VEGF and EGFR TKIs in EGFR mutated NSCLC patients

AuthorPhaseLine of TreatmentPatientsTreatmentResponse rate (%)Progression-free survival (months)Overall survival (months)
Seto et al. JO25567 trial [34, 35]IIFirst154Erlotinib + bevacizumab vs. erlotinib69 vs. 64, P = 0.4916 vs. 9.7, HR: 0.54; 95% CI: 0.36-0.79 P = 0.001547 vs. 47.4, HR: 0.81; 95% CI: 0.53-1.23 P = 0.3267
Saito et al. NEJ026 trial [36]IIIFirst228Erlotinib + bevacizumab vs. erlotinib72 vs. 66, P = 0.3116.9 vs.13.3, HR: 0.605; 95% CI: 0.417-0877; P = 0.016.n.r.
Rosell et al. BELIEF [37]IIFirst109Erlotinib + bevacizumab7713.2 (95% CI: 10.3-15.5)28.2 (95% CI: 21.4-41.8)
Stinchcombe et al. [38]IIFirst88Erlotinib + bevacizumab vs. erlotinib81 vs. 83, P = 0.8117.9 vs.13.5, HR: 0.81; 95% CI: 0.50-1.31; P =0.3932.4 vs. 50.6, HR: 1.41; 95% CI: 0.71-2.81; P = 0.33
Ichihara et al. Okoyama trial [39]IIFirst42Gefitinib + bevacizumab73.8 (95% CI: 58.0-86.1)14.4 (95% CI:10.1-19.2)n.r.
Kitigawa et al. [40]IIFirst16Gefitinib-bevacizumab vs. gefitinib44 vs. 505.4 (80% CI: 5.0-13.9) vs. 15.1 (80% CI: 6.2-23.5)1-year OS: 0.667 (95% CI: 0.195-0.904) vs. 0.75 (95% CI: 0.315-0.931)
Hata et al. ABC trial [41]IIAny line32Afatinib + bevacizumab18.8 (95% CI: 7.2-36.4)6.3 (95% CI: 3.9-8.7)n.r.
Nakagawa et al. RELAY trial [42]IIIFirst line449Erlotinib + Ramucirumab vs. Erlotinib76 vs. 75, P = 0.74119.4 vs. 12.4 HR: 0.59; 95% CI: 0.46-0.76, P < 0.0001n.r.