Summary of studies highlighting the role of immunotherapy in treatment of recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer
Author, year | Type | Sample size | Inclusion criteria | Treatment | Median follow up | Disease response | Toxicity |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Frenel et al. [33], 2017 | Multicentre, phase 1b, single-arm trial | 46 | Locally advanced, or metastatic PD-L1-positive cervical cancer that had progressed after prior standard therapy | Pembrolizumab every 2 weeks for up to 24 months or until progression, unacceptable toxicity | 11 months | 17% overall response, median OS 11 months, 1-year PFS 4% | 5/24 grade 3 treatment-related AE |
Chung et al. [34], 2019 | Phase 2 | 98 | Previously treated advanced cervical cancer | Pembrolizumab 200 mg q3 weeks for 2 years or till progression, intolerable toxicity, or physician/patient decision | 10.2 months | ORR 12.2% | Grade 3–4 AE 12.2% |
Tewari et al. [35], 2021 | Randomised phase 3 | 608 | Recurrent cervical cancer who had progressed on platinum-based therapy | Cemiplimab (350 mg every 3 weeks) or investigator’s choice of chemotherapy in 6-week cycles | 18.2 months | Median OS 12 months (cemiplimab) vs. 8.5 months | Grade > 3 AE in 45% with cemiplimab vs. 53.4% |
Naumann et al. [39], 2019 | Phase 1/2 | 19 | Recurrent or metastatic cervical carcinoma | Nivolumab monotherapy (240 mg every 2 weeks for ≤ 2 years) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity | 19.2 months | ORR 26.3% | Any grade AE 12/19 |
Colombo et al. [40], 2021 | Randomised phase 3 | 584 | Persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer | Pembrolizumab (200 mg) or placebo every 3 weeks for up to 35 cycles plus platinum-based chemotherapy and, bevacizumab as per investigator discretion | 22 months | Median PFS 10.4 months (pembrolizumab) vs. 8.2 months2-year OS: 53% (pembrolizumab) vs. 41.7% | Grade 3–5 anaemia: 30.3% (pembrolizumab) vs. 26.9% and neutropenia (12.4% vs. 9.7%) |
ORR: objective response rate; PD-L1: programmed death-ligand 1; PFS: progression-free survival; AE: adverse events
TD: Investigation, Writing—original draft. SA: Conceptualization, Writing—review & editing, Validation, Supervision. Both authors read and approved the submitted version.
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
© The Author(s) 2025.
Open Exploration maintains a neutral stance on jurisdictional claims in published institutional affiliations and maps. All opinions expressed in this article are the personal views of the author(s) and do not represent the stance of the editorial team or the publisher.