From:  The transition from NAFLD to MASLD: implications for Diagnosis, Prognosis, and Clinical Management

 Risk stratification models and prognostic predictors in MASLD.

CategoryModel/factorDescription/cut-offPrognostic implicationsReferences
Three-tier modelsFIB-4 < 1.3Low risk, NPV approximately 90%Outpatient follow-up[80, 119]
FIB-4 1.3–2.67Intermediate riskRequires second-level testing (elastography, ELF)[80, 120]
FIB-4 > 2.67High riskHigh probability of advanced fibrosis[80, 119]
Clinical factorsFibrosis ≥ F2Associated with increased overall mortalityIndication for intensive surveillance[117, 118]
T2DM + MASLDHigh-risk phenotypeAccelerated progression to cirrhosis and HCC[57, 121]
Older age, male sex, mixed dyslipidemiaIndependent aggravating factorsIncreased CV and renal risk[48]
Integrative toolsSCORE2, ASCVD Risk CalculatorCardiovascular risk integrationGreater predictive accuracy[111]
Renal stratifiersAlbuminuria, reduced eGFRNephropathy risk assessmentCKD monitoring[40, 41]
Emerging biomarkersPro-C3, “omics”, PNPLA3Personalized approachesTowards precision medicine[41, 67, 115]

CKD: chronic kidney disease; CV: cardiovascular; eGFR: estimated glomerular filtration rate; ELF: enhanced liver fibrosis; HCC: hepatocellular carcinoma; NPV: negative predictive value; T2DM: type 2 diabetes mellituss.