• Open Access
    Review

    Ascites in cirrhotic patients: a comprehensive review

    Paul Carrier 1,2,3*
    Véronique Loustaud-Ratti 1,2,3
    Marilyne Debette-Gratien 1,2,3
    Laure Elkrief 3,4

    Explor Dig Dis. 2024;3:362–381 DOI: https://doi.org/10.37349/edd.2024.00056

    Received: March 19, 2024 Accepted: June 21, 2024 Published: August 26, 2024

    Academic Editor: Amedeo Lonardo, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena, Italy

    This article belongs to the special issue Cirrhosis and Its Complications

    Abstract

    Ascites is a frequent complication in patients with cirrhosis, associated with a bad prognosis. Ascites is associated with severe complications, such as spontaneous bacterial peritonitis and kidney dysfunction, which must be diagnosed and managed rapidly. First-line management is based on diuretics use. Beta-blockers role remains debated but an early administration could probably decrease complications associated with portal hypertension. Albumin infusion is validated in large volume paracenteses, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, or kidney dysfunction, but is debated in other situations. Technical progresses allow the worldwide use of TIPS (transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt), but patient selection must be rigorous because of potential severe complications. An alternative treatment, automated low-flow ascites pump, can be offered in patients without TIPS possibility: It is a recent technique, whose patients’ selection and installation conditions were improved, with interesting results. Liver transplantation remains the gold standard, but the lack of grafts, and specific side effects, lead to prefer other methods. In case of acute kidney injury due to hepatorenal syndrome, terlipressin remains the standard of care; continuous infusion is associated with fewer side effects.

    Keywords

    Paracentesis, TIPS, beta-blockers, low-flow ascites pump, ascites

    Introduction

    Ascites is a peritoneal effusion. The main cause is cirrhosis in 80% to 90% of patients, and intricate causes, including cirrhosis can be associated and must be screened [1, 2]. Ascites is the most common complication in patients with cirrhosis and impacts significantly quality of life and, overall, life expectancy. That’s why specific and rapid management is necessary. It is associated with specific and severe complications, such as acute kidney injury (AKI) due to hepatorenal syndrome (HRS), spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, hyponatremia, or hepatic hydrothorax.

    Diagnosis

    Ascites is diagnosed at clinical examination, based on the definitions of the consensus conference of the International Ascites Club [3], which remains the standard (Table 1).

    Grading of ascites according to the International Ascites Club [3]

    GradeAmount of fluid in the abdominal cavity
    1Mild ascitesOnly detectable by ultrasound examination
    2Moderate ascitesModerate distension of abdomen
    3Large or gross ascitesMarked abdominal distension
    Display full size

    If ascites is generally controlled thanks to a treatment based on diuretics, in some cases, frequent paracentesis may be required. International Ascites Club gives specific definitions that remain widely used [4]. When ascites recurs and three or more paracenteses are performed within one year, diagnosis of recurrent ascites is retained. Refractory ascites is defined as “ascites that cannot be mobilized or the early recurrence of which (i.e., after large volume paracentesis) cannot be satisfactorily prevented by medical therapy” [4].

    Ascites analysis

    Ascites analysis is always necessary to assess its origin and to check for potential ascites infection. The main parameters of ascites associated to cirrhosis are SAAG (serum-ascites albumin gradient) superior to 11 g/L [5], low protein concentration under 15 g/L, neutrophil count under 250/mm3 in absence of infection, and absence of abnormal cell in cytology. In some difficult cases, notably if a malignant cause is suspected, ascites cholesterol concentration can also be discriminant.

    Ascites evolution and complications

    In patients with compensated cirrhosis, the incidence of ascites is 5% to 10 % of patients per year. Occurrence of ascites is generally considered as a turning point in patients’ natural history and leads to a mortality risk of 40% at 1 year and 50% at 2 years [6]. Factors associated with high mortality rates include hyponatremia, altered kidney function, sarcopenia, hepatic encephalopathy, and low urinary sodium excretion [7]. Recurrent ascites, and overall refractory ascites, are associated with a lower survival, respectively 50% and less than 50% at 1 year [8, 9]. Presence of ascites is associated with other complications, such as abdominal hernias, respiratory restrictive insufficiency, or sarcopenia [10]. Impact on quality of life is important, notably on working and social life. Hospitalizations are also frequent, with an economic impact [11].

    Pathophysiology

    Ascites results from an imbalance between liquid production and absorption in the peritoneum. Cirrhosis decompensation leads to a systemic disease [12]. In case of portal hypertension, it implies a splanchnic arterial vasodilatation, inducing an arteriolar underfilling and an increased pressure in the splanchnic capillaries [13]. Sodium retention mechanisms, including renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, sympathetic nervous system, and arginine-vasopressin secretion, are induced. Concurrently, increased pressure in splanchnic vessels and capillary leakage lead to an increased lymph production in ascites, exceeding reabsorption capacities.

    This situation can favour complications:

    • In case of advanced splanchnic vasodilatation, effective volaemia is imbalanced, leading to peripheral organ hypoperfusion, particularly in kidneys. When renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, sympathetic nervous system, is exceeded, renal afferent arteries are constricted with a HRS risk [14].

    • Similarly, arginine-vasopressin secretion can be altered, inducing a major risk of hyponatremia [15].

    • A specific condition, cirrhotic cardiomyopathy, can aggravate portal hypertension [16].

    • Cirrhosis is associated to a chronic inflammation, probably caused by bacteria and bacterial products, called pathogen associated molecular patterns (PAMPs). This situation is favoured by bacterial translocation and microbiota disturbance. Patients are exposed to an increased infection risk, notably ascites infection [17].

    Pathophysiology is summarised in Figure 1.

    Ascites pathophysiology and mechanisms of action of available treatments. TIPS: transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt; PAMPs: pathogen associated molecular patterns; SGLT2: sodium glucose co-transporter 2

    Paracentesis

    In case of large volume paracentesis, i.e., above 5 litres, the main risk is post paracentesis circulatory dysfunction (PPCD) [18, 19]. PPCD leads to pathophysiological changes, with higher plasmatic renin concentration, higher plasmatic noradrenaline, and higher porto-cave gradient pressure. It enhances hyponatremia, AKI, specifically HRS, early ascites recurrence and mortality [20]. Prevention is based on plasma expansion during the paracentesis, when more than 3 litres of liquid are removed [21]. Even if the studies comparing different plasma expanders show no differences, some concerns remain regarding their use, so albumin is preferred in this situation [2]. In large volume paracentesis, human albumin is the most efficient at 6–8 g of 20% albumin for each litre retrieved [3]. Most recommendations give no limit to the maximum amount of fluid that can be removed during paracentesis [22, 23]. Nevertheless, the limit of 8 litres should not be exceeded, because of a higher PPCD risk, estimated at 40% at 2 years [24]. PPCD risk seems to be higher in case hyponatremia (< 130 mmol/L), hemodynamic instability (systolic blood pressure under 90 mmHg) or AKI and probably needs a more important albumin compensation [25].

    It is held that a paracentesis is associated with a low risk of bleeding (3.3% of cases, including 1% of major bleeding), even in case of coagulopathy (INR > 1.5, platelets count < 50,000/mm3) [26].

    Treatment

    In absence of specific data, treatment is generally reserved to grade-2 and grade-3 ascites, because of the absence of impact on grade-1 ascites [2]. Also, the paradigm of cirrhosis management tends to change, with the aim to prevent complications as soon as possible [27]. Treating the underlying cause of ascites may allow recompensation of the cirrhosis, notably with alcohol withdrawal, hepatitis B or C treatment [28, 29].

    Sodium restriction

    Even if the upright position can reduce diuretics effect and enhance sodium reabsorption, there is no data concerning the effect of prolonged decubitus [30]. Dietary sodium restriction can lead to ascites resolution in 10% of ascites [31]. Because of a risk of kidney injury or hyponatremia in case of excessive sodium restriction, it is recommended a moderate sodium restriction (80–120 mmol per day, corresponding to 4.6–6.9 g) [32].

    Diuretics

    Due to a higher risk of kidney failure, weight loss should not exceed 0.5 kg in absence of oedema and 1 kg in case of oedema [33]. Urine sodium excretion is a good marker to adapt the diuretics dosage. In 24 hours, excretion must exceed intake (at least, 80 mmol/24 hours) or Na/K ratio must be above 1 [34]. It is considered that in case of resistance to treatment or difficulty to treat, diuretics must be stopped when urine sodium excretion is below 30 mmol/24 hours [2]. Anti-mineralocorticoid is the cornerstone [35]. The initial recommended dose of spironolactone is 100 mg per day, with a maximum of 400 mg. Furosemide is frequently associated. It is introduced at 40 mg per day, with a maximum at 160 mg. The choice of treatment is based on the risk of side effects: generally, short-term anti-aldosterone seems to be more efficient [36] whereas association with loop diuretics is preferred in a long-term management [37]. Adverse effects occur in around 40% of patients. The most frequent are gynecomastia, hepatic encephalopathy, hyponatremia, hypokalemia or hyperkaliemia, and muscle cramps [2]. Sometimes, notably when unbearable symptoms or hyponatremia occur, treatment must be changed: amiloride or eplerenone are an alternative to spironolactone (100 mg of spironolactone corresponds to 10 mg of amiloride or 50 mg of eplerenone.), whereas bumetanide or torsemide can be offered instead of furosemide (furosemide 40 mg corresponds to torsemide 7.5 mg or bumetanide 1 mg) [22].

    Beta-blockers

    Since the publication of a study by Sersté et al. [38] in 2010, that suggested a deleterious effects of beta-blockers in patients with refractory ascites, the role of beta-blockers remains unclear. Some studies emphasize a negative role, notably in spontaneous bacterial peritoneal, increasing circulatory dysfunction, whereas others do not show any impact, including in case of ACLF. A recent meta-analysis showed no negative effects, but it was based on 8 studies only [39, 40]. Prospective studies are needed to evaluate the beta-blockers’ role. Baveno VII conference recommends avoiding beta-blockers in case of blood pressure under 90 mmHg, serum creatinine above 1.5 mg/dL or natremia under 130 mmol/L.

    The class of alpha-beta-blockers is emerging in portal hypertension. Classical non-heart-selective beta-blockers such as propranolol or nadolol target β1 receptors, which decreases heart rate, and β2 receptors, which impacts α-adrenergic tone on splanchnic circulation. Prazosin, an alpha-blocker, was promising in portal hypertension reduction, in a Spanish study [41] involving 46 patients with portal hypertension. It showed a greater effect of portal pressure lowering in patients treated with propranolol and prazosin, compared to patients treated with propranolol and isosorbide-5-mononitrate (–24.2% ± 11% vs. –16.1% ± 11%; p < 0.01). Carvedilol, an alpha-beta-blocker, progressively replaced classical beta-blockers in portal hypertension. All these treatments were classically used in variceal bleeding primary or secondary prevention. PREDESCI multicentre study assessed the role of carvedilol or propranolol in portal hypertension-associated events, including ascites, in 201 patients with compensated ascites. The results showed that the treatment effectively delayed ascites formation in 9% of patients treated with beta-blockers vs. 20% with placebo, during a median 37-month follow-up (p = 0.03) [42]. Despite some criticisms, notably concerning material and methods (mostly hepatitis C patients included, porto-cave gradient measurements…), and previous studies that showed no differences [43, 44], in 2022, Baveno VII conference recommended introducing carvedilol in case of compensated cirrhosis, even with only a high liver stiffness result [45]. The same year, a meta-analysis (with a 51% weight of PREDESCI cohort) also suggested a benefit of carvedilol in patients with compensated cirrhosis, associated to clinically significant portal hypertension [46].

    SGLT2 inhibitors

    Sodium glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, a recent class developed in cardiac diseases and diabetes, block glucose and sodium reabsorption in the renal proximal convoluted tube. They logically increase sodium excretion and reduce renin secretion and renin activity at the juxtaglomerular apparatus. Studies were carried out in heart failure, diabetes, and kidney injury essentially [43]. Some case reports suggest a potential benefit on ascites however [4749]. Studies concerning SGLT2 inhibitors and ascites were registered in ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05999773, NCT05014594, NCT05013502, but no results have been published yet. The studies characteristics are reported in Table 2.

    Tabular comparison if ascites infusion protocols in patients with decompensated cirrhosis

    NameYearCountryStudy populationDesignDosePatients numberDurationResults
    ANSWER [54]2018ItalyUncomplicated ascites with diureticsRandomized, multicentric, placebo-controlled, open-labelStandard medical treatment (SMT) or SMT plus HA (40 g twice weekly for 2 weeks, and then 40 g weekly)Albumin: 218
    SMT: 213
    18 monthsSurvival at EOT:
    Albumin = 77% Control = 66% p = 0.028
    MACHT [55]2018SpainPatients with ascites on liver transplantation waiting listRandomized, multicentric, placebo-controlled, open-labelAlbumin (40 g every 2 weeks) + midodrine (15–30 mg/day) vs. placeboAlbumin: 87
    Placebo: 86
    12 monthsNo difference in survival or side effects
    ATTIRE [57]2021UKHospitalized patients with decompensated cirrhosis who had a serum albumin level of less than 30 g per liter at enrollmentRandomized, multicenter, open-label, parallel-group trialTargeted albumin solution (for serum albumin > 30 g/L) for up to 14 days or until discharge, vs. SMTAlbumin: 380
    SMT: 397
    15 daysNo difference in a composite criterion (infection, survival, kidney dysfunction) but more side effects in albumin arm
    Di Pascoli et al. [56]2019ItalyPatients with refractory cirrhosisSingle-centre, non-randomized open trialAlbumin 40 g per weak vs. SMTAlbumin: 45
    SMT: 25
    24 monthsReduction in mortality (p = 0.032), in hospitalization (p = 0.008)
    PRECIOSA study (NCT03451292)In progressWorldwidePatients with decompensated cirrhosisRandomized, multicentric, placebo-controlled, open-labelAlbumin 1.5 g/kg for 10 days vs. SMT410 patients1 yearActive, not recruiting
    Display full size

    EOT: end of treatment

    Statins

    Statins are interesting in liver cirrhosis, due to several potential mechanisms of protection in decompensated cirrhosis, particularly reduction in portal pressure, improved liver sinusoidal endothelial dysfunction, and prevention in cirrhosis progression [50]. Despite a probable interest here, clinical impact in ascites is not well known [51].

    Intravenous albumin

    Albumin role is essential, due to its oncotic, antioxidants, and anti-inflammatory qualities. Cirrhosis induces modifications leading to a decreased production and structure modifications, that alter its functions [52, 53]. Recently, studies investigated the potential long-term benefit of albumin infusions. The ANSWER multicentre study followed 440 patients with uncomplicated ascites, receiving high-dose diuretics [54]. The treatment including 40 g albumin twice a week for two weeks, followed by 40 g weekly was compared to standard medical treatment: it showed a higher overall 18-month survival (77% vs. 66%; p = 0.028). The MACHT study included Spanish patients waiting for liver transplantation [55]. One hundred and ninety-six patients with cirrhosis and ascites were distributed between two arms, one with midodrine and albumin (40 g every 2 weeks) and one with placebo: There was no benefit in survival or complications risk. Another Italian study, with a protocol close to that of ANSWER (albumin: 20 g twice per week) showed the following: cumulative incidence of 24-month mortality was significantly lower in patients treated with albumin than in patients treated with standard of care (SOC) (41.6% vs. 65.5%; p = 0.032) [56]. Hospitalizations for encephalopathy, ascites and infections were less frequent. The ATTIRE study aimed to evaluate the effect of albumin infusion versus SOC treatment in 777 UK patients with cirrhosis [57]. There was no difference in survival between the two arms, but side effects, sometimes severe, like pulmonary oedema were observed. Nevertheless, even though ascites was not an inclusion criterion, the reason for admission was new onset or worsening ascites in 62.1% of patients in albumin group versus 70.8% in SOC group. The ongoing international open-label PRECIOSA study (NCT03451292), comparing an original 1.5 g/kg for 10 days albumin infusion protocol to SOC in patients with decompensated cirrhosis and ascites during one year will probably help in current practice decisions. Furthermore, socio-economic data would probably be warranted in these managements.

    Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt

    Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is now a well-developed treatment that allows a rapid decrease in portal hypertension [58]. It was notably developed in patients with recurrent and refractory ascites [59].

    Technical progresses were obtained since TIPS development and, nowadays, a polytetrafluoroethylene self-expandable covered 8 mm stent is classically recommended [60, 61]. Seven RCTs [9, 59, 6266], including 452 patients in total, and 8 meta-analyses [6774] were published. Despite heterogeneity in material depending on the times (The first TIPS were not covered, and their diameter was higher.), and in patients characteristics (refractory ascites versus recurrent, disease stage), the main results were:

    • Ascites control is around 60% to 80%.

    • Global survival is improved, compared to repetition of paracenteses.

    • TIPS seems to be more efficient in recurrent ascites that in refractory ascites. In refractory ascites, global survival is 93% versus 52%. For this reason, it is suggested to propose TIPS early in disease history.

    • The main side effects are hepatic encephalopathy, heart insufficiency, and prosthesis infection or dysfunction.

    • An increase of muscular mass has a positive impact on survival.

    Patient selection must be rigorous. A clinical hepatic encephalopathy must be screened as well as related important risk factors, such as large port-systemic shunts, kidney insufficiency, sarcopenia, hyponatremia, elderly.

    • In case of large shunts, above 6 mm, radiologic occlusion is possible, and limits the risk of hepatic encephalopathy [75].

    • According to meta-analyses, age above 70 years is associated with elevated hepatic encephalopathy and mortality rates [76]. A prospective model was proposed to determine the risk in patients over 70 years old [76, 77].

    • Hepatic encephalopathy must be screened before programming TIPS insertion, including minimal encephalopathy evaluation [78, 79]. It is considered as a contraindication to TIPS [80]. In fact, the risk is estimated between 22% and 40% [58] and is decreased with recent 8-mm covered stents [81]. Prevention of encephalopathy is based on rifaximin, independently of TIPS indication [82]. If hepatic encephalopathy cannot be controlled, treatment can be increased wit disaccharides, stent reduction or occlusion, or liver transplantation.

    • It is important to screen the nutrition status: sarcopenia is associated to complications post-TIPS [67], even if mortality is not increased [83]. TIPS may improve sarcopenia [84].

    • Hepatic function is a prognostic factor: a model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score above 18 and Child Pugh C score are often considered as contraindications [79]. Bureau et al. [85] previously showed that platelets count under 75,000/mm3 and a bilirubin concentration above 50 μmol/L are associated with a poorer survival.

    • Heart evaluation is necessary based on an electrocardiogram, brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) concentration and a transthoracic cardiac ultrasound. Using tissue Doppler of the mitral annulus, the main parameters, to be measured for the diastolic dysfunction are the e’ wave (representing the speed of elongation of the myocardial fibres in the longitudinal plane) and the E/e’ ratio, and measurement of indexed left atrial volume, measurement of systolic pulmonary artery pressure estimated by the peak velocity of tricuspid regurgitation. A screening of valvopathy is recommended, as well as an evaluation of the ventricular systolic function [81, 86, 87]. The Toulouse algorithm, built in 2019, suggested that BNP < 40 pg/mL and NT-proBNP < 125 pg/mL are associated with absence of post-TIPS heart dysfunction [88].

    • Radiological investigation is recommended for portal thrombosis, liver tumor or vascular malformation screening. In case of portal thrombosis, radiological expertise is often necessary [89].

    • Other complications, including stent thrombosis on TIPS are rare, but must be known by clinicians [90].

    Automated low-flow ascites pump: alfapump®

    This recent technique aims to resolve ascites thanks to an implantable class III medical device that pumps ascites from the peritoneal space to the urinary bladder. The alfapump® set up requires a surgical procedure, that does not exceed 30 minutes [91]. A pumping system (FlowControlTM software) allows to estimate daily retrieved volume of ascites, based on volume and frequency of recent previous paracenteses [92]. The alfapump® classical indication is refractory ascites with contraindications to TIPS insertion. Also, it can be a waiting treatment, in case of a project of liver transplantation [82]. The alfapump® is contraindicated in case of loculated ascites, untreatable obstructive uropathy, severe life-threatening comorbidities, contraindication to general anesthesia, recent bladder cancer, and ongoing abdominal or urinary tract infection [93]. Available studies include one RCT, 5 observational prospective studies, and 2 retrospective studies. In 2019, a meta-analysis reported a decrease in paracenteses numbers and quantity of fluid removed [pooled estimate rates were 0.62 (95% CI = 0.49–0.74)] for the absence of required large volume paracentesis, in patients receiving automated low-flow ascites pump. However, 30% of these patients experienced an AKI, 27% an ascites infection and 20% a urinary infection, despite the heterogeneities of the studies [94]. In addition, in a real-world patients’ registry, including 106 patients during a 24-month follow-up, the median survival was 10.1 months. One hundred and eight surgical interventions were necessary in 72 patients, including 48 pump explants [95]. It is important to note that seven AKI occurred, not always early, within a median of 160 days (12 to 605 days), with two related deaths. Although it remains an uncommon technique, experience obtained by certain teams and literature data resulted in a recent consensus [93]. Studies did not include patients with a MELD score above 21, the most seen threshold is 15 [96, 97]. The main complications are local infections (pain, local inflammation signs), pump dysfunction and AKI. In this last situation, albumin and eventually terlipressin can be required, with a temporary reduction of retrieved volume. Also, it remains an expensive which is only available in a few centres. Carefully selecting the patients is recommended before implantation, notably concerning the risk of infection and AKI, and a close kidney function follow-up is necessary.

    Transplantation

    Transplantation is indicated in case of ascites associated with severe cirrhosis, hepatic failure or hepatocellular carcinoma, without possibility or response to classical therapies, including TIPS or automated low-flow ascites pump [2, 22]. Generally, it concerns patients with a MELD score above 18, with impaired kidney function, severe hyponatremia or altered nutritional status. In case of refractory ascites, because of a specific bad prognosis, transplantation waiting list scores are implemented in some countries to reduce waiting time [98]. Also, kidney function must specifically be screened, because of difficulties for a correct renal function evaluation, and an increased kidney impairment [99101].

    Classically, ascites is also observed in the first weeks after liver transplantation in patients with refractory ascites. Low sodium regimen and diuretics can help the management during this period [22].

    Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis

    The traditional definition remains a neutrophil polynuclear count over 250/mm3 in ascites. Clinicians must know that, in case of bloody ascites (red blood cells above 10,000/mm3). For bloody ascites (see definition later), the neutrophil polynuclear count can be corrected by subtracting 1 for every 250 red blood cells in ascites fluid [102]. Furthermore, in this case, the count can decrease to negative numbers, due to cells deterioration. To note, the use of urine dipsticks in the rapid diagnosis of ascites puncture has been widely studied before being abandoned. Clinical signs are usually diarrhoea, abdominal pain, tenderness, and fever, but presentation might be often asymptomatic. The risk of HRS is important, and must be prevented with albumin infusion, 1.5 g/kg at day 1 and 1 g/kg at day 3 [103]. As alternative, an albumin infusion protocol, 1 g/kg at day 1 and 0.5 g/kg at day 3 is possible, but further publications are necessary for its validation [104]. Patients with lower risk of renal impairment, i.e., with serum creatinine below 88 mol/L and with serum bilirubin concentration below 68 mol/L, can be exempted from prevention [105]. Also, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis is an emergency: Kim et al. [106] suggested in 2014 that every late hour increases mortality rate by 3%. Paracentesis control is recommended at 48 hours, and efficiency was defined by a 25% decrease in white cell count. A particular situation is bacterascites, defined by positive cultures without high cells count: It is most often associated to contamination or self-resolution, antibiotics are recommended only in presence of infection signs and a paracentesis control should be performed [107].

    In case of infection, a first-line treatment with 3rd generation cephalosporin is recommended. Cefotaxime is generally prescribed at 3 g per day, in two or three administrations, and ceftriaxone is probably more efficient at 2 g per day instead of 1 g, because of a worse distribution in ascites [108, 109]. In case of healthcare-associated or nosocomial spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, the risk of resistance to antibiotics is increased and piperacillin-tazobactam is often the first choice, in case of low sepsis or in area with low prevalence of multidrug resistance. Otherwise, carbapenem alone or combined with daptomycin, vancomycin or linezolid [2] can be used. These recommendations are enforced by recent modifications in ascites bacterial ecology: Cocci Gram positive bacteria prevalence is now superior to Gram negative bacteria prevalence [110, 111], probably due to emerging bacterial resistance to drugs, that impact prognosis [112].

    Secondary prevention is recommended to help limiting the risk of a new ascites infection [113]. Primary prophylaxis is reserved for patients with Child Pugh C cirrhosis and a liver transplantation project [2].

    Hepatic hydrothorax

    This transudative pleural effusion occurs in 5% to 15% of patients with portal hypertension and is due to a unilateral transfer of ascites from peritoneum to pleural cavity through diaphragm breaches [114, 115]. A specific article concerns hepatic hydrothorax in this issue.

    Hyponatremia

    The diagnosis of hyponatremia in cirrhotic patients is generally considered under the 130 mmol/L threshold. Twenty-two percent of cirrhotic patients meet this definition, whereas 49% of patients have natremia under 135 mmol/L [15]. Mainly, hyponatremia is associated to hypervolemia and ascites, even if it can be present with hypovolemia (notably, when the diuretics treatment decreases of a too large volume.) or euvolemia. Hyponatremia presence is a risk factor for hepatic encephalopathy (OR: 2.4), spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (OR: 3.5) and HRS (OR: 3.5) and, overall, increases hospitalizations and mortality [15]. For these reasons, the MELD-Na score was built, notably for liver transplant allocations.

    Management of hyponatremia differs according to clinicians [116]. Mostly, water restriction, and hypertonic saline or albumin perfusion are preferred and, more rarely, vaptans are used. Nevertheless, international recommendations propose water restriction only in case of mild hyponatremia (125–130 mmol/L). In case of hyponatremia under this threshold, water restriction to 1 litre/day is preferred: the risk of malnutrition and kidney impairment limits this restriction, but in certain cases, water restriction can be decreased to 500 mL/day [22]. Furthermore, diuretics must be stopped. Albumin intake is an option in this situation, particularly in case of hyponatremia under 120 mmol/L, contrary to hypertonic saline, which exposes to a hypervolemia increase [117]. The use of vaptans, vasopressin receptor antagonists, remains rare because of a low efficiency [118, 119]. Vaptans use can expose to dehydration also and, a potential overall hepatocellular risk was reported [120]. That is why its use is limited to 30 days [22].

    Hyponatremia correction must not exceed 8 mEq/day of sodium, because of a potential risk of osmotic demyelination syndrome. A cautious follow-up is particularly necessary in liver transplantation, with large fluid movements, leading to a potential risk between 0.5% and 1.5% [121, 122].

    Sarcopenia

    Specific criteria of European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People assess sarcopenia, incorporating low handgrip strength (< 27 kg for men and < 16 kg for women) with low skeletal muscle index evaluated by CT (< 50 for men and < 39 for women) [123, 124]. Sarcopenia is frequent in cirrhosis, with a prevalence between 23% and 60% [125]. It is strongly associated with cirrhosis complications notably ascites [126], including refractory ascites and infectious complications [127]. Sarcopenia is also associated with a worse prognosis, notably for patients on a liver transplantation waiting list [128].

    Kidney failure

    It is a major problem because of the impact on survival, before (mortality between 22% and 49% at 30 days) [129] or after liver transplantation [130, 131]. Its prevalence ranges between 27% and 53% in hospitalized patients with cirrhosis [132].

    AKI is defined by an increase in serum creatinine > 0.3 mg/dL or ≥ 50% in 48 hours, in a 3-stage classification, dependent of creatinine concentrations [133]. Recently, definitions were adapted and HRS-AKI and non-HRS-AKI were distinguished: HRS-AKI corresponds to previous type I HRS, representing around 30% of AKI in cirrhotic patients [101]. Tables 3 and 4 summarize the definitions. Distinction between HRS-AKI and non-HRS-AKI can be difficult in clinical practice, HRS-AKI corresponding to a pre-renal AKI, with tests avoiding parenchymal causes. There is no specific serum or urine biomarker for HRS-AKI, despite investigations. Urinary neutrophil-gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) is a potential tool: with a cut-off of 220 µg/g, specificity is 85% and sensitivity is 88%, thanks to a dosage at AKI diagnosis and 3 days after [129].

    Acute kidney injury (AKI) stage according to International Ascites Club [133]

    AKI stageDefinition
    1Increase of serum creatinine ≥ 0.3 mg/dL or up to 2-fold from baseline
    2Increase in serum creatinine between 2-fold and 3-fold from baseline
    3Increase in serum creatinine > 4 mg/dL (353.6 µmol/L) with an acute increase ≥ 0.3 mg/dL (26.5 µmol/L) or > 3-fold from baseline or serum creatinine or initiation of renal replacement therapy
    Display full size

    Diagnostic criteria of hepatorenal syndrome-acute kidney injury (AKI) according to International Ascites Club [133]

    Criteria of hepatorenal syndrome-AKI
    Cirrhosis with ascites
    Diagnosis of AKI according to International Ascites Club-Acute Kidney Injury criteria
    No response after 2 consecutive days of diuretic withdrawal and plasma volume expansion with albumin infusion (1 g/kg body weight per day)
    Absence of shock
    No current or recent use of nephrotoxic drugs (aminoglycosides, NSAIDs, or iodinated contrast media)
    No signs of structural kidney injury, as indicated by proteinuria (> 500 mg per day), microhematuria (> 50 red blood cells per high-power field), and/or abnormal renal ultrasonography
    Display full size

    HRS management cornerstone is prevention, particularly in case of spontaneous bacterial infection and large volume paracenteses. Also, potential nephrotoxic medications, such as NSAID, must be avoided [134]. In case of HRS-AKI, diuretics, such as beta-blockers, should be stopped according to Baveno consensus, as previously written here [45]. The specific treatment combines terlipressin, if possible, at 3 mg/day as continuous infusion, and albumin [135138]. Terlipressin must be used cautiously, because of potential side effects: vasoconstriction, notably in peripheral or coronary arteries, hyponatremia, heart arrhythmia, respiratory failure. For these reasons, terlipressin is generally avoided in patients with unstable coronary or ischemic diseases [139]. Norepinephrine is an alternative, but with lower efficiency [140]. Despite this treatment, mortality remains high, reaching nearly 50% [132]. Also, alternatives remain limited as renal replacement therapy is often associated with a high mortality [141]. It is generally reserved to patients with a liver transplantation project or a simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation. This option remains rare but possible, with specific criteria [142, 143]. TIPS insertion is not recommended in this situation, because of a lack of significant results [144].

    Conclusions

    Ascites is a prognostic stage in cirrhosis natural history and is often associated to potentially lethal complications. Management is based on ascites control, thanks to sodium intake reduction and diuretics, and prevention of complications. Clinicians have also the choice of radical invasive treatments, such as TIPS, liver transplantation and more rarely, low flow pump, but side effects are not negligible in cirrhotic patients. Ongoing and future works will target this early phase, with ascites or just portal significant hypertension, to limit the progression of the illness, with beta-blockers, SGLT2 inhibitors, statins, and eventually TIPS insertion.

    Abbreviations

    AKI:

    acute kidney injury

    BNP:

    brain natriuretic peptide

    HRS:

    hepatorenal syndrome

    MELD:

    model for end-stage liver disease

    PPCD:

    post paracentesis circulatory dysfunction

    SGLT2:

    sodium glucose co-transporter 2

    SOC:

    standard of care

    TIPS:

    transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt

    Declarations

    Acknowledgments

    We thank Sarah Legrand-Demai for her English language review and Céline Rigaud for her precious help.

    Author contributions

    PC: Conceptualization, Writing—original draft, Writing—review & editing. VLR and MDG: Validation, Writing—review & editing. LE: Validation, Writing—review & editing, Supervision.

    Conflicts of interest

    The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

    Ethical approval

    Not applicable.

    Consent to participate

    Not applicable.

    Consent to publication

    Not applicable.

    Availability of data and materials

    Not applicable.

    Funding

    Not applicable.

    Copyright

    © The Author(s) 2024.

    References

    Carrier P, Jacques J, Debette-Gratien M, Legros R, Sarabi M, Vidal E, et al. Non-cirrhotic ascites: pathophysiology, diagnosis and etiology. Rev Med Interne. 2014;35:36571. French. [DOI] [PubMed]
    European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines for the management of patients with decompensated cirrhosis. J Hepatol. 2018;69:40660. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Moore KP, Wong F, Gines P, Bernardi M, Ochs A, Salerno F, et al. The management of ascites in cirrhosis: report on the consensus conference of the International Ascites Club. Hepatology. 2003;38:25866. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Arroyo V, Ginès P, Gerbes AL, Dudley FJ, Gentilini P, Laffi G, et al. Definition and diagnostic criteria of refractory ascites and hepatorenal syndrome in cirrhosis. Hepatology. 1996;23:16476. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Runyon BA, Montano AA, Akriviadis EA, Antillon MR, Irving MA, McHutchison JG. The serum-ascites albumin gradient is superior to the exudate-transudate concept in the differential diagnosis of ascites. Ann Intern Med. 1992;117:21520. [DOI] [PubMed]
    D’Amico G, Morabito A, D’Amico M, Pasta L, Malizia G, Rebora P, et al. Clinical states of cirrhosis and competing risks. J Hepatol. 2018;68:56376. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Llach J, Ginès P, Arroyo V, Rimola A, Titó L, Badalamenti S, et al. Prognostic value of arterial pressure, endogenous vasoactive systems, and renal function in cirrhotic patients admitted to the hospital for the treatment of ascites. Gastroenterology. 1988;94:4827. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Bruno S, Saibeni S, Bagnardi V, Vandelli C, De Luca M, Felder M, et al.; AISF (Italian Association for the Study of the Liver) – EPA-SCO Collaborative Study Group. Mortality risk according to different clinical characteristics of first episode of liver decompensation in cirrhotic patients: a nationwide, prospective, 3-year follow-up study in Italy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013;108:111222. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Bureau C, Thabut D, Oberti F, Dharancy S, Carbonell N, Bouvier A, et al. Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunts With Covered Stents Increase Transplant-Free Survival of Patients With Cirrhosis and Recurrent Ascites. Gastroenterology. 2017;152:15763. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Ginés P, Quintero E, Arroyo V, Terés J, Bruguera M, Rimola A, et al. Compensated cirrhosis: natural history and prognostic factors. Hepatology. 1987;7:1228. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Kanwal F, Nelson R, Liu Y, Kramer JR, Hernaez R, Cholankeril G, et al. Cost of Care for Patients With Cirrhosis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2024;119:497504. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Bernardi M, Moreau R, Angeli P, Schnabl B, Arroyo V. Mechanisms of decompensation and organ failure in cirrhosis: From peripheral arterial vasodilation to systemic inflammation hypothesis. J Hepatol. 2015;63:127284. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Arroyo V, Terra C, Ruiz-del-Arbol L. Pathogenesis, Diagnosis and Treatment of Ascites in Cirrhosis. In: Rodés J, Benhamou JP, Blei AT, Reichen J, Rizzetto M, editors. Textbook of Hepatology. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2007. pp. 666–710. [DOI]
    Schrier RW, Arroyo V, Bernardi M, Epstein M, Henriksen JH, Rodés J. Peripheral arterial vasodilation hypothesis: a proposal for the initiation of renal sodium and water retention in cirrhosis. Hepatology. 1988;8:11517. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Angeli P, Wong F, Watson H, Ginès P; CAPPS Investigators. Hyponatremia in cirrhosis: Results of a patient population survey. Hepatology. 2006;44:153542. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Wiese S, Hove JD, Bendtsen F, Møller S. Cirrhotic cardiomyopathy: pathogenesis and clinical relevance. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014;11:17786. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Jalan R, D’Amico G, Trebicka J, Moreau R, Angeli P, Arroyo V. New clinical and pathophysiological perspectives defining the trajectory of cirrhosis. J Hepatol. 2021;75:S1426. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Bernardi M, Caraceni P, Navickis RJ, Wilkes MM. Albumin infusion in patients undergoing large-volume paracentesis: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. Hepatology. 2012;55:117281. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Ruiz-del-Arbol L, Monescillo A, Jimenéz W, Garcia-Plaza A, Arroyo V, Rodés J. Paracentesis-induced circulatory dysfunction: mechanism and effect on hepatic hemodynamics in cirrhosis. Gastroenterology. 1997;113:57986. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Ginès P, Titó L, Arroyo V, Planas R, Panés J, Viver J, et al. Randomized comparative study of therapeutic paracentesis with and without intravenous albumin in cirrhosis. Gastroenterology. 1988;94:1493502. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Ginès A, Fernández-Esparrach G, Monescillo A, Vila C, Domènech E, Abecasis R, et al. Randomized trial comparing albumin, dextran 70, and polygeline in cirrhotic patients with ascites treated by paracentesis. Gastroenterology. 1996;111:100210. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Biggins SW, Angeli P, Garcia-Tsao G, Ginès P, Ling SC, Nadim MK, et al. Diagnosis, Evaluation, and Management of Ascites, Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis and Hepatorenal Syndrome: 2021 Practice Guidance by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Hepatology. 2021;74:101448. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Adebayo D, Neong SF, Wong F. Refractory Ascites in Liver Cirrhosis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2019;114:407. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Tan HK, James PD, Wong F. Albumin May Prevent the Morbidity of Paracentesis-Induced Circulatory Dysfunction in Cirrhosis and Refractory Ascites: A Pilot Study. Dig Dis Sci. 2016;61:308492. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Bernardi M, Angeli P, Claria J, Moreau R, Gines P, Jalan R, et al. Albumin in decompensated cirrhosis: new concepts and perspectives. Gut. 2020;69:112738. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    De Gottardi A, Thévenot T, Spahr L, Morard I, Bresson-Hadni S, Torres F, et al. Risk of complications after abdominal paracentesis in cirrhotic patients: a prospective study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;7:9069. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Wong F. Innovative approaches to the management of ascites in cirrhosis. JHEP Rep. 2023;5:100749. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Wang Q, Zhao H, Deng Y, Zheng H, Xiang H, Nan Y, et al. Validation of Baveno VII criteria for recompensation in entecavir-treated patients with hepatitis B-related decompensated cirrhosis. J Hepatol. 2022;77:156472. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Hofer BS, Simbrunner B, Hartl L, Jachs M, Balcar L, Paternostro R, et al. Hepatic recompensation according to Baveno VII criteria is linked to a significant survival benefit in decompensated alcohol-related cirrhosis. Liver Int. 2023;43:222031. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Bernardi M, Santini C, Trevisani F, Baraldini M, Ligabue A, Gasbarrini G. Renal function impairment induced by change in posture in patients with cirrhosis and ascites. Gut. 1985;26:62935. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Ring-Larsen H, Henriksen JH, Wilken C, Clausen J, Pals H, Christensen NJ. Diuretic treatment in decompensated cirrhosis and congestive heart failure: effect of posture. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1986;292:13513. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Bernardi M, Laffi G, Salvagnini M, Azzena G, Bonato S, Marra F, et al. Efficacy and safety of the stepped care medical treatment of ascites in liver cirrhosis: a randomized controlled clinical trial comparing two diets with different sodium content. Liver. 1993;13:15662. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Pockros PJ, Reynolds TB. Rapid diuresis in patients with ascites from chronic liver disease: the importance of peripheral edema. Gastroenterology. 1986;90:182733. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Runyon BA; AASLD Practice Guidelines Committee. Management of adult patients with ascites due to cirrhosis: an update. Hepatology. 2009;49:2087107. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Bernardi M, Servadei D, Trevisani F, Rusticali AG, Gasbarrini G. Importance of plasma aldosterone concentration on the natriuretic effect of spironolactone in patients with liver cirrhosis and ascites. Digestion. 1985;31:18993. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Gatta A, Angeli P, Caregaro L, Menon F, Sacerdoti D, Merkel C. A pathophysiological interpretation of unresponsiveness to spironolactone in a stepped-care approach to the diuretic treatment of ascites in nonazotemic cirrhotic patients. Hepatology. 1991;14:2316. [PubMed]
    Santos J, Planas R, Pardo A, Durández R, Cabré E, Morillas RM, et al. Spironolactone alone or in combination with furosemide in the treatment of moderate ascites in nonazotemic cirrhosis. A randomized comparative study of efficacy and safety. J Hepatol. 2003;39:18792. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Sersté T, Melot C, Francoz C, Durand F, Rautou PE, Valla D, et al. Deleterious effects of beta-blockers on survival in patients with cirrhosis and refractory ascites. Hepatology. 2010;52:101722. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Xu X, Gao F, Wang T, Yang Z, Zhao Q, Qi X. Association of non-selective β blockers with the development of renal dysfunction in liver cirrhosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Med. 2024;56:2305935. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Wong RJ, Robinson A, Ginzberg D, Gomes C, Liu B, Bhuket T. Assessing the safety of beta-blocker therapy in cirrhosis patients with ascites: A meta-analysis. Liver Int. 2019;39:10808. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Albillos A, García-Pagán JC, Iborra J, Bandi JC, Cacho G, Pérez-Paramo M, et al. Propranolol plus prazosin compared with propranolol plus isosorbide-5-mononitrate in the treatment of portal hypertension. Gastroenterology. 1998;115:11623. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Villanueva C, Albillos A, Genescà J, Garcia-Pagan JC, Calleja JL, Aracil C, et al. β blockers to prevent decompensation of cirrhosis in patients with clinically significant portal hypertension (PREDESCI): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial. Lancet. 2019;393:1597608. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Abd ElRahim AY, Fouad R, Khairy M, Elsharkawy A, Fathalah W, Khatamish H, et al. Efficacy of carvedilol versus propranolol versus variceal band ligation for primary prevention of variceal bleeding. Hepatol Int. 2018;12:7582. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Groszmann RJ, Garcia-Tsao G, Bosch J, Grace ND, Burroughs AK, Planas R, et al.; Portal Hypertension Collaborative Group. Beta-blockers to prevent gastroesophageal varices in patients with cirrhosis. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:225461. [DOI] [PubMed]
    de Franchis R, Bosch J, Garcia-Tsao G, Reiberger T, Ripoll C; Baveno VII Faculty. Baveno VII – Renewing consensus in portal hypertension. J Hepatol. 2022;76:95974. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Villanueva C, Torres F, Sarin SK, Shah HA, Tripathi D, Brujats A, et al. Carvedilol reduces the risk of decompensation and mortality in patients with compensated cirrhosis in a competing-risk meta-analysis. J Hepatol. 2022;77:101425. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Kalambokis GN, Tsiakas I, Filippas-Ntekuan S, Christaki M, Despotis G, Milionis H. Empagliflozin Eliminates Refractory Ascites and Hepatic Hydrothorax in a Patient With Primary Biliary Cirrhosis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2021;116:6189. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Miyamoto Y, Honda A, Yokose S, Nagata M, Miyamoto J. Weaning from concentrated ascites reinfusion therapy for refractory ascites by SGLT2 inhibitor. Clin Kidney J. 2021;15:8313. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Montalvo-Gordon I, Chi-Cervera LA, García-Tsao G. Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors Ameliorate Ascites and Peripheral Edema in Patients With Cirrhosis and Diabetes. Hepatology. 2020;72:18802. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Bosch J, Gracia-Sancho J, Abraldes JG. Cirrhosis as new indication for statins. Gut. 2020;69:95362. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Tapper EB, Zhao Z, Mazumder N, Parikh ND. Incidence of, Risk Factors for, and Outcomes After Ascites in a Population-Based Cohort of Older Americans. Dig Dis Sci. 2022;67:532735. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Baldassarre M, Naldi M, Zaccherini G, Bartoletti M, Antognoli A, Laggetta M, et al. Determination of Effective Albumin in Patients With Decompensated Cirrhosis: Clinical and Prognostic Implications. Hepatology. 2021;74:205873. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    El Balkhi S, Rahali MA, Lakis R, Sauvage FL, Martin M, Janaszkiewicz A, et al. Early detection of liver injuries by the Serum enhanced binding test sensitive to albumin post-transcriptional modifications. Sci Rep. 2024;14:1434. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Caraceni P, Riggio O, Angeli P, Alessandria C, Neri S, Foschi FG, et al.; ANSWER Study Investigators. Long-term albumin administration in decompensated cirrhosis (ANSWER): an open-label randomised trial. Lancet. 2018;391:241729. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Solà E, Solé C, Simón-Talero M, Martín-Llahí M, Castellote J, Garcia-Martínez R, et al. Midodrine and albumin for prevention of complications in patients with cirrhosis awaiting liver transplantation. A randomized placebo-controlled trial. J Hepatol. 2018;69:12509. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Di Pascoli M, Fasolato S, Piano S, Bolognesi M, Angeli P. Long-term administration of human albumin improves survival in patients with cirrhosis and refractory ascites. Liver Int. 2019;39:98105. [DOI] [PubMed]
    China L, Freemantle N, Forrest E, Kallis Y, Ryder SD, Wright G, et al.; ATTIRE Trial Investigators. A Randomized Trial of Albumin Infusions in Hospitalized Patients with Cirrhosis. N Engl J Med. 2021;384:80817. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Rössle M. TIPS: 25 years later. J Hepatol. 2013;59:108193. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Sanyal AJ, Genning C, Reddy KR, Wong F, Kowdley KV, Benner K, et al.; North American Study for the Treatment of Refractory Ascites Group. The North American Study for the Treatment of Refractory Ascites. Gastroenterology. 2003;124:63441. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Trebicka J, Bastgen D, Byrtus J, Praktiknjo M, Terstiegen S, Meyer C, et al. Smaller-Diameter Covered Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Stents Are Associated With Increased Survival. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;17:27939.e1. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Perarnau JM, Le Gouge A, Nicolas C, d’Alteroche L, Borentain P, Saliba F, et al.; STIC-TIPS group. Covered vs. uncovered stents for transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt: a randomized controlled trial. J Hepatol. 2014;60:9628. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Narahara Y, Kanazawa H, Fukuda T, Matsushita Y, Harimoto H, Kidokoro H, et al. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt versus paracentesis plus albumin in patients with refractory ascites who have good hepatic and renal function: a prospective randomized trial. J Gastroenterol. 2011;46:7885. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Lebrec D, Giuily N, Hadengue A, Vilgrain V, Moreau R, Poynard T, et al.; Serge Erlinger French Group of Clinicians. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts: comparison with paracentesis in patients with cirrhosis and refractory ascites: a randomized trial. J Hepatol. 1996;25:13544. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Rössle M, Ochs A, Gülberg V, Siegerstetter V, Holl J, Deibert P, et al. A comparison of paracentesis and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunting in patients with ascites. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:17017. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Ginès P, Uriz J, Calahorra B, Garcia-Tsao G, Kamath PS, Del Arbol LR, et al. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunting versus paracentesis plus albumin for refractory ascites in cirrhosis. Gastroenterology. 2002;123:183947. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Salerno F, Merli M, Riggio O, Cazzaniga M, Valeriano V, Pozzi M, et al. Randomized controlled study of TIPS versus paracentesis plus albumin in cirrhosis with severe ascites. Hepatology. 2004;40:62935. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Benmassaoud A, Freeman SC, Roccarina D, Torres MC, Sutton AJ, Cooper NJ, et al. Treatment for ascites in adults with decompensated liver cirrhosis: a network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;1:CD013123. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Deltenre P, Mathurin P, Dharancy S, Moreau R, Bulois P, Henrion J, et al. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in refractory ascites: a meta-analysis. Liver Int. 2005;25:34956. [DOI] [PubMed]
    D’Amico G, Luca A, Morabito A, Miraglia R, D’Amico M. Uncovered transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt for refractory ascites: a meta-analysis. Gastroenterology. 2005;129:128293. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Albillos A, Bañares R, González M, Catalina M, Molinero LM. A meta-analysis of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt versus paracentesis for refractory ascites. J Hepatol. 2005;43:9906. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Saab S, Nieto JM, Lewis SK, Runyon BA. TIPS versus paracentesis for cirrhotic patients with refractory ascites. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;2006:CD004889. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Salerno F, Cammà C, Enea M, Rössle M, Wong F. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt for refractory ascites: a meta-analysis of individual patient data. Gastroenterology. 2007;133:82534. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Chen RP, Zhu Ge XJ, Huang ZM, Ye XH, Hu CY, Lu GR, et al. Prophylactic use of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt aids in the treatment of refractory ascites: metaregression and trial sequential meta-analysis. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2014;48:2909. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Bai M, Qi XS, Yang ZP, Yang M, Fan DM, Han GH. TIPS improves liver transplantation-free survival in cirrhotic patients with refractory ascites: an updated meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20:270414. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Lv Y, Chen H, Luo B, Bai W, Li K, Wang Z, et al. Concurrent large spontaneous portosystemic shunt embolization for the prevention of overt hepatic encephalopathy after TIPS: A randomized controlled trial. Hepatology. 2022;76:67688. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Ahmed Z, Farooq U, Faiza Arif S, Aziz M, Iqbal U, Nawaz A, et al. Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Outcomes in the Elderly Population: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Gastroenterology Res. 2022;15:32533. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Vizzutti F, Celsa C, Calvaruso V, Enea M, Battaglia S, Turco L, et al. Mortality after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in older adult patients with cirrhosis: A validated prediction model. Hepatology. 2023;77:47688. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Horhat A, Bureau C, Thabut D, Rudler M. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in patients with cirrhosis: Indications and posttransjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt complications in 2020. United European Gastroenterol J. 2021;9:2038. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Bureau C, Larrue H, Ganne Carrié N, Bourlière M; Groupe de travail. Recommandations TIPS: Indications et Modalités. Association Française pour l’Étude du Foie; 2023.
    Vilstrup H, Amodio P, Bajaj J, Cordoba J, Ferenci P, Mullen KD, et al. Hepatic encephalopathy in chronic liver disease: 2014 Practice Guideline by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the European Association for the Study of the Liver. Hepatology. 2014;60:71535. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Schepis F, Vizzutti F, Garcia-Tsao G, Marzocchi G, Rega L, Maria ND, et al. Under-dilated TIPS Associate With Efficacy and Reduced Encephalopathy in a Prospective, Non-randomized Study of Patients With Cirrhosis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;16:115362.e7. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Bureau C, Adebayo D, Chalret de Rieu M, Elkrief L, Valla D, Peck-Radosavljevic M, et al. Alfapump® system vs. large volume paracentesis for refractory ascites: A multicenter randomized controlled study. J Hepatol. 2017;67:9409. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Nardelli S, Riggio O, Marra F, Gioia S, Saltini D, Bellafante D, et al. Episodic overt hepatic encephalopathy after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt does not increase mortality in patients with cirrhosis. J Hepatol. 2024;80:596602. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Nardelli S, Lattanzi B, Torrisi S, Greco F, Farcomeni A, Gioia S, et al. Sarcopenia Is Risk Factor for Development of Hepatic Encephalopathy After Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Placement. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;15:9346. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Bureau C, Métivier S, D’Amico M, Péron JM, Otal P, Pagan JC, et al. Serum bilirubin and platelet count: a simple predictive model for survival in patients with refractory ascites treated by TIPS. J Hepatol. 2011;54:9017. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Jansen C, Schröder A, Schueler R, Lehmann J, Praktiknjo M, Uschner FE, et al. Left Ventricular Longitudinal Contractility Predicts Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure Development and Mortality After Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt. Hepatol Commun. 2019;3:3407. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Nagueh SF, Smiseth OA, Appleton CP, Byrd BF 3rd, Dokainish H, Edvardsen T, et al. Recommendations for the Evaluation of Left Ventricular Diastolic Function by Echocardiography: An Update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016;17:132160. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Billey C, Billet S, Robic MA, Cognet T, Guillaume M, Vinel JP, et al. A Prospective Study Identifying Predictive Factors of Cardiac Decompensation After Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt: The Toulouse Algorithm. Hepatology. 2019;70:192841. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Lv Y, Qi X, He C, Wang Z, Yin Z, Niu J, et al.; PVT-TIPS Study Group. Covered TIPS versus endoscopic band ligation plus propranolol for the prevention of variceal rebleeding in cirrhotic patients with portal vein thrombosis: a randomised controlled trial. Gut. 2018;67:215668. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Mizrahi M, Adar T, Shouval D, Bloom AI, Shibolet O. Endotipsitis-persistent infection of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt: pathogenesis, clinical features and management. Liver Int. 2010;30:17583. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Stepanova M, Nader F, Bureau C, Adebayo D, Elkrief L, Valla D, et al. Patients with refractory ascites treated with alfapump® system have better health-related quality of life as compared to those treated with large volume paracentesis: the results of a multicenter randomized controlled study. Qual Life Res. 2018;27:151320. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Weil-Verhoeven D, Di Martino V, Stirnimann G, Cervoni JP, Nguyen-Khac E, Thévenot T. Alfapump® implantable device in management of refractory ascites: An update. World J Hepatol. 2022;14:134456. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Aagaard NK, Malago M, De Gottardi A, Thomas M, Sauter G, Engelmann C, et al. Consensus care recommendations for alfapump® in cirrhotic patients with refractory or recurrent ascites. BMC Gastroenterol. 2022;22:111. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Lepida A, Marot A, Trépo E, Degré D, Moreno C, Deltenre P. Systematic review with meta-analysis: automated low-flow ascites pump therapy for refractory ascites. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2019;50:97887. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Stirnimann G, Berg T, Spahr L, Zeuzem S, McPherson S, Lammert F, et al. Final safety and efficacy results from a 106 real-world patients registry with an ascites-mobilizing pump. Liver Int. 2022;42:224759. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Wong F, Bendel E, Sniderman K, Frederick T, Haskal ZJ, Sanyal A, et al. Improvement in Quality of Life and Decrease in Large-Volume Paracentesis Requirements With the Automated Low-Flow Ascites Pump. Liver Transpl. 2020;26:65161. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Thomas MN, Sauter GH, Gerbes AL, Stangl M, Schiergens TS, Angele M, et al. Automated low flow pump system for the treatment of refractory ascites: a single-center experience. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2015;400:97983. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Heuman DM, Abou-Assi SG, Habib A, Williams LM, Stravitz RT, Sanyal AJ, et al. Persistent ascites and low serum sodium identify patients with cirrhosis and low MELD scores who are at high risk for early death. Hepatology. 2004;40:80210. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Carrier P, Destere A, Giguet B, Debette-Gratien M, Essig M, Monchaud C, et al. Iohexol plasma and urinary concentrations in cirrhotic patients: A pilot study. World J Hepatol. 2022;14:162132. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Francoz C, Nadim MK, Baron A, Prié D, Antoine C, Belghiti J, et al. Glomerular filtration rate equations for liver-kidney transplantation in patients with cirrhosis: validation of current recommendations. Hepatology. 2014;59:151421. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Carrier P, Debette-Gratien M, Essig M, Loustaud-Ratti V. Beyond serum creatinine: which tools to evaluate renal function in cirrhotic patients? Hepatol Res. 2018;48:7719. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Guarner C, Runyon BA. Ascites. In: McNally PR, editor. GI/Liver Secrets. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Inc.; 2010. pp. 217–27. [DOI]
    Sort P, Navasa M, Arroyo V, Aldeguer X, Planas R, Ruiz-del-Arbol L, et al. Effect of intravenous albumin on renal impairment and mortality in patients with cirrhosis and spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:4039. [DOI] [PubMed]
    de Araujo A, de Barros Lopes A, Rossi G, da Silva GV, Ananias P, Ness S, et al. Low-dose albumin in the treatment of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis: should we change the standard treatment? Gut. 2012;61:13712. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Sigal SH, Stanca CM, Fernandez J, Arroyo V, Navasa M. Restricted use of albumin for spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. Gut. 2007;56:5979. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Kim JJ, Tsukamoto MM, Mathur AK, Ghomri YM, Hou LA, Sheibani S, et al. Delayed paracentesis is associated with increased in-hospital mortality in patients with spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2014;109:143642. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Runyon BA. Monomicrobial nonneutrocytic bacterascites: a variant of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. Hepatology. 1990;12:7105. [DOI] [PubMed]
    McNamara PJ, Gibaldi M, Stoeckel K. Volume of distribution terms for a drug (ceftriaxone) exhibiting concentration-dependent protein binding. II. Physiological significance. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1983;25:40712. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Mazer L, Tapper EB, Piatkowski G, Lai M. The need for antibiotic stewardship and treatment standardization in the care of cirrhotic patients with spontaneous bacterial peritonitis - a retrospective cohort study examining the effect of ceftriaxone dosing. F1000Res. 2014;3:57. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Fiore M, Maraolo AE, Gentile I, Borgia G, Leone S, Sansone P, et al. Current concepts and future strategies in the antimicrobial therapy of emerging Gram-positive spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. World J Hepatol. 2017;9:11661175. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Piroth L, Pechinot A, Di Martino V, Hansmann Y, Putot A, Patry I, et al. Evolving epidemiology and antimicrobial resistance in spontaneous bacterial peritonitis: a two-year observational study. BMC Infect Dis. 2014;14:287. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Marciano S, Díaz JM, Dirchwolf M, Gadano A. Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in patients with cirrhosis: incidence, outcomes, and treatment strategies. Hepat Med. 2019;11:1322. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Fernández J, Navasa M, Planas R, Montoliu S, Monfort D, Soriano G, et al. Primary prophylaxis of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis delays hepatorenal syndrome and improves survival in cirrhosis. Gastroenterology. 2007;133:81824. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Banini BA, Alwatari Y, Stovall M, Ogden N, Gershman E, Shah RD, et al. Multidisciplinary Management of Hepatic Hydrothorax in 2020: An Evidence-Based Review and Guidance. Hepatology. 2020;72:185163. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Cadranel JD, Ollivier-Hourmand I, Cadranel J, Thevenot T, Zougmore H, Nguyen-Khac E, et al. International survey among hepatologists and pulmonologists on the hepatic hydrothorax: plea for recommendations. BMC Gastroenterol. 2023;23:305. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Sigal SH, Amin A, Chiodo JA 3rd, Sanyal A. Management Strategies and Outcomes for Hyponatremia in Cirrhosis in the Hyponatremia Registry. Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;2018:1579508. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Bajaj JS, Tandon P, OʼLeary JG, Biggins SW, Wong F, Kamath PS, et al. The Impact of Albumin Use on Resolution of Hyponatremia in Hospitalized Patients With Cirrhosis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2018;113:1339. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Chai L, Li Z, Wang T, Wang R, Pinyopornpanish K, Cheng G, et al. Efficacy and safety of tolvaptan in cirrhotic patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023;17:104151. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Pose E, Solà E, Piano S, Gola E, Graupera I, Guevara M, et al. Limited Efficacy of Tolvaptan in Patients with Cirrhosis and Severe Hyponatremia: Real-Life Experience. Am J Med. 2017;130:3725. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Cárdenas A, Ginès P, Marotta P, Czerwiec F, Oyuang J, Guevara M, et al. Tolvaptan, an oral vasopressin antagonist, in the treatment of hyponatremia in cirrhosis. J Hepatol. 2012;56:5718. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Yun BC, Kim WR, Benson JT, Biggins SW, Therneau TM, Kremers WK, et al. Impact of pretransplant hyponatremia on outcome following liver transplantation. Hepatology. 2009;49:16105. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Crivellin C, Cagnin A, Manara R, Boccagni P, Cillo U, Feltracco P, et al. Risk factors for central pontine and extrapontine myelinolysis after liver transplantation: a single-center study. Transplantation. 2015;99:125764. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Durand F, Buyse S, Francoz C, Laouénan C, Bruno O, Belghiti J, et al. Prognostic value of muscle atrophy in cirrhosis using psoas muscle thickness on computed tomography. J Hepatol. 2014;60:11517. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Bahat G, Bauer J, Boirie Y, Bruyère O, Cederholm T, et al.; Writing Group for the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People 2 (EWGSOP2), and the Extended Group for EWGSOP2. Sarcopenia: revised European consensus on definition and diagnosis. Age Ageing. 2019;48:601. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Bunchorntavakul C, Reddy KR. Review article: malnutrition/sarcopenia and frailty in patients with cirrhosis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2020;51:6477. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Topan MM, Sporea I, Dănilă M, Popescu A, Ghiuchici AM, Lupuşoru R, et al. Impact of Sarcopenia on Survival and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Liver Cirrhosis. Front Nutr. 2021;8:766451. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Kim G, Kang SH, Kim MY, Baik SK. Prognostic value of sarcopenia in patients with liver cirrhosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0186990. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Montano-Loza AJ, Duarte-Rojo A, Meza-Junco J, Baracos VE, Sawyer MB, Pang JX, et al. Inclusion of Sarcopenia Within MELD (MELD-Sarcopenia) and the Prediction of Mortality in Patients With Cirrhosis. Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2015;6:e102. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Huelin P, Solà E, Elia C, Solé C, Risso A, Moreira R, et al. Neutrophil Gelatinase-Associated Lipocalin for Assessment of Acute Kidney Injury in Cirrhosis: A Prospective Study. Hepatology. 2019;70:31933. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Maurel P, Prémaud A, Carrier P, Essig M, Barbier L, Rousseau A, et al. Evaluation of Longitudinal Exposure to Tacrolimus as a Risk Factor of Chronic Kidney Disease Occurrence Within the First-year Post-Liver Transplantation. Transplantation. 2021;105:158594. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Ojo AO, Held PJ, Port FK, Wolfe RA, Leichtman AB, Young EW, et al. Chronic renal failure after transplantation of a nonrenal organ. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:93140. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Ginès P, Solà E, Angeli P, Wong F, Nadim MK, Kamath PS. Hepatorenal syndrome. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2018;4:23. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Angeli P, Ginès P, Wong F, Bernardi M, Boyer TD, Gerbes A, et al. Diagnosis and management of acute kidney injury in patients with cirrhosis: revised consensus recommendations of the International Club of Ascites. J Hepatol. 2015;62:96874. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Mazumder NR, Junna S, Sharma P. The Diagnosis and Non-pharmacological Management of Acute Kidney Injury in Patients with Cirrhosis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023;21:S119. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Arora V, Choudhary SP, Maiwall R, Vijayaraghavan R, Jindal A, Kumar G, et al. Low-dose continuous terlipressin infusion is effective and safer than intravenous bolus injections in reducing portal pressure and control of acute variceal bleeding. Hepatol Int. 2023;17:1318. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Garcia-Tsao G, Abraldes JG, Rich NE, Wong VW. AGA Clinical Practice Update on the Use of Vasoactive Drugs and Intravenous Albumin in Cirrhosis: Expert Review. Gastroenterology. 2024;166:20210. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Wong F, Pappas SC, Curry MP, Reddy KR, Rubin RA, Porayko MK, et al.; CONFIRM Study Investigators. Terlipressin plus Albumin for the Treatment of Type 1 Hepatorenal Syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2021;384:81828. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Cavallin M, Piano S, Romano A, Fasolato S, Frigo AC, Benetti G, et al. Terlipressin given by continuous intravenous infusion versus intravenous boluses in the treatment of hepatorenal syndrome: A randomized controlled study. Hepatology. 2016;63:98392. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Flamm SL, Wong F, Ahn J, Kamath PS. AGA Clinical Practice Update on the Evaluation and Management of Acute Kidney Injury in Patients With Cirrhosis: Expert Review. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022;20:270716. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Kwong A, Kim WR, Kwo PY, Wang U, Cheng X. Feasibility and Effectiveness of Norepinephrine Outside the Intensive Care Setting for Treatment of Hepatorenal Syndrome. Liver Transpl. 2021;27:1095105. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Angeli P, Rodríguez E, Piano S, Ariza X, Morando F, Solà E, et al.; CANONIC Study Investigators of EASL-CLIF Consortium. Acute kidney injury and acute-on-chronic liver failure classifications in prognosis assessment of patients with acute decompensation of cirrhosis. Gut. 2015;64:161622. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Nadim MK, Sung RS, Davis CL, Andreoni KA, Biggins SW, Danovitch GM, et al. Simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation summit: current state and future directions. Am J Transplant. 2012;12:29018. [DOI] [PubMed]
    Nadim MK, Kellum JA, Davenport A, Wong F, Davis C, Pannu N, et al. Hepatorenal syndrome: the 8th International Consensus Conference of the Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative (ADQI) Group. Crit Care. 2012;16:R23. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
    Gonzalez-Garay AG, Serralde-Zúñiga AE, Velasco Hidalgo L, Flores García NC, Aguirre-Salgado MI. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts for adults with hepatorenal syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024;1:CD011039. [DOI] [PubMed]