From:  The role of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in liver malignancy: case series and literature review

 Clinical characteristics, procedural parameters, and radiologic outcomes of patients undergoing EUS-RFA.

CaseAge (years)DiagnosisLesion siteBaseline size (mm)Follow-up duration (month)Ablation power (watts)Total ablation timeEUS access routeImaging modality at follow-upResponse criteriaResponseAdditional treatment
180HCC (Child Pugh score 8)Segment II5015–203 minTransgastric (lesser curvature)CT scanmRECISTStable diseaseAtezolizumab + bevacizumab
267HCC (Child Pugh score 6)Multifocal (segments III and VIII)Segment III: 36 and 23; segment VIII: 21115–258 min 30 sTransgastric (lesser curvature)MRImRECISTStable diseaseNone
382iCCAIntrahepatic53415–306 minTransgastric (lesser curvature)CT scanRECIST 1.1Stable diseaseDurvalumab
465CRLMCaudate lobe23415–305 minTransduodenal (second portion of duodenum)CT scanRECIST 1.1Stable diseaseNone
583PNET liver metastasisMultifocal (left liver lobe)12 and 3285–3010 minTransgastric (lesser curvature)MRIRECIST 1.1Progressive diseaseNone

CRLM: colorectal liver metastasis; CT: computed tomography; EUS-RFA: endoscopic ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation; HCC: hepatocellular carcinoma; iCCA: intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma; mRECIST: modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors; MRI: magnetic resonance imaging; PNET: pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor.