Recent developments in digital health technologies are overwhelming, and their use in routine work is still difficult to anticipate. This narrative review summarizes the concept of consecutive cohorts in the literature, together with local research experiences in consecutive rheumatic outpatients. Digital health techniques have to reflect the clinicians’ needs, support real-life care of patients, and allow for the specific assessment of quality parameters fulfilling the Donabedian aspect of qualified health care, using quality indicators to improve health care and research. Rapidly growing observational cohorts will perform best to provide follow-up data as the basis for further development of healthcare approaches for rheumatic patients. The challenges of a selection bias, patients with limited disease expression, and chances of early detection of patients with rare diseases are addressed. For research purposes, sequential analyses with growing cohort size, comparative cross-sectional studies with sequential hypothesis testing and other prognostic, diagnostic, and therapeutic aspects of patient management can be performed. With the support of new technologies, young clinicians can easily approach such clinical topics, and learn about clinical data analyses. The use of quality standards as proposed in international recommendations for diagnostic issues and classification criteria, management recommendations, monitoring, and training issues can be supported by digital technologies. In conclusion, collaborative projects allow detailed clinical analyses of large cohorts, but local initiatives can prepare these co-operations, provide first local logistics and research experiences, and teach clinicians how to perform clinical research. Digital health technologies will strongly support these local initiatives.

Rheumatology, the medical specialty dealing with the diagnosis and treatment of rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs), is evolving with the emergence of digital health technologies, such as electronic health records (EHRs), virtual visits, mobile health (mHealth), wearable medical devices, social media, websites, digital therapeutics, artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning. These technologies offer new opportunities to improve essential aspects of care, such as care access or disease management. They can significantly reduce the risk of errors and the workload of rheumatologists, while enhancing communication between physicians and patients, resulting in better quality of care. Moreover, digital health technologies can significantly improve research outcomes. However, digital health technologies in rheumatology also face specific barriers such as privacy, security concerns, incremental costs as well as limited digital health literacy and access. Therefore, further analysis, actions and strategies are needed to overcome these barriers. This article explores the impact of digital health technologies on rheumatology practice and highlights their contributions and challenges. By understanding the immense potential and overcoming the obstacles, the way for a future where digital health technologies are integrated into daily rheumatology care may be envisioned, in order to empower patients and healthcare providers.

Remote monitoring technologies (RMTs) are an emerging tool for assessing, monitoring, and following up on patients with chronic diseases including autoimmune rheumatic diseases (AIRDs). The best use of these exponentially expanding technologies warrants optimum evidence. Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic inflammatory process that requires close monitoring of disease activity, response to treatment, and the potential adverse effects. Though there are several studies that have explored RMTs in RA, there is little head-to-head comparison between the individual technologies or the standard of care. Before investing in potentially high-cost strategies like RMTs, it is prudent to estimate their pragmatic role in the management and potentially with long-term follow-up including drug titration. A thorough search of the literature was conducted across PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and WebOfScience databases for recent and relevant literature looking at the acceptance, practical utility, and outcomes in RA using RMTs. This scoping review aims to summarize the current level of evidence in favor of RMTs, estimate real-world benefits and costs, potential hazards and limitations, and finally, identify future studies needed before endeavoring to mainstream RMTs. It emphasizes randomized trials using RMTs, patients reported outcomes and disparities in the usage of RMTs.