Oral VEGFR inhibitors and erlotinib in EGFR wild type NSCLC patients

AuthorPhaseLine of TreatmentPatientsTreatmentResponse rate (%)Progression-free survival (months)Overall survival (months)
Spigel et al. [29]IISecond line168Sorafenib + erlotinib vs. placebo + erlotinib8 vs. 11, P = 0.5553.38 vs. 1.94, HR: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.60-1.22 P = 0.1967.62 vs. 7.23, HR: 0.89; 95% CI: 0.59-1.34 P = 0.290
Scagliotti et al. [32]IIISecond line960Sunitinib + erlotinib vs. placebo + erlotinib10.6 vs. 6.9, P = 0.04713.6 vs. 2.0 HR: 0.807; 95% CI: 0.695-0.937 P = 0.00239.0 vs. 8.5, HR: 0.922; 95% CI: 0.797-1.067 P = 0.1388
Groen et al. [33]IISecond line132Sunitinib + erlotinib vs. placebo + erlotinib4.6 vs. 3.0, P = 0.6242.8 vs. 2.0 HR: 0.898; 80% CI: 0.671-1.203 P = 0.3218.2 vs. 7.6 HR: 1.066; 95% CI: 0.705-1.612 P = 0.617