Risk stratification of liver outcomes in NAFLD

Author, year [Ref.]SeriesFindingsConclusion
Dongiovanni et al., 2018 [46]9,414 individuals from three study populations were recruited: the liver biopsy cohort, the Swedish Obese Subjects Study and the population-based Dallas Heart Study

Intra-hepatic fat accumulation was associated with liver disease and dysmetabolic traits

Genetic variants affect liver damage proportionally to their steatogenic capacity

Long-term accumulation of fat in the liver causes CLD
Labenz et al., 2018 [47]261 non‐cirrhotic biopsy-proven NAFLD German patients were enrolledLSM identified advanced fibrosis with an AUC of 0.81 (95% CI 0.72–0.91) while NFS, FIB‐4, and APRI exhibited a lower performance (AUCs of 0.74, 0.71, and 0.67, respectively)LSM outperformed wet tests in ruling out advanced fibrosis
Ioannou et al., 2019 [48]7,068 individuals with NAFLD-cirrhosis identified in 2012 were evaluated for the development of incident HCC retrospectively till January 20187 variables, namely age, sex, BMI, diabetes, platelet count, serum albumin and serum AST/√ALT ratio, selected out of 25 considered potential predictors, were included in the final statistical modelAge, platelet count, serum AST/√ALT ratio and albumin accounted for 93.9% of the risk of incident HCC among individuals with NAFLD-cirrhosis
De Vincentis et al., 2022 [49]The UKBB database was used to assess prospectively incident cirrhosis, decompensated liver disease, HCC, and/or liver transplantation among 266,687 recruited individuals followed during a median 9-year timePRS-HFC based on polymorphisms in PNPLA3, TM6SF2, MBOAT7, and GCKR improved diagnostic accuracy and PPV for severe liver disease among those classified as at intermediate-high risk with NFS, FIB-4, APRI, or Forns. Risk stratification and prediction were either not or were poorly affected by unfavorable genetics in subjects not having metabolic risk factorsTo the ends of identifying severe incident CLD, common genetic variants provide additional prognostic information which is not captured by validated clinical/biochemical parameters
Fujiwara et al., 2022 [50]

Derivation set = 48 patients previously submitted to curative HCC ablation

Tissue validation set 1 = 106 HCC-naive individuals

Tissue validation set 2 = 59 previously submitted to curative HCC resection

Serum validation set = 59 HCC-naive

A 133-gene signature, (PLS)-NAFLD predicted incident HCC over a 15-year follow-up

High-risk PLS-NAFLD was associated with specific immune cell phenotypes in fibrotic portal tracts along with impaired metabolic regulators PLS-NAFLD was bioinformatically translated into a four-protein secretome signature, PLSec-NAFLD, which was validated in an independent cohort of HCC-naive patients with NAFLD and cirrhosis. Combination of PLSec-NAFLD with a previously defined index (the etiology-agnostic PLSec-AFP) further improved HCC risk stratification

This proof-of-concept study developed and validated PLS/PLSec-NAFLD. Given that they predict long-term HCC risk and estimate effects of therapeutic interventions in patients with NAFLD, these signatures may potentially improve the poor outcome of NAFLD-HCC and disclose novel avenues for HCC chemoprevention
Jambulingam et al., 2023 [51]All 189 patients consecutive new referrals for NAFLD services between 2011 and 2019 were enrolled, 58.7% of whom were submitted to liver biopsyThe fast fibrosis progressors were identified by a combination of metabolites and lipoproteins (AUROC 0.788, 95% CI: 0.703–0.874, P < 0.001) better than with noninvasive markersThe combination of metabolites and lipids may help in the risk-stratification of fast fibrosis progression among NAFLD patients
Chen et al., 2023 [52]NAFLD, defined as otherwise unexplained raised ALT, was assessed in a total of 54,773 individuals belonging to 2 independent: study populations: the MGI (7,893 individuals) and the UKBB (46,880 individuals) cohortsPNPLA3-rs738409 genotype and diabetes identified patients with FIB-4, 1.3–2.67, currently considered indeterminate risk for NAFLD, who exhibited a risk of cirrhosis similar to those with FIB-4, 2.67, who are considered high-riskPNPLA3 genotyping improves prognostication of liver outcomes compared to common judgement based on clinical and laboratory assessment
Liu et al., 2023 [53]550 Chinese with biopsy-proven NAFLDThe combination of serum BAs with WC, DBP, ALT, or HOMA-IR identified mild fibrosis, in either sex, irrespective of obesity with AUROCs 0.80, 0.88, 0.75 and 0.78 in the training set (n = 385), and 0.69, 0.80, 0.61 and 0.69 in the testing set (n = 165), respectively. Interestingly, these AUROCs were more accurately than those yielded by FIB-4, NFS, and Hepamet fibrosis scoreMild fibrosis is accurately identified non-invasively with analysis of secondary BA levels combined with anthropometric and hepato-metabolic biomarkers

ALT: alanine transaminase; AUROC/AUC: area under the curve; AFP: alpha-fetoprotein; APRI: aspartate transaminase-to-platelet ratio index; AST: aspartate transaminase; PLSec: prognostic liver secretome signature; BAs: bile acids; BMI: body mass index; CLD: chronic liver disease; DBP: diastolic blood pressure; HOMA-IR: homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance; MGI: Michigan genomics initiative; PLS: prognostic liver signature; PPV: positive predictive value; PRS-HFC: polygenic risk score-hepatic fat content; UKBB: United Kingdom Biobank; WC: waist circumference