From:  A comparative study of deep learning-based retinal image registration methods

 Performance Comparison on FIRE Dataset using Mean Landmark Error (MLE), Success Rate (SR), Area Under Curve (AUC), and Normalized Cross Correlation (NCC).

MethodOverall
(n = 134)
Class S
(n = 71)
Class A
(n = 14)
Class P
(n = 49)
MLEMLEMLEMLE
RetinaRegNet3.12 ± 2.431.70 ± 0.545.24 ± 2.644.57 ± 2.80
EyeLiner3.81 ± 3.131.80 ± 0.404.87 ± 3.056.01 ± 3.75
GeoFormer6.06 ± 4.862.42 ± 0.776.55 ± 4.7111.20 ± 3.25
SRSRSRSR
RetinaRegNet97.76%100%92.86%95.92%
EyeLiner97.01%100%92.86%93.88%
GeoFormer88.06%100%92.86%69.39%
AUCAUCAUCAUC
RetinaRegNet0.890.950.790.85
EyeLiner0.850.930.800.76
GeoFormer0.760.910.740.54
NCCNCCNCCNCC
RetinaRegNet0.560.750.600.29
EyeLiner0.560.740.630.28
GeoFormer0.640.720.620.53