﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.1 20151215//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">Explor Foods Foodomics</journal-id>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">EFF</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Exploration of Foods and Foodomics</journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">2837-9020</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Open Exploration Publishing</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.37349/eff.2026.1010126</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="manuscript">1010126</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Article</subject>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Enhancement in nutraceutical potential of legumes through lactic acid bacteria-mediated solid-state fermentation</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0009-0005-0208-6017</contrib-id>
<name>
<surname>Rajpal</surname>
<given-names>Aditi</given-names>
</name>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/">Conceptualization</role>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/">Methodology</role>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/">Formal analysis</role>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/">Investigation</role>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/visualization/">Visualization</role>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/">Writing—original draft</role>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing—review &amp; editing</role>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="I1" />
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4452-9462</contrib-id>
<name>
<surname>Bhadekar</surname>
<given-names>Rama</given-names>
</name>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/">Conceptualization</role>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/resources/">Resources</role>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/validation/">Validation</role>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/">Supervision</role>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing—review &amp; editing</role>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="I1" />
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1">
<sup>*</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="editor">
<name>
<surname>Nazzaro</surname>
<given-names>Filomena</given-names>
</name>
<role>Academic Editor</role>
<aff>CNR, Italy</aff>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="I1">Department of Microbial Biotechnology, Rajiv Gandhi Institute of Information Technology and Biotechnology, Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), Pune 411045, Maharashtra, India</aff>
<author-notes>
<corresp id="cor1">
<bold>
<sup>*</sup>Correspondence:</bold> Rama Bhadekar, Department of Microbial Biotechnology, Rajiv Gandhi Institute of Information Technology and Biotechnology, Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), Pune 411045, Maharashtra, India. <email>rama.bhadekar@bharatividyapeeth.edu</email></corresp>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2026</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>20</day>
<month>03</month>
<year>2026</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>4</volume>
<elocation-id>1010126</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>23</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2025</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>14</day>
<month>02</month>
<year>2026</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>© The Author(s) 2026.</copyright-statement>
<license xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<license-p>This is an Open Access article licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link>), which permits unrestricted use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, for any purpose, even commercially, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.</license-p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<sec>
<title>Aim:</title>
<p id="absp-1">This study aimed to evaluate the potential of a lactic acid (LA) bacteria (LAB) co-culture during solid-state fermentation (SSF) of yellow peas and soybeans, with an emphasis on the production of health-promoting metabolites from legumes.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Methods:</title>
<p id="absp-2">A synergistic probiotic consortium comprising <italic>L. acidophilus</italic>, <italic>L. plantarum</italic>, and <italic>L. rhamnosus</italic> was employed for SSF across 11 different legume substrates at three legume-to-water ratios over 48 h to identify optimal fermentation conditions. Based on microbial growth outcomes, yellow peas and soybeans were selected for further SSF studies at an optimized substrate-to-water ratio (1:3). Fermentation performance was assessed by monitoring microbial growth, pH changes, production of LA, short-chain fatty acids, B-vitamins, and antimicrobial activity. Data were statistically analysed using two-way ANOVA. Structural modifications of fermented substrates and bacterial colonization were examined using scanning electron microscopy (SEM).</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Results:</title>
<p id="absp-3">SSF exhibited distinct substrate-specific biochemical patterns. Yellow peas supported rapid LAB proliferation (16.04 log<sub>10 </sub>CFU/g) and pronounced acidification (pH 7.33→4.66), reflecting their high fermentable carbohydrate content. In contrast, soybean yielded higher LA production (7.28 g/L) despite lower viable counts, indicating enhanced per-cell metabolic activity. Short-chain fatty acid synthesis was also influenced by substrate composition and pH, with soybean showing maximum accumulation of acetic acid (11.73 g/L) and propionic acid (15.95 g/L). Butyric acid was detected at lower levels in both substrates. B-vitamin biosynthesis was also substrate-dependent: yellow peas produced higher levels of vitamin B<sub>2 </sub>(7.097 µg/mL) and B<sub>9 </sub>(3.69 µg/mL), whereas soybeans favoured vitamin B<sub>12 </sub>synthesis (2.187 µg/mL). Fermented extracts exhibited strong antimicrobial activity against <italic>Escherichia coli</italic>, <italic>Salmonella typhi</italic>, and <italic>Staphylococcus aureus</italic>, with inhibition zones reaching up to 28, 26, and 18.6 mm, respectively. SEM analysis revealed matrix erosion and aggregation of LAB colonization.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Conclusions:</title>
<p id="absp-4">SSF is an efficient and sustainable strategy for producing multifunctional probiotic-enriched fermented legumes with enhanced nutritional and antimicrobial properties.</p>
</sec>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>antimicrobial activity</kwd>
<kwd>B-vitamins</kwd>
<kwd>plant-based substrates</kwd>
<kwd>SCFAs</kwd>
<kwd>synergistic fermentation</kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="s1">
<title>Introduction</title>
<p id="p-1">Environmentally, legumes are highly sustainable, requiring lower water and nitrogen inputs compared to animal or cereal-based protein sources, making them key candidates for addressing both nutritional and ecological concerns [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">1</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">2</xref>]. Legumes offer a rich nutritional profile, comprising high-quality proteins (20–45%), dietary fibre (5–37%), complex carbohydrates (65–70%), 85% of which is resistant starch, polyunsaturated fatty acids (66.1–85.3% of total lipids), and polyphenolic antioxidants [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">3</xref>–<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">5</xref>]. However, the nutritional potential of legumes is frequently compromised by the presence of anti-nutritional factors (ANFs), such as lectins, phytates, tannins, trypsin inhibitors, and oligosaccharides of the raffinose family. These compounds reduce protein digestibility, hinder mineral absorption, and cause gastrointestinal discomfort [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">6</xref>]. Moreover, the characteristic “beany” flavour of legumes may limit consumer acceptance, necessitating processing techniques that enhance both nutritional bioavailability and sensory appeal [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">7</xref>]. Fermentation, particularly with lactic acid (LA) bacteria (LAB) such as <italic>Leuconostoc</italic>, <italic>Lactiplantibacillus</italic>, <italic>Lacticaseibacillus</italic>, and <italic>Limosilactobacillus</italic>, has emerged as an effective strategy to overcome these limitations, facilitating the enzymatic hydrolysis of complex carbohydrates, degrading ANFs, and synthesizing bioactive peptides [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">7</xref>–<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">9</xref>]. LAB can further synthesize essential B-complex vitamins, especially riboflavin (B<sub>2</sub>), folate (B<sub>9</sub>), and cobalamin (B<sub>12</sub>) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">10</xref>], addressing key micronutrient limitations often associated with plant-based substrates.</p>
<p id="p-2">Among fermentation modalities, solid-state fermentation (SSF) is particularly promising for legume processing. SSF enables microbial growth on moistened solid substrates with minimal water content, reducing energy and downstream processing demands while promoting nutrient preservation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">11</xref>]. Previous studies have shown that LAB-mediated SSF can enhance the formation of functional metabolites across a range of substrates. In <italic>Spirulina</italic>, LAB-SSF increases protein-derived bioactive compounds such as GABA, <italic>L</italic>-glutamic acid, and biogenic amines [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">12</xref>]. Similarly, the SSF of <italic>A. argyi</italic> leaves elevated flavonoid, polyphenol, and related antioxidant activities [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">13</xref>]. Building upon these findings, the present study explored the application of LAB-mediated SSF to legume-based substrates. Legumes are widely consumed worldwide. Crops such as soybeans (SBs), peas, chickpeas, and beans are staple components of Mediterranean and other traditional plant-based dietary patterns, which are widely associated with improved metabolic and cardiovascular health outcomes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">14</xref>] and represent promising fermentation matrices due to their favourable nutritional composition, including protein (e.g., 36.5 g/100 g in soybean), dietary fibre (e.g., 4.2 g/100 g in black beans), and carbohydrate content (e.g., 60.4 g/100 g in chickpeas) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">15</xref>]. The global shift toward sustainable plant-based diets has created a strong demand for bioprocess strategies that enhance the nutritional and functional properties of legumes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">16</xref>].</p>
<p id="p-3">Short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), such as acetate, propionate, and butyrate, produced through LAB-mediated fermentation, play vital roles in gut health by serving as energy sources for colonocytes, reducing inflammation, and improving epithelial integrity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">17</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">18</xref>]. The prebiotic carbohydrates present in legumes can stimulate SCFA production during gut fermentation, and this effect is increased when legumes undergo LAB-mediated pre-fermentation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">19</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">20</xref>]. Concurrently, LA synthesis ensures inhibition of common foodborne pathogens and spoilage-causing microorganisms. In addition to acidification, LAB fermentation yields bioactive antimicrobials such as hydrogen peroxide and bacteriocins [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">21</xref>–<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">23</xref>].</p>
<p id="p-4">Despite the growing interest in bioprocessing, the majority of studies have emphasized submerged fermentation or the enhancement of a single metabolite [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">10</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">21</xref>]. There remains a significant knowledge gap regarding the comparative evolution of multiple legume matrices under SSF, particularly using LAB consortia for multifunctional transformation. Specifically, the synergistic enhancement of SCFAs, vitamin biosynthesis, antimicrobial activity, and probiotic viability within a single SSF system has rarely been addressed. Furthermore, while fermentation is inherently dynamic, most research relies on endpoint analysis, leaving the systematic, time-dependent evolution of metabolites in SSF systems insufficiently explored. In view of this, eleven legumes, including SB, yellow pea (YP), white kidney bean (WKB), mung bean or green gram (GM), cowpea (BEB), black kidney bean (BKB), lima bean (LB), black gram (BG), black chickpea (KC), field bean (FB), and horse gram (HG), were initially screened in the present study to evaluate their suitability as substrates for LAB-mediated SSF. Selected matrices demonstrating favourable fermentation performance were further investigated in detail. The consortium comprising <italic>L. acidophilus</italic> (<italic>Lactobacillus acidophilus</italic>), <italic>L. plantarum</italic> [<italic>Lactobacillus plantarum</italic> (<italic>Lactiplantibacillus plantarum</italic>)], and <italic>L. rhamnosus</italic> [<italic>Lactobacillus casei var. rhamnosus</italic> (<italic>Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus</italic>)], selected here, is based on prior evidence of its superior synergistic antimicrobial activity against a wide range of pathogens compared to individual strains [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">24</xref>]. This consortium also demonstrates enhanced efficacy in the presence of prebiotic co-substrates [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">25</xref>] and exhibits multi-enzyme activities, including anti-proteolytic, anti-collagenase, and anti-elastase effects, and significant anti-angiogenic properties [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">26</xref>]. The results would contribute to the development of sustainable, functional legume-based fermentations with applications in both food biotechnology and health-oriented biomanufacturing.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2">
<title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="t2-1">
<title>Chemicals and reagents</title>
<p id="p-5">Analytical-grade LA, acetic acid (AA), and propionic acid (PA), vitamins: B<sub>2</sub> and B<sub>9</sub>, HPLC-grade acetonitrile, trifluoroacetic acid, and orthophosphoric acid, were purchased from SRL Chemicals (India). The analytical grade butyric acid (BA) was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA), and B<sub>12</sub> was sourced from HiMedia Laboratories (India). Analytical-grade sulfuric acid was obtained from Merck (India). Ascorbic acid, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), and sodium dihydrogen phosphate were obtained from HiMedia Laboratories (India).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="t2-2">
<title>Microorganisms</title>
<p id="p-6">
<italic>L. acidophilus</italic> NCIM (National Collection of Industrial Microorganisms) 2660 (ATCC 11975), <italic>L. plantarum</italic> NCIM 2374 (NCIB 6376), and <italic>L. rhamnosus</italic> NCIM 2364 (ATCC 7469) were procured from the NCIM, National Chemical Laboratory (NCL), Pune, India. Each strain was individually revived in de Man, Rogosa, and Sharpe (MRS) broth (HiMedia, India) and incubated at 37°C for 24 h. Equal volumes of the active cultures were mixed in a 1:1:1 ratio to form a consortium, as described by Bhola and Bhadekar (2019) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">24</xref>]. The inoculum was standardised to ~10<sup>10</sup> CFU/mL by serial dilution and plate counting and stored at 4°C. A 0.2% (v/v) inoculum of this consortium was used in all fermentation experiments. Uninoculated media were used as controls in all experiments. Clinical isolates of <italic>E. coli</italic>, <italic>S. aureus</italic>, and <italic>S. typhi</italic> were obtained from Bharati Hospital, Pune, India, and maintained on Mueller–Hinton (MH) medium (HiMedia, India).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="t2-3">
<title>Selection of legumes</title>
<p id="p-7">Eleven legumes, including SB, YP, WKB, GM, BEB, BKB, LB, BG, KC, FB, and HG, representing the botanical species <italic>Glycine max</italic>, <italic>Pisum sativum L.</italic>, <italic>Phaseolus vulgaris</italic>, <italic>Vigna radiata</italic>, <italic>Vigna unguiculata</italic>, <italic>Phaseolus vulgaris L.</italic>, <italic>Phaseolus lunatus</italic>, <italic>Vigna mungo</italic>, <italic>Cicer arietinum</italic>, <italic>Lablab purpureus</italic>, and <italic>Macrotyloma uniflorum</italic>, respectively, were procured from the local market and washed thoroughly with sterile distilled water. Coarse flour was prepared from each legume for further analysis. The legume flours were hydrated in distilled water at three different ratios (1:1, 1:2, and 1:3 w/v) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">27</xref>], and supplemented with 5% (w/w) sucrose (SRL, India) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">28</xref>] to support the bacterial growth. The mixtures were autoclaved at 121°C for 15 min, cooled to room temperature, and inoculated with the LAB consortium. SSF was conducted in sterile Petri plates at 37°C for 48 h. Total viable counts (TVCs) were determined post-fermentation, and legumes were selected for further study based on their microbial growth performance.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="t2-4">
<title>Metabolite profiling</title>
<p id="p-8">Fermentation experiments were conducted using selected formulations inoculated with the LAB consortium under static conditions. Samples were collected at 24-hour intervals over a 5-day period and analysed for viable cell counts, pH, LA concentration, SCFA profile, B-complex vitamins (B<sub>2</sub>, B<sub>9</sub>, and B<sub>12</sub>), and antimicrobial activity as described below.</p>
<sec id="t2-4-1">
<title>Microbial viability</title>
<p id="p-9">Bacterial growth was assessed by plating serial dilutions of homogenised fermented samples on MRS agar, followed by incubation at 37°C for 48 h [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">29</xref>]. Results were expressed as log<sub>10</sub> CFU/g.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="t2-4-2">
<title>LA and SCFAs</title>
<p id="p-10">LA and SCFAs: AA, PA, and BA were quantified using a Shimadzu LC-20AT HPLC system equipped with a photodiode array (PDA) detector. Separation was achieved on a reversed-phase C18 column (Shim-Pack Solar C18, 5 μm, 4.6 mm I.D. × 250 mm) at room temperature. Cell-free supernatants (CFSs) were acidified to pH 1.8–2.0 using 0.1 M H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> prior to injection. The mobile phase consisted of Solvent A (1% acetonitrile in 20 mM sodium dihydrogen phosphate, pH 2.2) and Solvent B (acetonitrile). The gradient elution program was adapted from Kulshreshtha et al. (2012) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">30</xref>]. The flow rate was 1.5 mL/min, and detection was performed at 210 nm. Quantification was based on external calibration using standard solutions (50–200 mg/L) of AA, LA, PA, and BA.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="t2-4-3">
<title>Vitamins</title>
<p id="p-11">Cell lysate (CL) fractions were used for B-vitamin quantification. A 500 μL aliquot of each lysate was mixed with 0.1% ascorbic acid and 1 mM EDTA (HiMedia, India) and heated at 70°C for 10 min. After centrifugation at 10,000× <italic>g</italic> for 10 min, the supernatant was filtered using 0.22 μm syringe filters. Quantification was performed using the HPLC system described above, with detection at 318 nm. The mobile phase consisted of Solvent A (0.1% trifluoroacetic acid in water, pH 2.6) and Solvent B (acetonitrile), following a gradient elution program adapted from Albawarshi et al. (2022) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">31</xref>]. The flow rate was set at 0.9 mL/min, and the column oven was maintained at 30°C. Standard solutions of B<sub>2</sub>, B<sub>9</sub>, and B<sub>12</sub> were used for calibration.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="t2-4-4">
<title>Antimicrobial activity</title>
<p id="p-12">Antimicrobial properties of the fermented extracts were assessed using the agar well diffusion method. Whole cell biomass (WCB) was prepared by suspending the fermented samples individually in sterile distilled water at 1:1 w/v. The CFS was obtained by centrifuging samples at 10,000× <italic>g</italic> for 15 min, while the CL was prepared by sonicating the pellets in 0.1 M phosphate buffer using a probe sonicator (LABMAN Scientific). Agar plates were prepared with a 1:1 mixture of MRS agar and MH agar overlaid on 2% agar base and then pre-seeded individually with standardised (0.5 McFarland) cultures of <italic>E. coli</italic>, <italic>S. aureus</italic>, and <italic>S. typhi</italic>. Wells were prepared using a sterile cork borer. Fifty microliters of each test fraction (CFS, CL, and WCB) were dispensed into wells, and the plates were incubated at 37°C for 24 h [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">24</xref>].</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="t2-5">
<title>Scanning electron microscopy (SEM)</title>
<p id="p-13">LAB samples were further analysed via SEM to assess cellular morphology and colonisation when cultivated under stress conditions. Three sample treatments were prepared: (i) unfermented control, (ii) 48-hour fermented sample, and (iii) fermented sample exposed to 0.5% bile salts at pH 2.5 for 3 h. Cells were fixed following the protocol described by Ammar (2017) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">32</xref>]. Initially, the cells were fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde, dehydrated in a graded ethanol series (30% to 100%), and sputter-coated with gold. SEM imaging was performed using an FEI Nova NanoSEM 450 system.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="t2-6">
<title>Statistical analysis</title>
<p id="p-14">Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism (10) with two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test. Significance was set at <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.05. All experiments were conducted in biological triplicate (<italic>n</italic> = 3). Graphs were generated using Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Corporation, USA), with error bars indicating standard deviation.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s3">
<title>Results</title>
<sec id="t3-1">
<title>Selection of legumes</title>
<p id="p-15">The growth performance of the LAB consortium was evaluated at the end of 48 h across eleven different legume substrates at three legume-to-water ratios: 1:1, 1:2, and 1:3 (w/v) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). In all cases, an increase in water content from 1:1 to 1:2 led to a progressive enhancement in bacterial growth. Statistical analysis (two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test) revealed significant differences between the 1:2 and 1:3 ratios in eight legumes (<italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.05), while three legumes (WBG, HG, and BEB) showed no significant difference (ns) among the tested legumes, as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>. YP demonstrated the highest LAB proliferation, increasing from 10.12 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/g at the 1:1 ratio to 16.04 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/g at 1:3, representing a 58.5% increase. SB also showed substantial support for LAB growth, rising from 10.72 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/g to 13.01 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/g, a 21.36% increase. Other legumes, including HG, KC, and BKB, exhibited a moderate increase in bacterial growth, ranging from 14 to 33%. Thus, at a 1:3 legume-to-water ratio, both YP and SB demonstrated maximum microbial growth. Both these legumes possess distinct nutritional compositions. YP contains higher levels of carbohydrates and fibre, while SB offers significantly more protein but fewer fermentable carbohydrates (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t1">Table 1</xref>) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">15</xref>]. Hence, both the legumes were selected for further experiments.</p>
<fig id="fig1" position="float">
<label>Figure 1</label>
<caption>
<p id="fig1-p-1">
<bold>Viable counts of LAB (log<sub>10</sub> CFU/g) in eleven legumes after 48 h of fermentation at substrate-to-water ratios of 1:1, 1:2, and 1:3 (w/v).</bold> Statistical differences between 1:1 and 1:2 are indicated by (#), and those between 1:2 and 1:3 are indicated by (*), as assessed by Tukey’s test. Significance levels: # or * <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.05; ## or ** <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.01; ### or *** <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.001; #### or **** <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.0001; ns: not significant. Legume codes: SB (soybean), YP (yellow pea), WKB (white kidney bean), GM (mung bean), BEB (cowpea), BKB (black kidney bean), LB (lima bean), BG (black gram), KC (black chickpea), FB (field bean), HG (horse gram). Error bars represent standard deviation (SD), <italic>n</italic> = 3. LAB: lactic acid bacteria.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="eff-04-1010126-g001.tif" />
</fig>
<table-wrap id="t1">
<label>Table 1</label>
<caption>
<p id="t1-p-1">
<bold>Nutritional composition of yellow peas and soybeans [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">15</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">33</xref>–<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">35</xref>].</bold>
</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th>
<bold>Composition</bold>
</th>
<th>
<bold>Soybeans</bold>
</th>
<th>
<bold>Yellow peas</bold>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Protein</td>
<td>36.5%</td>
<td>23.1%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Carbohydrate</td>
<td>30.2%</td>
<td>61.6%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Fat</td>
<td>19.9%</td>
<td>3.89%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Dietary fibre</td>
<td>9.3%</td>
<td>22.2%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Sucrose</td>
<td>6.35%</td>
<td>1.85%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Raffinose</td>
<td>1.15%</td>
<td>0.6%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Stachyose</td>
<td>2.85%</td>
<td>1.71%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Verbascose</td>
<td>-</td>
<td>2.3%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Starch</td>
<td>10.9–11.7%</td>
<td>39.44–46.23%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Total sugars</td>
<td>7.33%</td>
<td>3.14%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="t3-2">
<title>Growth kinetics</title>
<p id="p-16">Following inoculation with 0.2% (v/v) of a 10<sup>10</sup> CFU/mL bacterial suspension, the population dynamics of LAB in YP and SB matrices were monitored over 120 h (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>). In YP, bacterial counts increased rapidly, reaching a maximum of 16.04 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/g at 48 h, corresponding to an approximate 10<sup>8</sup>-fold increase relative to the initial inoculum. Between 72 and 120 h, bacterial populations remained relatively stable, ranging from 15.08 to 15.51 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/g. In SB, bacterial counts increased over time, peaking at 14.60 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/g at 72 h, indicating an approximate 10<sup>6</sup>-fold increase. This was followed by a plateau phase, with values ranging from 14.34 to 14.54 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/g between 96 and 120 h. These results indicate that both legume matrices supported substantial bacterial growth; however, YPs facilitated more rapid proliferation and achieved higher maximum population densities compared to SBs under identical conditions.</p>
<fig id="fig2" position="float">
<label>Figure 2</label>
<caption>
<p id="fig2-p-1">
<bold>Growth of LAB in yellow pea (YP) and soybean (SB) during 120 h of fermentation.</bold> Statistical analysis was performed using two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test. 0–24 h: <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.0001 (****); 24–48 h: <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.05 (#), <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.01 (##); 48–72 h: <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.01 (§§), <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.0001 (§§§§); 72–96 h: ns (not significant); 96–120 h: <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.0001 (††††); ns (not significant). Error bars represent standard deviation (SD) (<italic>n</italic> = 3). LAB: lactic acid bacteria.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="eff-04-1010126-g002.tif" />
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="t3-3">
<title>LA and SCFAs</title>
<p id="p-17">Progressive acid accumulation was accompanied by a decline in pH for both matrices. The pH of the YP matrix decreased to 4.66 at 96 h (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>), whereas SB showed a moderate reduction to 5.16 at 48 h (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>). These pH profiles closely mirrored changes in organic acid concentrations, indicating active microbial metabolism and substrate-specific buffering capacities.</p>
<fig id="fig3" position="float">
<label>Figure 3</label>
<caption>
<p id="fig3-p-1">
<bold>Production of lactic acid (LA), acetic acid (AA), propionic acid (PA), and butyric acid (BA) during solid-state fermentation (SSF) of yellow peas (YP) over 120 h, compared to the unfermented control.</bold> Statistical analysis was performed using two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test. Significance: <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.05 (*), <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.01 (**), <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.001 (***); ns (not significant) vs. control. Error bars represent standard deviation (SD), (<italic>n</italic> = 3). SCFAs: short-chain fatty acids.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="eff-04-1010126-g003.tif" />
</fig>
<fig id="fig4" position="float">
<label>Figure 4</label>
<caption>
<p id="fig4-p-1">
<bold>Production of lactic acid (LA), acetic acid (AA), propionic acid (PA), and butyric acid (BA) during solid-state fermentation (SSF) of soybean (SB) over 120 h, compared to the unfermented control.</bold> Statistical analysis was performed using two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test. Significance: <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.05 (*), <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.01 (**), <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.001 (***), <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.0001 (****); ns (not significant) vs. control. Error bars represent standard deviation (SD), (<italic>n</italic> = 3). SCFAs: short-chain fatty acids.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="eff-04-1010126-g004.tif" />
</fig>
<p id="p-18">LA production showed the most pronounced temporal variation. In YP, maximum LA production reached 4.2 g/L at 96 h, while in SB, 7.28 g/L at 72 h. SB exhibited a sharper rise in LA, corresponding to a 12.1-fold increase as compared to its control.</p>
<p id="p-19">In YP, BA levels increased steadily in the mid-phase of fermentation (24–72 h), peaking at 1.05 g/L at 48 h, representing a 1.5-fold rise compared to the control. In contrast, in SB, maximum accumulation of AA was observed at 24 h, with a concentration of 11.73 g/L, and PA, which was absent in the control, peaked later at 48 h, reaching 15.95 g/L.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="t3-4">
<title>Vitamin B<sub>2</sub>, B<sub>9</sub> and B<sub>12</sub> production</title>
<p id="p-20">B<sub>2</sub> production showed the most substantial increase among the B-group vitamins. At the end of 96 h in YP, vitamin B<sub>2</sub> reached a maximum concentration at 7.097 µg/mL, corresponding to a 4.9-fold increase relative to the control (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>), while in SB, attaining 0.97 µg/mL, striking a 35.9-fold enhancement, at 96 h from an initial level of 0.027 µg/mL (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>).</p>
<fig id="fig5" position="float">
<label>Figure 5</label>
<caption>
<p id="fig5-p-1">
<bold>Vitamin B<sub>2</sub>, B<sub>9</sub>, and B<sub>12</sub> levels during solid-state fermentation (SSF) of yellow pea (YP) for 120 h compared to the unfermented control.</bold> Statistical analysis was performed using two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test; <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.05 (*), <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.01 (**), <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.001 (***), <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.0001 (****); ns (not significant) vs. control. Error bars indicate standard deviation (SD), (<italic>n</italic> = 3).</p>
</caption>
<graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="eff-04-1010126-g005.tif" />
</fig>
<fig id="fig6" position="float">
<label>Figure 6</label>
<caption>
<p id="fig6-p-1">
<bold>Vitamin B<sub>2</sub>, B<sub>9</sub>, and B<sub>12</sub> levels during solid-state fermentation (SSF) of soybean (SB) over 120 h compared to the unfermented control.</bold> Statistical analysis was performed using two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test; <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.05 (*), <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.01 (**), <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.001 (***), ns (not significant) vs. control. Error bars indicate standard deviation (SD), (<italic>n</italic> = 3).</p>
</caption>
<graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="eff-04-1010126-g006.tif" />
</fig>
<p id="p-21">At the end of 24 h in both substrates, B<sub>9</sub> concentrations exhibited moderate variation. In YP, vitamin B<sub>9</sub> concentration was 3.69 µg/mL; similarly, SB showed a comparable peak of 3.683 µg/mL, with minimal change thereafter, indicating limited B<sub>9</sub> biotransformation during fermentation.</p>
<p id="p-22">B<sub>12</sub> concentration was enhanced in both legume matrices, though with differing kinetics. In YP, the maximum level was 0.99 µg/mL at 48 h. SB demonstrated a higher final concentration of 2.187 µg/mL at 72 h.</p>
<p id="p-23">These observations suggest that YP favours B<sub>2</sub> and early B<sub>12</sub> production, whereas SB demonstrates higher overall yields of vitamins B<sub>2</sub> and B<sub>12</sub>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="t3-5">
<title>Antimicrobial activity against pathogens</title>
<p id="p-24">The antimicrobial potential of WCB, CL, and CFS obtained from fermented YP and SB matrices was evaluated against <italic>S. aureus</italic>, <italic>E. coli</italic>, and <italic>S. typhi</italic> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>). Antimicrobial activity was not observed in non-fermented controls when processed identically to fermented samples across all tested fractions at various fermentation times.</p>
<fig id="fig7" position="float">
<label>Figure 7</label>
<caption>
<p id="fig7-p-1">
<bold>Antibacterial activity of fermented samples against (a) <italic>S. aureus</italic>, (b) <italic>E. coli</italic>, and (c) <italic>S. typhi</italic> using yellow pea (YP) and soybean (SB) substrates across 120 h of fermentation.</bold> WCB (whole cell biomass), CL (cell lysate), and CFS (cell-free supernatant). Statistical analysis was performed using two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test. Significance: <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.05 (*), <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.01 (**), <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.001 (***); ns (not significant) between YP and SB. Error bars represent standard deviation (SD), (<italic>n</italic> = 3).</p>
</caption>
<graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="eff-04-1010126-g007.tif" />
</fig>
<p id="p-25">The WCB fraction exhibited the strongest antimicrobial activity among all tested fractions, with inhibition zones ranging from 13 to 28 mm. Samples derived from SB showed higher activity as compared to YP against the selected clinical isolates. Among the tested pathogens, <italic>E. coli</italic> was the most sensitive organism, followed by <italic>S. typhi</italic>. These findings indicate that the antimicrobial potential of fermented legumes is predominantly associated with intact or surface-bound bacterial components.</p>
<p id="p-26">The CL fraction of SB also demonstrated a higher antimicrobial effect than that of YP, showing an inhibition zone of 22.98 mm against <italic>E. coli</italic>. The CFS fraction from SB also exhibited notable inhibition, with a maximum zone of 21.51 mm against <italic>S. typhi.</italic> Both CL and CFS fractions of YP showed comparable activity against <italic>S. typhi</italic> and <italic>E. coli.</italic></p>
<p id="p-27">Collectively, these results confirm that fermented YP and SB matrices exhibit broad-spectrum antimicrobial potential, primarily mediated through cell-associated mechanisms.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="t3-6">
<title>SEM analysis of YP</title>
<p id="p-28">SEM analysis was conducted on YP samples, as they exhibited the highest microbial growth during fermentation. After 48 h of fermentation, the surface of the YP exhibited noticeable roughening and localized structural changes, likely due to microbial enzymatic activity. Dense populations of rod-shaped LAB were observed adhering to the legume matrix, often embedded within spherical extracellular deposits, presumed to be exopolysaccharides (EPS) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref>).</p>
<fig id="fig8" position="float">
<label>Figure 8</label>
<caption>
<p id="fig8-p-1">
<bold>SEM images of yellow pea (YP) samples: (a) unfermented control with rough surface; (b) 48 h fermented YP with dense lactic acid bacteria (LAB) in extracellular polymeric substances (EPS); (c) fermented YP after stress conditions (0.5% bile salts, pH 2.5, 3 h) showing adherent, intact LAB cells.</bold> SEM: scanning electron microscopy.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="eff-04-1010126-g008.tif" />
</fig>
<p id="p-29">In the non-fermented control, no microbial structures were detected, confirming substrate sterility and validating that subsequent observations were due to the inoculated LAB. The surface of the unfermented legume appeared smooth and structurally intact, with no evidence of microbial adherence or surface disruption.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s4">
<title>Discussion</title>
<p id="p-30">In this study, legumes were selected as fermentation substrates as they are low-cost, protein-rich matrices containing intrinsic prebiotic carbohydrates (resistant starches, oligosaccharides) that facilitate microbial colonization and metabolic flux toward SCFA and vitamin biosynthesis. Organic acid production is often monitored over extended fermentation periods, typically up to five days. The temporal dynamics of vitamin biosynthesis have been less frequently investigated, with most studies reporting vitamin levels only at selected time points, such as 24, 48, or 72 h [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">36</xref>–<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">38</xref>]. Therefore, a comprehensive time-dependent evaluation is essential to better understand metabolite progression and to determine optimal fermentation intervals for simultaneous enhancement of multiple functional compounds. SSF of legume flours with <italic>Lactobacillus</italic> consortium represents a scalable bioprocessing platform that integrates microbial growth support up to 7 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/g with substrate valorisation, improving protein accessibility, reducing antinutrient load, and enhancing metabolite recovery yields [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">39</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">40</xref>]. Multiple additional legumes, including HG, FB, KC, WKB, GM, BEB, BKB, LB, and BG, were also screened, demonstrating that the LAB consortium maintains functional robustness across diverse legume matrices. Maximum LAB viability was observed at a legume-to-water ratio of 1:3 (~67% moisture), consistent with previous findings that 60–65% moisture is ideal for nutrient diffusion and microbial metabolic activity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">41</xref>]. Viable counts ranged from 11.8 to 12.4 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/g across most of the screened legumes at 1:3 moisture, demonstrating strong microbial adaptability and substrate compatibility. Although YP exhibited the highest viability (16.04 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/g), several other legumes, such as BKB, GM, FB, and HG, also supported substantial LAB proliferation. Among the legumes studied, YP and SB were selected for detailed analysis because of their contrasting macronutrient compositions, as mentioned in <xref ref-type="table" rid="t1">Table 1</xref>.</p>
<p id="p-31">Fermentation kinetics revealed that YP supported more rapid LAB proliferation, 15.52 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/g and pH drop to 4.9, reaching within the first 24 h, whereas SB exhibited delayed growth peaking at 14.6 log CFU/g by 72 h with a more gradual pH decrease. Previous studies on LAB reported 8–9 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/g growth of <italic>L. casei</italic> and <italic>L. plantarum</italic> on lentils [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">42</xref>], while Śliżewska et al. (2020) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">27</xref>] observed proliferation of <italic>Lactobacillus</italic> strain up to 10.28 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/g using wheat, barley, rye, and maize flours. These findings indicate that the higher fermentable carbohydrate content of YPs promotes rapid and efficient fermentation. Conversely, SBs support slower and more gradual microbial growth and acidification, likely due to their limited availability of fermentable sugars and high concentrations of ANFs such as trypsin inhibitors and phytic acid, which may hinder microbial metabolism by chelating essential nutrients or inhibiting enzymatic pathways critical for LAB activity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">43</xref>].</p>
<p id="p-32">LA production also exhibited clear substrate-dependent variability. In the present study, LA accumulation reached 4.2 g/L in YP at the end of 96 h and 7.28 g/L in SB at 72 h, with SB producing higher LA despite lower LAB counts, suggesting enhanced per-cell metabolic activity. This may result from acid stress-induced amino acid catabolism, which buffers the intracellular pH while sustaining LA synthesis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">44</xref>]. In YP, a rapid decline in pH was observed within the first 24 h, which may be due to its distinct carbohydrate composition (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t1">Table 1</xref>), with a high content of complex carbohydrates. Oligosaccharides such as verbascose, raffinose, and stachyose are utilized in mixed-acid pathways that generate organic acids like formic and succinic, along with carbon dioxide, lowering the pH during early fermentation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">45</xref>]. In contrast, SB contains a higher proportion of readily fermentable soluble sugars, particularly hexoses (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t1">Table 1</xref>), supports rapid homolactic fermentation, resulting in earlier and higher accumulation of LA. Thus, the substrate-specific sugar profile strongly governs acid production patterns and explains the contrasting pH–LA dynamics observed between YP and SB during the early fermentation. At later fermentation stages (≥ 120 h), a modest increase in pH was observed for both substrates. This apparent decoupling of pH and LA levels can be attributed to the shift in metabolism of microorganisms to consume organic acids after readily available sugars are depleted, leading to the production of alkaline metabolites, such as ammonia, that partially neutralize the accumulated organic acids in the medium [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">46</xref>]. Previous studies have also demonstrated the influence of substrate composition on LA yield. For example, SB yielded 136.2 mg/kg of LA using <italic>L. sakei</italic> in 24 h [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">21</xref>], while oil palm empty fruit bunches (EFBs) produced 6.49 g/L at 120 h via <italic>L. acidophilus</italic> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">47</xref>]. In the present study, LA accumulation in YP and SB reached 4.14 and 5.38 g/L at the end of 120 h respectively. Moreover, LAB strains, particularly <italic>L. plantarum</italic>, have been shown to increase LA output by up to 94.9%, correlating with enhanced protease and cellulase activity that promotes the synergistic degradation of complex biomass, such as SB meal [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">48</xref>].</p>
<p id="p-33">SCFA production was similarly influenced by pH dynamics. In SB, AA and PA reached maximum concentrations (AA: 11.73 g/L at 24 h; PA: 15.95 g/L at 48 h) at pH 5.16–5.61. In contrast, YP’s rapid acidification curtailed the window for secondary acid biosynthesis. When the pH dropped below 4.5, AA and PA levels declined due to the inhibition of acetyl-CoA and propionyl-CoA pathways [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">49</xref>]. BA levels in SB were 1.17-fold higher than in YP but remained ~60% lower than in unfermented SB. This reduction likely reflects a LAB-driven metabolic shift prioritizing LA synthesis, along with the possible enzymatic conversion of BA into volatile esters, such as ethyl butyrate. Additionally, BA’s cytotoxicity may restrict its accumulation during extended fermentation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">50</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">51</xref>]. Fermentations using <italic>L. plantarum</italic> on jicama extract have demonstrated that LAB can produce all three major SCFAs, including 1.58 mg/mL PA, 1.31 mg/mL AA, and 1.05 mg/mL BA [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">52</xref>]. <italic>L. acidophilus</italic> cultivated in MRS supplemented with 2% salt produced 4.23 g/L AA, 0.0246 g/L PA, and 0.024 g/L BA after 24 h [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">49</xref>], while skim milk-based fermentation after 48 h reported AA production of 2.243 g/L with 1% glucose, with BA concentrations of 0.111 g/L, and PA production up to 0.019 g/L in skim milk alone [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">53</xref>]. Compared to MRS broth and dairy-based fermentation systems, the elevated SCFA production observed in legume-based SSF in the present study highlights the strong influence of substrate composition, particularly complex carbohydrates and oligosaccharides, on microbial metabolic flux and secondary acid biosynthesis. This highlights the ability of LAB to biosynthesize a full spectrum of SCFAs, underscoring the potential of diverse plant substrates to support SCFA biosynthesis even without butyrate-producing co-cultures. Given the health-promoting effects of SCFAs on energy metabolism, immune modulation, and gut integrity, fermented legumes represent a sustainable dietary source compared to chemical sources and monoculture fermentation approaches [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">54</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">55</xref>].</p>
<p id="p-34">Legume fermentation also enriches the B-vitamin content. B<sub>2</sub> accumulation was higher in YP (7.097 µg/mL) compared to SB (0.97 µg/mL) at the end of 96 h. Previous reports of <italic>L. plantarum</italic> isolated from rice-based foods demonstrated production of up to 0.7 µg/mL [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">10</xref>] and 0.481 µg/mL in soymilk fermentations [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">56</xref>]. B<sub>2</sub> enrichment following fermentation has been widely reported in traditional fermented foods. Tempeh fermented by <italic>R. oryzae</italic> and natto fermented by <italic>Bacillus natto</italic> contain approximately 3.58 µg/g and 1.9 µg/g B<sub>2</sub> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">15</xref>], respectively, while idli batter fermentation has been reported to yield up to 5.9 µg/g B<sub>2</sub> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">57</xref>]. B<sub>9</sub> production in both YP and SB reached similar levels (~3.6 μg/mL) at 24 h, indicating a strong and sustained biosynthetic capacity under these conditions. Tempeh and natto contain relatively low B<sub>9</sub> concentrations (0.24 µg/g and 0.08 µg/g, respectively) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">15</xref>]. <italic>L. fermentum</italic> was earlier reported for B<sub>9</sub> concentration in chemically defined B<sub>9</sub>-free medium, where production peaked at 0.092 μg/mL after 24 h [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">10</xref>], and <italic>L. rhamnosus</italic> K4E yielded 0.24 μg/mL after 12 h [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">38</xref>], highlighting the high biosynthetic potential of select strains under legume-based SSF. These vitamins serve as nutraceuticals and key metabolic cofactors. B<sub>2</sub>-derived coenzymes (FMN and FAD), for instance, are crucial in redox reactions and energy metabolism, enhancing the biosynthesis of LA and SCFAs during fermentation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">10</xref>]. SB supported higher yields (2.187  µg/mL) of B<sub>12</sub> than YP (0.96  µg/mL), as observed at 72 h. This difference likely reflects strain-specific interactions with matrix components, as certain LAB (e.g., <italic>L. plantarum, L. casei, L. acidophilus</italic>) exhibit enhanced vitamin synthesis in response to precursor availability and matrix complexity. In comparison, plant-based fermented foods typically contain negligible amounts of vitamin B<sub>12</sub>, with tempeh reported to contain approximately 0.0008 µg/g and natto showing undetectable levels [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">15</xref>]. <italic>Acetobacter malorum</italic> in sourdough systems has been reported to produce up to 0.018 µg/mL in 48 h [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58">58</xref>], while Das et al. (2021) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">38</xref>] reported B<sub>12</sub> production up to 0.084 µg/mL in soymilk fermented after 12 h with <italic>L. fermentum.</italic> This indicates a better yield of vitamins in legume-based SSF systems. The decrease in certain vitamin levels after an initial increase during <italic>Lactobacilli</italic> fermentation is generally caused by the consumption of these vitamins by the bacteria for their own growth and metabolism, as well as the degradation of specific vitamins due to the highly acidic environment [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B59">59</xref>].</p>
<p id="p-35">The antimicrobial activity observed in LAB-fermented SB and YP extracts demonstrates the capacity of LAB to produce bioactive metabolites capable of inhibiting both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. Among the tested fractions, WCB exhibited the strongest inhibition (up to 27.93 mm) for <italic>E. coli</italic>, followed by CL (up to 22.98 mm) and CFS (up to 21.51 mm). This hierarchy suggests that intact cells retain greater antimicrobial potency through the combined effects of membrane-bound bacteriocins, intracellular enzymes, and sustained acid production [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">24</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B60">60</xref>]. Comparatively less antagonistic effect on <italic>S. aureus</italic> may be attributed to its acid tolerance and thick peptidoglycan wall, and the damaging effect of LA on lipopolysaccharide (LPS) barrier [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B61">61</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B62">62</xref>].</p>
<p id="p-36">This is evidenced by earlier studies reporting effective suppression of pathogenic and spoilage organisms following LAB fermentation in legume seed sprouts, including reductions in mold counts by 1 Log<sub>10</sub> CFU/mL, <italic>E. coli</italic> and <italic>Klebsiella</italic> spp. by 2 Log<sub>10</sub> CFU/mL, and complete elimination of <italic>Salmonella</italic> spp., <italic>Shigella</italic> spp., and <italic>Staphylococcus epidermidis</italic>. Additionally, <italic>S. aureus</italic> and <italic>S. saprophyticus</italic> populations declined by approximately 3 Log<sub>10</sub> CFU/mL, frequently reaching undetectable levels [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B63">63</xref>]. The superiority of plant-based substrates is further supported by SSF studies, where LAB-fermented <italic>Spirulina</italic> exhibited inhibition zones ranging from 9–16 mm against <italic>S. aureus</italic>, significantly exceeding those observed under submerged fermentation conditions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">12</xref>]. Similarly, under optimized SSF conditions, <italic>L. plantarum</italic> fermenting bean by-products achieved maximum antimicrobial activity, resulting in reductions of approximately 2 and 4 Log<sub>10</sub> CFU/g against <italic>Listeria monocytogenes</italic> and <italic>E. coli</italic>, respectively [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B64">64</xref>]. When compared with dairy-based systems, the antimicrobial activity observed in the present study was notably stronger against <italic>E. coli</italic>. LAB isolates from fermented milk have previously shown inhibition zones of up to 15 mm against <italic>E. coli</italic> and approximately 22 mm against <italic>S.  dysenteriae</italic> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B65">65</xref>]. These observations reinforce the potential of LAB, particularly under SSF conditions, to generate bioactive compounds with selective antimicrobial effects, which may be enhanced by specific substrates and strain–matrix interactions.</p>
<p id="p-37">SEM analysis revealed significant matrix degradation and LAB colonization in YP. After 48 h, fermented samples exhibited smoother, eroded surfaces indicative of enzymatic breakdown of proteins, fibres, and lipids, consistent with previous studies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B66">66</xref>]. Numerous bacilli-shaped LAB cells were visible adhering to the matrix, often in proximity to spherical EPS-like structures, suggestive of biofilm formation. These findings align with previous SEM reports of LAB colonization on olive surfaces during fermentation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B67">67</xref>].</p>
<p id="p-38">Observed clustering and EPS secretion support classic phases of biofilm development: initial adhesion, maturation, and dispersal, as supported by morphological clustering and EPS secretion [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B68">68</xref>]. The SEM images showing LAB entrapped in fibrous grooves under acid and bile stress further suggest stress-induced adaptation.</p>
<p id="p-39">Collectively, these findings demonstrate that legume-based SSF using a LAB consortium is an effective strategy for enhancing the nutritional and functional properties of plant-derived substrates. Screening of multiple legumes confirmed the broad adaptability of the consortium, with YP and SB selected for detailed evaluation due to their contrasting compositional profiles. Fermentation influenced probiotic viability and metabolite production patterns, resulting in substrate-specific variations in LA, SCFAs, and B-complex vitamins. YP supported higher BA production, whereas SB exhibited greater LA, PA, and AA production compared to their respective controls. Additionally, fermented extracts demonstrated strong antimicrobial activity, and SEM analysis confirmed matrix degradation and microbial colonization. A consolidated summary of functional and biochemical changes in selected substrates before and after fermentation is presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="t2">Table 2</xref>.</p>
<table-wrap id="t2">
<label>Table 2</label>
<caption>
<p id="t2-p-1">
<bold>Summary of LAB metabolites.</bold>
</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th>
<bold>Metabolite</bold>
</th>
<th>
<bold>Yellow pea (unfermented)</bold>
</th>
<th>
<bold>Yellow pea (post fermentation) (maximum value; time)</bold>
</th>
<th>
<bold>Soybean (unfermented)</bold>
</th>
<th>
<bold>Soybean (post fermentation) (maximum value; time)</bold>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<bold>Lactic acid (LA)</bold>
</td>
<td>-</td>
<td>4.2 g/L; 96 h</td>
<td>0.6 g/L</td>
<td>7.28 g/L; 72 h</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<bold>Acetic acid (AA)</bold>
</td>
<td>6.85 g/L</td>
<td>2.33 g/L; 24 h</td>
<td>9.1 g/L</td>
<td>11.73 g/L; 24 h</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<bold>Propionic acid (PA)</bold>
</td>
<td>0.65 g/L</td>
<td>0.51 g/L; 24 h</td>
<td>-</td>
<td>15.95 g/L; 48 h</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<bold>Butyric acid (BA)</bold>
</td>
<td>0.68 g/L</td>
<td>1.05 g/L; 48 h</td>
<td>3.71 g/L</td>
<td>1.23 g/L; 24 h</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<bold>Vitamin B<sub>2</sub></bold>
</td>
<td>1.443 µg/mL</td>
<td>7.097 µg/mL; 96 h</td>
<td>0.02 µg/mL</td>
<td>0.97 µg/mL; 96 h</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<bold>Vitamin B<sub>12</sub></bold>
</td>
<td>0.34 µg/mL</td>
<td>0.99 µg/mL; 48 h</td>
<td>1.14 µg/mL</td>
<td>2.187 µg/mL; 72 h</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<bold>Vitamin B<sub>9</sub></bold>
</td>
<td>3.29 µg/mL</td>
<td>3.69 µg/mL; 24 h</td>
<td>3.56 µg/mL</td>
<td>3.683 µg/mL; 24 h</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<bold>LAB count</bold>
</td>
<td>-</td>
<td>16.04 Log<sub>10</sub> CFU/g; 48 h</td>
<td>-</td>
<td>14.6 Log<sub>10</sub> CFU/g; 72 h</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<bold>Antimicrobial compounds (<italic>E.</italic> <italic>coli</italic>)</bold>
</td>
<td>-</td>
<td>27.87 mm; 72 h</td>
<td>-</td>
<td>27.93 mm; 72 h</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<bold>Antimicrobial compounds (<italic>S.</italic> <italic>typhi</italic>)</bold>
</td>
<td>-</td>
<td>25.84 mm; 48 h</td>
<td>-</td>
<td>26.02 mm; 72 h</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<bold>Antimicrobial compounds (<italic>S.</italic> <italic>aureus</italic>)</bold>
</td>
<td>-</td>
<td>16.54 mm; 96 h</td>
<td>-</td>
<td>18.57 mm; 48 h</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p id="t2-fn-1">LAB: lactic acid bacteria.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p id="p-40">Despite these promising outcomes, certain limitations remain, including the lack of strain-specific metabolite attribution and the observation that different substrates preferentially enhanced specific metabolites rather than simultaneously maximizing all functional compounds. This indicates that substrate selection plays a critical role in directing metabolic outputs and may require tailored optimization depending on the targeted metabolite. Future studies should therefore focus on improving metabolite yield through selection or blending of complementary legume substrates, incorporation of targeted prebiotic supplementation, and optimization of fermentation parameters. Furthermore, advanced metabolomic and molecular investigations, along with in vivo validation, will be essential to confirm the health benefits and functional efficacy of fermented legume products. Overall, these findings highlight the potential of LAB-mediated SSF as a sustainable approach for developing nutrient-enriched plant-based functional foods.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<glossary>
<title>Abbreviations</title>
<def-list>
<def-item>
<term>AA</term>
<def>
<p>acetic acid</p>
</def>
</def-item>
<def-item>
<term>ANFs</term>
<def>
<p>anti-nutritional factors</p>
</def>
</def-item>
<def-item>
<term>B<sub>12</sub></term>
<def>
<p>cobalamin</p>
</def>
</def-item>
<def-item>
<term>B<sub>2</sub></term>
<def>
<p>riboflavin</p>
</def>
</def-item>
<def-item>
<term>B<sub>9</sub></term>
<def>
<p>folate</p>
</def>
</def-item>
<def-item>
<term>BA</term>
<def>
<p>butyric acid</p>
</def>
</def-item>
<def-item>
<term>BEB</term>
<def>
<p>cowpea</p>
</def>
</def-item>
<def-item>
<term>BG</term>
<def>
<p>black gram</p>
</def>
</def-item>
<def-item>
<term>BKB</term>
<def>
<p>black kidney bean</p>
</def>
</def-item>
<def-item>
<term>CFSs</term>
<def>
<p>cell-free supernatants</p>
</def>
</def-item>
<def-item>
<term>CL</term>
<def>
<p>cell lysate</p>
</def>
</def-item>
<def-item>
<term>EDTA</term>
<def>
<p>ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid</p>
</def>
</def-item>
<def-item>
<term>EPS</term>
<def>
<p>exopolysaccharides</p>
</def>
</def-item>
<def-item>
<term>FB</term>
<def>
<p>field bean</p>
</def>
</def-item>
<def-item>
<term>GM</term>
<def>
<p>mung bean or green gram</p>
</def>
</def-item>
<def-item>
<term>HG</term>
<def>
<p>horse gram</p>
</def>
</def-item>
<def-item>
<term>KC</term>
<def>
<p>black chickpea</p>
</def>
</def-item>
<def-item>
<term>LA</term>
<def>
<p>lactic acid</p>
</def>
</def-item>
<def-item>
<term>LAB</term>
<def>
<p>lactic acid bacteria</p>
</def>
</def-item>
<def-item>
<term>LB</term>
<def>
<p>lima bean</p>
</def>
</def-item>
<def-item>
<term>MH</term>
<def>
<p>Mueller–Hinton</p>
</def>
</def-item>
<def-item>
<term>MRS</term>
<def>
<p>de Man, Rogosa, and Sharpe</p>
</def>
</def-item>
<def-item>
<term>PA</term>
<def>
<p>propionic acid</p>
</def>
</def-item>
<def-item>
<term>SBs</term>
<def>
<p>soybeans</p>
</def>
</def-item>
<def-item>
<term>SCFAs</term>
<def>
<p>short-chain fatty acids</p>
</def>
</def-item>
<def-item>
<term>SEM</term>
<def>
<p>scanning electron microscopy</p>
</def>
</def-item>
<def-item>
<term>SSF</term>
<def>
<p>solid-state fermentation</p>
</def>
</def-item>
<def-item>
<term>WCB</term>
<def>
<p>whole cell biomass</p>
</def>
</def-item>
<def-item>
<term>WKB</term>
<def>
<p>white kidney bean</p>
</def>
</def-item>
<def-item>
<term>YP</term>
<def>
<p>yellow pea</p>
</def>
</def-item>
</def-list>
</glossary>
<sec id="s5">
<title>Declarations</title>
<sec id="t-5-1">
<title>Disclaimer</title>
<p>Declaration of generative AI and AI-assisted technologies in the writing process: During manuscript preparation, the authors used Paperpal (Editage) to enhance language clarity and grammar. Following this assistance, all content was carefully reviewed and revised by the authors, who take full responsibility for the final published version.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="t-5-2">
<title>Acknowledgments</title>
<p>The authors express their sincere gratitude to Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be) University for institutional support throughout this study. The authors also acknowledge the Department of Biotechnology, Government of India, for infrastructural support provided under the DBT-Builder Scheme (Grant No. BT/INF/22/SP41297/2021).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="t-5-3">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>AR: Conceptualization, Methodology, Formal analysis, Investigation, Visualization, Writing—original draft, Writing—review &amp; editing. RB: Conceptualization, Resources, Validation, Supervision, Writing—review &amp; editing. Both authors read and approved the submitted version.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="t-5-4" sec-type="COI-statement">
<title>Conflicts of interest</title>
<p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="t-5-5">
<title>Ethical approval</title>
<p>Not applicable.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="t-5-6">
<title>Consent to participate</title>
<p>Not applicable.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="t-5-7">
<title>Consent to publication</title>
<p>Not applicable.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="t-5-8" sec-type="data-availability">
<title>Availability of data and materials</title>
<p>The raw data supporting the conclusions of this manuscript will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation, to any qualified researcher.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="t-5-9">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>This work did not receive any specific grant for the conduct of the study.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="t-5-10">
<title>Copyright</title>
<p>© The Author(s) 2026.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s6">
<title>Publisher’s note</title>
<p>Open Exploration maintains a neutral stance on jurisdictional claims in published institutional affiliations and maps. All opinions expressed in this article are the personal views of the author(s) and do not represent the stance of the editorial team or the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<label>1</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Náthia-Neves</surname>
<given-names>G</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Getachew</surname>
<given-names>AT</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Santana</surname>
<given-names>ÁL</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jacobsen</surname>
<given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Legume Proteins in Food Products: Extraction Techniques, Functional Properties, and Current Challenges</article-title>
<source>Foods</source>
<year iso-8601-date="2025">2025</year>
<volume>14</volume>
<elocation-id>1626</elocation-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/foods14091626</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">40361707</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">PMC12071647</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<label>2</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yanni</surname>
<given-names>AE</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Iakovidi</surname>
<given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vasilikopoulou</surname>
<given-names>E</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Karathanos</surname>
<given-names>VT</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Legumes: A Vehicle for Transition to Sustainability</article-title>
<source>Nutrients</source>
<year iso-8601-date="2023">2023</year>
<volume>16</volume>
<elocation-id>98</elocation-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/nu16010098</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">38201928</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">PMC10780344</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<label>3</label>
<element-citation publication-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Maphosa</surname>
<given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jideani</surname>
<given-names>VA</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>The Role of Legumes in Human Nutrition</article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname>Hueda</surname>
<given-names>MC</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source>Functional Food - Improve Health through Adequate Food</source>
<comment>IntechOpen; 2017.</comment>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5772/intechopen.69127</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<label>4</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Khrisanapant</surname>
<given-names>P</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kebede</surname>
<given-names>B</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Leong</surname>
<given-names>SY</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Oey</surname>
<given-names>I</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>A Comprehensive Characterisation of Volatile and Fatty Acid Profiles of Legume Seeds</article-title>
<source>Foods</source>
<year iso-8601-date="2019">2019</year>
<volume>8</volume>
<elocation-id>651</elocation-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/foods8120651</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31817745</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">PMC6963610</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<label>5</label>
<element-citation publication-type="web">
<article-title>Ask the Expert: Legumes and Resistant Starch [Internet]</article-title>
<comment>Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health; c2026 [cited 2026 Feb 3]. Available from: <uri xlink:href="https://nutritionsource.hsph.harvard.edu/2015/11/16/ask-the-expert-legumes-and-resistant-starch/">https://nutritionsource.hsph.harvard.edu/2015/11/16/ask-the-expert-legumes-and-resistant-starch/</uri></comment>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<label>6</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mishra</surname>
<given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tripathi</surname>
<given-names>MK</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tripathi</surname>
<given-names>N</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Singh</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tiwari</surname>
<given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Nutritional and Anti-Nutritional Factors in Soybean</article-title>
<source>Act Scie Agri</source>
<year iso-8601-date="2024">2024</year>
<volume>8</volume>
<fpage>46</fpage>
<lpage>63</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.31080/asag.2024.08.1432</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<label>7</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Senanayake</surname>
<given-names>D</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Torley</surname>
<given-names>PJ</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chandrapala</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Terefe</surname>
<given-names>NS</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Microbial Fermentation for Improving the Sensory, Nutritional and Functional Attributes of Legumes</article-title>
<source>Fermentation</source>
<year iso-8601-date="2023">2023</year>
<volume>9</volume>
<elocation-id>635</elocation-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/fermentation9070635</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<label>8</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Aguirre-Garcia</surname>
<given-names>YL</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nery-Flores</surname>
<given-names>SD</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Campos-Muzquiz</surname>
<given-names>LG</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Flores-Gallegos</surname>
<given-names>AC</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Palomo-Ligas</surname>
<given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ascacio-Valdés</surname>
<given-names>JA</given-names>
</name>
<etal>et al.</etal>
</person-group>
<article-title>Lactic Acid Fermentation in the Food Industry and Bio-Preservation of Food</article-title>
<source>Fermentation</source>
<year iso-8601-date="2024">2024</year>
<volume>10</volume>
<elocation-id>168</elocation-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/fermentation10030168</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<label>9</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chiacchio</surname>
<given-names>MF</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tagliamonte</surname>
<given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pazzanese</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vitaglione</surname>
<given-names>P</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Blaiotta</surname>
<given-names>G</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Lactic acid fermentation improves nutritional and functional properties of chickpea flours</article-title>
<source>Food Res Int</source>
<year iso-8601-date="2025">2025</year>
<volume>203</volume>
<elocation-id>115899</elocation-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foodres.2025.115899</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">40022406</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<label>10</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hati</surname>
<given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Patel</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mishra</surname>
<given-names>BK</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Das</surname>
<given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Short-chain fatty acid and vitamin production potentials of <italic>Lactobacillus</italic> isolated from fermented foods of Khasi Tribes, Meghalaya, India</article-title>
<source>Ann Microbiol</source>
<year iso-8601-date="2019">2019</year>
<volume>69</volume>
<fpage>1191</fpage>
<lpage>9</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s13213-019-01500-8</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<label>11</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>López-Gómez</surname>
<given-names>JP</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Venus</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Potential Role of Sequential Solid-State and Submerged-Liquid Fermentations in a Circular Bioeconomy</article-title>
<source>Fermentation</source>
<year iso-8601-date="2021">2021</year>
<volume>7</volume>
<elocation-id>76</elocation-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/fermentation7020076</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<label>12</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Tolpeznikaite</surname>
<given-names>E</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bartkevics</surname>
<given-names>V</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Skrastina</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pavlenko</surname>
<given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ruzauskas</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Starkute</surname>
<given-names>V</given-names>
</name>
<etal>et al.</etal>
</person-group>
<article-title>Submerged and Solid-State Fermentation of Spirulina with Lactic Acid Bacteria Strains: Antimicrobial Properties and the Formation of Bioactive Compounds of Protein Origin</article-title>
<source>Biology (Basel)</source>
<year iso-8601-date="2023">2023</year>
<volume>12</volume>
<elocation-id>248</elocation-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/biology12020248</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">36829524</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">PMC9952912</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<label>13</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname>
<given-names>X</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Han</surname>
<given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname>
<given-names>G</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Solid-state fermentation by <italic>Lactiplantibacillus plantarum</italic> improves the active ingredients levels and physiological activities of <italic>Artemisia argyi</italic> leaves</article-title>
<source>Ind Crops Prod</source>
<year iso-8601-date="2025">2025</year>
<volume>228</volume>
<elocation-id>120898</elocation-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.indcrop.2025.120898</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<label>14</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Naureen</surname>
<given-names>Z</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bonetti</surname>
<given-names>G</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Medori</surname>
<given-names>MC</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Aquilanti</surname>
<given-names>B</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Velluti</surname>
<given-names>V</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Matera</surname>
<given-names>G</given-names>
</name>
<etal>et al.</etal>
</person-group>
<article-title>Foods of the Mediterranean diet: garlic and Mediterranean legumes</article-title>
<source>J Prev Med Hyg</source>
<year iso-8601-date="2022">2022</year>
<volume>63</volume>
<fpage>E12</fpage>
<lpage>20</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.15167/2421-4248/jpmh2022.63.2S3.2741</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">36479501</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">PMC9710409</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<label>15</label>
<element-citation publication-type="web">
<article-title>FoodData Central [Internet]</article-title>
<comment>U.S. Department of Agriculture; [cited 2026 Feb 3]. Available from: <uri xlink:href="https://fdc.nal.usda.gov/">https://fdc.nal.usda.gov/</uri></comment>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<label>16</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Gulia</surname>
<given-names>V</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Singh</surname>
<given-names>Dhull S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Beniwal</surname>
<given-names>D</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Deepali</surname>
<given-names>D</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sangwan</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rani</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Legumes and their role in linking nutrition, sustainability and veganism</article-title>
<source>Int J Veg Sci</source>
<year iso-8601-date="2025">2025</year>
<volume>31</volume>
<fpage>593</fpage>
<lpage>611</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/19315260.2025.2496739</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<label>17</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kang</surname>
<given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kim</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Park</surname>
<given-names>HM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kim</surname>
<given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Paek</surname>
<given-names>N</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Antioxidant activity and short-chain fatty acid production of lactic acid bacteria isolated from Korean individuals and fermented foods</article-title>
<source>3 Biotech</source>
<year iso-8601-date="2021">2021</year>
<volume>11</volume>
<elocation-id>217</elocation-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s13205-021-02767-y</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33936926</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">PMC8050147</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<label>18</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Fusco</surname>
<given-names>W</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lorenzo</surname>
<given-names>MB</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cintoni</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Porcari</surname>
<given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rinninella</surname>
<given-names>E</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kaitsas</surname>
<given-names>F</given-names>
</name>
<etal>et al.</etal>
</person-group>
<article-title>Short-Chain Fatty-Acid-Producing Bacteria: Key Components of the Human Gut Microbiota</article-title>
<source>Nutrients</source>
<year iso-8601-date="2023">2023</year>
<volume>15</volume>
<elocation-id>2211</elocation-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/nu15092211</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">37432351</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">PMC10180739</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<label>19</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Thivya</surname>
<given-names>P</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bhanu</surname>
<given-names>Prakash Reddy N</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Deotale</surname>
<given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vanmathi</surname>
<given-names>Mugasundari A</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Fermentation of Pseudocereals: Exposing Innovative Prospects in the Development of Plant-Based Dairy Alternatives</article-title>
<source>Food Rev Int</source>
<year iso-8601-date="2025">2025</year>
<volume>42</volume>
<fpage>920</fpage>
<lpage>56</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/87559129.2025.2507156</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<label>20</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Teixeira-Guedes</surname>
<given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sánchez-Moya</surname>
<given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pereira-Wilson</surname>
<given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ros-Berruezo</surname>
<given-names>G</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>López-Nicolás</surname>
<given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>In Vitro Modulation of Gut Microbiota and Metabolism by Cooked Cowpea and Black Bean</article-title>
<source>Foods</source>
<year iso-8601-date="2020">2020</year>
<volume>9</volume>
<elocation-id>861</elocation-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/foods9070861</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32630276</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">PMC7404724</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<label>21</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bartkiene</surname>
<given-names>E</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Krungleviciute</surname>
<given-names>V</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Juodeikiene</surname>
<given-names>G</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vidmantiene</surname>
<given-names>D</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Maknickiene</surname>
<given-names>Z</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Solid state fermentation with lactic acid bacteria to improve the nutritional quality of lupin and soya bean</article-title>
<source>J Sci Food Agric</source>
<year iso-8601-date="2015">2015</year>
<volume>95</volume>
<fpage>1336</fpage>
<lpage>42</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/jsfa.6827</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25042749</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<label>22</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Tong</surname>
<given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Abbas</surname>
<given-names>Z</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname>
<given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Si</surname>
<given-names>D</given-names>
</name>
<etal>et al.</etal>
</person-group>
<article-title>Antimicrobial activity and mechanism of novel postbiotics against foodborne pathogens</article-title>
<source>LWT</source>
<year iso-8601-date="2025">2025</year>
<volume>217</volume>
<elocation-id>117464</elocation-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.lwt.2025.117464</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<label>23</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zapaśnik</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sokołowska</surname>
<given-names>B</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bryła</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Role of Lactic Acid Bacteria in Food Preservation and Safety</article-title>
<source>Foods</source>
<year iso-8601-date="2022">2022</year>
<volume>11</volume>
<elocation-id>1283</elocation-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/foods11091283</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35564005</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">PMC9099756</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<label>24</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bhola</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bhadekar</surname>
<given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Invitro synergistic activity of lactic acid bacteria against multi-drug resistant staphylococci</article-title>
<source>BMC Complement Altern Med</source>
<year iso-8601-date="2019">2019</year>
<volume>19</volume>
<elocation-id>70</elocation-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12906-019-2470-3</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30890126</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">PMC6425562</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<label>25</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bhola</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bhadekar</surname>
<given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Prebiotic effect of daily dietary polyphenols and oligosaccharides on <italic>lactobacillus</italic> species</article-title>
<source>Bioact Carbohydr Diet Fibre</source>
<year iso-8601-date="2024">2024</year>
<volume>31</volume>
<elocation-id>100407</elocation-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.bcdf.2024.100407</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<label>26</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bhola</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bhadekar</surname>
<given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>
<italic>In vitro</italic> exploration of the multi-functional dermatological benefits of a <italic>Lactobacillus</italic>-turmeric synbiotic</article-title>
<source>Microbe</source>
<year iso-8601-date="2025">2025</year>
<volume>6</volume>
<elocation-id>100242</elocation-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.microb.2025.100242</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<label>27</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Śliżewska</surname>
<given-names>K</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chlebicz-Wójcik</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Growth Kinetics of Probiotic <italic>Lactobacillus</italic> Strains in the Alternative, Cost-Efficient Semi-Solid Fermentation Medium</article-title>
<source>Biology (Basel)</source>
<year iso-8601-date="2020">2020</year>
<volume>9</volume>
<elocation-id>423</elocation-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/biology9120423</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33260858</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">PMC7760101</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<label>28</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lin</surname>
<given-names>E</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cheng</surname>
<given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hsiao</surname>
<given-names>FS</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Proskura</surname>
<given-names>WS</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dybus</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yu</surname>
<given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Optimization of solid-state fermentation conditions of <italic>Bacillus licheniformis</italic> and its effects on Clostridium perfringens-induced necrotic enteritis in broilers</article-title>
<source>R Bras Zootec</source>
<year iso-8601-date="2019">2019</year>
<volume>48</volume>
<elocation-id>e20170298</elocation-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1590/rbz4820170298</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<label>29</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kyereh</surname>
<given-names>E</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sathivel</surname>
<given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Viability of <italic>Lactobacillus plantarum</italic> NCIMB 8826 immobilized in a cereal-legume complementary food “weanimix” with simulated gastrointestinal conditions</article-title>
<source>Food Biosci</source>
<year iso-8601-date="2021">2021</year>
<volume>40</volume>
<elocation-id>100848</elocation-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fbio.2020.100848</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<label>30</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kulshreshtha</surname>
<given-names>NM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kumar</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bisht</surname>
<given-names>G</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pasha</surname>
<given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kumar</surname>
<given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Usefulness of organic acid produced by Exiguobacterium sp. 12/1 on neutralization of alkaline wastewater</article-title>
<source>Sci World J</source>
<year iso-8601-date="2012">2012</year>
<volume>2012</volume>
<elocation-id>345101</elocation-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1100/2012/345101</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22666107</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">PMC3361193</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<label>31</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Albawarshi</surname>
<given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Amr</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Al-Ismail</surname>
<given-names>K</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shahein</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Majdalawi</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Saleh</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<etal>et al.</etal>
</person-group>
<article-title>Simultaneous Determination of B1, B2, B3, B6, B9, and B12 Vitamins in Premix and Fortified Flour Using HPLC/DAD: Effect of Detection Wavelength</article-title>
<source>J Food Qual</source>
<year iso-8601-date="2022">2022</year>
<volume>2022</volume>
<fpage>1</fpage>
<lpage>11</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1155/2022/9065154</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<label>32</label>
<element-citation publication-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ammar</surname>
<given-names>OF</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source>Preparation of bacteria for Scanning Electron Microscope and common reagents preparation protocols</source>
<comment>2017.</comment>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.13140/RG.2.2.16802.84160</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<label>33</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sosulski</surname>
<given-names>FW</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Elkowicz</surname>
<given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Reichert</surname>
<given-names>RD</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Oligosaccharides in Eleven Legumes and Their Air-Classified Protein and Starch Fractions</article-title>
<source>J Food Sci</source>
<year iso-8601-date="1982">1982</year>
<volume>47</volume>
<fpage>498</fpage>
<lpage>502</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2621.1982.tb10111.x</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<label>34</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Stevenson</surname>
<given-names>DG</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Doorenbos</surname>
<given-names>RK</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jane</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Inglett</surname>
<given-names>GE</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Structures and Functional Properties of Starch From Seeds of Three Soybean (<italic>Glycine max</italic> (L.) Merr.) Varieties*</article-title>
<source>Starch Stärke</source>
<year iso-8601-date="2006">2006</year>
<volume>58</volume>
<fpage>509</fpage>
<lpage>19</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/star.200600534</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<label>35</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname>
<given-names>D</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>W</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wan</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hu</surname>
<given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gan</surname>
<given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zou</surname>
<given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>A Comprehensive Review of Pea (<italic>Pisum sativum</italic> L.): Chemical Composition, Processing, Health Benefits, and Food Applications</article-title>
<source>Foods</source>
<year iso-8601-date="2023">2023</year>
<volume>12</volume>
<elocation-id>2527</elocation-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/foods12132527</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">37444265</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">PMC10341148</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<label>36</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Singh</surname>
<given-names>B</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sharma</surname>
<given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Vitamin B12 Production by Lactobacillus Species Isolated from Milk Products</article-title>
<source>J Res Appl Sci Biotechnol</source>
<year iso-8601-date="2022">2022</year>
<volume>1</volume>
<fpage>48</fpage>
<lpage>59</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.55544/jrasb.1.2.6</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B37">
<label>37</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ribeiro</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Maciel</surname>
<given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cruz</surname>
<given-names>P</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Darmancier</surname>
<given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nogueira</surname>
<given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Costa</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<etal>et al.</etal>
</person-group>
<article-title>Exploiting Potential Probiotic Lactic Acid Bacteria Isolated from <italic>Chlorella vulgaris</italic> Photobioreactors as Promising Vitamin B12 Producers</article-title>
<source>Foods</source>
<year iso-8601-date="2023">2023</year>
<volume>12</volume>
<elocation-id>3277</elocation-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/foods12173277</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">37685210</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">PMC10486965</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B38">
<label>38</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Das</surname>
<given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mishra</surname>
<given-names>B</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hati</surname>
<given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Impact of <italic>Lactobacillus</italic> cultures on production of B-vitamins, organic acids and biotransformation of soy isoflavones</article-title>
<source>AAlim</source>
<year iso-8601-date="2021">2021</year>
<volume>50</volume>
<fpage>125</fpage>
<lpage>35</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1556/066.2020.00199</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B39">
<label>39</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Cichońska</surname>
<given-names>P</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ziarno</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Legumes and Legume-Based Beverages Fermented with Lactic Acid Bacteria as a Potential Carrier of Probiotics and Prebiotics</article-title>
<source>Microorganisms</source>
<year iso-8601-date="2021">2021</year>
<volume>10</volume>
<elocation-id>91</elocation-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/microorganisms10010091</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35056540</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">PMC8779895</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B40">
<label>40</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>De</surname>
<given-names>Pasquale I</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pontonio</surname>
<given-names>E</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gobbetti</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rizzello</surname>
<given-names>CG</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Nutritional and functional effects of the lactic acid bacteria fermentation on gelatinized legume flours</article-title>
<source>Int J Food Microbiol</source>
<year iso-8601-date="2020">2020</year>
<volume>316</volume>
<elocation-id>108426</elocation-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2019.108426</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31722270</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B41">
<label>41</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Rodríguez</surname>
<given-names>de Olmos A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Garro</surname>
<given-names>MS</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Metabolic profile of <italic>Lactobacillus paracasei</italic> subsp. paracasei CRL 207 in solid state fermentation using commercial soybean meal</article-title>
<source>Food Biosci</source>
<year iso-8601-date="2020">2020</year>
<volume>35</volume>
<elocation-id>100584</elocation-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fbio.2020.100584</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B42">
<label>42</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mockus</surname>
<given-names>E</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zokaityte</surname>
<given-names>E</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Starkute</surname>
<given-names>V</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Klupsaite</surname>
<given-names>D</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ruibys</surname>
<given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rocha</surname>
<given-names>JM</given-names>
</name>
<etal>et al.</etal>
</person-group>
<article-title>Influence of different lactic acid bacteria strains and milling process on the solid-state fermented green and red lentils (<italic>Lens culinaris</italic> L.) properties including gamma-aminobutyric acid formation</article-title>
<source>Front Nutr</source>
<year iso-8601-date="2023">2023</year>
<volume>10</volume>
<elocation-id>1118710</elocation-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fnut.2023.1118710</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">37125035</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">PMC10133501</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B43">
<label>43</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Xue</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ji</surname>
<given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sun</surname>
<given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gao</surname>
<given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname>
<given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
<etal>et al.</etal>
</person-group>
<article-title>Effect of microbial fermentation on the quality of soybean meal</article-title>
<source>Int J of Food Sci Tech</source>
<year iso-8601-date="2023">2023</year>
<volume>59</volume>
<fpage>72</fpage>
<lpage>83</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/ijfs.16817</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B44">
<label>44</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shi</surname>
<given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Su</surname>
<given-names>W</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jin</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname>
<given-names>B</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hao</surname>
<given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
<etal>et al.</etal>
</person-group>
<article-title>Dynamics of the Physicochemical Characteristics, Microbiota, and Metabolic Functions of Soybean Meal and Corn Mixed Substrates during Two-Stage Solid-State Fermentation</article-title>
<source>mSystems</source>
<year iso-8601-date="2020">2020</year>
<volume>5</volume>
<fpage>e00501</fpage>
<lpage>19</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/mSystems.00501-19</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32047057</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">PMC7018524</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B45">
<label>45</label>
<element-citation publication-type="web">
<article-title>Verbascose [Internet]</article-title>
<comment>Laboratory Notes; c2026 [cited 2026 Feb 3]. Available from: <uri xlink:href="https://www.laboratorynotes.com/verbascose/">https://www.laboratorynotes.com/verbascose/</uri></comment>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B46">
<label>46</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>An</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sun</surname>
<given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dai</surname>
<given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ge</surname>
<given-names>G</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>Z</given-names>
</name>
<etal>et al.</etal>
</person-group>
<article-title>Influences of Growth Stage and Ensiling Time on Fermentation Characteristics, Nitrite, and Bacterial Communities during Ensiling of Alfalfa</article-title>
<source>Plants (Basel)</source>
<year iso-8601-date="2023">2023</year>
<volume>13</volume>
<elocation-id>84</elocation-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/plants13010084</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">38202392</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">PMC10780930</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B47">
<label>47</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Abdulla</surname>
<given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Derman</surname>
<given-names>E</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Balasubramaniam</surname>
<given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gansau</surname>
<given-names>JA</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chandel</surname>
<given-names>AK</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Bioconversion of Oil Palm Empty Fruit Bunches into Lactic Acid via <italic>Lactobacillus acidophilus</italic></article-title>
<source>Waste Biomass Valor</source>
<year iso-8601-date="2025">2025</year>
<volume>16</volume>
<fpage>4955</fpage>
<lpage>67</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s12649-025-02950-9</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B48">
<label>48</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname>
<given-names>Q</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>B</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>G</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shi</surname>
<given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Effect of <italic>Bacillus subtilis</italic> and <italic>Lactobacillus plantarum</italic> on solid-state fermentation of soybean meal</article-title>
<source>J Sci Food Agric</source>
<year iso-8601-date="2023">2023</year>
<volume>103</volume>
<fpage>6070</fpage>
<lpage>9</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/jsfa.12683</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">37140367</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B49">
<label>49</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hadinia</surname>
<given-names>N</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Edalatian</surname>
<given-names>Dovom MR</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yavarmanesh</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>The effect of fermentation conditions (temperature, salt concentration, and pH) with lactobacillus strains for producing Short Chain Fatty Acids</article-title>
<source>LWT</source>
<year iso-8601-date="2022">2022</year>
<volume>165</volume>
<elocation-id>113709</elocation-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.lwt.2022.113709</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B50">
<label>50</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Maryati</surname>
<given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nuraida</surname>
<given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hariyadi</surname>
<given-names>RD</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Production of Organic Acid and Short-Chain Fatty Acids (SCFA) from Lactic Acid Bacteria Isolate on Oligosaccharide Media</article-title>
<source>J Kim Sains Apl</source>
<year iso-8601-date="2021">2021</year>
<volume>24</volume>
<fpage>213</fpage>
<lpage>21</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.14710/jksa.24.6.213-221</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B51">
<label>51</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ma</surname>
<given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Deng</surname>
<given-names>Q</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Du</surname>
<given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ren</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname>
<given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>X</given-names>
</name>
<etal>et al.</etal>
</person-group>
<article-title>Biosynthetic Pathway for Ethyl Butyrate Production in <italic>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</italic></article-title>
<source>J Agric Food Chem</source>
<year iso-8601-date="2020">2020</year>
<volume>68</volume>
<fpage>4252</fpage>
<lpage>60</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/acs.jafc.0c00750</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32186186</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B52">
<label>52</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wijayanti</surname>
<given-names>AA</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wikandari</surname>
<given-names>PR</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Potency of fermented jicama extract cultured with <italic>Lactobacillus plantarum</italic> B1765 for producing short chain fatty acid</article-title>
<source>J Pijar MIPA</source>
<year iso-8601-date="2023">2023</year>
<volume>18</volume>
<fpage>822</fpage>
<lpage>8</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.29303/jpm.v18i5.5457</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B53">
<label>53</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ozcan</surname>
<given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Eroglu</surname>
<given-names>E</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Effect of stevia and inulin interactions on fermentation profile and short‐chain fatty acid production of <italic>Lactobacillus acidophilus</italic> in milk and <italic>in vitro</italic> systems</article-title>
<source>Int J of Dairy Tech</source>
<year iso-8601-date="2021">2021</year>
<volume>75</volume>
<fpage>171</fpage>
<lpage>81</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/1471-0307.12814</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B54">
<label>54</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Insani</surname>
<given-names>YR</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wikandari</surname>
<given-names>PR</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Potential Fermentation of Sweet Potato Pickle (<italic>Ipomoea batatas L.</italic>) with Lactobacillus plantarum B1765 in the Production of Short Chain Fatty Acids</article-title>
<source>J Pijar MIPA</source>
<year iso-8601-date="2024">2024</year>
<volume>19</volume>
<fpage>840</fpage>
<lpage>5</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.29303/jpm.v19i5.7285</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B55">
<label>55</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Qayyum</surname>
<given-names>N</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shuxuan</surname>
<given-names>W</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yantin</surname>
<given-names>Q</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ruiling</surname>
<given-names>W</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ismael</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<etal>et al.</etal>
</person-group>
<article-title>Characterization of Short-chain fatty acid-producing and cholesterol assimilation potential probiotic Lactic acid bacteria from Chinese fermented rice</article-title>
<source>Food Biosci</source>
<year iso-8601-date="2023">2023</year>
<volume>52</volume>
<elocation-id>102404</elocation-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fbio.2023.102404</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B56">
<label>56</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Rana</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Taneja</surname>
<given-names>NK</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Singh</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dhewa</surname>
<given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kumar</surname>
<given-names>V</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kumar</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<etal>et al.</etal>
</person-group>
<article-title>Synergistic fermentation of vitamin B2 (riboflavin) bio-enriched soy milk: optimization and techno-functional characterization of next generation functional vegan foods</article-title>
<source>Discov Food</source>
<year iso-8601-date="2025">2025</year>
<volume>5</volume>
<elocation-id>10</elocation-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s44187-025-00269-x</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B57">
<label>57</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ghosh</surname>
<given-names>D</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chattopadhyay</surname>
<given-names>P</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Preparation of idli batter, its properties and nutritional improvement during fermentation</article-title>
<source>J Food Sci Technol</source>
<year iso-8601-date="2011">2011</year>
<volume>48</volume>
<fpage>610</fpage>
<lpage>5</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s13197-010-0148-4</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23572795</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">PMC3551127</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B58">
<label>58</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Stumpf</surname>
<given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schildbach</surname>
<given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Coffey</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Obtaining Novel Vitamin B12 Production Strains Acetobacter malorum HFD 3141 and <italic>Acetobacter orientalis</italic> HFD 3031 from Home-Fermented Sourdough</article-title>
<source>Appl Microbiol</source>
<year iso-8601-date="2024">2024</year>
<volume>4</volume>
<fpage>986</fpage>
<lpage>99</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/applmicrobiol4030067</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B59">
<label>59</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Meng</surname>
<given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>G</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fan</surname>
<given-names>X</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Qiao</surname>
<given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<etal>et al.</etal>
</person-group>
<article-title>The nutrient requirements of <italic>Lactobacillus acidophilus</italic> LA-5 and their application to fermented milk</article-title>
<source>J Dairy Sci</source>
<year iso-8601-date="2021">2021</year>
<volume>104</volume>
<fpage>138</fpage>
<lpage>50</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3168/jds.2020-18953</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33131816</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B60">
<label>60</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Rodríguez-Sánchez</surname>
<given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ramos</surname>
<given-names>IM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rodríguez-Pérez</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Poveda</surname>
<given-names>JM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Seseña</surname>
<given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Palop</surname>
<given-names>ML</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Lactic acid bacteria as biocontrol agents to reduce <italic>Staphylococcus aureus</italic> growth, enterotoxin production and virulence gene expression</article-title>
<source>LWT</source>
<year iso-8601-date="2022">2022</year>
<volume>170</volume>
<elocation-id>114025</elocation-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.lwt.2022.114025</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B61">
<label>61</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hayati</surname>
<given-names>F</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yuliana</surname>
<given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rialita</surname>
<given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Antimicrobial activity of bacteriocin like inhibitory substance (BLIS) and lactic acid bacteria (LAB) isolated from traditional fermented buffalo milk from West Sumatra, Indonesia</article-title>
<source>IOP Conf Ser: Earth Environ Sci</source>
<year iso-8601-date="2021">2021</year>
<volume>924</volume>
<elocation-id>012082</elocation-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1088/1755-1315/924/1/012082</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B62">
<label>62</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wei</surname>
<given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shang</surname>
<given-names>N</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>P</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Synergistic Inhibition of Plantaricin E/F and Lactic Acid Against <italic>Aeromonas hydrophila</italic> LPL-1 Reveals the Novel Potential of Class IIb Bacteriocin</article-title>
<source>Front Microbiol</source>
<year iso-8601-date="2022">2022</year>
<volume>13</volume>
<elocation-id>774184</elocation-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2022.774184</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35242114</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">PMC8886044</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B63">
<label>63</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Budryn</surname>
<given-names>G</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Klewicka</surname>
<given-names>E</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Grzelczyk</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gałązka-Czarnecka</surname>
<given-names>I</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mostowski</surname>
<given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Lactic acid fermentation of legume seed sprouts as a method of increasing the content of isoflavones and reducing microbial contamination</article-title>
<source>Food Chem</source>
<year iso-8601-date="2019">2019</year>
<volume>285</volume>
<fpage>478</fpage>
<lpage>84</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.01.178</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30797373</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B64">
<label>64</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ricci</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bernini</surname>
<given-names>V</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tedeschi</surname>
<given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zanardi</surname>
<given-names>E</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Neviani</surname>
<given-names>E</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lazzi</surname>
<given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Exploring the fermentation of bean by-products as a source of antimicrobials</article-title>
<source>Food Biosci</source>
<year iso-8601-date="2025">2025</year>
<volume>64</volume>
<elocation-id>105823</elocation-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fbio.2024.105823</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B65">
<label>65</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Makut</surname>
<given-names>MD</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Emelogu</surname>
<given-names>NJ</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ekeleme</surname>
<given-names>IK</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Owuna</surname>
<given-names>JE</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Alfa</surname>
<given-names>UF</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Antimicrobial activity of lactic acid bacteria isolated from locally fermented cow milk products sold in Keffi, Nigeria on clinical bacteria</article-title>
<source>GSC Adv Res Rev</source>
<year iso-8601-date="2021">2021</year>
<volume>8</volume>
<fpage>78</fpage>
<lpage>84</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.30574/gscarr.2021.8.2.0165</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B66">
<label>66</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Toor</surname>
<given-names>BS</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kaur</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kaur</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Fermentation of legumes with <italic>Rhizopus oligosporus</italic>: effect on physicochemical, functional and microstructural properties</article-title>
<source>Int J of Food Sci Tech</source>
<year iso-8601-date="2022">2022</year>
<volume>57</volume>
<fpage>1763</fpage>
<lpage>72</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/ijfs.15552</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B67">
<label>67</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sisto</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lavermicocca</surname>
<given-names>P</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Suitability of a probiotic <italic>Lactobacillus paracasei</italic> strain as a starter culture in olive fermentation and development of the innovative patented product “probiotic table olives”</article-title>
<source>Front Microbiol</source>
<year iso-8601-date="2012">2012</year>
<volume>3</volume>
<elocation-id>174</elocation-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2012.00174</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22586426</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">PMC3347039</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B68">
<label>68</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yao</surname>
<given-names>P</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Esah</surname>
<given-names>EM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname>
<given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Regulatory mechanisms and applications of <italic>Lactobacillus</italic> biofilms in the food industry</article-title>
<source>Front Microbiol</source>
<year iso-8601-date="2025">2025</year>
<volume>15</volume>
<elocation-id>1465373</elocation-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2024.1465373</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">39845052</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">PMC11753222</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>