Summary of the most relevant studies about CIPN and PA

ReferenceNumber subjects, age, median (range), sex, IG–CGDiagnosisMethodsProtocolOutcome measurementResultsConclusions
Kneis et al. [11]Pre-protocol subjects:
N = 37
IG: 18, female: 14, male: 4, age median 70 (44–82)
CG: 19, female: 12, male: 7, age median 60 (46–75)
Breast cancer, colorectal cancer, gynecological cancer, upper gastrointestinal cancer, NSCLC, non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, multiple myelomaOne-on-one IG: 12 weeks twice/weekly (endurance + balance training)
CG: active control group (endurance training)
Endurance training:
30 min stable bike moderate intensity (under the IAT)
Balance training:
3–8 exercises 3 repetitions each 20/30 s progressively increasing exercise difficulty (reducing the support surface, visual input, adding motor/cognitive tasks, and instability induction
Functional performance
CIPN symptoms and QoL Cardiorespiratory fitness
Endurance training induced a reduction in sensory symptoms in both groups, while balance training additionally improved patients’ functional statusBoth exercises provide a clear and relevant benefit for patients with CIPN
Streckman et al. [12]N = 61
IG: 30
CG: 31
LymphomaIG: 36 weeks, 2 times per week (sensorimotor-, endurance- and strength training)
CG: usual care
Endurance training:
Treadmill, bike-dynamometer 70–80% HRmax
Sensorimotor:
4 postural stabilization tasks progressively increase task difficulty
Resistance training:
4 exercises carried out at maximum force
QoL (EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire)
Movement coordination, endurance, strength, and therapy-induced side-effects
Increase of balance in IG compared with CG. Static (P = 0.03), dynamic (P = 0.007), perturbed (P = 0.009), and bipedal (P = 0.006)Exercise, especially sensorimotor training provide benefit to cancer patients, ↑ QoL (emotional function, pain, constipation, diarrhea), ↓ side-effects, ↑ balance control, ↑ mobility
Kleckner et al.[13]N = 355, age: 56 ± 11, 93% female
IG: 170
CG: 185
Different types of cancer (mostly breast cancer)IG: 6 weeks, daily session (EXCAP©®)
CG: usual care
Endurance training:
Low-to-moderate walking: 60–85% of HRR
Strength training:
Bands: RPE of 3–5 (1–10 scale)
Effects of exercise on CIPN symptoms
Factors that predict CIPN symptoms
Factors that moderate effects of exercise on CIPN symptoms
Reduction symptoms (on 10-point scale) hot/cold in hand/feet (-0.46 point) P = 0.045; reduction numbness and tingling (-0.42 point) P = 0.061
More effect in older people (P = 0.086), male (P = 0.028), and breast cancer (0.076)
Exercise appears to reduce CIPN symptoms in patients receiving taxane-, platinum-, or vinca alkaloid-based chemotherapy
Vollmers et al. [14]N = 36
IG: 17, age: 48.56 ± 11.94
CG: 19, age: 52.39 ± 10.14
Breast cancerIG: 2 times/week during chemotherapy and 6 weeks after the end (physical training and sensorimotor exercises)
CG: received an instruction sheet with a PA program to do autonomously by the patients
Not reportedBalance, upper and lower strength, QoL (EORTC and MFI questionnaires)No significant difference reported↑ Postural stability in IG
Moderate strength exercises proved to prevent a loss of upper extremity strength
↑ In the decreased intensity of CIPN or possibly faster remission
Zimmer et al. [15]N = 30
IG: 17
CG: 13
Colorectal cancerIG: 8 weeks–two times/week (a combo of endurance and resistance training)
CG: usual care (written standard recommendations to obtain physical fitness)
Endurance training:
Walking, bicycle ergometer, or cross-trainer
Resistance training:
Circuit training of bench press, lat pulldown, leg press, seated row, and abdominal exercise
Trial outcome index (TOI)
Balance
Neuropathic symptoms remained stable in the IG over time, while CIPN significantly worsened in CG of 7.14 points (P = 0.077) of the FACT/GOG-NTX questionnaire
IG significantly
Improved strength and balance function
↓ CIPN symptoms, ↑ balance, ↑ strength, ↑ QoL
Henke et al. [16]N = 29
IG: 18
CG: 11
Lung cancer (NSCLC and SCLC)IG: 5 times/week endurance training and breathing technique; 2 times/week strength training
CG: usual care
Endurance training:
Walking 55–70% of HRR
Strength training:
50% of RM
Barthel index
QoL (EORTC QLQ C-30/LC-13 questionnaire)
Barthel index was significantly worse after the intervention in CG (P = 0.041); functional capacity increased more in IG (6MWT); an increased single score of EORTC QLQ C-30/LC-13 questionnaire↑ QoL (physical functioning, hemoptysis, pain in arms or shoulder, peripheral neuropathy, cognitive functioning)
Training has a positive effect on the patient’s endurance and strength capacity
Wonders et al. [17]N = 6 (finished the intervention), female subjectsBreast cancerIG: 10-week home-based program
CG: not present
Endurance training:
Moderate-intensity 55–65% of their self-estimated HRR
Increase gradually from 20 min (1st week) to 150 min (10th week) of exercise per week
Resistance training:
Not reported
CIPN symptoms rate
QoL (McGill QoL questionnaire)
Significantly lowered levels of both troublesome and pain symptoms↓ CIPN symptoms
↑ QoL (level of troublesome symptoms related to peripheral neuropathy)
Low adherence rate
Difficulty getting subjects to complete the 10-week program
Andersen Hammond et al. [18]N = 48
IG: 22 mean age 56.3 ± 9.9
CG: 26 mean age 53.0 ± 10.3
Breast cancerIG: 3 times daily home-based exercise program; 5/10 min every session
CG: usual care
Nerve gliding exercise programEffects of exercise on CIPN symptoms
QoL (DASH questionnaire)
Strength
Less pain for IG (P = 0.053) preservation of vibration (P = 0.001) and heat pain thresholds (left P = 0.021, right P = 0.039)
Significant improvements in grip strength
↓ CIPN pain
↓ Pain pressure
↑ Grip dynamometry
Van Waart et al. [19]N = 230
IG: 153; HBI = 77, HIP = 76
CG: 77
Breast or colon cancerIG: divided into “Onco-Move program” and “OnTrack program
CG: usual care
Onco-Move:
Home-based program, 30 min, 5 days/week, 12–14 Borg Scale, exercises not reported
OnTrack program:
Supervised 20 min, 2 days/week
Endurance training:
30 minutes, 50% to 80% of the maximal workload, exercises not reported
Resistance training:
2 series of 8 repetitions at 80% of the 1RM
Cardiorespiratory fitness, upper muscle strength, lower muscle strength, fatigue, QoL (EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire), functioning in daily life, quality of sleep, return to work, psychological distress, self-reported PA level, chemotherapy regimen, dose, and adverse effects of chemotherapy, compliance with exercise programsIGs: less decline of cardiorespiratory fitness (P < 0.001), better physical functioning (P < 0.001), less pain (HBI P = 0.003, HIP P = 0.011)Both IGs provide a benefit for patients, especially the HIP group
McCrary et al. [20]A single group for pre and post
N = 29 mean age 61.6 (32–79)
Female 21, male 8
Breast cancer, colorectal cancer, ovarian cancer, endometrial cancer, appendix cancer, lymphoma, myeloma, urothelial, carcinomaIG: 8 weeks, 3 times weekly (resistance training, balance training, and endurance training)
CG: not present
Exercises performed at RPE of 13–15 (6–20 scale)Objective CIPN, patient-reported CIPN, patient-reported disability, QoL (SF-36 questionnaire), mobility, dynamic balance/leg strength, standing balance, sensoryneurophysiology, motor neurophysiologyDynamic balance, standing balance in eye-open conditions, mobility, and QoL were improved (P ≤ 0.05)
Ameliorating objective CIPN and patient reported CIPN
Significance increasing of:
Objective CIPN, patient-reported CIPN, patient-reported disability, QoL, mobility
Dynamic balance, stable surfacewith eyes open, unstable surface with eyes open

IG: intervention group; CG: control group; HRmax: maximum heart rate; HRR: heart rate reserve; RM: maximum repetitions; RPE: rated perceived exertion; IAT: individual anaerobic threshold; 1RM: one repetition maximum; NSCLC: non-small cell lung cancer; SCLC: small-cell lung cancer; ↑: increase; ↓: decrease; 6MWT: 6-minute walking test; HBI: home-based intervention; HIP: high intensity program