Comparison of LVEF as measured by different non-invasive imaging methods, reported mean difference and agreement
Echo 3D vs. CMR | SPECT vs. CMR | MDCT vs. CMR | Echo3D vs. SPECT | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Mannaerts et al. 2003 [6] | MD 1.8% ± 11.6% | |||
Persson et al. 2005 [7] | MD 4% ± 7% (P < 0.001) | |||
Belge et al. 2006 [8] | MD 1% ± 21% (P = NS) r = 0.95; P < 0.001 | |||
Soliman et al. 2008 [9] | MD 0.2% ± 6.2% | |||
Beitner et al. 2019 [10] | MD 0.56% ± 15% | MD 0.75% ± 10% | 1.3% ± 20% | |
ICC 0.71 | ICC 0.89 | ICC 0.51 | ||
β = 0.72, P = 0.003 | β = 0.90, P < 0.001 |
Echo2D: bidimensional echocardiography; Echo3D: three dimensional echocardiography; MDCT: gated multidetector row computed tomography; MD: mean difference; NS: not significant; r: correlation index; ICC: intraclass correlation coefficient
ELA wrote the first draft of the manuscript. All authors contributed to manuscript revision, read and approved the submitted version.
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
© The Author(s) 2020.