Studies illustrating the potential of artificial intelligence in multiomics

StudyGenomics
Chen et al. [23]A DL model, DeepVariant-AF, created by Google Health is applied to large data sets and reliably identifies gene variants.
Aradhya et al. [24]DL models were trained using Invitae’s Evidence Modeling Platform to predict protein structure and function based on sequence data.
Kuenzi et al. [26]A DL model, DrugCell, predicts the in vitro response of tumor cell lines to various drugs.
Sammut et al. [27]A predictive model using combined sequence and digital pathology data predicts response to neo-adjuvant therapy in breast cancer patients.
Pathomics
Källén et al. [29]The DL model, OverFeat, accurately predicts the Gleason score using region-level tissue classification.
Hoang et al. [30]A two-step model, ENLIGHT-DeepPT, predicts genome-wide tumor mRNA expression and treatment response to targeted and immune therapies based on digital pathology images of hematoxylin and eosin-stained (H&E) tumor slides.
Hu et al. [31]CNN model predicts response to immune-checkpoint blockade based on the analysis of H&E slides alone.
Zhang et al. [32]The DL model, PathoSig, predicts response to chemotherapy by identifying phenotypic clusters from H&E digital images.
Cheng et al. [33]A DL model and three AI models quantitatively score PD-L1 expression.
Choi et al. [34]A DL model improves the consensus of reads between pathologists and predicts response to treatment in patients with NSCLC.
Ligero et al. [35]A Retrieval with Clustering-guided Contrastive Learning (RetCCL) model quantifies the degree of positivity of PD-L1 on IHC slides and predicts response to ICIs by estimating progression-free survival.
Radiomics
Mu et al. [42]A small residual convolutional network was employed to analyze PET/CT images and clinical data from NSCLC patients in order to develop a DL score that predicted PD-L1 expression.
He et al. [43]Developed a novel non-invasive biomarker by integrating DL technology with CT characteristics to differentiate between NSCLC patients with high-TMB and low-TMB tumors and predict treatment efficacy.
Mu et al. [47]Radiomic features from baseline pre-treatment 18F-FDG-PET/CT scans can predict clinical outcomes for NSCLC patients undergoing checkpoint blockade immunotherapy.
Vaidya et al. [48]Radiomic markers extracted from baseline CT scans of advanced NSCLC patients treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors identifies patients at risk of hyperprogression.
Li et al. [49]A CT-based radiomics model accurately predicts hyperprogression and pseudoprogression in NSCLC patients undergoing immunotherapy.
Metabolomics
Curry et al. [51]Developed an artificial neural network to help classify MS spectrometry.
Ball et al. [52]Machine learning approaches to analyze MS data and identify metabolic signatures can differentiate patients with low versus high grade astrocytoma.
O’Shea et al. [54]Use of an artificial neural network model with sputum metabolomics identifies six metabolites that were elevated in patients with small cell lung cancer compared to NSCLC.
Xie et al. [55]Machine learning techniques identify six metabolites that distinguish stage 1 lung cancer patients from healthy controls.
Lipidomics
Jiang et al. [63]Lipidomic profiling identifies six key lipids, used to develop a predictive model for treatment response to chemo-immunotherapy.
Yu et al. [64]Nine distinct lipids were used to predict immune related adverse events in NSCLC patients undergoing treatment with ICIs.
Immunogenomics
Chen et al. [67]Ground-glass associated lung cancers were less metabolically active and had a less active immune microenvironment compared to patients with solid lung nodules.
Sun et al. [68]Immunohistochemistry and RNA-sequencing data show that NSCLC patients who lack either PD-L1 expression or immune infiltration may not benefit from immunotherapy.
Liu et al. [71]Combined data from scanned histology slides and RNA-sequencing to develop an AI-based immunoscore model capable of predicting survival outcomes in patients with NSCLC who had received chemoimmunotherapy.
Breathomics
Gordon et al. [76]Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) analysis of breath samples classifies 93% of patients with vs. without lung cancer.
Philipps et al. [77]GC-MS analysis of 108 individuals confirms lung cancer in 60 patients.
Di Natale et al. [80]Use of the electronic nose combined with partial least squares discriminant analysis correctly classifies 100% of lung cancer patients.
Mazzone et al. [82]Colorimetric sensors accurately predict individuals with lung cancer versus individuals with other lung diseases.
Electronic health record
Marmarelis et al. [84]A nudge-based intervention with an EMR increases molecular testing and better guideline-concordant care.
Yuan et al. [85]Developed a machine-learning-based prognostic model for NSCLC by the extraction of unstructured and structured data.

DL: deep learning; CNN: convolutional neural network; NSCLC: non-small cell lung cancer; EMR: electronic medical record