Cancer refers to uncontrolled cell proliferation that damages neighboring tissues. Oral cancer is the sixth most common cancer in the world. A person suffering from oral cancer may notice a little, inexplicable growth or sore in the mouth, cheeks, sinuses, tongue, hard or soft palate, or any portion of the mouth that extends from the base to the oropharynx. Data across the globe revealed that India accounts for one-third of the world’s total oral cancer burden and has the highest number of mouth cancer cases overall. According to Gupta et al. [1] countries going through economic transformation are more vulnerable to oral cancer. There has been a steady increase in the incidence of oral cancer with 90% being squamous cell carcinomas (SCC) [2]. The cancer cells in invasive SCC have progressed to more advanced stages of the oral cavity, as stated by Bishop et al. [3]. Lifestyle is one of the most significant factors that show a strong correlation with 75% of oral malignancies. These lifestyle factors or risk factors include smoking, chewing betel nuts or tobacco, drinking, not getting enough nutrition, using mouthwashes with excess alcohol, bad oral hygiene, having a weakened immune system, age, and gender.

In Southeast Asia, particularly on the Indian subcontinent, the most widespread habit is chewing betel quid with various additives. Betel quid, pan, or paan is a traditional Indian spice blend that typically includes betel leaf, areca nut, slaked lime, tobacco, and other herbs, and spices. Turmeric, cardamom, cloves, or aniseed in India are some of the other components commonly added to quid. In various parts of India, you can find these mixtures in the following forms: khaini (tobacco and lime), mishri (burned tobacco), zarda (boiled tobacco), gadakhu (tobacco and molasses), and mawa (tobacco, lime, and areca). In Central Asia and the Middle East, you can find nass (tobacco, ash, cotton, or sesame oil), and in Saudi Arabia and Sudan, you can find shammah (tobacco, ash, and lime). These products have been linked to an increased risk of oral cancer, according to research. Tobacco chewing is linked to oral cancer and precancerous conditions, including leukoplakia, erythroplakia, oral lichen planus (OLP), and oral submucous fibrosis, according to studies [4, 5]. Leukoplakia defines the presence of white patches of the oral mucosa (buccal mucosa, alveolar mucosa, palate, tongue, and floor of mouth) and doesn’t confirm the presence or absence of epithelial dysplasia. Its incidence varies between 1–3% with greater incidence in men [6, 7]. Erythroplakia (0.02–0.2% prevalence) with lesser frequency appears as red lesions with a velvet texture on the oral mucosa. It is asymptomatic in nature but shows a burning sensation or soreness while eating [8, 9]. OLP is an immunologically driven chronic inflammatory condition affecting the oral mucosa of middle-aged patients. Erosive OLP reflects the highest risk of malignant transformation [10, 11]. Submucosal fibrosis represents chronic fibrotic lesions with malignant potential (transformation rate is 9%). These fibrotic lesions result in loss of elasticity in the affected oral mucosa tissue, thereby limiting mouth opening [12]. Furthermore, betel quid chewing is also responsible for higher incidences of cardiovascular diseases along with a proportionate increase in obesity, metabolic syndrome, diabetes, and chronic kidney disease, thereby worsening the condition of the patients [13–17]. Recent findings from the International Agency for Research on Cancer suggest that smokeless tobacco may contribute to the development of oral cancer [18]. Malki et al. [19] and Oji and Chukwuneke [20] include hereditary variables, mate drinking, and chronic trauma as additional risk factors (Figure 1). But if someone smokes and drinks simultaneously, the consequences can be disastrous [21]. Oral cancer, which mostly affects males, accounts for around 25% of all anticipated cancer cases in these nations (low and middle-income countries) [22]. Buccal mucosa accounts for about 32% of oral cancer cases, tongue for 22%, lower lip for 11%, palate for 11%, vestibule for 8%, alveolus for 5%, floor of the mouth for 5%, and gingiva for 3% [23]. There are about 4,000 compounds in tobacco smoke, including 60 known carcinogens such as nicotine, arsenic, methanol, and methoxy methyl furfural [24]. Activation of procarcinogens is accelerated by alcohol, and it also acts as a solvent to allow dangerous carcinogens to enter cells in the body. As soon as the tumor reaches a certain size, localized discomfort begins to manifest, prompting the pursuit of medical intervention.

Oral cancer is difficult to diagnose in its early stages since the disease often causes no symptoms at all. A higher percentage of patient survival may be achieved with an earlier diagnosis. When caught early, the survival chances are about 80–90% [30]. Death rates rise as a result of detection delays. There are several therapeutic options available, but the survival rate is still dismal.

Early identification and prediction of oral cancer may be achieved with the use of screening technologies that aid in the detection and localization of oral cancer [31]. Early diagnosis, monitoring, and differentiation of oral cancer can be aided by salivary biomarkers such as L-phenylalanine, angiogenetic markers such as cluster of differentiation factor 34 (CD34), genomic biomarkers like integrin α3 and integrin β4, and the cloning of an acidic laccase gene 2 (proteomic biomarker) [32] (Figure 2).

From first exposure to risk factors to clinical identification of a lesion, there are many stages in the development of oral cancer. People who smoke may be exposing themselves to carcinogens. Additional research has shown that tobacco smoke extract may activate the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in a controlled laboratory setting. This activation, in turn, leads to an increase in the production of prostaglandins, such as prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), which might potentially boost EGFR signal transduction even more. Increased cyclin-D1 activity is a downstream process initiated by EGFR activation, and cyclin-D1 overexpression is common in head and neck cancer [65]. Chromosome 3p and 9p deletions or mutations are genetic abnormalities that are present early in carcinogenesis. In the early stages of carcinogenesis, telomerase activation also takes place. Typically, deletions or mutations on chromosome 17p [which affects the p53 tumor suppressor gene (TSG)], chromosome 13q, and chromosome 18q manifest later on. A different molecular process may be at work in individuals whose tumors contain human papilloma virus (HPV) mRNA, as the frequency of chromosome 3p, 9p, and 17p deletions is much lower in these patients. One possible mechanism of HPV-mediated carcinogenesis is that the viral proteins E6 and E7 deactivate p53 and retinoblastoma (Rb) protein, leading to cell cycle dysregulation [66].

According to research, oral cancers begin as a premalignant progenitor cell line and then undergo a process known as clonal expansion to progress to more advanced stages. As mutations and abnormalities in deoxyribose nucleic acid (DNA) accumulate, clonal proliferation continues until cancer develops into a full-blown disease [67]. Two main genetic changes are the inactivation of TSGs and the activation of proto-oncogenes, which play a crucial role in the development of oral cancer. When normal mucosa transforms into premalignant mucosa/lesions, changes take place during early mutagenesis. Research has linked the development of SCC to a range of premalignant lesions such as leukoplakia, erythroplakia, OLP, and oral submucous fibrosis are prevalent and may develop into malignancy in several ways. According to the World Health Organization (2005), premalignant lesions may be categorized as mild, moderate, severe, or carcinoma in situ based on the degree of dysplasia [68, 69]. Seventy to eighty percent of oral cancers have chromosomal region 9p21 lost. Research has connected viral infections to the development of cancers of the mouth and throat. HPV is the most prevalent virus linked to the development of oral cancers. The majority of oral SCCs are caused by HPV 16 and HPV 18. Unlike those who misuse smoke or alcohol, the process of HPV mutagenesis seems to be different. HPV viral oncoproteins may destroy TSGs instead of altering them. It is believed that the genetic and cellular alterations are induced by the two early gene proteins encoded by HPV 16 and 18, E6 and E7. Cellular division is halted when E6 inactivates or degrades p53 [70]. Another mechanism by which E7 messes with cell cycle control is its alleged role in Rb degradation. Some research suggests that “traditional” carcinomas and HPV-mediated oropharyngeal and oral cancers are not the same. There may be cellular alterations connected to HPV that are associated with verrucous cancer and proliferative verrucous hyperplasia. Cancer patients who test positive for HPV tend to be younger, never smoke, have metastases to lymph nodes at an earlier stage, and have a history of more frequent heterosexual and orogenital sexual interactions in their social lives. Contrasted with oral cavity lesions, which only revealed HPV DNA in 12% to 18% of cases, oropharyngeal cancers, and tonsillar cancer in particular, had the greatest rates of HPV DNA detection, ranging from 45% to 67% of individuals tested [71].

Despite treatment, people with oral SCC (OSCC) still have a bad prognosis. According to Inchingolo et al. [28] and Mehrotra and Gupta [72], the key to increasing patients’ survival rates is early diagnosis and treatment. There is a dearth of succinct information on the numerous specific and non-specific methods that have been developed over the years to anticipate the malignant progression of oral cancers and to address new treatment approaches (precision medicine). Additionally, there is still some doubt about their usage in regular clinical practice [73, 74]. Numerous novel, as-yet-untested biomarkers and treatments have emerged as promising alternatives to conventional ones, owing to the ongoing investigation into genomics, translational medicine, biochemistry, and molecular biology [75–77]. Whether the illness is in its early stages, has progressed locally, or is recurring, surgery is an important tool. Fortunately, surgical knowledge expanded to include head and neck cancer due to progress in anatomy. From antiquity until the nineteenth century, all surgical procedures posed serious risks to patients due to a lack of anesthesia, antiseptic techniques, airway control, and the possibility of bleeding. In the twentieth century, researchers investigated the use of chemotherapy and radiation for the treatment of oral cancer [78]. Surgery, radiation, chemotherapy (5-fluorouracil, carboplatin or cisplatin, Taxol-based therapies, and irinotecan in the most advanced cases), and, more recently, monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeted against the EGFR are often part of a multidisciplinary approach for patients with locally advanced oral cancers. Oral malignancies often activate the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway, which may be a therapeutic target due to its cancer-promoting function. Clinical studies examining the effects of direct PI3K and/or mTOR inhibitors in the mouth and metformin, which inhibits mTOR indirectly, are both looking at the dependency of this pathway on oral cavity tumors in individuals with possible premalignant lesions [79–85].

Because of its well-established efficacy in preventing and treating mandibular osteoradionecrosis, preliminary data suggests that adding hyperbaric oxygen (HBO₂) therapy to the chemo-radiation standard of care is a safe, feasible, and well-tolerated option [86]. And lastly, T-cell exhaustion is an important new mechanism of tumor immunosuppression. Derived from inflammatory monocytes, tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) are essential regulators of tumor growth. Typically, TAMs encourage tumor growth while reducing the immune response via innate and adaptive immunological pathways. Nevertheless, TAMs still can limit tumor growth via pro-inflammatory mechanisms, which is a double-edged sword. Promising preclinical and clinical results have been seen from treatment techniques targeting TAMs, which either deplete the immunosuppressive function or elicit anti-tumor capacity. It is now possible to reactivate anticancer T-cell responses using macrophage-centered treatment methods such as anti-programmed death 1 (PD-1) T-cell [87].

Extensive patient genetic testing for facilitating targeted, personalized treatments is expected to be a part of the future of oral cancer management, as is the application of stem cell technologies to “grow” suitable organs that could replace missing tissue without the need for immunosuppression [126, 127]. Unfortunately, the prognosis for patients diagnosed with oral cancer at stages III and IV has not changed much over the past several decades, even though chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgical resection have improved the quality of life for patients. Whether the disease is in its early stages, has progressed locally, or is recurring, surgery is an important tool. The most effective method for treating oral cancer is a thorough neck dissection, and the presence of lymph nodes in the patient’s body is still a major indicator of prognosis. Recent advances in treating oral cancer have included mAbs directed against the EGFR [28, 128, 129].

Oral cancer development may be influenced by multiple risk factors with a higher inclination towards cigarette smoking and alcohol intake. Another important factor is inflammation, which is thought to be influenced by genetic predisposition. The causes, symptoms, and methods of early identification and treatment of oral cancer have been the subject of a great deal of research. Oral cancer is a serious illness that requires better prevention and treatment methods because of its high death and morbidity rates. Patients diagnosed with oral cancer typically have surgery as a primary method of treatment followed by radiation and chemotherapy. Mental and physical health problems are associated with all of the aforementioned therapeutic approaches. Preventing and detecting oral cancer at an early stage can lessen the severity of these dire consequences. Although immunotherapy has been examined for its potential use in treating oral cancer, more research is needed to determine its efficacy in preventing and treating oral cancer. Moreover, early detection and prevention of oral cancer are both enhanced by a deeper knowledge of the molecular pathways involved in its development. The identification of ways to minimize the morbidity and fatality rates of oral cancer requires substantial effort.