus-neutralizing antibody; saRNA: self-amplifying RNA; SARS-CoV-2: Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2; VE: vaccine effectiveness; WV: whole virus. Adapted from [2]. © Author(s) 2024. CC BY 4.0.
KL: Conceptualization, Investigation, Writing—original draft, Writing—review & editing. The author read and approved the submitted version.
The author declares that he has no conflicts of interest.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
© The Author(s) 2026.
Open Exploration maintains a neutral stance on jurisdictional claims in published institutional affiliations and maps. All opinions expressed in this article are the personal views of the author(s) and do not represent the stance of the editorial team or the publisher.