Evaluation of cardiovascular outcomes in transplanted patients with or without assessment of pre-LT steatosis, either receiving a graft with steatosis and/or with de novo/recurrent NAFLD post LT

AuthorsYearType of studyNationPopulationF-up after LTCV endpointNAFLDResults
Evaluation of CV outcomes in transplanted patients without data on pre-existing NAFLD
Alves et al. [35]2019Cross sectionalBrasil791.4–6.3 yearscIMTNA
  • Prevalence of increased cIMT 54%

  • Independently associated with higher LDL, C-reactive protein and intake of saturated and trans fatty acids with diet

Bargehr et al. [53]2018Retrospective Case controlUSA717
-32 cases (AF)
-63 controls
5–8 yearsIntraoperative and postoperative cardiac complications (ventricular tachycardia, hemodynamic instability, cardiac arrest, death)NA
  • Prevalence of intraoperative/postoperative cardiac complications in 28%/8% (cases) and 5%/2% (controls)

  • Mortality for CV causes 9% cases, 0 controls

Josefsson et al. [44]2014RetrospectiveUK2342–20 years-CV events (arrhythmias, CAD)
-Mortality from CV events
NA
  • Prevalence of CV events 29%, with mortality in 88% of them (26% of the cohort)

  • Independently associated with pre-LT ECG abnormalities (prolonged QTc time, Q wave, ECG feature compatible with CAD)

Dowsley et al. [43]2012RetrospectiveUSA1072.6 ± 1.4 monthsHFNA
  • Prevalence of HF 24%

  • Independently associated with pre-LT diastolic dysfunction

Eimer er al. [42]2008ProspectiveUSA862 weeks
-2 years
Systolic HFNA
  • Incidence of systolic HF 7%

  • Independently associated with age and pulmonary hypertension

Evaluation of CV outcomes in transplanted patients with data on pre-existing NAFLD but without analysis on the impact of NAFLD on CV assessment
Memaran et al. [71]2019Cross sectionalGermany104 (children)6.9 years-Carotid-femoral pulse PWV
-cIMT
-LVMI
Pre-LT NASH 6%
  • Prevalence of alterations in PWV, cIMT, and LVMI in 21.9%, 57.0%, and 11.1%. Data separated in NASH not available

  • PWV independently associated with diastolic BP and GFR; cIMT with age; LVMI with pre-LT BMI

Sonny et al. [47]2018Case controlUSA1,284
-45 cases (LVEF < 45% within 6 months from LT)
-180 controls
6 monthsSystolic HF (LVEF < 45%)-Pre-LT NASH case: 22%
-Controls: 23%
  • Prevalence of systolic HF 6%. Data separated in NASH not available

  • Independently associated with pre-LT diastolic dysfunction

Roccaro et al. [62]2018RetrospectiveUSA9942-12 yearsMajor CV events (cardiac arrest, MI, stroke, PAD)Pre-LT NASH 10%
  • Prevalence of major CV events 12%, mortality from CV events 4%. Data separated in NASH not available.

  • Independently associated with post LT diabetes.

Perito et al. [37]2018Cross sectionalUSA88 (children)11.2 ± 5.6 yearscIMTPre-LT NASH 17%
  • Increase in cIMT independently associated with glucose intolerance and diastolic hypertension.

VanWagner et al. [38]2017RetrospectiveUSA1,02410 yearsHospitalization or mortality from major CV events (MI, AF, HF, cardiac arrest, PE, TIA, stroke)Pre-LT NASH 16%
  • Prevalence of hospitalization 32% and death from CV events 32% and 5%. Data separated in NASH not available.

  • Independently associated with T2DM, hypertension, pre existing AF and HF, age > 65 years

VanWagner et al. [32]2016RetrospectiveUSA32,81090 daysMajor CV events (MI, AF, PE, HF, cardiac arrest, stroke)Pre-LT NASH 9.7%
  • Prevalence of major CV events 3%. Data separated in NASH not available

  • Independently associate with NASH, age > 65 years, baseline AF and stroke

Fussner et al. [39]2015RetrospectiveUSA4558–12 yearsCVD (CAD, arrythmias, congestive HF, symptomatic PAD)Pre-LT NASH 10%
  • Prevalence of CVD 30%. Data separated in NASH not available

  • Independently associated with age, diabetes, prior history of CVD and pre-LT serum troponin

VanWagner et al. [9]2014RetrospectiveUSA54,69730 daysMortality from CV eventsPre-LT NASH 5%
  • Prevalence of death from CV events 1.1%. Data separated in NASH not available

  • Independently associated with age, intensive care unit status, ventilator status, MELD, portal vein thrombosis, donor BMI, and cold ischemia time

Qureshi et al. [45]2013ProspectiveUSA9705.3 ± 3.4 yearsHFPre-LT NASH 4.5%
  • Incidence of HF 10%. Data separated in NASH not available

  • Independently associated with pre-LT grade 3 diastolic dysfunction, diabetes, hypertension, BNP, pulmonary hypertension, QT > 450

Watt et al. [5]2010RetrospectiveUSA79812.5 (9–13) yearsMortality from all causes and CV causesPre-LT NASH 29%
  • Prevalence of death 41%, from CV events 5%. Data separated in NASH not available

  • CV mortality independently associated with age, criptogenetic cirrhosis and ALD

Evaluation of CV outcomes in transplanted patients with pre-existing NAFLD and with analysis on the impact of NAFLD on CV assessment
Kwong et al. [29]2020RetrospectiveUSA1,0231–3 years-Survival
-CV events (AF, MI, HF, stroke)
Pre-LT NASH in 21%
  • No difference in survival at 1 and 3 year among NASH (91.3% and 83.3%) compared to non-NASH (90% and 81%)

  • No difference in incidence of CV events between NASH and non-NASH patients

Nagai et al. [95]2019RetrospectiveUSA32,660 (6,344 NASH) (17,037 HCV) (9,279 ALD)1–2 yearsAll cause and CV mortalityPre-LT NASH 19%
  • Overall mortality 22%

  • Significantly higher mortality in NASH compared to HCV or ALD, adjusted for HCC presence (especially in age 50–59 years)

  • Mortality from CV disease highest among patients with NASH (11.5%), compared to 7.0% in HCV and 9.6% in ALD

D’Avola et al. [98]2017ProspectiveSpain1,8195 yearsAll cause and CV mortality-Cryptogenetic cirrhosis 2.9%.
-Data on NASH NA
  • Overall mortality 22%, 12% from CV causes

  • ALD was an independent predictors of CV events, HCV of mortality

Piazza et al. [104]2016RetrospectiveItaly143 (65 ALD) (78 NASH)3 years-All-cause mortality
-CV events (sudden cardiac death, CAD, congestive HF, AF or arrhythmia, valvular heart disease, PAD, or stroke)
Pre-LT NASH 54%
  • No difference in prevalence of CV events at 3 years in patients with ALD (14.1%) and NASH (13.8%)

  • No difference in survival between NASH and ALD patients (87.2% vs. 86.4%)

VanWagner et al. [8]2012RetrospectiveUSA242 (115 NASH) (127 ALD)5 years-Survival
-CV events (death from any cardiac cause, MI, acute HF, arrhythmia, stroke)
Pre-LT NASH in 47%
  • Increased CV events in NASH vs. ALD patients (26% vs. 8%) independently of confounding factors

  • No difference in survival between two groups. The 1-, 3-, and 5- year patient survival were 81.3%, 73.3%, and 60.3% in the NASH group and 88.1%, 85.3%, and 68.8% in the ALD group

Contos et al. [83]2001ProspectiveUSA58 (30 NASH) (16 ALD) (12 PBC)30 daysSurvivalPre-LT NASH 51%
  • Overall survival 96%

  • No difference in survival among groups

Evaluation of CV outcomes in transplanted patients receiving liver graft with NAFLD
Kulik et al. [79]2017RetrospectiveGermany1,205 [77 requiring re-LT, 39 due to primary non function (PNF) and 38 to vascular and biliary disease]3 months-11 years-In-hospital mortality in patients with re-LT
-Survival in patients with re-LT
NAFLD in 69% of graft of with PNF
  • Overall survival 0.5 years in PNF and 5.3 years in patients with vascular and biliary disease

  • In-hospital mortality was 53.8% vs. 26.4%

  • PNF due to fatty liver allograft was the only independent factor associated with poor outcome.

Andert et al. [80]2017RetrospectiveGermany9430 days-1 yearsAll cause mortalityDonor graft hepatic steatosis: < 30% (n = 27), 30%–60%(n = 41) > 60% (n = 26)
  • The 30-day survival rates were 100% in all groups. The 1-year patient survival rates were 94.4% in the group with steatosis < 30%, 87.9% 30%–60% and 90.9% in > 60% group (no difference among groups)

de Graaf et al. [76]2012RetrospectiveAustralia2913 monthsMortality-NAFLD in 72% of graft
-Data on pre-LT NASH NA
  • Increased prevalence of mortality in patients with steatosis graft compared to patients without steatosis graft and the higher the grade of steatosis the higher the mortality (steatosis grade 3 25%; grade 1 19%; absence 7%)

Evaluation of CV outcomes in transplanted patients with de novo/recurrent NAFLD
Pisano et al. [36]2020ProspectiveItaly542 years-Carotid IMT, plaques and PWV
-Diastolic dysfunction (E/A)
-EAT
-New onset steatosis 26%
-Pre-LT NAFLD 19%
-Graft with steatosis 20%
  • Prevalence of carotid plaques increased before and after LT from 52% to 67%; cIMT from 0.78 mm to 0.83 mm; E/A 1.1 to 0.86; EAT 5.9 mm to 8.1 mm

  • Worsening of indices of early damage of carotid (IMT), diastolic dysfunction and EAT not different between patients with or without post LT steatosis

Bhati et al. [91]2017RetrospectiveUSA1035–15 years-All cause and CV mortality
-Survival
-Recurrent NAFLD 87–88%
-Pre-LT NASH 47%, criptogenetic cirrhosis 53%
  • Overall mortality 31%, CV mortality 6%

  • 5, 10, and 15 years post-LT survival rates 86%, 71%, and 51%, respectively

  • No difference in survival between patients with recurrent NAFL versus NASH as determined by biopsy

Hejlova et al. [85]2016RetrospectiveCzech republic54815 yearsSurvival (comparison between grade 0–1 steatosis vs. 2–3 grade steatosis)De novo NAFLD in 56% (17% grade 3)
  • Survival times did not differ between patients with significant steatosis and steatosis grades 0–1

  • CV mortality after the first year in patients with significant steatosis and steatosis grades 0–1 was 21.4% and 5.4% (NS)

Yalamanchili et al. [90]2010RetrospectiveUSA2,0521–10 yearsSurvival-De novo NAFLD in 31%
-Pre-LT NASH/criptogenetic cirrhosis in 12%
  • One-, 5-, and 10-year survival not different in patients transplanted for criptogenetic cirrhosis or NASH (86%, 71%, and 56%) vs. with other LT indications (86%, 71%, and 53%)

  • Increased prevalence of CV death in patients transplanted for criptogenetic cirrhosis or NASH (21%) vs. with other LT indications (14%)

Dureja et al. [94]2011Cohort-studyUSA881–7 years-All causes mortality and CV mortality
-Survival
-Recurrent NAFLD 39%
-Pre-LT NAFLD/criptogenetic cirrhosis 100%
  • Prevalence of mortality 27% (34% in patients with recurrent NAFLD vs. 24% not recurrent, NS)

  • Survival and CV mortality, did not differ between those with and without NAFLD recurrence

PAD: peripheral artery disease; BMP: brain natriuretic peptide; MI: myocardial infarction; AF: atrial fibrillation, PE: pulmonary emobolism; PWV: pulse wave velocity; LVMI: left ventricular mass index; HF: heart failure; LVEF: left ventricular ejection fraction; TIA: transient ischemic attack; NAFL: non-alcoholic fatty liver; BP: blood pressure; GFR: glomerular filtrate rate; NS: not statistically significant; NA: not available; LDL: low density lipoproteins; BNP:brain natriuretic peptide; ALD: alcoholic liver disease; HCV: hepatitis C virus; HCC: hepatocellular carcinoma; PBC: primary biliary cholangitis; PNF: primary non function; E/A: E wave A wave ratio; EAT:epicardial adipose tissue