From:  Bioethical challenges in the implementation of targeted anti-tumor therapies in low-resource settings: a perspective from Latin America

 Characteristics of the studies included in the integrative review (n = 24).

Author(s), yearCountry/regionStudy designMain topicAnalytical theme
Penchaszadeh, 2015 [1]ArgentinaTheoretical/perspectiveGenetics and public health in Latin AmericaResearch vulnerability
Barrios et al., 2019 [2]Latin America (Brazil)Review/perspectiveAccess to high-cost drugs (trastuzumab) in public systemsInnovation paradox/financial toxicity
Raez et al., 2018 [3]Latin America (multi)ReviewAccess to genomic profiling, immunotherapy, and targeted treatments for lung cancerInnovation paradox/financial toxicity
de Castilla et al., 2024 [4]Latin America (multi)Policy/perspectivePrecision oncology implementation: barriers and stakeholder rolesInfrastructure deficits/epistemic injustice
Richard-Greenblatt et al., 2021 [16]LMIC (global)Original researchCold chain logistics for diagnostic sample transportInfrastructure deficits
Popejoy & Fullerton, 2016 [6]GlobalData analysis (GWAS Catalog)Ancestry composition of genomic study participants worldwideEpistemic injustice
Zavala et al., 2021 [7]USA/Latin AmericaReviewCancer health disparities in racial/ethnic minoritiesEpistemic injustice
Mastroleo, 2016 [8]Global/theoreticalTheoretical/ethical-legal analysisPost-trial access obligations under the Declaration of Helsinki 2013Research vulnerability
Andia & Lamprea, 2019 [10]Colombia/BrazilScoping reviewJudicialization of healthcare and equity implicationsJudicialization dilemma
Riegler, 2023 [11]Global/theoreticalTheoreticalComparative ethics of modern payment models and care ethicsJudicialization/financial toxicity
Desai et al., 2022 [17]USA/LMIC relevanceOriginal researchEconomic cost and sustainability of oral therapies in precision oncologyInnovation paradox/financial toxicity
Elshiekh et al., 2024 [18]GlobalReviewFinancial challenges of long-term high-cost medicationsInnovation paradox/financial toxicity
Sebastian et al., 2025 [19]India (LMIC)Original researchTepotinib in MET exon 14 skipping NSCLC: real-world LMIC outcomesInfrastructure deficits/research vulnerability
Kivuyo et al., 2025 [20]Tanzania (LMIC)Retrospective reviewPathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancerInnovation paradox/infrastructure deficits
Zampoli et al., 2023 [21]Global/LMICReviewAccess disparities and ethics of CFTR modulator drugsInnovation paradox/financial toxicity
Putra et al., 2025 [22]Asia (LMIC)Systematic review (abstract)Socioeconomic inequities in glioblastoma care in AsiaInfrastructure deficits/financial toxicity
Zafar et al., 2013 [23]USAPilot study (quantitative)Financial toxicity of cancer treatment: out-of-pocket expensesInnovation paradox/financial toxicity
Smith et al., 2019 [24]GlobalSystematic reviewFinancial burdens of cancer treatment: risk factors and outcomesInnovation paradox/financial toxicity
Martínez-Nava et al., 2024 [25]Latin America (multi)Systematic review/meta-analysisSomatic mutations in Latin American breast cancer patientsEpistemic injustice
Zarić et al., 2025 [26]GlobalReviewPharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and personalized cancer therapyEpistemic injustice
Corrarino, 2013 [27]USA/LMIC relevanceReviewHealth literacy and women’s health: challenges and opportunitiesResearch vulnerability
Paasche-Orlow et al., 2003 [28]USAOriginal researchReadability of informed-consent forms vs. actual readabilityResearch vulnerability
Amerson & Strang, 2015 [29]LMIC (global)ReviewResearch challenges in developing countries: ethical and logistical barriersResearch vulnerability
Salha et al., 2022 [30]BrazilOriginal research (quantitative)Judicialization of health: oncological medicine demands in BrazilJudicialization dilemma

Studies classified under Methods [12, 14, 15] served as the methodological framework for this review. LMIC: low- and middle-income country; CFTR: cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator; NSCLC: non-small cell lung cancer.