Gliomas are brain tumors arising from central nervous system (CNS) glial cells, classified by the World Health Organization (WHO) based on histological and molecular traits into astrocytomas, oligodendrogliomas, and ependymomas [1–4]. Gliomas are the most common type of primary brain tumor, accounting for approximately 75% of all brain tumors [4, 5].

The pathogenesis of gliomas involves a multistep process characterized by genetic mutations, epigenetic alterations, and interactions within the tumor microenvironment. Key genetic abnormalities often include mutations in the IDH1/IDH2 genes, which are critical for cellular metabolism and contribute to the accumulation of oncometabolite 2-hydroxyglutarate (2-HG), promoting tumorigenesis and altering cellular differentiation [6]. Additionally, loss of the tumor suppressor gene p53 and alterations in the retinoblastoma (Rb) signaling pathway are commonly observed in higher-grade gliomas, leading to uncontrolled cellular proliferation and survival [7, 8]. Epigenetic modifications, such as aberrant DNA methylation patterns, further drive glioma progression and contribute to the heterogeneity of these tumors [8]. Moreover, the tumor microenvironment, including the presence of immune cells and extracellular matrix components, plays a significant role in glioma development and therapy resistance [9]. Understanding these intricate mechanisms is crucial for developing targeted therapies and improving treatment outcomes for glioma patients.

Diagnosing and monitoring glioma remains challenging, especially using traditional imaging methods (Table 1). Traditional methods of diagnosing and monitoring glioma progression in patients include: (1) MRI (magnetic resonance imaging): MRI is the standard imaging modality for diagnosing and monitoring glioma progression; however, it has several limitations in distinguishing true tumor progression from treatment-related effects [10]. A major challenge is pseudoprogression, where post-radiotherapy inflammatory changes mimic tumor growth, particularly in patients treated with temozolomide and radiotherapy [11]. Conversely, pseudoresponse occurs in patients receiving anti-angiogenic therapies (e.g., bevacizumab), where reduced contrast enhancement gives a false impression of tumor shrinkage despite ongoing malignancy [12]. Another limitation is the inability of conventional MRI to accurately delineate infiltrative tumor margins, as glioma cells extend beyond the contrast-enhancing region, leading to underestimation of residual disease [13]. Furthermore, MRI has poor specificity in differentiating tumor recurrence from radiation necrosis, as both conditions exhibit similar imaging characteristics [14]. Low-grade gliomas and non-enhancing tumor components are also difficult to monitor using standard MRI, necessitating advanced imaging techniques [15]. While diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) perfusion MRI, and magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) improve diagnostic accuracy, they still lack the molecular-level precision required for accurate assessment [16]. Translocator protein (TSPO) positron emission tomography (PET) imaging has emerged as a promising complementary tool for distinguishing active tumor growth from inflammatory changes, but its integration into routine clinical practice is still evolving [17]. (2) Computed tomography (CT) scans: CT scans use X-rays and computer technology to produce detailed brain images. While CT scans are widely used, they have limitations, such as (i) radiation exposure: CT scans use ionizing radiation, which can increase the risk of cancer in patients with a history of radiation exposure; (ii) limited sensitivity: CT scans may not detect small tumors or early signs of recurrence; (iii) limited spatial resolution: CT scans resolution may not be sufficient to detect small changes in tumor size or shape. (3) A neurological examination is a non-invasive method that assesses the patient’s symptoms, cognitive function, and motor skills, providing valuable information on tumor progression [18]. (4) Stereotactic biopsy is an invasive method that involves collecting tissue samples from the brain to identify genetic markers and determine tumor grade. Still, it is limited by its invasiveness and potential risks [19]. (5) Contrast-enhanced imaging, such as MRI or CT scans, uses contrast agents to highlight tumor activity and detect changes in tumor size and shape, allowing for monitoring of tumor progression and response to treatment [20]. While these methods are widely used, they have limitations, including false-negative results and incomplete sampling of the tumor. For example, a neurological examination may not detect subtle changes in cognitive function or motor skills, while a stereotactic biopsy may not capture the entire extent of the tumor [21, 22]. Newer imaging modalities, such as functional MRI and MRS, may offer improved diagnostic accuracy and reduced radiation exposure. Further research is needed to develop more accurate and non-invasive methods for monitoring glioma patients. The traditional methods for diagnosis and disease progression monitoring, as well as their merits and demerits, are presented in Table 1.

Molecular imaging techniques offer a promising approach for diagnosis and monitoring disease progression in glioma patients. These techniques utilize targeted probes that bind specifically to biomarkers that are overexpressed in glioma [30]. One such molecular imaging technique is PET imaging. PET imaging uses radiotracers that bind to specific molecular targets. For example, the radiotracer [¹⁸F]FLT ([¹⁸F]3'-deoxy-3'-fluorothymidine) has been shown to accumulate in glioma cells and can be used to monitor tumor proliferation and growth [31]. As stated by Schiepers et al. [32], in a study published in the Journal of Nuclear Medicine, [¹⁸F]FLT PET was used to monitor disease progression in patients with glioblastoma, the most aggressive form of glioma. The study showed that [¹⁸F]FLT PET imaging could detect changes in tumor biology early, allowing for more effective treatment and monitoring [31, 33]. Much as PET scans use small amounts of radioactive material to produce images of metabolic activity in the brain [31], PET scans are sensitive for detecting metabolic changes. However, they have limitations, such as (1) radiation exposure: PET scans use ionizing radiation, which can increase the risk of cancer in patients with a history of radiation exposure; (2) limited spatial resolution: PET scan resolution may not be sufficient to detect small changes in tumor size or shape; (3) high cost: PET scans are expensive and may not be available in all hospitals [34].

TSPO PET imaging provides a unique advantage over traditional imaging modalities like MRI and CT by allowing the visualization of early molecular changes in glioma biology associated with tumor proliferation and inflammatory processes. Unlike MRI and CT, which primarily offer anatomical information, TSPO PET detects the upregulation of TSPO expression, often linked to activated microglia and macrophages within the tumor microenvironment, which occurs even prior to significant tumor growth [35]. This early detection capability is crucial for understanding the underlying biological behavior of gliomas, as it may provide insights into tumor aggressiveness and response to therapies [36]. As stated by Simmons et al. [37], TSPO PET imaging can serve as a biomarker for monitoring therapeutic efficacy, thereby enhancing the precision of glioma management [35]. Given these advantages, TSPO PET emerges as a promising tool for early glioma diagnosis and disease progression monitoring, complementing traditional imaging approaches.

Besides TSPO PET, several other molecular PET imaging techniques have been developed to monitor the progression of glioma. One widely used approach is amino acid PET imaging, particularly with radiotracers such as [¹⁸F]FET (O-(2-[¹⁸F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine) and [¹¹C]MET (L-[methyl-¹¹C]methionine), which take advantage of the increased amino acid transport in gliomas to provide better tumor delineation and grading [38–40]. Additionally, as stated by Verger et al. [38], [¹⁸F]FDOPA (6-[¹⁸F]fluoro-L-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine) has been utilized to assess glioma progression and response to therapy by targeting the upregulated L-type amino acid transporter 1 (LAT1) in tumor cells. Another significant PET imaging strategy involves glucose metabolism with [¹⁸F]FDG (2-[¹⁸F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose) [38, 41]. However, its clinical utility in gliomas is limited due to high background uptake in normal brain tissue [42]. Beyond metabolism-based tracers, receptor-targeted PET imaging has also gained interest, with [¹⁸F]-PSMA (prostate-specific membrane antigen)-1007 and [⁶⁸Ga]PSMA PET showing promise in identifying glioblastoma due to PSMA expression in neovascular endothelium [43]. Furthermore, hypoxia-targeted PET imaging, using [¹⁸F]FMISO ([¹⁸F]fluoromisonidazole), helps in assessing tumor hypoxia, a key factor in glioma aggressiveness and resistance to therapy [41]. These diverse molecular PET techniques complement TSPO PET by offering insights into glioma biology, including metabolism, amino acid transport, receptor expression, and tumor hypoxia, ultimately enhancing tumor characterization and treatment monitoring.

Another molecular imaging technique is single photon emission CT (SPECT) imaging, which uses radiolabeled molecules that emit gamma radiation, which can be detected by SPECT imaging. SPECT is an important functional imaging technique used in the diagnosis and monitoring of glioma progression, particularly when combined with radiotracers that target tumor metabolism and proliferation. SPECT imaging offers advantages in detecting tumor viability, distinguishing recurrent glioma from post-treatment effects, and assessing response to therapy [17, 44]. Commonly used radiotracers include 99mTc-MIBI (technetium-99m methoxyisobutylisonitrile), which accumulates in viable tumor cells due to increased mitochondrial activity, and 201Tl (thallium-201)-chloride, which reflects cellular proliferation and membrane integrity [17, 45, 46]. Additionally, SPECT with amino acid tracers such as 123I-α-methyl-L-tyrosine (123I-IMT) provides enhanced specificity by targeting glioma-specific metabolic pathways [47, 48]. Compared to MRI, SPECT can differentiate between tumor recurrence and radiation necrosis, reducing diagnostic uncertainty [17, 49]. However, its lower spatial resolution compared to PET and MRI limits its standalone use, making it most effective when integrated into multimodal imaging approaches [50]. Despite these limitations, advances in hybrid SPECT/CT imaging and novel radiotracers are improving their clinical utility in glioma management [50].

Molecular imaging techniques have the potential to detect early changes in tumor biology and provide valuable information for treatment planning and monitoring. Further research is needed to understand the potential of these techniques fully and to develop new molecular imaging agents for the detection and monitoring of gliomas. Early detection capability in gliomas is crucial for understanding the underlying biological behavior of gliomas, as it may provide insights into tumor aggressiveness and response to therapies [51].

TSPO, a conserved protein in the outer mitochondrial membrane, is also known as the peripheral benzodiazepine receptor (PBR) or the mitochondrial benzodiazepine receptor (MBR) [51, 52], which modulates mitochondrial function, cholesterol transport, and inflammatory responses [53]. TSPO has a variety of biological functions, such as steroid hormone synthesis, apoptosis, cell proliferation, porphyrin and heme transport, anion transport, and immunomodulation [36, 51–56]. Additionally, TSPO is upregulated in various cancers and neurodegenerative diseases, i.e., breast, prostate, colon, brain tumors, Alzheimer’s disease, and Parkinson’s disease. TSPO expression is linked to tumor progression and poor survival rates in cancer patients [36, 51, 57]. In glioma pathogenesis, TSPO has been shown to be involved in promoting tumor growth and progression [51].

Studies have suggested that TSPO expression is increased in glioma cells and that it may contribute to the resistance of glioma cells to chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Additionally, TSPO has been implicated in the pathogenesis of gliomas, although the exact role of TSPO in gliomagenesis is still not fully understood [51]. Some of the key points discussing the involvement of TSPO in gliomas include: (1) expression in glioma cells, as proposed by Ammer et al. [51], TSPO is expressed in glioma cells, with varying levels of expression reported across different glioma subtypes and grades. Higher TSPO expression has been observed in high-grade gliomas (III–IV), such as glioblastoma, compared to low-grade gliomas (I–II), such as diffuse astrocytoma, oligodendroglioma, etc. [58]. (2) Involvement in glioma cell proliferation and survival: TSPO has been suggested to play a role in promoting glioma cell proliferation and survival. Activation of TSPO signaling has been associated with increased cell growth, resistance to apoptosis, and enhanced migration and invasion of glioma cells [51]. (3) Relationship with mitochondrial function, where TSPO is primarily localized to the mitochondria and is involved in regulating mitochondrial functions, such as bioenergetics, metabolism, and reactive oxygen species (ROS) production. Dysregulation of mitochondrial function is a hallmark of gliomas, and TSPO may contribute to mitochondrial dysfunction in glioma cells [59]. (4) Interaction with signaling pathways in which TSPO has been reported to interact with various signaling pathways implicated in glioma pathogenesis, such as the PI3K/AKT/mTOR (phosphoinositide 3-kinase/protein kinase B/mammalian target of rapamycin) pathway, MAPK/ERK (mitogen-activated protein kinase/extracellular signal-regulated kinase) pathway, and NF-κB (nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells) pathway. Activation of these pathways can lead to increased glioma cell proliferation, survival, migration, and resistance to therapy [60, 61] (Figure 1). (5) Potential as a therapeutic target: given its expression in glioma cells and its role in promoting glioma progression, TSPO has been suggested as a potential therapeutic target for glioma treatment. Inhibition of TSPO activity or expression may offer a promising strategy to impair glioma cell growth and enhance the efficacy of current treatment modalities [51]. (6) Imaging biomarker: TSPO expression in glioma tumors can also serve as a potential imaging biomarker for the non-invasive detection and monitoring of glioma progression [35, 62]. Imaging techniques using radiolabeled ligands that bind to TSPO have been developed for visualizing neuroinflammation and monitoring the progression of gliomas. PET using a radiolabeled TSPO probe has allowed non-invasive and reliable investigation of the role of TSPO in neuropathological damage and tumor progression [57]. TSPO-influenced signaling pathways in glioma cells leading to tumor progression are illustrated in Figure 1.

TSPO plays an important role in various physiological processes, including energy metabolism, neurotransmission, cell proliferation, apoptosis, inflammation, and cell survival [53]. In glioma, TSPO has been implicated in tumor progression, invasion, and resistance to chemotherapy [63]. Studies have shown that TSPO is overexpressed in glioma cells compared to normal brain tissue. A study published in the Journal of Neuro-Oncology found that TSPO expression was significantly higher in glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) tissue than in normal brain tissue [51]. Another study published in the Journal of Neurochemistry found that TSPO expression was increased in glioma cells compared to normal astrocytes [59, 64].

Overexpression of TSPO in glioma cells has been linked to several mechanisms that contribute to tumor progression, including: (1) increased energy metabolism: TSPO is involved in the transport of reducing equivalents across the mitochondrial inner membrane, which can lead to increased energy production and enhanced cell growth; (2) enhanced chemo-resistance: TSPO has been shown to play a role in the transport of chemotherapeutic drugs out of the cell, which can contribute to the development of resistance to chemotherapy; (3) increased cell migration and invasion: TSPO has been implicated in the regulation of cell migration and invasion, which are key processes involved in glioma progression; (4) anti-apoptotic effects: TSPO has been shown to inhibit apoptosis in glioma cells, which can contribute to their survival and proliferation [62, 65]. The TSPO-targeted therapies for glioma (Figure 3) highlight different types of therapeutic interventions in the treatment of glioma, both current and future.

Regarding the clinical significance of TSPO expression in glioma, several studies have demonstrated that high levels of TSPO expression are associated with poor prognosis and reduced survival rates. A study published in the Journal of Neuro-Oncology found that patients with GBM who had high levels of TSPO expression had a significantly shorter median survival time than those with low TSPO expression levels [58, 66].

Targeting TSPO has been proposed as a potential therapeutic strategy for glioma treatment. For example, some studies have shown that inhibitors of TSPO can enhance the effectiveness of chemotherapy and radiation therapy by increasing drug uptake and reducing resistance mechanisms. Additionally, some studies have explored the use of TSPO as a biomarker for diagnosing and monitoring glioma patients [67]. This suggests that combining TSPO-targeting therapy with chemotherapy may be an effective treatment strategy. Studies indicated that TSPO expression tends to increase with the advancing grade of gliomas (low to high). The characteristic features of the effect of TSPO expression on glioma progression.

Some of the effects of TSPO on tumor proliferation and migration are (1) effects on tumor proliferation: (i) cell cycle regulation, where TSPO has been shown to regulate cell cycle progression by modulating the activity of cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) and their inhibitors. The overexpression of TSPO in glioma cells can promote cell proliferation by activating CDKs and reducing the activity of CDK inhibitors [62]. (ii) Cell survival, where TSPO can promote cell survival by inhibiting apoptosis through the activation of anti-apoptotic signaling pathways, such as the PI3K/AKT pathway [62]. (iii) Cell migration, whereby TSPO can also promote cell migration by regulating the activity of cytoskeletal proteins, such as actin and microtubules, which are essential for cell migration [72]. (2) Effects on tumor migration: (i) epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), where TSPO has been shown to promote EMT, a process by which epithelial cells acquire a mesenchymal phenotype, which is associated with increased migratory and invasive capabilities. (ii) Cell adhesion, where TSPO can regulate cell adhesion by modulating the activity of adhesion molecules, such as integrins and cadherins, which are essential for cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions. (iii) Invasion, in which TSPO can promote tumor invasion by regulating the activity of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), which are responsible for degrading the extracellular matrix and promoting tumor invasion [73].

Mechanisms underlying the effects of TSPO on glioma development include: (1) hypoxia: TSPO is upregulated in response to hypoxia, which is a common feature of glioma. Hypoxia-induced TSPO expression promotes cell survival and proliferation, contributing to tumor growth [62, 74]. (2) Mitochondrial function: TSPO is involved in mitochondrial function, including the regulation of mitochondrial membrane potential and the production of ROS. Altered mitochondrial function can contribute to changes in cellular metabolism and signaling pathways that promote tumor growth [75]. (3) Epigenetic regulation: TSPO expression can be regulated by epigenetic mechanisms, such as DNA methylation and histone modification. These epigenetic changes can contribute to the development of glioma tumors by modulating gene expression [76].

TSPO expression in glioma cells has garnered significant attention due to its involvement in tumor biology and neuroinflammation [59]. Abnormal TSPO expression has been implicated in the pathophysiology of gliomas, with studies indicating that high levels of TSPO correlate with tumor aggressiveness and a poor prognosis [51, 59]. This upregulation is often associated with the metabolic demands of rapidly proliferating tumor cells, as TSPO is involved in the regulation of mitochondrial functions essential for energy production and cellular metabolism [77].

There are mechanisms that regulate TSPO expression in gliomas: transcriptional activation, epigenetic regulation, and post-transcriptional modifications. Transcription factors such as NF-κB, SP1 (specific protein 1), and AP-1 (activator protein 1) have been shown to bind to the TSPO promoter in response to inflammatory cytokines, thereby enhancing its expression. Additionally, the hypoxic tumor microenvironment commonly found in gliomas can activate signaling pathways like HIF-1α (hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha), further promoting TSPO upregulation [78]. Epigenetic regulation regulates TSPO expression by epigenetic modifications such as DNA methylation and histone modification. In glioma cells, DNA methylation and histone H3 lysine 27 trimethylation (H3K27me3) can repress TSPO expression, while histone H3 lysine 4 trimethylation (H3K4me3) can activate it [79]. The expression of TSPO is also influenced by post-transcriptional mechanisms, including microRNAs that can either promote or inhibit its expression, thus adding an additional layer of complexity to the regulation of TSPO in glioma pathology [80]. Post-translational regulation: TSPO expression can be regulated post-translationally by various mechanisms, including protein degradation, phosphorylation, and ubiquitination. In glioma cells, the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway can regulate TSPO stability and degradation [81].

Furthermore, the interaction between glioma cells and the surrounding tumor microenvironment also plays a critical role in TSPO regulation. Components such as tumor-associated macrophages and astrocytes may secrete various factors that modulate TSPO expression in glioma cells, indicating that the regulation of TSPO is not solely an intrinsic property of the tumor cells but also a reflection of the dynamic interactions within the tumor niche [82]. Collectively, these regulatory mechanisms highlight the potential of TSPO as both a biomarker for glioma progression and a therapeutic target, warranting further investigation into its role in tumor metabolism and microenvironmental interactions [83].

TSPO is overexpressed in various cancer types, including glioma, and targeting TSPO has been shown to be a promising therapeutic strategy for glioma treatment [51]. Some of the current therapies targeting TSPO in gliomas include:

Many PET probes for TSPO imaging have been developed, and several [¹¹C] and [¹⁸F] labeled TSPO ligands have been evaluated in the human brain, such as [¹⁸F]FEPPA ([¹⁸F]N-(2-(2-fluoroethoxy)benzyl)-N-(4-phenoxypyridin-3-yl)acetamide), [¹⁸F]PBR-28 (N-(2-[¹⁸F]fluoroethyl)-N-(4-phenoxypyridin-3-yl)acetamide), and many others [57, 58, 84, 85]. These radioligands bind specifically to TSPO and allow for the detection of TSPO-expressing tumors. For instance, [¹¹C]PK11195 ([¹¹C]N-butan-2-yl-1-(2-chlorophenyl)-N-methylisoquinoline-3-carboxamide), [¹¹C]PBR-28 (N-(2-[¹¹C]methoxybenzyl)-N-(4-phenoxypyridin-3-yl)acetamide), [¹⁸F]DPA-714 ([¹⁸F]N,N-diethyl-2-(2-(4-(2-fluoroethoxy)phenyl)-5,7-dimethylpyrazolo[1,5-a]pyrimidin-3-yl)acetamide), and others are used to image TSPO-positive glioblastoma tumors [51, 58, 86].

TSPO-targeted therapies are shown in Table 3, highlighting their merits, mechanisms of action (MOA), and clinical uses.

Agents like TSPO antagonists are considered a direct approach to targeting TSPO, as they bind to the protein, potentially disrupting its function and leading to reduced cell survival and proliferation in glioma cells [36, 108]. In addition, inhibitors targeting downstream pathways influenced by TSPO, such as NF-κB and STAT3 (signal transducer and activator of transcription 3), offer a therapeutic strategy to modulate inflammation and immune evasion, which are critical for glioma progression [109]. By blocking these pathways, TSPO-associated pro-survival signaling can be suppressed, potentially slowing tumor growth [110–112]. ICIs represent another potential therapeutic avenue related to TSPO. Since TSPO is involved in immune modulation, targeting checkpoints [e.g., PD-1/PD-L1 (programmed cell death ligand-1)] in combination with TSPO modulation may enhance immune system activity against glioma cells, reducing the tumor’s ability to evade immune detection [113]. Furthermore, metabolic pathways influenced by TSPO offer a target to disrupt the metabolic adaptations glioma cells make for survival. Modulating these pathways could impair glioma cells’ energy production and biosynthesis, hindering tumor growth and survival [114]. Other key molecular targets and therapeutic strategies in glioma treatment have been shown in Table 4, highlighting molecular targets, pathways, effects on glioma cells, and potential therapeutic agents.

Several studies have investigated the potential of TSPO as a biomarker for treatment selection in gliomas. These include: (1) TSPO expression is associated with poor prognosis, and this has been shown in a study published in the Journal of Neuro-Oncology that revealed that high TSPO expression was correlated with poor prognosis and shorter overall survival in patients with GBM [51]. This suggests that TSPO may be a useful biomarker for identifying patients with aggressive tumors. (2) A study published in the journal Cancer Research demonstrated that TSPO-targeting therapy using a small molecule inhibitor reduced tumor growth and increased survival in a mouse model of GBM. This suggests that TSPO may be a viable target for cancer therapy [51, 56, 65]. (3) TSPO expression predicts response to chemotherapy, and this has been shown in one study published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology, which found that high TSPO expression was associated with poor response to chemotherapy in patients with GBM. This suggests that TSPO may be used as a biomarker to predict response to chemotherapy. (4) TSPO-targeting therapy combined with chemotherapy has been studied and published in the Journal of Neuro-Oncology, which found that combining TSPO-targeting therapy with chemotherapy resulted in improved survival and reduced tumor growth in a mouse model of GBM.

Multimodal imaging strategies enhance the diagnostic and therapeutic value of TSPO-targeted imaging by providing complementary information on tumor metabolism, vascularity, and molecular characteristics. In glioma, TSPO PET using radiotracers like [¹¹C]PK11195, [¹⁸F]DPA-714, and [¹⁸F]GE180 ([¹⁸F]3-(2-fluoroethyl)-2-[(4-methoxyphenyl)thiomethyl]-8-methylquinazolin-4-one) can be combined with various imaging modalities to improve sensitivity and specificity [85]. MRI, including contrast-enhanced MRI, DWI, and DSC perfusion MRI, is commonly used alongside TSPO PET to assess tumor size, vascular permeability, and treatment response [15]. MRS provides metabolic profiling by detecting glioma-associated metabolites such as choline, N-acetyl aspartate, and lactate, complementing TSPO imaging in differentiating tumor progression from pseudoprogression [16]. Additionally, FDG-PET can assess glioma glucose metabolism, while amino acid PET (e.g., [¹⁸F]FET, [¹¹C]MET PET) improves tumor delineation beyond TSPO PET alone [119]. Photoacoustic imaging (PAI) and optical imaging techniques are emerging as adjuncts to TSPO-based imaging for intraoperative tumor visualization [120]. These multimodal approaches enhance glioma characterization, improving diagnostic accuracy, treatment monitoring, and surgical planning [121].

Some of the potential future strategies for targeting TSPO in glioma treatment include (1) TSPO-based imaging: TSPO is overexpressed in glioma cells, making it a possible target for imaging modalities such as PET. Studies have shown that TSPO-based PET imaging can detect glioma recurrence and monitor treatment response [36, 122]. (2) TSPO-targeting therapeutics: several small-molecule compounds have been developed to target TSPO, including ligands that bind to the TSPO receptor and inhibit its activity. For example, PK11195, a well-known TSPO ligand, has been shown to inhibit glioma cell proliferation and induce apoptosis [62, 123]. (3) TSPO-targeting nanoparticles, nanoparticle-based delivery systems, can be designed to target TSPO-expressing glioma cells, allowing for enhanced delivery of chemotherapeutic agents or other therapeutic molecules. For example, TSPO-targeted liposomes have been shown to deliver doxorubicin to glioma cells selectively [124]. (4) TSPO-based gene therapy and the gene therapy approaches that target TSPO have been explored as a means to deliver therapeutic genes to glioma cells. For example, a study demonstrated that a TSPO-targeted adenovirus vector could efficiently deliver the suicide gene herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase (HSV-tk) to glioma cells [125–127]. (5) Combination therapy: targeting TSPO in combination with other therapeutic agents may enhance treatment efficacy and reduce side effects. For example, a study combining PK11195 with temozolomide showed enhanced anti-glioma activity compared to either agent alone [128, 129]. (6) TSPO-targeting immunotherapy: ICIs have revolutionized cancer treatment, but their efficacy in glioma is limited due to the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. Targeting TSPO may enhance the activity of immunotherapies by increasing immune cell infiltration and activation within the tumor. For example, a study showed that PK11195 increased the expression of PD-1 on T-cells and enhanced their anti-tumor activity [125]. (7) TSPO-targeting immunotoxins, in which immunotoxins are fusion proteins that combine an antibody targeting TSPO with a cytotoxin. These molecules have been shown to selectively kill TSPO-expressing glioma cells while sparing normal cells [125]. (8) Targeting TSPO in glioma therapy has been proposed as a potential therapeutic strategy for glioma treatment, and several approaches have been explored, including (i) TSPO inhibitors [130, 131]; (ii) TSPO-targeting antibodies [132]; (iii) TSPO siRNA (short interfering ribonucleic acid)-based therapy: siRNA targeting TSPO has been shown to inhibit glioma cell proliferation and survival [125, 131].