From:  Cancer vaccines: advances, hurdles, and future directions

 Comparison of tumor antigen classes and their vaccination pros/cons.

Antigen typeExamplesDefinitionPros of vaccinationCons of vaccination
Tumor-associated antigens (TAAs)MUC1, HER2, prostate acid phosphatase (PAP), MAGE-A, NY-ESO-1Self-antigens overexpressed or aberrantly expressed in tumors but are also found at low levels in normal tissue- Broadly shared across patients
- Suitable for “off-the-shelf” vaccines
- Scalable manufacturing
- Subject to immune tolerance
- Weak immunogenicity
- Risk of autoimmunity if expressed in normal tissues
NeoantigensKRAS G12D, TP53 R175H, BRAF V600E, PIK3CA E545K, EWS-FLI1, PAX7-FOXO1 fusionsNon-self antigens arising from somatic mutations or gene fusions unique to tumor cells- High immunogenicity
- No central tolerance
- Personalized and tumor-specific
- Lower off-target risk
- Individualized production (time-consuming and costly)
- Requires tumor sequencing and prediction
- May miss escape variants
Cryptic/Hidden antigens (e.g., fusion breakpoints)EWSR1 exon 7-FLI1 fusion (e.g., “SQQSSSYGQQ...”)Peptides derived from untranslated regions, aberrant transcripts, or fusion breakpoints absent from the normal proteome- Highly specific to tumors
- Potential “public” neoantigens in some sarcomas
- May be shared across subsets of patients
- Limited validation
- Often unknown expression/presentation
- Technical difficulty in identification and prediction