Select studies on UC utilizing ctDNA-guided treatment responses

Trial name/study cohortPhase of trial/patient populationN of patientsPrimary endpointResults/Comments
IMvigor010Phase III/ypT2/pT3/pT4 or pN+ or > pT3pN+500DFS on adjuvant atezolizumab vs. placeboPrimary endpoint negative DFS atezolizumab vs. placebo; 37% were ctDNA+; ctDNA+ with improved OS in atezolizumab arm (HR 0.59)
Sfakianos et al. [17]Retrospective/stage I–IV UC167Real-world data on DFS with ctDNA, WES, NGSNo DFS benefit from adjuvant atezolizumab if ctDNA– (P = 0.34); ctDNA+ shorter DFS (HR = 6.93, P < 0.001)
IMvigor011Phase III/ypT2/pT3/pT4 (if +NAC) or pN+ or > pT3pN+ (if no NAC)405DFS for ctDNA+ ≤ 20 weeks after cystectomyNo results yet
MODERNPhases II and III/ypT2/pT3/pT4 (if +NAC) or pN+ or > pT3pN+ (if no NAC)1,000ctDNA clearance proportion; DFS for cohort B and OS for cohort A (phase III nivolumab vs. nivolumab/relatlimab)No results yet

pT2: pathologic T2 stage; pT3: pathologic T3 stage; DFS: disease-free survival; PFS: progression-free survival; pN+: pathologic node positive; NAC: neoadjuvant chemotherapy; ctDNA: circulating tumor DNA; HR: hazard ratio; NGS: next-generation sequencing; OS: overall survival; UC: urothelial cancer