From:  Unmet needs beyond precision in gastrointestinal cancers

 Conceptual caveats and unmet needs across GI malignancies.

Cancer typeDominant clinical paradigmWhat biology revealsKey conceptual caveatUnmet clinical need
CRCStage-based adjuvant therapy; risk classification by clinicopathological factorsMolecular residual disease (ctDNA) identifies recurrence risk independent of stagePrognostic precision does not equate to predictive utilityEffective MRD-directed therapeutic strategies
GCStatic molecular classification guiding perioperative and advanced treatmentMarked spatial and temporal heterogeneity with rapid emergence of resistanceBaseline biomarkers fail to capture dynamic tumor evolutionLongitudinal biomarkers to guide adapting treatment
EACNeoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery, with response-based prognosticationPathological response incompletely reflects residual biological riskResponse surrogates do not ensure disease eradicationReliable markers of residual disease and relapse risk
Pancreatic cancerTreatment escalation driven by performance statusDistinct biological subtypes with differential aggressiveness and resistanceIntensification without biological selectionClassifying patients by tumor biology and adaptive trial designs
BTCsUniform systemic therapy across anatomical subtypesExtreme molecular heterogeneity with subtype-specific vulnerabilitiesPotential obscuring of subtype-specific signals by aggregationSubtype-specific, biomarker-enriched clinical trials
HCCSystemic therapy selection based on liver function and stageTumor behavior strongly modulated by etiology and host factorsTumor-centric models ignore host-tumor interactionIntegrated tumor-host predictive frameworks

BTCs: biliary tract cancer; CRC: colorectal cancer; ctDNA: circulating tumor DNA; EAC: esophageal adenocarcinoma; GC: gastric cancer; GI: gastrointestinal; HCC: hepatocellular carcinoma; MRD: minimal residual disease.