From:  A comparative study of deep learning-based retinal image registration methods

 Statistical comparison of MLE for Class A images (n = 14).

ComparisonTestStatisticRaw
P-value
Bonferroni
P-value
Mean difference
(A–B)
Friedmanχ²(2)8.1430.017
RetinaRegNet vs EyeLinerWilcoxon V710.2590.7760.340
RetinaRegNet vs GeoFormerWilcoxon V180.0330.098−1.147
EyeLiner vs GeoFormerWilcoxon V60.0040.012*−1.487

Asterisks denote Bonferroni-adjusted significance: * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001.