From:  Nut consumption and musculoskeletal health: a systematic review

 Data extraction table: characteristics of ex vivo and non-randomized interventional studies (n = 2).

Authors (year);
Country
Study design and duration Population (n, M/F/MSC, age)Intervention (nut type, duration)Control groupPrimary outcomes & results
Ex vivo
Platt et al. (2011);
Canada [32]
Ex vivo, not statedn = 14, MSC, 26.3 ± 8.6 y3 Macro = meals (60 g almonds & 97 g white bread, rice, potatoes). 4 baseline blood draws, meal w/in 10 min & blood draw every 15 min for 4 hN/A↓ osteoclast formation & function in vitro; 15% ↓ TRAP activity vs. baseline sera (P = 0.03)
Non-randomized interventional
Moriguchi Watanabe et al. (2022);
Brazil [29]
Open, non-randomized, single-center study, January 2017–September 2018n = 32, MSC, 18–60 y1 unit of Brazil nut daily for 3 months N/ASNP response to Brazil nut & biomarkers of muscle homeostasis. Brazil nut intake GPX1 mRNA expression only in subjects w/rs1050450 CC genotype

↓: lower(ed) or reduced; MSC: mixed-sex cohort.