Examples of types of adjuvants, their mode of action and their key advantages and disadvantages
Adjuvant | Mode of action | Representative examples | Type of antigen | Advantages | Disadvantages |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mineral salts | Retain antigen at site of injection (short-term depot) and induce Th2 responses | Aluminium hydroxideAluminium phosphateBrands: Alhydrogel, Adjuphos, Imject Alum | Extracellular pathogensLive virusInactivated virus | Good safety profileLow costStrong humoral response | Multiple injections often necessaryHigh reactogenicity in felines (abscess, sarcomas, and granulomas)Adsorption based on characteristics of antigenDoes not induce Th1 immunityCannot be easily frozen or lyophilized |
Oil emulsions | Form antigen depot at injection site and induce inflammatory cytokines | MF59AS03Emulsigen-DMontanide | Live virusInactivated virus | Strong Th2 immunityLow costLong term immunity | Weak Th1 responseScar tissue formation and adhesionGranuloma and cyst formationInflammation, irritation and pain at injection siteReactogenicity (injection site reactions)Potential contamination from carcinogenic hydrocarbons |
Immune-stimulating complexes (ISCOM) | Activate inflammasome, induce DNA release activate TLRs, induce T cell and humoral responses | SaponinsBrands: Quil A, QS21, ISCOM, VetSap | ViralBacterialParasitic | Strong humoral and cellular immune response | Potential toxicityHaemolysisGranulomasLocal inflammatory reactionsPain at injection site |
Bacterial products and derivatives | Activate TLRs and elicit strong humoral and T cell responses | Monophosphoryl lipid A (MPL)Alum + MPL (AS04) | ProteinSubunit | High antibody responsesMucosal or transcutaneous use | High reactogenicity (fever, arthritis, uveitis)Poor consistency between preparationsNot cost-effective |
Cytokines | Activate antigen presenting cells and provide co-stimulatory signals to B cells and T cells | Granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) | Cancer | Good antitumor immunity | Limited application due to poor stability and toxicityHigh costMay promote autoimmunity |
Particles (nano- and micro-) | Encapsulate antigen in biodegradable polymers, providing depot effect and targeting of antigen to antigen presenting cells | Poly(D,L-lactide-co-glycolic acid) polymer ester (PLGA)Poly(lactic acid) (PLA)ChitosanPolyphosphazenes | Recombinant proteinDNA | Controlled release of antigenReduced inflammatory responseBiodegradable and biocompatible | Antigen release rate influenced by type of microparticle. Dosage may be difficult to optimiseAntigen stability issues during production and storage |
TLR ligands | Engage TLRs leading to cytokine expression and Th1 activity | Poly I:CCpGMPLA | ViralBacterialParasiticProtein | Can stimulate Th1 immunity and mucosal immunitySmall sizeGood stability | High doses may result in splenomegalyCan trigger cytokine release syndrome |
Polysaccharides | Stimulate both cellular and humoral immunity via DC-SIGN activation and activate complement pathway | Delta inulin (Advax®) | ViralBacterialParasiticToxinRecombinant protein | Does not require adsorption of antigenCan be combined with other adjuvants | None identified |
Combination adjuvants | Combination of immune stimulators with antigen delivery systems | Advax-CpG55.2Alum + MPLAAlum + CpG | ViralBacterialParasiticToxinRecombinant protein | Enhances both Th1 and Th2 immunity, thereby maximizing both neutralizing antibody as well as cellular immunity | See data on individual components |
TLRs: Toll-like receptors
The viewpoint and content of this article are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
AA: Writing—original draft. NP: Conceptualisation, Supervision, Writing—review & editing.
AA and NP are affiliated with Vaxine Pty Ltd which hold proprietary interests over Advax-CpG adjuvant.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
Development of Advax-CpG55.2 adjuvant was supported by funding from National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases of the National Institutes of Health [HHS-N272201400053C, HHSN272201800044C]. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
© The Author(s) 2025.
Open Exploration maintains a neutral stance on jurisdictional claims in published institutional affiliations and maps. All opinions expressed in this article are the personal views of the author(s) and do not represent the stance of the editorial team or the publisher.