Performance comparison of radiologists and radiomics
| Aim | Reference | Information database | Radiomic performances |
|---|---|---|---|
| WD-LPS vs. lipoma | Vos et al. [37] | MDM2 detection | Sensitivity: radiologist > radiomics Specificity: radiologist < radiomics Accuracy: radiologist = radiomics |
| LPS vs. lipoma | Malinauskaite et al. [26] | Histologic examination | Sensitivity: radiologist < radiomics Specificity: radiologist < radiomics Accuracy: radiologist < radiomics |
| ALT vs. lipoma | Tang et al. [40] | Histologic examination | Sensitivity: radiologist > radiomics Specificity: radiologist < radiomics Accuracy: radiologist < radiomics |
RN: Conceptualization, Data curation, Writing—original draft. MG and FF: Conceptualization, Resources. GV: Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, Formal analysis, Data curation, Writing—original draft, Writing—review & editing. MCB: Methodology, Data curation, Writing—original draft. AS: Software, Formal analysis, Writing—review & editing. MZ and LB: Validation, Supervision. VG and IS: Resources. MB: Data curation, Writing—original draft. All authors read and approved the submitted version.
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
This work has been partially supported by MUR - REASONING: foRmal mEthods for computAtional analySis for diagnOsis and progNosis in imagING - PRIN. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
© The Author(s) 2023.