The authors would like to thank the Vice-Chancellor for Research of Zahedan University of Medical Sciences for their support and cooperation.
Author contributions
ES: Conceptualization, Investigation, Data curation, Formal analysis, Writing—original draft, Writing—review & editing. SB: Conceptualization, Investigation, Writing—review & editing, Supervision. FG: Conceptualization, Investigation, Validation, Writing—review & editing, Supervision. EM and FF: Investigation, Writing—review & editing, Supervision. All authors read and approved the submitted version.
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Ethical approval
The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki 2013 and approved by the ethics committee of Zahedan University of Medical Sciences (IR.ZAUMS.REC.1398.061 on 2019-04-29).
Consent to participate
Given that the teeth used in this study were extracted with the full consent of the patients to receive necessary medical services such as orthodontics, and were considered medical waste in this study, obtaining informed consent from the patients was not required.
Consent to publication
Not applicable.
Availability of data and materials
Data are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Open Exploration maintains a neutral stance on jurisdictional claims in published institutional affiliations and maps. All opinions expressed in this article are the personal views of the author(s) and do not represent the stance of the editorial team or the publisher.
References
Mamat R, Nik Abdul Ghani NR. The Complexity of the Root Canal Anatomy and Its Influence on Root Canal Debridement in the Apical Region: A Review.Cureus. 2023;15:e49024. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Siqueira JF Jr, Rôças IN, Paiva SSM, Guimarães-Pinto T, Magalhães KM, Lima KC. Bacteriologic investigation of the effects of sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine during the endodontic treatment of teeth with apical periodontitis.Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007;104:122–30. [DOI] [PubMed]
Saberi E, Zahedani SS, Ebrahimipour S. Apical Extrusion of Intracanal Bacteria with Single File and Multifile Rotary Instrumentation Systems.J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2017;7:292–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Sharma A, Sharma R, Sharma M, Jain S, Rai A, Gupta S. Endodontic Flare-Ups: An Update.Cureus. 2023;15:e41438. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Udoye C, Aguwa E. Flare-up incidence and related factors in adults.J Dent Oral Hyg. 2010;2:19–22.
Sinhal TM, Shah RRP, Shah NC, Jais PS, Hadwani KD. Comparative evaluation of 2% chlorhexidine gel and triple antibiotic paste with calcium hydroxide paste on incidence of interappointment flare-up in diabetic patients: A randomized double-blinded clinical study.Endodontology. 2017;29:136–41. [DOI]
Nabavizadeh M, Shokouhi MM, Kheirandish M, Sahebi S, Sadatshojaee N, Abbaszadegan A. A Comparison of the Apical Extrusion of Debris during the Preparation of Root Canal with Medin, RaCe, and ProTaper Rotary Systems.J Dent (Shiraz). 2021;22:193–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Nouroloyouni A, Shahi S, Salem Milani A, Noorolouny S, Farhang R, Yousefi Azar A. In vitro apical extrusion of debris and instrumentation time following root canal instrumentation with Reciproc and Reciproc Blue instruments and a novel stainless steel rotary system (Gentlefile) versus manual instrumentation.J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2023;17:136–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Grande NM, Castagnola R, Minciacchi I, Marigo L, Plotino G. A review of the latest developments in rotary NiTi technology and root canal preparation.Aust Dent J. 2023;68:S24–38. [DOI] [PubMed]
Dablanca-Blanco AB, Castelo-Baz P, Miguéns-Vila R, Álvarez-Novoa P, Martín-Biedma B. Endodontic Rotary Files, What Should an Endodontist Know?Medicina (Kaunas). 2022;58:719. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Yared G. Canal preparation using only one Ni-Ti rotary instrument: preliminary observations.Int Endod J. 2008;41:339–44. [DOI] [PubMed]
De-Deus G, Brandão MC, Barino B, Di Giorgi K, Fidel RAS, Luna AS. Assessment of apically extruded debris produced by the single-file ProTaper F2 technique under reciprocating movement.Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010;110:390–4. [DOI] [PubMed]
Sedigh-Shams M, Ebrahimi R, Asheghi B, Eskandari F. Comparative Evaluation of Cyclic Fatigue Resistance of Two Single-file Rotary Instruments in Simulated Stainless Steel Curved Canals.J Res Dent Maxillofac Sci. 2022;7:48–54. Farsi. [DOI]
Bürklein S, Benten S, Schäfer E. Quantitative evaluation of apically extruded debris with different single-file systems: Reciproc, F360 and OneShape versus Mtwo.Int Endod J. 2014;47:405–9. [DOI] [PubMed]
Ghoneim WM, Shaheen NA. Apically extruded debris associated with different instrumentation systems and irrigation needles.Tanta Dent J. 2018;15:105–10. [DOI]
De-Deus G, Neves A, Silva EJ, Mendonça TA, Lourenço C, Calixto C, et al. Apically extruded dentin debris by reciprocating single-file and multi-file rotary system.Clin Oral Investig. 2015;19:357–61. [DOI] [PubMed]
Donyavi Z, Dehghan Banadkooki S, Ranjpour N, Karimi Mianji S. Comparison of Apically Extruded Debris Using Neoniti A1, ProTaper Gold, and WaveOne Gold Rotary Files in Mandibular Premolars: An In Vitro Study.Avicenna J Dent Res. 2024;16:232–7. [DOI]
Gürler K, Yilmaz S, Dumani A, Yoldas O. Comparison of cyclic fatigue resistance of three different single-file systems after clinical use.BMC Oral Health. 2024;24:1482. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Bane K, Faye B, Sarr M, Niang SO, Ndiaye D, Machtou P. Root canal shaping by single-file systems and rotary instruments: a laboratory study.Iran Endod J. 2015;10:135–9. [PubMed] [PMC]
Amaral RR, Love RM, Braga T, Souza Côrtes MI, Rachid CTCC, Rôças IN, et al. Impact of root canal preparation using two single-file systems on the intra-radicular microbiome of teeth with primary apical periodontitis.Clin Oral Investig. 2024;28:139. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Kucukyilmaz E, Savas S, Saygili G, Uysal B. Evaluation of Apically Extruded Debris and Irrigant Produced by Different Nickel-Titanium Instrument Systems in Primary Teeth.J Contemp Dent Pract. 2015;16:864–8. [DOI] [PubMed]
Uzun I, Güler B, Özyürek T, Tunc T. Apical extrusion of debris using reciprocating files and rotary instrumentation systems.Niger J Clin Pract. 2016;19:71–5. [DOI] [PubMed]
Schneider SW. A comparison of canal preparations in straight and curved root canals.Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1971;32:271–5. [DOI] [PubMed]
Myers GL, Montgomery S. A comparison of weights of debris extruded apically by conventional filing and canal master techniques.J Endod. 1991;17:275–9. [DOI] [PubMed]
Azim AA, Azim KA, Abbott PV. Prevalence of inter-appointment endodontic flare-ups and host-related factors.Clin Oral Investig. 2017;21:889–94. [DOI] [PubMed]
Bassam S, El-Ahmar R, Salloum S, Ayoub S. Endodontic postoperative flare-up: An update.Saudi Dent J. 2021;33:386–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Capar ID, Arslan H, Akcay M, Ertas H. An In Vitro Comparison of Apically Extruded Debris and Instrumentation Times with ProTaper Universal, ProTaper Next, Twisted File Adaptive, and HyFlex Instruments.J Endod. 2014;40:1638–41. [DOI] [PubMed]
Ghivari SB, Kubasad GC, Chandak MG, Akarte N. Apical extrusion of debris and irrigant using hand and rotary systems: A comparative study.J Conserv Dent. 2011;14:187–90. [PubMed] [PMC]
Azar NG, Ebrahimi G. Apically-Extruded Debris Using The ProTaper System.Aust Endod J. 2005;31:21–3. [DOI] [PubMed]
De-Deus GA, Nogueira Leal Silva EJ, Moreira EJ, de Almeida Neves A, Belladonna FG, Tameirão M. Assessment of Apically Extruded Debris Produced by the Self-Adjusting File System.J Endod. 2014;40:526–9. [DOI] [PubMed]
Singbal K, Jain D, Raja K, Hoe TM. Comparative evaluation of apically extruded debris during root canal instrumentation using two Ni-Ti single file rotary systems: An in vitro study.J Conserv Dent. 2017;20:64–7. [PubMed] [PMC]
Gummadi A, Panchajanya S, Ashwathnarayana S, Santhosh L, Jaykumar T, Shetty A. Apical extrusion of debris following the use of single-file rotary/reciprocating systems, combined with syringe or ultrasonically-facilitated canal irrigation.J Conserv Dent. 2019;22:351–5. [PubMed] [PMC]
Ahmad MZ, Sadaf D, MacBain MM, Mohamed AN. Apical extrusion of debris with different rotary and reciprocating single-file endodontic instrumentation systems: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.BMJ Open. 2020;10:e038502. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Fau VJ, Bitter K, Fau BK, Kielbassa AM, Kielbassa A. Evaluation of rotary root canal instruments in vitro: A review.Endod Pract. 2007;1:189–203.
Siqueira JF Jr, Rôças IN, Favieri A, Machado AG, Gahyva SM, Oliveira JCM, et al. Incidence of Postoperative Pain After Intracanal Procedures Based on an Antimicrobial Strategy.J Endod. 2002;28:457–60. [DOI] [PubMed]
Ehsani M, Farhang R, Harandi A, Tavanafar S, Raoof M, Galledar S. Comparison of Apical Extrusion of Debris by Using Single-File, Full-Sequence Rotary and Reciprocating Systems.J Dent (Tehran). 2016;13:394–9. [PubMed] [PMC]
Nevares G, Xavier F, Gominho L, Cavalcanti F, Cassimiro M, Romeiro K, et al. Apical Extrusion of Debris Produced during Continuous Rotating and Reciprocating Motion.Sci World J. 2015;2015:267264. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Jaggi P, Mulay S, Tandale A, Jadhao R, Joshi P, Aras S, et al. Comparative Evaluation of Debris Extrusion, Remaining Dentin Thickness and Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Teeth Using Rotary and Reciprocating Endodontic File Systems: An In Vitro Study.Cureus. 2023;15:e42290. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Diemer F, Calas P. Effect of Pitch Length on the Behavior of Rotary Triple Helix Root Canal Instruments.J Endod. 2004;30:716–8. [DOI] [PubMed]
Koch K, Brave D. Real world endo: design features of rotary files and how they affect clinical performance.Oral Health. 2002;92:39–49.
Labbaf H, Nazari Moghadam K, Shahab S, Mohammadi Bassir M, Fahimi MA. An In vitro Comparison of Apically Extruded Debris Using Reciproc, ProTaper Universal, Neolix and Hyflex in Curved Canals.Iran Endod J. 2017;12:307–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [PMC]
Elashiry MM, Saber SE, Elashry SH. Apical Extrusion of Debris after Canal Shaping with Three Single-file Systems.Niger J Clin Pract. 2020;23:79–83. [DOI] [PubMed]
Elnaghy AM. Cyclic fatigue resistance of ProTaper Next nickel-titanium rotary files.Int Endod J. 2014;47:1034–9. [DOI] [PubMed]
Daugherty DW, Gound TG, Comer TL. Comparison of Fracture Rate, Deformation Rate, and Efficiency Between Rotary Endodontic Instruments Driven at 150 rpm and 350 rpm.J Endod. 2001;27:93–5. [DOI] [PubMed]
Peters OA, Morgental RD, Schulze KA, Paqué F, Kopper PMP, Vier-Pelisser FV. Determining cutting efficiency of nickel-titanium coronal flaring instruments used in lateral action.Int Endod J. 2014;47:505–13. [DOI] [PubMed]
Tanalp J, Kaptan F, Sert S, Kayahan B, Bayirl G. Quantitative evaluation of the amount of apically extruded debris using 3 different rotary instrumentation systems.Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2006;101:250–7. [DOI] [PubMed]
Topçuoğlu HS, Aktı A, Tuncay Ö, Dinçer AN, Düzgün S, Topçuoğlu G. Evaluation of Debris Extruded Apically during the Removal of Root Canal Filling Material Using ProTaper, D-RaCe, and R-Endo Rotary Nickel-Titanium Retreatment Instruments and Hand Files.J Endod. 2014;40:2066–9. [DOI] [PubMed]
Martin H, Cunningham WT. The effect of endosonic and hand manipulation on the amount of root canal material extruded.Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1982;53:611–3. [DOI] [PubMed]
Beeson TJ, Hartwell GR, Thornton JD, Gunsolley JC. Comparison of debris extruded apically in straight canals: Conventional filing versus profile .04 Taper series 29.J Endod. 1998;24:18–22. [DOI] [PubMed]
