﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.1 20151215//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">Explor Foods Foodomics</journal-id>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">EFF</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Exploration of Foods and Foodomics</journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">2837-9020</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Open Exploration Publishing</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.37349/eff.2026.1010187</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="manuscript">1010187</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Article</subject>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Biotyping and antibiotic susceptibility of animal streptococci from raw/thermized milks of native Epirus sheep breeds</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4921-5649</contrib-id>
<name>
<surname>Samelis</surname>
<given-names>John</given-names>
</name>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/">Conceptualization</role>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/">Formal analysis</role>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/">Methodology</role>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/validation/">Validation</role>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/resources/">Resources</role>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/">Data curation</role>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/project-administration/">Project administration</role>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/">Writing—original draft</role>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing—review &amp; editing</role>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/">Investigation</role>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/visualization/">Visualization</role>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="I1" />
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1">
<sup>*</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kakouri</surname>
<given-names>Athanasia</given-names>
</name>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/">Formal analysis</role>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/validation/">Validation</role>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing—review &amp; editing</role>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="I1" />
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="editor">
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>Xianhua</given-names>
</name>
<role>Academic Editor</role>
<aff>Tianjin University, China</aff>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="I1">Department of Dairy Research, Institute of Technology of Agricultural Products, Hellenic Agricultural Organization – DIMITRA, Katsikas, 45221 Ioannina, Greece</aff>
<author-notes>
<corresp id="cor1">
<bold>
<sup>*</sup>Correspondence:</bold> John Samelis, Department of Dairy Research, Institute of Technology of Agricultural Products, Hellenic Agricultural Organization – DIMITRA, Ethnikis Antistaseos 3, Katsikas, 45221 Ioannina, Greece. <email>jsam@otenet.gr</email></corresp>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2026</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>02</day>
<month>09</month>
<year>2026</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>4</volume>
<elocation-id>1010187</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>19</day>
<month>04</month>
<year>2026</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>27</day>
<month>07</month>
<year>2026</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>© The Author(s) 2026.</copyright-statement>
<license xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<license-p>This is an Open Access article licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link>), which permits unrestricted use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, for any purpose, even commercially, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.</license-p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<sec>
<title>Aim:</title>
<p id="absp-1">Animal streptococci surviving thermization of raw milk prior to traditional Greek cheese processing may include both harmless and potentially harmful strains with multiple antibiotic resistances. Therefore, the aims of this study were to biotype and evaluate the antibiotic resistance and primary technological and safety properties of wild streptococci occurring in Greek sheep milk before and after mild thermization.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Methods:</title>
<p id="absp-2">Sixteen <italic>Streptococcus</italic> isolates previously isolated from two raw/thermized (65<sup>o</sup>C; 30 s) counterpart milks of native Epirus sheep breeds and identified by 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene sequencing were biochemically characterized using conventional methods (phenotypic tests, sugar fermentation patterns, API 20 STREP and API ZYM profiles) and assessed for susceptibility to eight antibiotics by the disk diffusion method, and for their milk acidification capacity, bacteriocin activity, enzymatic activity profiles, and biogenic amine (BA) formation in vitro.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Results:</title>
<p id="absp-3">Tetracycline-resistant (57% of the total 7 isolates) <italic>Streptococcus parauberis</italic> and ciprofloxacin-resistant <italic>Streptococcus gallolyticus</italic> subsp. <italic>pasteurianus</italic> (1 isolate) and <italic>Streptococcus lutetiensis</italic> (2 isolates) strains occurring in raw milk were not recovered post-thermally. Instead, thermization selected for a tetracycline-resistant (50% of the total 6 isolates) thermophilic group previously genotyped as <italic>Streptococcus equinus</italic>, herein biotyped as <italic>Streptococcus pneumoniae.</italic> None of the <italic>Streptococcus</italic> isolates was resistant to ampicillin, chloramphenicol, erythromycin, gentamycin, penicillin, or vancomycin, or β-hemolytic, or produced histamine and tyramine. The milk acidifying activity rate (final skimmed milk pH 4.79 to 5.47 after growth at 37<sup>o</sup>C for 6 h, gradually decreasing to 22<sup>o</sup>C for a total of 48 h) of the isolates was species-dependent and increased in the order <italic>S. equinus</italic> &gt; <italic>S. gallolyticus</italic> &gt; <italic>S. lutetiensis</italic> &gt; <italic>S. parauberis</italic>.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Conclusions:</title>
<p id="absp-4">Except for the two bacteriocin-producing and α-galactosidase-positive <italic>S. lutetiensis</italic> antilisterial strains (KFM 55 and KFM 60), which show promise, all animal streptococci derived from Epirus sheep milk should be considered <italic>a priori</italic> unsafe for inclusion in complex natural cheese starter cultures because they belong to pathogenic, mastitis-causing species or subspecies. The two promising <italic>S. lutetiensis</italic> strains require further safety evaluations for streptococcal virulence and antibiotic resistance genes, mainly to ciprofloxacin, before their commercial use as natural cheese starters.</p>
</sec>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>sheep milk</kwd>
<kwd>thermization</kwd>
<kwd>antibiotic resistance</kwd>
<kwd>animal streptococci</kwd>
<kwd>
<italic>Streptococcus lutetiensis</italic>
</kwd>
<kwd>
<italic>S. parauberis</italic>
</kwd>
<kwd>
<italic>S. equinus</italic>
</kwd>
<kwd>
<italic>S. gallolyticus</italic>
</kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="s1">
<title>Introduction</title>
<p id="p-1">Thermization is the oldest and most commonly used empirical strategy to improve the microbiological quality of raw milk (RM) with minimum collateral heat damage to milk components and restricted undesirable changes in the flavor of milk and milk products compared to pasteurization [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">1</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">2</xref>]. Unlike pasteurization (72<sup>o</sup>C for 15 s or equivalent at 63<sup>o</sup>C for 30 min), thermization is not precisely defined by law but generally describes a wide range of subpasteurization (&lt; 72<sup>o</sup>C) treatments of RM (57 to 68<sup>o</sup>C for 5 s up to 30 min, but usually for 10 to 20 s) which do not cause complete inactivation of alkaline phosphatase [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">2</xref>–<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">4</xref>]. However, even mild thermization treatments markedly reduce the counts of spoilage, mainly psychrotrophic gram-negative bacteria (i.e., <italic>Pseudomonas</italic> and <italic>Enterobacteriaceae</italic>), and inactivate low counts or few cells of naturally occurring pathogenic (<italic>Salmonella</italic>, <italic>Escherichia coli</italic>, <italic>Yersinia enterocolitica</italic>, <italic>Staphylococcus aureus</italic>, <italic>Listeria monocytogenes</italic>) bacteria, without fully suppressing the technological RM microbiota primarily consisting of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">2</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">3</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">5</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">6</xref>].</p>
<p id="p-2">Altogether, the above beneficial effects explain why thermization is empirically preferred to pasteurization in the manufacture of traditional cheeses, either on the basis of national Protected Designation of Origin (PDO) cheese specifications [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">3</xref>] or to extend the keeping quality of milk during chilled storage prior to further processing [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">4</xref>], as it happens in many Greek dairies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">5</xref>]. The milder the thermization treatment, the lesser the negative impact of heat on milk quality (e.g., denaturation of whey proteins, loss of vitamins, inactivation of lipoprotein lipase and other enzymes involved in milk and cheese flavor development) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">2</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">3</xref>] and the higher the survival of the RM biota in thermized milk (TM), and thus, the greater the natural starter and non-starter LAB diversity in the resultant TM cheeses [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">4</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">5</xref>]. However, the technological benefits of thermization are contradicted by certain safety concerns, mainly its ineffectiveness against bacterial spores, and the possibility that some gram-positive, non-sporulating pathogens remain viable [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">3</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">4</xref>].</p>
<p id="p-3">Moreover, unavoidably, thermization selects for thermoduric RM bacterial contaminants, mainly <italic>Enterococcus</italic> and <italic>Streptococcus.</italic> This natural selective survival of enterococci and animal streptococci in TM [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">5</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">6</xref>], or their potential prevalence in RM cheeses [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">7</xref>] or in natural starter cultures (NSCs) derived from RM for use in traditional cheese production [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">8</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">9</xref>] should be a concern because of the controversial nature and role of these LAB genera in foods [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">10</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">11</xref>]. Indeed, numerous strains of <italic>Streptococcus</italic> and <italic>Enterococcus</italic> of animal, fecal, or clinical origin are opportunistic pathogens; they are virulent and antibiotic resistant (AR), can cause β-hemolysis, mastitis in ruminants and many different healthcare-associated infections in humans, and hence, may compromise the safety of RM/TM cheeses and other dairy products [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">12</xref>–<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">14</xref>]. In particular, certain species, or several strains within a species, of the thermophilic <italic>Streptococcus equinus/Streptococcus bovis</italic> (SESB) complex and of the mesophilic, pyogenic <italic>S. uberis</italic> group bearing virulence genes and multidrug resistance in response to veterinary treatments on farms [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">15</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">16</xref>] can be transferred to RM from teat-infected animals [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">17</xref>] and may survive in TM cheese to cause infection.</p>
<p id="p-4">On the other hand, certain species or subspecies of the SESB complex, as for instance <italic>Streptococcus gallolyticus</italic> subsp. <italic>macedonicus, S. infantarius</italic>, and <italic>Streptococcus lutetiensis</italic>, comprise multi-functional, safe and promising strains for dairy fermentations [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">18</xref>–<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">21</xref>]. However, despite their beneficial role in artisan cheeses, none of the above streptococci is Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS) or included in the Qualified Presumption of Safety (QPS) list of species, likewise the genus <italic>Enterococcus</italic> entirely [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">12</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">22</xref>]; a complete safety evaluation at the strain level is a prerequisite for their potential use in (dairy) foods, according to the current EFSA [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">22</xref>] recommendations. In this context, a novel strategy described by Chessa et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">8</xref>] to develop a freeze-dried NSC by keeping the entire LAB biota of Sardinian sheep RM resulted in a mixture of 33 distinct genotypes belonging to eight non-QPS species, <italic>E. faecium</italic>, <italic>E. durans</italic>, <italic>E. faecalis</italic>, <italic>S. gallolyticus</italic> subsp. <italic>macedonicus, S. equinus</italic>, <italic>S. lutetiensis</italic>, <italic>S. oralis</italic>, <italic>S. salivarius</italic>, and one QPS species, <italic>Lacticaseibacillus paracasei.</italic> Although all genotypes were considered safe for applying that complex NSC in cheese production [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">9</xref>], different RMs from sheep or other domestic animals may contain virulent or multidrug resistant (MDR) <italic>Enterococcus</italic>, <italic>Streptococcus</italic> or other non-QPS LAB strain contaminants, rendering the resultant NSC concentrates unsafe for use.</p>
<p id="p-5">Indeed, two RM batches from native Epirus sheep breeds displaying inherent antilisterial activity mainly attributed to safe, enterocin-producing <italic>E. faecium/E. durans</italic> strains also contained <italic>E. faecalis</italic> strains harboring virulence (<italic>gelE</italic>, <italic>ace</italic>) genes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">23</xref>]. Furthermore, controversial <italic>Streptococcus parauberis</italic> strains [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">14</xref>] were prevalent in one RM batch, suggesting that teat-infected sheep with subclinical mastitis were milked [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">23</xref>]. Because 14 distinct <italic>Enterococcus</italic> spp. strain biotypes, including those with single or multiple enterocin gene activity, became prevalent (83.7%) in the above milks post-thermally [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">6</xref>], evaluation of enterococci was prioritized in order to select the most suitable, antagonistic, antibiotic susceptible and safe strains for inclusion in a complex NSC; the isolation of vancomycin-resistant <italic>E. faecalis</italic> biotype 3B strains from TM was concerning [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">24</xref>]. Meanwhile, the increased survival (8.6%) in TM (65<sup>o</sup>C; 30 s) of potentially harmful thermophilic streptococci as opposed to the major declines of lactococci and mesophilic streptococci (22.8%) and leuconostocs (42.7%) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">6</xref>], required further investigations. However, unlike enterococci and lactococci [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">5</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">24</xref>], published data referring to the biochemical, molecular and technological characterization of streptococci found in milk of Greek native sheep breeds are very limited. In particular, no previous study has phenotypically characterized <italic>Streptococcus</italic> species from Epirus sheep milk for both safety and technological traits. Therefore, in this study, animal streptococci that coexisted with autochthonous enterococci in native Epirus breed sheep milk before or after thermization [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">24</xref>] were biotyped, biochemically evaluated for primary technological and safety properties, and their phenotypic AR was assessed. The final aim was to select candidate strains for inclusion in novel complex NSCs or as adjuncts in future traditional cheese-making studies.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2">
<title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="t2-1">
<title>Sheep milk isolates, reference strains and culture conditions</title>
<p id="p-6">Sixteen autochthonous <italic>Streptococcus</italic> spp. isolates originating from two batches of sheep milk of native Epirus breeds before (KFM isolates) and after (KTM isolates) thermization (65<sup>o</sup>C; 30 s), and previously identified at the species level by 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene sequencing [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">23</xref>], were selected for further study (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t1">Table 1</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap id="t1">
<label>Table 1</label>
<caption>
<p id="t1-p-1">
<bold>Animal streptococci from Epirus sheep milk included in this study<sup>1</sup>.</bold>
</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th>
<bold>Species</bold>
</th>
<th>
<bold>Raw milk isolates</bold>
</th>
<th>
<bold>Thermized milk isolates</bold>
</th>
<th>
<bold>Closest relative strain in BLAST (Accession no.)</bold>
</th>
<th>
<bold>16S rRNA gene seq. similarity (%)</bold>
</th>
<th>
<bold>Alternative genotypic species identification</bold>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<italic>Streptococcus parauberis</italic>
</td>
<td>KFM 32<break />KFM 33<break />KFM 54<break />KFM 41</td>
<td />
<td>MT579801<break />MT597919<break />MT579786<break />MN758826</td>
<td>100<break />100<break />100<break />100</td>
<td />
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<italic>Streptococcus parauberis</italic>
</td>
<td>KFM 34<break />KFM 35<break />KFM 42</td>
<td />
<td>CP025420<break />CP025420<break />CP025420</td>
<td>100<break />100<break />100</td>
<td />
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<italic>Streptococcus equinus</italic>
</td>
<td>KFM 5</td>
<td>KTM 2, KTM 5, KTM 8, KTM 9, KTM 16</td>
<td>MF429207</td>
<td>100</td>
<td />
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<italic>Streptococcus gallolyticus</italic>
</td>
<td>KFM 26</td>
<td />
<td>CP050959</td>
<td>99.93</td>
<td>
<italic>Streptococcus pasteurianus</italic> (MK330581; 99.93%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<italic>Streptococcus lutetiensis</italic>
</td>
<td>KFM 55</td>
<td />
<td>LS483348</td>
<td>100</td>
<td />
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<italic>Streptococcus lutetiensis</italic>
</td>
<td>KFM 60</td>
<td />
<td>LS483403</td>
<td>100</td>
<td>
<italic>Streptococcus infantarius</italic> (MK330572; 100%)</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p id="t1-fn-1">
<sup>1</sup> All data for the RM isolates (coded with the prefix KFM) are adapted from Sioziou et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">23</xref>]. Counterpart TM isolates (coded with the prefix KTM) are reported by Samelis et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">6</xref>].</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p id="p-7">Two clinical <italic>Enterococcus</italic> strains were used as reference controls in the AR tests: <italic>Enterococcus faecalis</italic> ATCC 29212<sup>TM</sup> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">25</xref>], a quality control strain defined by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">26</xref>], and <italic>Enterococcus faecium</italic> 315VR, a virulent, MDR human isolate primarily serving as a vancomycin-resistant control strain [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">27</xref>]. Additionally, two basic NSC strains, <italic>Streptococcus thermophilus</italic> ST1 and the wild, nisin A-producing (NisA+) <italic>Lactococcus lactis</italic> subsp. <italic>cremoris</italic> M78 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">27</xref>–<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">29</xref>] were included in the present biochemical assays, as specified in the <xref ref-type="sec" rid="s3">Results</xref>.</p>
<p id="p-8">All sheep milk isolates and the control strains were resuscitated by transferring 0.1 mL of frozen (–30<sup>o</sup>C) working stock cultures with 20% (w/v) glycerol, in 10 mL MRS broth (Neogen Culture Media, Lab M, Heywood, UK), incubated at 30<sup>o</sup>C for 24 h, and then subcultured twice, as above. Particularly the thermophilic <italic>Streptococcus</italic> isolates of the SESB complex [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">20</xref>] were also resuscitated and subcultured in 10 mL M17 broth (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany), incubated at 37<sup>o</sup>C for 24 h to ensure their optimal recovery and growth. The second subculture of all isolates was streaked for growth on MRS agar (Neogen) or M17 agar (Biolife, Italiana, S.r.l., Milano, Italy) at 30<sup>o</sup>C or 37<sup>o</sup>C for 48–72 h, to check and ensure purity by transferring one single colony to new 10 mL MRS or M17 tubes, incubated as above, for use in the experiments.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="t2-2">
<title>Biochemical identification of the sheep milk isolates</title>
<p id="p-9">All autochthonous sheep milk isolates were rechecked for their Gram-positive and catalase-negative reactions and basic phenotypic traits: microscopic appearance, CO<sub>2</sub> production from glucose, NH<sub>3</sub> production from arginine, growth at 10<sup>o</sup>C and 45<sup>o</sup>C, growth in 4% and 6.5% NaCl, and growth on Kanamycin Aesculin Azide (KAA) agar (Neogen). Next, all isolates were tested for acid production from 13 basic (key) sugars, L-arabinose, cellobiose, galactose, lactose, maltose, mannitol, melibiose, raffinose, ribose, sorbitol, sucrose, trehalose, and xylose (Sigma-Aldrich Chemie GmbH, Steinheim, Germany), in pre-sterilized 96-well mini-plates (Sarstedt AG &amp; Co. KG, Nümbrecht, Germany) to identify them biochemically at the species, in comparison with their 16S rRNA species identification (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t1">Table 1</xref>). The mini-plates were incubated at 30<sup>o</sup>C for 72 h or at 37<sup>o</sup>C for 48 h for the mesophilic and thermophilic isolates, respectively; the positive sugar fermentation readings were based on the color change of the bromocresol purple indicator to yellow due to acid production. The biochemical discrimination and identification of animal <italic>Streptococcus</italic> spp. was based on the sugar fermentation patterns tabulated in Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">11</xref>].</p>
<p id="p-10">Additionally, all 16 <italic>Streptococcus</italic> sheep milk isolates (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t1">Table 1</xref>) were identified by the API 20 STREP biochemical method, according to the manufacturer’s instructions (BioMerieux, Marcy l’Etoile, France). This commercialized id-kit detects for 10 key taxonomic sugar fermentation reactions and 10 key enzymatic activities within the genus <italic>Streptococcus</italic> and related coccoid LAB genera, mainly <italic>Enterococcus</italic>; a positive or negative β-hemolysis reaction of each strain is required as an additional external test to generate its 7-digit API 20 STREP identification code. According to Sioziou et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">23</xref>] and Samelis et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">6</xref>], all streptococcal isolates in <xref ref-type="table" rid="t1">Table 1</xref> were not β-hemolytic, but were α-hemolytic. Therefore, the hemolysis test was not repeated during this study.</p>
<p id="p-11">However, in the course of this study, safety evaluation of <italic>Streptococcus</italic> spp. by biochemical tests was extended to biogenic amine (BA) formation, an undesirable trait for the selection of autochthonous starter or adjunct LAB strains. Therefore, all sheep milk isolates were tested for their in vitro ability to produce histamine and tyramine by using the improved BA screening method of Bover-Cid and Holzapfel [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">30</xref>]. BA production was recorded by the color change of the improved BA broth from yellowish to blue or purple, using <italic>E. faecalis</italic> ATCC 29212<sup>TM</sup> and <italic>E. faecium</italic> 315VR as tyramine-positive controls, as described by Tsanasidou et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">27</xref>].</p>
</sec>
<sec id="t2-3">
<title>Antibiotic susceptibility of the <italic>Streptococcus</italic> sheep milk isolates</title>
<p id="p-12">All <italic>Streptococcus</italic> sheep milk isolates were tested for susceptibility to eight common antibiotics, according to the CLSI [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">26</xref>] protocol using the Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method (μg per disk): ampicillin (AMP; 10), chloramphenicol (CHL; 30), ciprofloxacin (CIP; 5), erythromycin (ERY; 15), gentamicin (GEN; 10), penicillin G (PEN; 10 units per disk), tetracycline (TET; 30), and vancomycin (VAN; 30), as described by Tsanasidou et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">27</xref>]. For comparative purposes, the AR testing of the present isolates was conducted together with all <italic>Enterococcus</italic> spp. strain biotypes co-isolated from the same RM/TM samples using the same agar media and reagents [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">24</xref>]. Briefly, commercial antibiotic disks (BioMaxima SA, Lublin, Poland) were used. Two M17 agar plates were spread-inoculated with 100 μL of fresh (24-h) M17 broth cultures of each tested isolate, the inocula were left to absorb for 5–10 min, and then 4 different antibiotic disks were placed over the cell lawn on each plate. All plates were incubated at 37<sup>o</sup>C overnight. On the next morning, the diameter of the inhibition zones formed around each disk, including the diameter (6-mm) of the disk, as specified by CLSI [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">26</xref>], was measured with a micrometer (model D15, Mitutoyo, Kanagawa, Japan). The above process was repeated using a series of new fresh cultures, and the mean of the two independent replicate measurements of AR zone for each disk was calculated. M17 agar was used for the AR tests because streptococci and enterococci grow abundantly on this medium exclusively containing lactose, the primary sugar fermented by LAB in milk and dairy products, instead of glucose. However, the AR of some strains was further tested comparatively on Mueller-Hinton agar (Oxoid CM0337, Oxoid Ltd., Basingstoke, UK) medium [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">26</xref>] to account for potential media effects on the size and clarity of the inhibition zones. The results were interpreted according to the breakpoints recommended by CLSI [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">26</xref>] for streptococci and enterococci. As indicated in <xref ref-type="sec" rid="t2-1">Sheep milk isolates, reference strains and culture conditions</xref>, the CLSI quality control strain <italic>E. faecalis</italic> ATCC 29212<sup>TM</sup> (i.e., penicillin-resistant) and the MDR strain <italic>E. faecium</italic> 315VR served as positive controls.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="t2-4">
<title>Milk acidification capacity</title>
<p id="p-13">All <italic>Streptococcus</italic> sheep milk isolates were further tested for their ability to ferment milk in pure culture in vitro compared with the NSC strains <italic>S. thermophilus</italic> ST1 and <italic>Lc. lactis</italic> M78. The acidifying activity rate was evaluated by measuring the pH declines (ΔpH) of inoculated (1% v/v) 10% reconstituted skimmed milk (RSM; Neogen) cultures in triplicate 10-mL tubes for each strain grown at 37°C for 6 h, shifted to 30°C for up to 24 h, and finally to 22°C for an additional 24 h, in simulation of the gradual temperature reductions of fresh curds during traditional cheese processing. The pH of all RSM cultures was measured by direct immersion of the glass electrode of a 3510 digital pH meter (Jenway, Essex, UK) in the milk. During incubation and before each pH measurement, the clotting strength and the uniformity of the curd, if any, were recorded macroscopically. Moreover, to check whether the temperature shifting from 37<sup>o</sup>C (simulating the cheese milk curdling/fermentation step) to 22<sup>o</sup>C (simulating the cheese ripening step) retarded the acidifying activity of the isolates, particularly the members of the thermophilic SESB complex (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t1">Table 1</xref>), additional RSM cultures inoculated as above were incubated at the optimal growth temperature for each species (i.e., 30<sup>o</sup>C, 48 h for <italic>S. parauberis</italic>; 37<sup>o</sup>C, 24 h for the SESB complex), and the final RSM pH values and clotting strength were recorded as above and compared. Finally, it should be noted that screening for the milk acidifying activity of the <italic>Streptococcus</italic> isolates during this study was limited to pH measurements; the titratable acidity for the strains potentially selected as natural starters should be measured in real cheese milks.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="t2-5">
<title>Bacteriocin-mediated antilisterial activity</title>
<p id="p-14">Fresh (37<sup>o</sup>C; 24 h) MRS broth cultures of all sheep milk isolates were streaked on M17 and MRS agar plates. Following growth at 37<sup>o</sup>C for 48 h, all plates were screened for direct antagonistic activity against the target strain <italic>Listeria monocytogenes</italic> no.10 by the simple agar overlay technique [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">23</xref>]. For the <italic>Streptococcus</italic> spp. isolates causing inhibition halos, bacteriocin activity was tested further by using well diffusion assays: filter-sterilized MRS culture (37<sup>o</sup>C; 24 h) cell-free supernatants (CFS) were assayed directly or after adjustment to pH 6.2, heating at 100<sup>o</sup>C for 5 min, and treatment with 1 mg/mL of proteinase K and trypsin (Sigma Aldrich Chemie GmbH, Steinheim, Germany) at 37<sup>o</sup>C for 3 to 24 h, as described for enterococci by Sioziou et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">23</xref>].</p>
</sec>
<sec id="t2-6">
<title>Enzymatic activity</title>
<p id="p-15">Finally, the two selected antilisterial strains <italic>S. lutetiensis</italic> KFM 55 and KFM 60 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">23</xref>] were assayed for 19 constitutive enzymes in their cell biomass using the API ZYM semi-quantitative method, according to the manufacturer instructions (BioMerieux) and in direct comparison with the basic NSC strains <italic>S. thermophilus</italic> ST1 and <italic>Lc.</italic> lactis M78. Selection was made in view of their potential suitability for inclusion in NSCs or use as protective adjunct strains in future cheese making studies.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s3">
<title>Results</title>
<sec id="t3-1">
<title>Biotyping of animal streptococci from sheep milk of native Epirus breeds</title>
<p id="p-16">The basic phenotypic/biochemical differentiating characteristics of the autochthonous <italic>Streptococcus</italic> sheep milk isolates are presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="t2">Table 2</xref>. First, it was noted that the nine thermophilic, arginine-negative <italic>Streptococcus</italic> sheep milk isolates molecularly assigned to the non-QPS species <italic>S. equinus</italic>, <italic>S. gallolyticus</italic>, and <italic>S. lutetiensis</italic> were not salt tolerant because all failed to grow in 6.5% salt (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t2">Table 2</xref>). Likewise, the mesophilic, arginine-positive <italic>S. parauberis</italic> isolates did not grow in 6.5% salt (biotype I) or grew with delay (biotype 2). Of note, all streptococcal isolates with cells forming long chains were <italic>S. equinus</italic>. This animal-associated species was subdominant in RM1 (KFM 5), but it prevailed in TM1 post-thermally (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t1">Table 1</xref>). In contrast, consistent with its mesophilic nature (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t2">Table 2</xref>), <italic>S. parauberis</italic> was not isolated from TM2, despite it prevailed in RM2 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">23</xref>]. <italic>S. parauberis</italic> RM isolates formed two distinct biotypes, I and II, with the biotype I isolates failing to produce acid from cellobiose and sorbitol (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t2">Table 2</xref>). Notably, all three biotype II isolates (KFM 34, KFM 35, and KFM 42) matched one strain genotype in BLAST, too (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t1">Table 1</xref>), while all seven isolates shared the (key) sugar fermentation reactions with the species <italic>S. parauberis</italic> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">11</xref>]. On the other hand, the basic sugar fermentation profiles of the single KFM 26 isolate from RM1 and both KFM 55 and KFM 60 isolates from RM2 were identical (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t2">Table 2</xref>), despite their 16S rRNA gene identification as two separate species of the SESB complex, <italic>S. gallolyticus</italic> and <italic>S. lutetiensis</italic>, respectively (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t1">Table 1</xref>). All differed from the RM/TM group genotyped as <italic>S. equinus</italic> (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t1">Table 1</xref>) by their inability to ferment cellobiose and melibiose (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t2">Table 2</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap id="t2">
<label>Table 2</label>
<caption>
<p id="t2-p-1">
<bold>Phenotypic and biochemical characteristics of the Epirus sheep milk isolates.</bold>
</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th>
<bold>Species</bold>
</th>
<th colspan="2">
<bold>
<italic>Streptococcus parauberis</italic>
</bold>
</th>
<th>
<bold>
<italic>Streptococcus equinus</italic>
</bold>
</th>
<th>
<bold>
<italic>Streptococcus gallolyticus</italic>
</bold>
</th>
<th>
<bold>
<italic>Streptococcus lutetiensis</italic>
</bold>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Biotype</td>
<td>I</td>
<td>II</td>
<td />
<td />
<td />
</tr>
<tr>
<td>No. isolates<sup>1</sup></td>
<td>4</td>
<td>3</td>
<td>6</td>
<td>1</td>
<td>2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Cell shape</td>
<td>CP/CSC</td>
<td>CP/CSC</td>
<td>CLC</td>
<td>CP</td>
<td>CP/CSC</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>NH<sub>3</sub> from arginine</td>
<td>+</td>
<td>+</td>
<td>–</td>
<td>–</td>
<td>–</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="6">Growth at:</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>10<sup>o</sup>C</td>
<td>+</td>
<td>+</td>
<td>–</td>
<td>–</td>
<td>–</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>45<sup>o</sup>C</td>
<td>–</td>
<td>–</td>
<td>+</td>
<td>+</td>
<td>+</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>4.0% salt</td>
<td>+</td>
<td>+</td>
<td>+/(+)</td>
<td>–</td>
<td>–/(+)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>6.5% salt</td>
<td>–</td>
<td>+d</td>
<td>–</td>
<td>–</td>
<td>–</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Growth on KAA agar</td>
<td>–</td>
<td>–</td>
<td>(+)/–</td>
<td>(+)</td>
<td>+</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="6">Fermentation of:</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>L-Arabinose</td>
<td>–</td>
<td>–</td>
<td>–</td>
<td>–</td>
<td>–</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Cellobiose</td>
<td>–</td>
<td>+</td>
<td>–</td>
<td>+</td>
<td>+</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Galactose</td>
<td>+</td>
<td>+</td>
<td>+</td>
<td>+</td>
<td>+</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Lactose</td>
<td>+</td>
<td>+</td>
<td>+</td>
<td>+</td>
<td>+</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Maltose</td>
<td>+</td>
<td>+</td>
<td>+</td>
<td>+</td>
<td>+</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Mannitol</td>
<td>–</td>
<td>–</td>
<td>–</td>
<td>–</td>
<td>–</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Melibiose</td>
<td>–</td>
<td>–</td>
<td>–</td>
<td>+</td>
<td>+</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Raffinose</td>
<td>–</td>
<td>–</td>
<td>+/–*</td>
<td>+</td>
<td>+</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Ribose</td>
<td>+</td>
<td>+</td>
<td>–</td>
<td>–</td>
<td>–</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Sorbitol</td>
<td>–</td>
<td>+</td>
<td>–</td>
<td>–</td>
<td>–</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Sucrose</td>
<td>+</td>
<td>+</td>
<td>+</td>
<td>+</td>
<td>+</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Trehalose</td>
<td>+</td>
<td>+</td>
<td>+/–*</td>
<td>+</td>
<td>+</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Xylose</td>
<td>–</td>
<td>–</td>
<td>–</td>
<td>–</td>
<td>–</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p id="t2-fn-1">Symbols: +: all isolates were positive; –: all isolates were negative; (+): weak reaction; ++: strong positive reaction; +d: delayed reaction. CP: cocci in pairs; CSC: cocci in short chains; CLC: cocci in long chains. The asterisk attached to the ‘minus’ symbol in the <italic>S. equinus</italic> column refers to strain KTM 16 in <xref ref-type="table" rid="t1">Table 1</xref> that was the only of the six isolates that showed a negative fermentation reaction with raffinose and trehalose. <sup>1</sup> The number of isolates for each species and biotype correspond with the number of the coded isolates as grouped in <xref ref-type="table" rid="t1">Table 1</xref>.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p id="p-17">Therefore, to discriminate the present sheep milk isolates of the SESB complex at, and within, the species, it was necessary to use additional, more specific biochemical identification tools. For this purpose, all <italic>Streptococcus</italic> isolates were tested by the API 20 STREP method and their 7-digit id-codes generated according to the manufacturer’s instructions, were submitted to the Veterinary Laboratory, Food Hygiene Department, Ministry of Agriculture, Athens, for validating their identification using the apiweb<sup>TM</sup> software; the results are presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="t3">Table 3</xref>. Based on the recorded codes, only the <italic>S. gallolyticus</italic> KFM 26 strain genotype underwent an excellent identification; its previous 16S rRNA-based assignment to this species (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t1">Table 1</xref>) was extended to the subspecies <italic>pasteurianus</italic> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">31</xref>] by the API 20 STREP method (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t3">Table 3</xref>). Additionally, a very good identification within the SESB complex as <italic>S. bovis</italic> biotype I/II was recorded for the two thermophilic isolates previously identified as <italic>S. lutetiensis</italic> (KFM 55) and/or <italic>S. lutetiensis/S. infantarius</italic> (KFM 60) by 16S rRNA gene sequencing (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t1">Table 1</xref>). This result was considered valid because the above two species were extracted and raised as novel species after a double sequential reclassification of the heterogeneous SESB complex [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">32</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">33</xref>]. Specifically, the former <italic>S. infantarius</italic> subsp. <italic>coli</italic> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">32</xref>] was raised to <italic>S. lutetiensis</italic> sp. nov. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">33</xref>], the latter differing, among others, from <italic>S. infantarius</italic> subsp. <italic>infantarius</italic> in being β-glucosidase and esculin-positive [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">32</xref>]. Therefore, according to their positive esculin (β-glucosidase) hydrolysis reaction (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t3">Table 3</xref>), both KFM 55 and KFM 60 strains clearly belong to <italic>S. lutetiensis</italic> (formerly <italic>S. bovis</italic> biotype II.1) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">33</xref>].</p>
<table-wrap id="t3">
<label>Table 3</label>
<caption>
<p id="t3-p-1">
<bold>API 20 STREP-based identification and biotyping of the <italic>Streptococcus</italic> isolates from raw or thermized sheep milk (compared to the genomic identification in Table 1)<sup>1</sup>.</bold>
</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th>
<bold>Test</bold>
</th>
<th>
<bold>Reaction/Enzymes</bold>
</th>
<th colspan="2">
<bold>
<italic>Streptococcus parauberis</italic>
</bold>
</th>
<th>
<bold>
<italic>Streptococcus equinus</italic>
</bold>
</th>
<th>
<bold>
<italic>Streptococcus gallolyticus</italic>
</bold>
</th>
<th>
<bold>
<italic>Streptococcus lutetiensis</italic>
</bold>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td colspan="2">Biotype</td>
<td>I (4)</td>
<td>II (3)</td>
<td>(6)</td>
<td>(1)</td>
<td>(2)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>VP</td>
<td>Acetoin production</td>
<td>+</td>
<td>+</td>
<td>–</td>
<td>+</td>
<td>+</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>HIP</td>
<td>Hydrolysis (hipuric acid)</td>
<td>+</td>
<td>+</td>
<td>–</td>
<td>–</td>
<td>–</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ESC</td>
<td>β-glucosidase hydrolysis</td>
<td>–</td>
<td>–</td>
<td>–</td>
<td>+</td>
<td>+</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>PYRA</td>
<td>Pyrolidonyl arylamidase</td>
<td>–</td>
<td>–</td>
<td>–</td>
<td>–</td>
<td>–</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>αGAL</td>
<td>α-galactosidase</td>
<td>–</td>
<td>–</td>
<td>+</td>
<td>+</td>
<td>+</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>βGUR</td>
<td>β-glucuronidase</td>
<td>–</td>
<td>–</td>
<td>–</td>
<td>+</td>
<td>–</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>βGAL</td>
<td>β-galactosidase</td>
<td>–</td>
<td>–</td>
<td>+</td>
<td>+</td>
<td>–</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>PAL</td>
<td>Alkaline phosphatase</td>
<td>–</td>
<td>+</td>
<td>–</td>
<td>–</td>
<td>–</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>LAP</td>
<td>Leucine aminopeptidase</td>
<td>+</td>
<td>+</td>
<td>+</td>
<td>+</td>
<td>+</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ADH</td>
<td>Arginine dihydrolase</td>
<td>+</td>
<td>+</td>
<td>–</td>
<td>–</td>
<td>–</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>RIB</td>
<td>D-ribose (acidification)</td>
<td>+</td>
<td>+</td>
<td>–</td>
<td>–</td>
<td>–</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ARA</td>
<td>L-arabinose (acidification)</td>
<td>–</td>
<td>–</td>
<td>–</td>
<td>–</td>
<td>–</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>MAN</td>
<td>D-mannitol (acidification)</td>
<td>–</td>
<td>–</td>
<td>–</td>
<td>–</td>
<td>–</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>SOR</td>
<td>D-sorbitol (acidification)</td>
<td>–</td>
<td>+/(+)</td>
<td>–</td>
<td>–</td>
<td>–</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>LAC</td>
<td>D-lactose (acidification)</td>
<td>+</td>
<td>+</td>
<td>+</td>
<td>+</td>
<td>+</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>TRE</td>
<td>D-trehalose (acidification)</td>
<td>+</td>
<td>+</td>
<td>+</td>
<td>+</td>
<td>+</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>INU</td>
<td>Inulin (acidification)</td>
<td>–</td>
<td>+</td>
<td>–/(+)**</td>
<td>–</td>
<td>–</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>RAF</td>
<td>D-raffinose (acidification)</td>
<td>–</td>
<td>–</td>
<td>+</td>
<td>+</td>
<td>+</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>AMD</td>
<td>Starch (acidification)</td>
<td>–</td>
<td>–/+*</td>
<td>+</td>
<td>–</td>
<td>+</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>GLYG</td>
<td>Glycogen (acidification)</td>
<td>–</td>
<td>–</td>
<td>+</td>
<td>–</td>
<td>+</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>βHEM</td>
<td>β-hemolysis</td>
<td>–</td>
<td>–</td>
<td>–</td>
<td>–</td>
<td>–</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>API code</td>
<td />
<td>3043410</td>
<td>3063630<break />3063631*</td>
<td>0250453<break />0250473**</td>
<td>5650450</td>
<td>5240453</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>API-ID</td>
<td />
<td>
<italic>S. agalactiae</italic> Acceptable</td>
<td>
<italic>S. uberis</italic> Uncertain</td>
<td>
<italic>S. pneumoniae</italic> <break />Good/<break />Very good</td>
<td>
<italic>S. gallolyticus</italic> <break /><italic>pasteurianus</italic> <break />Excellent</td>
<td>
<italic>S. equinus</italic> <break />(<italic>S. bovis</italic> I/II)  <break />Very good</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p id="t3-fn-1">
<sup>1</sup> The number of isolates (in brackets) corresponds with the isolate codes as grouped for each species in <xref ref-type="table" rid="t1">Table 1</xref>. * Isolate KFM 35 of <italic>S. parauberis</italic>-biotype II was starch-positive; ** Isolates KTM 2, KTM 8 and KTM 9 of <italic>S. equinus</italic> gave a weak positive acidification reaction with inulin.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p id="p-18">In contrast, the 16S rRNA identification of the KFM 5 isolate and thereby of the five TM isolates sharing this strain biotype as <italic>S. equinus</italic> (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t1">Table 1</xref>) was not consistent with their very good or good identification as <italic>Streptococcus pneumoniae</italic> by the API 20 STREP method (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t3">Table 3</xref>). Likewise, there was a discrepancy between the molecular identification of <italic>S. parauberis</italic> biotypes I and II by the 16S rRNA method using BLAST (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t1">Table 1</xref>) and their ‘acceptable’ or ‘uncertain’ identifications as <italic>Streptococcus agalactiae</italic> and <italic>S. uberis</italic>, respectively, using the API 20 STREP id-database (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t3">Table 3</xref>).</p>
<p id="p-19">Lastly, regarding cheese milk safety, none of the non-hemolytic <italic>Streptococcus</italic> spp. sheep milk isolates biotyped in <xref ref-type="table" rid="t2">Tables 2</xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="t3">3</xref> were found to produce histamine or tyramine in improved BA broth, unlike the two virulent control strains <italic>E. faecalis</italic> ATCC 29212<sup>TM</sup> and <italic>E. faecium</italic> 315VR, which were confirmed to produce tyramine when tyrosine was added as a precursor in BA broth (data not shown).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="t3-2">
<title>Antibiotic resistance of animal streptococci derived from Epirus sheep milk</title>
<p id="p-20">The phenotypic AR profiles of the 16 <italic>Streptococcus</italic> spp. isolates originating from two sheep milk batches of native Epirus breeds before and after thermization are presented comparatively to the AR profiles of the two <italic>Enterococcus</italic> control strains in <xref ref-type="table" rid="t4">Table 4</xref>.</p>
<table-wrap id="t4">
<label>Table 4</label>
<caption>
<p id="t4-p-1">
<bold>Antibiotic susceptibility of the <italic>Streptococcus</italic> sheep milk isolates.</bold>
</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th rowspan="2">
<bold>Strain code (biotype)</bold>
</th>
<th colspan="8">
<bold>Antibiotic tested (μg/disc)</bold>
</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>
<bold>AMP 10</bold>
</th>
<th>
<bold>CHL 30</bold>
</th>
<th>
<bold>CIP 5</bold>
</th>
<th>
<bold>ERY 15</bold>
</th>
<th>
<bold>GEN 10</bold>
</th>
<th>
<bold>PEN10U</bold>
</th>
<th>
<bold>TET 30</bold>
</th>
<th>
<bold>VAN 30</bold>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td colspan="9">
<bold>Control strains</bold>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<italic>E. faecium</italic> 315VR**</td>
<td>
<bold>R (6.0)</bold>
</td>
<td>I (16.1)</td>
<td>
<bold>R (6.0)</bold>
</td>
<td>
<bold>R (6.0)</bold>
</td>
<td>
<bold>R (6.0)</bold>
</td>
<td>
<bold>R (6.0)</bold>
</td>
<td>
<bold>R (9.4)</bold>
</td>
<td>
<bold>R (7.6)</bold>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<italic>E. faecalis</italic> ATCC 29212<sup>TM</sup></td>
<td>S (20.6)</td>
<td>S (22.0)</td>
<td>I (19.1)</td>
<td>I (16.8)</td>
<td>I (9.4)</td>
<td>
<bold>R (12.7)</bold>
</td>
<td>I (15.1)</td>
<td>I (16.1)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="9">
<bold>Sheep milk isolates</bold>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<italic>S. parauberis</italic> KFM 41 (biotype I)</td>
<td>S (24.0)</td>
<td>S (22.7)</td>
<td>
<bold>R (15.3)</bold>
</td>
<td>S (25.5)</td>
<td>S (18.2)</td>
<td>S (28.0)</td>
<td>
<bold>R (12.9)</bold>
</td>
<td>S (20.1)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<italic>S. parauberis</italic> biotype I (three remaining isolates)</td>
<td>S (26.5 ± 1.2)</td>
<td>S (23.6 ± 3.14)</td>
<td>I (18.9 ± 2.4)</td>
<td>S (23.6 ± 1.9)</td>
<td>S (14.1 ± 0.6)</td>
<td>S (27.5 ± 1.1)</td>
<td>S (27.0 ± 0.4)</td>
<td>S (21.0 ± 1.1)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<italic>S. parauberis</italic> KFM 34 (biotype II)</td>
<td>S (23.8)</td>
<td>S (23.2)</td>
<td>I (18.8)</td>
<td>S (21.7)</td>
<td>S (12.4)</td>
<td>S (22.7)</td>
<td>
<bold>R (14.8)</bold>
</td>
<td>S (20.6)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<italic>S. parauberis</italic> KFM 35 (biotype II)</td>
<td>S (28.6)</td>
<td>S (25.9)</td>
<td>S (24.6)</td>
<td>S (26.8)</td>
<td>S (13.1)</td>
<td>S (26.1)</td>
<td>
<bold>R (15.0)</bold>
</td>
<td>S (25.3)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<italic>S. parauberis</italic> KFM 42 (biotype II)</td>
<td>S (24.2)</td>
<td>S (22.4)</td>
<td>
<bold>R (15.1)</bold>
</td>
<td>S (25.2)</td>
<td>S (17.4)</td>
<td>S (28.5)</td>
<td>
<bold>R (14.0)</bold>
</td>
<td>S (20.6)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<italic>S. equinus</italic> KFM 5</td>
<td>S (34.1)</td>
<td>S (27.0)</td>
<td>S (21.6)</td>
<td>S (27.0)</td>
<td>S (18.3)</td>
<td>S (29.7)</td>
<td>
<bold>R (13.8)</bold>
</td>
<td>S (22.2)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<italic>S. equinus</italic> KTM 8</td>
<td>S (28.2)</td>
<td>S (23.9)</td>
<td>I (19.3)</td>
<td>S (24.9)</td>
<td>S (13.1)</td>
<td>S (27.6)</td>
<td>
<bold>R (17.0)</bold>
</td>
<td>S (17.5)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<italic>S. equinus</italic> KTM 9</td>
<td>S (25.2)</td>
<td>S (25.2)</td>
<td>I (19.0)</td>
<td>S (25.6)</td>
<td>S (12.1)</td>
<td>S (26.4)</td>
<td>
<bold>R (18.0)</bold>
</td>
<td>S (18.1)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<italic>S. equinus</italic> (three remaining isolates)</td>
<td>S (27.4 ± 1.0)</td>
<td>S (25.8 ± 1.2)</td>
<td>S (21.0 ± 1.5)</td>
<td>S (26.0 ± 1.4)</td>
<td>S (13.1 ± 2.6)</td>
<td>S (25.5 ± 3.4)</td>
<td>S/I (22.7 ± 5.8)</td>
<td>S (19.1 ± 1.0)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<italic>S. gallolyticus</italic> KFM 26</td>
<td>S (25.3)</td>
<td>S (27.0)</td>
<td>
<bold>R (13.8)</bold>
</td>
<td>I (19.4)</td>
<td>S (22.7)</td>
<td>S (26.0)</td>
<td>I (21.1)</td>
<td>S (20.7)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<italic>S. lutetiensis</italic> KFM 55</td>
<td>S (19.5)</td>
<td>S (24.4)</td>
<td>
<bold>R (12.1)</bold>
</td>
<td>S (25.0)</td>
<td>S (12.8)</td>
<td>S (25.9)</td>
<td>S (27.8)</td>
<td>S (23.0)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<italic>S. lutetiensis</italic> KFM 60</td>
<td>S (21.4)</td>
<td>S (25.3)</td>
<td>
<bold>R (13.4)</bold>
</td>
<td>S (21.2)</td>
<td>S (16.8)</td>
<td>S (29.6)</td>
<td>S (28.7)</td>
<td>S (24.4)</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p id="t4-fn-1">AMP: ampicillin; CHL: chloramphenicol; CIP: ciprofloxacin; ERY: erythromycin; GEN: gentamicin; PEN: penicillin; TET: tetracycline; VAN: vancomycin. The numbers next to the antibiotics indicate μg per disk, or units per disk for penicillin. S (susceptible), I (intermediate), <bold>R (resistant</bold>); the numbers in brackets indicate the inhibition zone size (mm) as the mean of two independent measurements for each strain versus each antibiotic disk; SD values (<italic>n</italic> = 2) for the AR zones of each strain singly are not shown for table simplification.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p id="p-21">As anticipated, the <italic>vanA</italic>+ <italic>E. faecium</italic> 315VR strain was MDR whereas the CLSI quality control <italic>E. faecalis</italic> ATCC 29212<sup>TM</sup> was resistant to penicillin but partially susceptible to most of the remaining antibiotics tested, including vancomycin (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t4">Table 4</xref>). Because AR is strain-dependent, every RM/TM isolate found resistant to at least one of the tested antibiotics is tabulated separately; otherwise, the remaining antibiotic susceptible or of intermediate sensitivity isolates within each species are combined by averaging the diameter of their mean inhibition zones.</p>
<p id="p-22">Contrary to our anticipation, all <italic>Streptococcus</italic> isolates from sheep milk before or after thermization had restricted ARs (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t4">Table 4</xref>). Specifically, the RM2 <italic>S. parauberis</italic> biotype I isolates were susceptible to all antibiotics tested, except for KFM 41 that was resistant to ciprofloxacin and tetracycline, while all RM2 biotype II isolates were resistant only to tetracycline, and one of them (KFM 42) to ciprofloxacin similarly to KFM 41 above. <italic>S. equinus</italic> KFM 5 from RM1 was strongly resistant to tetracycline, too. However, from the five <italic>S. equinus</italic> isolates from TM1, two were close to the CLSI breakpoint (≤ 18 mm) and another two were of intermediate sensitivity to tetracycline (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t4">Table 4</xref>). None of the six <italic>S. equinus</italic> isolates were resistant to ciprofloxacin, but it is worthy of noting that the two tetracycline-resistant isolates (KTM 8, KTM 9) from TM1 were of intermediate sensitivity to ciprofloxacin as well. Conversely, <italic>S. gallolyticus</italic> subsp. <italic>pasteurianus</italic> and <italic>S. lutetiensis</italic> strain biotypes represented by the raw sheep milk isolates KFM 26 and KFM 55 = KFM 60, respectively, were fully resistant to ciprofloxacin, but susceptible or partially susceptible (i.e., KFM 26) to tetracycline and the remaining six antibiotics tested. None of the 16 <italic>Streptococcus</italic> sheep milk isolates of the <italic>S. uberis</italic> group or the SESB complex exhibited multidrug resistance (i.e., resistance to ≥ 3 antibiotic classes). Instead, all showed a remarkably high susceptibility to ampicillin, chloramphenicol, erythromycin, gentamycin, and mainly penicillin and vancomycin (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t4">Table 4</xref>).</p>
<p id="p-23">The above AR profiles of the <italic>Streptococcus</italic> spp. isolates were confirmed for total eight representative isolates resistant to tetracycline and/or ciprofloxacin when tested on M17 agar plates (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t4">Table 4</xref>), which were also tested on Mueller-Hinton agar, the reference CLSI agar for disk diffusion AR testing [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">26</xref>]; the results are summarized in <xref ref-type="sec" rid="s-suppl">Table S1</xref>. Generally, the antibiotic inhibition zones on Mueller-Hinton agar (containing no glucose or lactose, but starch plus beef dehydrated infusion and casein hydrolysate) were similar, in some cases smaller, than those formed by the same strain on M17 agar; however, the AR profile of each representative strain was not critically altered. Most discrepancies were minor and noted with ciplofloxacin (<xref ref-type="sec" rid="s-suppl">Table S1</xref>). In fact, the most prominent and thus critical difference was the resistance of <italic>S. equinus</italic> KFM 5 to ciprofloxacin on Mueller-Hinton agar, whereas it was sensitive on the respective M17 agar plates (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t4">Table 4</xref>). To address this discrepancy, the AR testing on M17 agar was repeated particularly for this strain and confirmed that ciprofloxacin caused a large (22.9 mm) inhibitory zone on its cell lawn as all antibiotics (&gt; 21 mm) did, except for tetracycline (14.8 mm) to which <italic>S. equinus</italic> KFM 5 was resistant on both agar media. Further tests are needed to clarify this medium-dependent AR discrepancy.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="t3-3">
<title>Growth temperature-dependent variations in the milk acidification capacity of the <italic>Streptococcus</italic> sheep milk isolates</title>
<p id="p-24">When inoculated (1% v/v) in heat-sterilized (121<sup>o</sup>C; 5 min) RSM (initial pH 6.78) and grown at 30<sup>o</sup>C for 48 h, the mesophilic <italic>S. parauberis</italic> biotype I and II isolates (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t2">Table 2</xref>) reduced the pH to 4.99 ± 0.02 (ΔpH 1.79) and 5.09 ± 0.04 (ΔpH 1.69), respectively; this slightly higher milk acidifying capacity of the biotype I isolates resulted in a firmer curd compared to the biotype II isolates which gave a softer unstable curd that was flowed by inverting the tube. It is worth noting that the RSM cultures of all <italic>S. parauberis</italic> isolates remained non-clotted (pH &gt; 5.2) after the first 24 h, requiring at least a 42-h incubation period at 30<sup>o</sup>C to curdle the milk. Conversely, the six thermophilic <italic>S. equinus</italic> isolates (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t2">Table 2</xref>) were the best acidifiers among the sheep milk streptococci in this study since their RSM culture pH fell to 4.80 ± 0.02 (ΔpH 1.98) and the skimmed milk was curdled firmly at 37<sup>o</sup>C for 24 h. Both <italic>S. lutetiensis</italic> KFM 55 and KFM 60 strains were relatively less aciduric (pH 4.89 ± 0.09; ΔpH 1.89) and formed a softer curd than the <italic>S. equinus</italic> isolates in RSM. <italic>S. gallolyticus</italic> KFM 26 was the least acidifying strain (pH 5.34 ± 0.08; ΔpH 1.44) following growth in RSM at 37<sup>o</sup>C for 24 h (data not tabulated).</p>
<p id="p-25">From the above findings, it became evident that the gradual acidifying activity of the <italic>Streptococcus</italic> sheep milk isolates was primarily dependent on the species, less so on each strain within a species, and strongly on the growth temperature, as indicated by the kinetic acidification results presented separately for each isolate in <xref ref-type="table" rid="t5">Table 5</xref>. Indeed, the <italic>S. equinus</italic> isolates were the strongest, and the <italic>S. parauberis</italic> isolates were the weakest RSM acidifiers during the first 6 h at 37<sup>o</sup>C, with the <italic>S. lutetiensis</italic> and <italic>S. gallolyticus</italic> isolates being of intermediate rapid acidification capacity. Surprisingly, based on the second-term ΔpH values during incubation, retardation of the acidifying activity of all <italic>S. parauberis</italic> isolates was similar (0.16 to 0.29 pH units) with that of the thermophilic SESB isolates (0.16 to 0.27 pH units) following shifting of the incubation temperature from 30<sup>o</sup>C to 22<sup>o</sup>C after the first 24 h (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t5">Table 5</xref>). Therefore, all <italic>S. parauberis</italic> failed to reduce the final RSM pH &lt; 5.2 and curdle the milk when growth was completed at 22<sup>o</sup>C, instead of 30<sup>o</sup>C and above. Neither of the two <italic>S. lutetiensis</italic> strains curdled the RSM under the shifting incubation temperature conditions (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t5">Table 5</xref>), as both did so slowly at 37<sup>o</sup>C for 24 h. Only <italic>S. equinus</italic> isolates managed firm RSM curds at 22<sup>o</sup>C thanks to their superior milk acidification rate at 37<sup>o</sup>C and then at 30<sup>o</sup>C, while <italic>S. gallolyticus</italic> KFM 26 was the only raw sheep milk strain likely favored by the growth temperature shifting (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t5">Table 5</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap id="t5">
<label>Table 5</label>
<caption>
<p id="t5-p-1">
<bold>Acidifying activity of the <italic>Streptococcus</italic> spp. isolates from Epirus sheep milk isolates, in comparison with the basic NSC strains, in reconstituted skim milk (RSM) at gradually decreasing incubation temperatures<sup>1</sup>.</bold>
</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th rowspan="3">
<bold>Species</bold>
</th>
<th rowspan="3">
<bold>Isolate code</bold>
</th>
<th colspan="6">
<bold>Shifting incubation (temperature/time) conditions</bold>
</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th colspan="2">
<bold>37<sup>o</sup>C for an initial 6 h</bold>
</th>
<th colspan="2">
<bold>30<sup>o</sup>C for an additional 18 h</bold>
</th>
<th colspan="2">
<bold>22<sup>o</sup>C for an additional 24 h</bold>
</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>
<bold>RSM pH</bold>
</th>
<th>
<bold>Milk curd<sup>2</sup></bold>
</th>
<th>
<bold>RSM pH</bold>
</th>
<th>
<bold>Milk curd</bold>
</th>
<th>
<bold>RSM pH</bold>
</th>
<th>
<bold>Milk curd</bold>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td rowspan="4">
<italic>Streptococcus parauberis</italic> (Biotype I)</td>
<td>KFM 32</td>
<td>6.17</td>
<td>–</td>
<td>5.45</td>
<td>–</td>
<td>5.22</td>
<td>–</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>KFM 33</td>
<td>6.20</td>
<td>–</td>
<td>5.47</td>
<td>–</td>
<td>5.29</td>
<td>–</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>KFM 54</td>
<td>6.23</td>
<td>–</td>
<td>5.64</td>
<td>–</td>
<td>5.35</td>
<td>–</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>KFM 41</td>
<td>6.56</td>
<td>–</td>
<td>5.68</td>
<td>–</td>
<td>5.44</td>
<td>–</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="3">
<italic>Streptococcus parauberis</italic> (Biotype II)</td>
<td>KFM 34</td>
<td>6.45</td>
<td>–</td>
<td>5.63</td>
<td>–</td>
<td>5.47</td>
<td>–</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>KFM 35</td>
<td>6.50</td>
<td>–</td>
<td>5.63</td>
<td>–</td>
<td>5.43</td>
<td>–</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>KFM 42</td>
<td>6.40</td>
<td>–</td>
<td>5.61</td>
<td>–</td>
<td>5.45</td>
<td>–</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="6">
<italic>Streptococcus equinus</italic>
</td>
<td>KFM 5</td>
<td>5.76</td>
<td>–</td>
<td>4.96</td>
<td>++</td>
<td>4.79</td>
<td>++</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>KTM 2</td>
<td>5.86</td>
<td>–</td>
<td>5.21</td>
<td>+</td>
<td>5.05</td>
<td>++</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>KTM 5</td>
<td>5.82</td>
<td>–</td>
<td>5.19</td>
<td>+</td>
<td>5.02</td>
<td>++</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>KTM 8</td>
<td>5.86</td>
<td>–</td>
<td>5.23</td>
<td>+</td>
<td>5.04</td>
<td>++</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>KTM 9</td>
<td>5.89</td>
<td>–</td>
<td>5.22</td>
<td>+</td>
<td>5.05</td>
<td>++</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>KTM 16</td>
<td>5.90</td>
<td>–</td>
<td>5.24</td>
<td>+</td>
<td>5.03</td>
<td>++</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<italic>Streptococcus gallolyticus</italic>
</td>
<td>KFM 26</td>
<td>6.04</td>
<td>–</td>
<td>5.28</td>
<td>(+)</td>
<td>5.01</td>
<td>+</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="2">
<italic>Streptococcus lutetiensis</italic>
</td>
<td>KFM 55</td>
<td>6.16</td>
<td>–</td>
<td>5.36</td>
<td>–</td>
<td>5.19</td>
<td>–</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>KFM 60</td>
<td>6.17</td>
<td>–</td>
<td>5.51</td>
<td>–</td>
<td>5.35</td>
<td>–</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2">Basic NSC strains</td>
<td />
<td />
<td />
<td />
<td />
<td />
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2">
<italic>S. thermophilus</italic> ST1</td>
<td>4.99</td>
<td>++</td>
<td>4.08</td>
<td>++</td>
<td>4.00</td>
<td>++</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2">
<italic>Lc. lactis/cremoris</italic> M78</td>
<td>5.48</td>
<td>–/(+)</td>
<td>4.66</td>
<td>++</td>
<td>4.46</td>
<td>++</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p id="t5-fn-1">
<sup>1</sup> Each pH value is the mean of two RSM replicates; the initial pH of RSM was 6.78. <sup>2</sup> Type of milk curd: ++: hard, strong milk clotting; +: soft, moderate milk clotting; (+): partially and weakly clotted milk; –: no evidence of milk clotting/curd formation.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p id="p-26">Meanwhile, the primary starter <italic>S. thermophilus</italic> ST1 grew abundantly in RSM, managing a ΔpH value as high as 1.79 after 6 h at 37<sup>o</sup>C, which increased further to 2.70 pH units after 24 h at 30<sup>o</sup>C and resulted in strong curd formation early during incubation. The NisA+ costarter <italic>Lc. lactis</italic> M78 was a remarkably slower milk acidifier than ST1 but faster and stronger than all <italic>Streptococcus</italic> sheep milk isolates (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t5">Table 5</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="t3-4">
<title>Bacteriocin-mediated antilisterial activity of the <italic>Streptococcus lutetiensis</italic> raw sheep milk strains</title>
<p id="p-27">All <italic>S. parauberis</italic> sheep milk isolates and mainly <italic>S. gallolyticus</italic> KFM 26 and both <italic>S. lutetiensis</italic> KFM 55 and KFM 60 strains inhibited growth of <italic>L. monocytogenes</italic> no. 10 on the MRS agar (initial pH 5.7 ± 0.1) overlays (i.e., all six <italic>S. equinus</italic> isolates were unable to grow in/on MRS media and thus could not be tested accordingly). However, none of the present <italic>S. parauberis</italic>, <italic>S. equinus</italic>, and <italic>S. gallolyticus</italic> strains could inhibit <italic>Listeria</italic> growth in the respective M17 agar (initial pH 7.2 ± 0.2; containing 0.5% lactose instead of 2% glucose) overlays. As previously noted [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">23</xref>], <italic>S. lutetiensis</italic> KFM 55 and KFM 60 were the only streptococcal raw sheep milk isolates that showed a clear bacteriocin-like antilisterial activity on M17 agar overlays (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1A</xref>; the non-active KFM 26 strain is illustrated in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1B</xref> for comparison). Next, the direct antilisterial activity of both <italic>S. lutetiensis</italic> strains was retained in their filter-sterilized acidic (pH 4.5–4.7) CFS after growth in MRS broth at 37<sup>o</sup>C for 24 h (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1C</xref>), as well as after the acidic CFS was neutralized at pH 6.2 and boiled at 100<sup>o</sup>C for 5 min, but it was lost after treatment with proteolytic enzymes, proteinase K and trypsin (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1D</xref>). Thus, strains KFM 55 and KFM 60 excreted a heat-resistant antilisterial peptide in MRS broth, most likely a class II bacteriocin. Further studies are needed to find out whether strains KFM 55 and KFM 60 possess one or more known or novel streptococcal bacteriocin gene/s in their genome and whether the active peptide/s can be produced in situ in sheep milk during cheese making or enrichment of the milk with glucose and possibly additional nutrients present in MRS is a prerequisite for bacteriocin formation by <italic>S. lutetiensis.</italic></p>
<fig id="fig1" position="float">
<label>Figure 1</label>
<caption>
<p id="fig1-p-1">
<bold>Bacteriocin-mediated activity of the <italic>Streptococcus lutetiensis</italic> KFM 55 and KFM 60 raw sheep milk strains against <italic>Listeria monocytogenes</italic> no.10.</bold> (<bold>A</bold>) Direct in vitro antilisterial activity of the streaked KFM 60 strain on M17 agar overlayed with a listerial cell lawn and incubated at 30<sup>o</sup>C overnight; (<bold>B</bold>) no activity by <italic>S. gallolyticus</italic> KFM 26; (<bold>C</bold>) listerial growth inhibition by the filter-sterilized MRS (37<sup>o</sup>C; 24 h) cell-free supernatants (CFS; pH 4.6–4.7) of strains KFM 55 and KFM 60 in the MPCA well diffusion assays; (<bold>D</bold>) wells opened in a solidified MPCA plate pre-seeded with listerial cells were filled with 80 μL of the neutralized (pH 6.2) CFS of the KFM 60 strain before (well 1) or after (well 2) heating at 100<sup>o</sup>C for 5 min, or after treatment with proteinase K (well 3) and trypsin (well 4). KFM 55 gave similar results, not illustrated.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="eff-04-1010187-g001.tif" />
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="t3-5">
<title>Variations in the enzymatic activity profiles of <italic>S. lutetiensis</italic> raw sheep milk strains compared to the basic <italic>S. thermophilus</italic> and <italic>Lc. lactis</italic> cheese starter strains</title>
<p id="p-28">Based on the AR and biochemical identification results, and particularly on the API 20 STREP records closely relating most strain biotypes of sheep milk streptococci with the pathogenic species <italic>S. agalactiae</italic>, <italic>S. uberis</italic>, <italic>S. pneumoniae</italic>, and <italic>S. gallolyticus</italic> subsp. <italic>pasteurianus</italic> (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t2">Tables 2</xref>–<xref ref-type="table" rid="t4">4</xref>), only the two bacteriocin-producing <italic>S. lutetiensis</italic> KFM 55 and KFM 60 strains were further evaluated for their entire enzymatic activity profiles. Major species-dependent variations in the API ZYM profiles of the two <italic>S. lutetiensis</italic> and the two NSC strains, <italic>S. thermophilus</italic> ST1 and <italic>Lc. lactis</italic> M78 were noted (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t6">Table 6</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap id="t6">
<label>Table 6</label>
<caption>
<p id="t6-p-1">
<bold>Enzymatic activity profiles of selected strains isolated from raw sheep milk of native Epirus breeds with the highest potential for inclusion in natural starter cultures<sup>1</sup>.</bold>
</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th>
<bold>Strain</bold>
</th>
<th>
<bold>
<italic>Streptococcus thermophilus</italic> ST1</bold>
</th>
<th>
<bold>
<italic>Lactococcus lactis</italic> M78</bold>
</th>
<th>
<bold>
<italic>Streptococcus lutetiensis</italic> KFM 55</bold>
</th>
<th>
<bold>
<italic>Streptococcus lutetiensis</italic> KFM 60</bold>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Alkaline phosphatase</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>40</td>
<td>10</td>
<td>20</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Esterase (C4)</td>
<td>20</td>
<td>20</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Esterase lipase (C8)</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>30</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Lipase (C14)</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Leucine arylamidase</td>
<td>40</td>
<td>40</td>
<td>40</td>
<td>40</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Valine arylamidase</td>
<td>10</td>
<td>30</td>
<td>5</td>
<td>5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Cystine arylamidase</td>
<td>10</td>
<td>30</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Trypsin</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>α-chymotrypsin</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>20</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Acid phosphatase</td>
<td>30</td>
<td>40</td>
<td>40</td>
<td>40</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Naphthol-AS-BI-phosphohydrolase</td>
<td>10</td>
<td>40</td>
<td>20</td>
<td>20</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>α-galactosidase</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>40</td>
<td>40</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>β-galactosidase</td>
<td>30</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>β-glucuronidase</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>α-glucosidase</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>40</td>
<td>5</td>
<td>0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>β-glucosidase</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<italic>N</italic>-acetyl-β-glucosaminidase</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>α-mannosidase</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>α-fucosidase</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p id="t6-fn-1">The reactions were graded from 0 (negative) to 5 (strongly positive) based on the change in the color intensity after the addition of the ZYM A &amp; ZYM B reagents in each well. Activity (approximate values) was expressed as arbitrary units of substrate hydrolyzed; 0: negative (similar to the first well-control); 1: liberation of 5 nmol; 2: 10 nmol; 3: 20 nmol; 4: 30 nmol; 5: 40 nmol or more (Samelis and Kakouri [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">24</xref>] 2025). Liberation of 20 to 40 nmol or more was considered a clearly positive enzymatic reaction. The basic starter strains <italic>S. thermophilus</italic> ST1 and <italic>Lc. lactis</italic> M78 were tested for comparison.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p id="p-29">Specifically, both <italic>S. lutetiensis</italic> isolates displayed very strong α-galactosidase activity, which was absent in both NSC strains ST1 and M78, which, however, displayed strong β-galactosidase and α-glucosidase activity, respectively (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t6">Table 6</xref>). Actually, these were the most prominent API ZYM differences between the four strains as far as the crucial glycolytic enzyme system for milk fermentation is concerned. On the other hand, similarly to ST1 and M78, both <italic>S. lutetiensis</italic> strains displayed strong leucine arylamidase and acid phosphatase, and moderate napthol-AS-BI-phosphohydrolase activity. However, unlike M78, both <italic>S. lutetiensis</italic> strains lacked esterase (C4), esterase-lipase (C8), or valine and cystine arylamidase activities, which were also weak or absent in ST1. Moreover, both <italic>S. lutetiensis</italic> strains lacked α-chymotrypsin activity moderately possessed by M78, but not by ST1. Also, although both of them displayed a weak to moderate alkaline phosphatase activity in the API ZYM kit (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t6">Table 6</xref>), they should be considered negative as they were in the API 20 STREP id-kit (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t3">Table 3</xref>), which is more reliable for this particular enzymatic test [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">24</xref>]. Finally, no strain showed lipase (C14), trypsin, β-glucuronidase, β-glucosidase, <italic>N</italic>-acetyl-β-glucosaminidase, α-mannosidase, and α-fucosidase activities (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t6">Table 6</xref>).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s4">
<title>Discussion</title>
<p id="p-30">Except for their phenotypic resistance or intermediate susceptibility to ciprofloxacin (68.8%) and tetracycline (50%), the increased (&gt; 22 mm inhibition zones) sensitivity of all mesophilic or thermophilic animal streptococci from raw or thermized sheep milk to all antibiotics tested (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t4">Table 4</xref>) was positive for cheese safety. This finding correlates well with the absence of the <italic>gelE</italic>, <italic>hyl-</italic>like or cytolysin genes from all <italic>Streptococcus</italic> RM isolates, primarily from <italic>S. equinus</italic> and the other two thermophilic members of the SESB complex [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">23</xref>], which can survive in TM [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">6</xref>]. It is also consistent with the findings reported by Özkan et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">20</xref>] regarding the beneficial properties of <italic>S. gallolyticus</italic>, <italic>S. lutetiensis</italic> and <italic>S. infantarius</italic> Turkish cheese isolates, including the susceptibility of all, except for one, to ampicillin, chloramphenicol, penicillin, and vancomycin. Likewise, Morandi et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">34</xref>] detected two subdominant <italic>S. equinus</italic> strains in an Italian RM cheese susceptible to all antibiotics (i.e., ciprofloxacin, erythromycin, penicillin, tetracycline, vancomycin) tested herein, too; however, both Italian <italic>S. equinus</italic> strains were resistant to streptomycin, which was not among the antibiotics tested in the present study. Conversely, 43% and 24% of the <italic>S. lutetiensis</italic> isolates from clinical mastitis of dairy cows in China were resistant to tetracycline and erythromycin [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">16</xref>].</p>
<p id="p-31">Similarly, <italic>S. parauberis</italic> field isolates from clinical bovine mastitis cases in China were highly resistant to erythromycin (90.9%), followed by tetracycline (45.5%), chloramphenicol (36.4%) and clindamycin (27.3%); of note, the <italic>S. uberis</italic> co-isolates were highly resistant to tetracycline (81.3%) and clindamycin (62.5%), while both species were susceptible to ampicillin [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">15</xref>]. Earlier, Pitkälä et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">35</xref>] found subclinical isolates of <italic>S. uberis</italic> from Finish bovine milk to be resistant to oxytetracycline (40.6%) and erythromycin (15.6%). All of them were susceptible to β-lactam antibiotics, and two subdominant isolates of <italic>S. parauberis</italic> isolates were susceptible to all antibiotics tested [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">35</xref>]. Of note, four <italic>S. uberis</italic> RM cheese strains were susceptible to all antibiotics tested (with the exception of streptomycin), including tetracycline; however, three and one of them were found to possess the <italic>tetM</italic> and <italic>tetL</italic> genes, respectively, despite all of them were phenotypically sensitive to tetracycline [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">34</xref>].</p>
<p id="p-32">Overall, the high variability in virulence gene profiles of field strains of the two <italic>Streptococcus</italic> groups, <italic>S. uberis/parauberis</italic> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">15</xref>] and the SESB complex [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">20</xref>] primarily associated with mastitis in ruminants is a serious concern. Additional streptococcal virulence genes (<italic>asa1</italic>, <italic>mrp</italic>, <italic>sly</italic>, <italic>bay</italic>, <italic>bca</italic>, <italic>speG</italic>, <italic>scpB</italic>, <italic>ssa</italic>) were tested for the SESB complex and the species <italic>S. lutetiensis</italic> in particular [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">16</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">20</xref>]. Also, the virulence genes (<italic>sua</italic>, <italic>pauA</italic>, <italic>skc</italic>, <italic>gapC</italic>, <italic>hasC</italic>) specific to the pyogenic <italic>S. uberis</italic> group [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">15</xref>] differ from the <italic>Enterococcus</italic>-specific virulence genes tested by Sioziou et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">23</xref>].</p>
<p id="p-33">
<italic>Streptococcus</italic>-specific virulence genes were not tested by Sioziou et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">23</xref>] or in this study because, as mentioned, according to the API 20 STREP data in <xref ref-type="table" rid="t3">Table 3</xref>: All <italic>S. parauberis</italic> sheep milk isolates biochemically identified as <italic>S. agalactiae</italic> (biotype I) or <italic>S. uberis</italic> (biotype II), and all <italic>S. equinus</italic> sharing a high biochemical similarity with <italic>S. pneumoniae</italic>, were <italic>a priori</italic> considered unwanted strains resembling closely-related pathogenic species causing mastitis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">17</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">35</xref>–<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">37</xref>], irrespective none of them was MDR (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t4">Table 4</xref>) or β-hemolytic (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t3">Table 3</xref>) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">6</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">23</xref>]. In other words, the potential inclusion of any of the above non-QPS <italic>Streptococcus</italic> field isolates in complex NSCs is restricted by their genotypic and primary phenotypic assignment to major LAB species associated with clinical mastitis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">37</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">38</xref>], especially to <italic>S. agalactiae</italic> and <italic>S. uberis</italic> with a pooled global prevalence of 9% each amongst the most important pathogens present in the milk of the world [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">39</xref>]. The above restriction also applies to the single <italic>S. gallolyticus</italic> subsp. <italic>pasteurianus</italic> KFM 26 raw sheep milk isolate, the only strain biotype studied herein that exhibited β-glucuronidase activity (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t3">Table 3</xref>).</p>
<p id="p-34">In summary, as it was concluded by Özkan et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">20</xref>], dairy scientists should be conscious to claim that strains of non-QPS species within the SESB complex associated with many diseases are actually beneficial. However, when certain safe strains of this major group prevail in traditionally fermented dairy (cheese) products, they deserve to be evaluated differently from similar strains of clinical origin. Amongst the non-QPS sheep milk <italic>Streptococcus</italic> isolates of this study, only the two <italic>S. lutetiensis</italic> strains were likely to deserve further attention and a positive view. The species is highly controversially associated with clinical mastitis of dairy cows [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">16</xref>]. However, different <italic>S. lutetiensis</italic> strains were members of the beneficial technological LAB biota in Turkish Beyaz [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">40</xref>] and Tulum [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">41</xref>] cheeses, or showed high acid and diacetyl/acetoin production in milk after 24 h at 30–40<sup>o</sup>C [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">42</xref>]. Moreover, unidentified class I and II bacteriocins predicted in the genomes of ruminal <italic>S. lutetiensis</italic> strains were confirmed by SDS-PAGE, showing promise as novel antimicrobial peptides [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">43</xref>]. Therefore, recent data about <italic>S. lutetiensis</italic> are in accordance with our present findings regarding the strong bacteriocin- mediated antilisterial activity (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>), strong acetoin production and beneficial enzymatic activities of the <italic>S. lutetiensis</italic> KFM 55 and KFM 60 strains, including their α-galactosidase and leucine aminopeptidase activities (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t3">Tables 3</xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="t6">6</xref>). However, on the other hand, the resistance of these strains to ciprofloxacin, a fluoroquinolone, is a safety concern, especially for potential human consumption and precludes their free use as natural starter or adjunct culture constituents in traditional cheese technologies.</p>
<p id="p-35">According to the literature, the most promising, autochthonous starter or adjunct LAB candidates should possess strong to moderate acid phosphatase, aminopeptidase, esterase, esterase/lipase and high glycolytic (α-galactosidase and/or β-galactosidase, or α-glucosidase) activities, and should lack undesired activities, such as β-glucoronidase and β-glucosidase considered to be potential mediators of colon carcinogenesis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">44</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">45</xref>]. However, this negative health-associated consideration has been contradicted in recent reviews: A beneficial, multi-functional role for at least the β-glucosidase activity of many LAB species, especially <italic>Lactiplantibacillus plantarum</italic>, in food fermentation and human health is concluded by Paventi et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">46</xref>], supporting the application of <italic>Lp. plantarum</italic> H25, a strong-positive strain for β-glucosidase activity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">27</xref>], as an aromatic adjunct in traditional Galotyri PDO cheese products [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">28</xref>]. Nevertheless, neither the two selected bacteriocin-producing <italic>S. lutetiensis</italic> strains nor the two primary NSC strains <italic>S. thermophilus</italic> ST1 and <italic>Lc. lactis</italic> M78 were β-glucosidase-positive (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t6">Table 6</xref>), whereas the only β-glucoronidase-positive, potentially harmful sheep milk isolate was assigned to <italic>S. gallolyticus</italic> subsp. <italic>pasteurianus</italic> KFM 26 (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t3">Table 3</xref>).</p>
<p id="p-36">On the other hand, the superiority of the cheese starter strain <italic>S. thermophilus</italic> ST1 to strongly acidify the RSM within less than 6 h at 37<sup>o</sup>C (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t5">Table 5</xref>) was primarily attributed to its positive reaction for β-galactosidase, i.e., the main enzyme responsible for lactose breakdown to glucose and galactose during milk fermentation. Accordingly, the faster and stronger RSM acidification by all <italic>S. equinus</italic> isolates and <italic>S. gallolyticus</italic> KFM 26 (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t5">Table 5</xref>) corroborates their β-galactosidase-positive reaction in the API 20 STREP compared to all <italic>S. parauberis</italic> and <italic>S. lutetiensis</italic> isolates, which gave a negative reaction (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t3">Table 3</xref>). In particular, the weaker milk acidifying activity of the <italic>S. parauberis</italic> isolates is consistent with the fact that all of them were negative for β-galactosidase, α-galactosidase, β-glucosidase, and β-glucuronidase; their α-glucosidase activity, not included in the API 20 STREP kit (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t3">Table 3</xref>), should be tested in future studies.</p>
<p id="p-37">Meanwhile, the lack of α-galactosidase in both NSC strains ST1 and M78 (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t6">Table 6</xref>), and in all strain biotypes of the <italic>E. faecium/E. durans</italic> group and <italic>E. faecalis</italic> that coexisted in both sheep RM/TM counterparts [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">24</xref>] makes α-galactosidase activity exhibited by <italic>S. lutetiensis</italic> a potentially major biotechnological advantage. Whereas the negative lipolytic and low proteolytic (valine and cystine arylamidase) activities of <italic>S. lutetiensis</italic> strains may be replaced by the bioprotective <italic>Lc. lactis</italic> strain (M78 = M104) genotype [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">29</xref>] and selected <italic>E. faecium/E. durans</italic> adjunct strains [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">27</xref>] with respect to their in situ metabolic performance in cheese milk and dairy foods overall. Thus, the prominent differences in the API ZYM profiles of the <italic>S. lutetiensis</italic> KFM 55 and KFM 60 strains might be complementary to those of the NSC strains <italic>S. thermophilus</italic> ST1 and <italic>Lc. lactis</italic> subsp<italic>. cremoris</italic> M78 (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t6">Table 6</xref>), as well as of the adjunct strains <italic>E. faecium</italic> KE82 (<italic>entA/entB/entP</italic> producer) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">47</xref>] and <italic>Lp. plantarum</italic> H25 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">28</xref>].</p>
<p id="p-38">To this end and relative to the natural presence of controversial, potentially beneficial <italic>S. lutetiensis</italic> strains in Greek RMs from native small ruminant breeds, a very recent (available online 1 May 2026) comprehensive study by Zoumpopoulou et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">48</xref>] on the LAB ecology of eight RM samples of the Lesvos breed identified two <italic>S. lutetiensis</italic> (1.7%) along with four <italic>S. macedonicus</italic> (3.4%) strains as subdominant members of the total LAB biota (117 isolates) dominated by <italic>Enterococcus</italic> spp. (73; 62.4%) followed by thermophilic lactobacilli (27; 23.1%) and mesophilic lactobacilli of the <italic>Lacticaseibacillus casei/paracasei/rhamnosus</italic> group (11; 9.4%). Of note, two strains of the latter probiotic group possessed bacteriocin-mediated antilisterial activity and two probiotic <italic>S. macedonicus</italic> strains anti-streptococcal activity. Conversely, none of the two <italic>S. lutetiensis</italic> strains originating from one sample of Lesvos breed sheep milk produced bacteriocin; however, one of them, <italic>S. lutetiensis</italic> 307, exhibited more than one probiotic properties, including proteolytic activity, bile salt hydrolase (BSH) activity, high survival in the presence of 1% bile salts, and good survival under GIT (pH 2.5) conditions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">48</xref>]. Finally, both <italic>S. lutetiensis</italic> strains found in Lesvos raw sheep milk were resistant to gentamicin, kanamycin and streptomycin; but, consistent with the KFM 55 and KFM 60 Epirus milk strains, both were susceptible to ampicillin, chloramphenicol, erythromycin, tetracycline and vancomycin, while resistance to ciprofloxacin was not tested for the LAB isolates from Lesvos breed sheep milk by Zoumpopoulou et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">48</xref>].</p>
<p id="p-39">Collectively, based on the present results and preceding discussion, further in situ validation studies are required to assess the actual milk acidification activity and other potentially complementary enzymatic activities, as well as potential probiotic activities, of the two novel antilisterial-bacteriocin-producing <italic>S. lutetiensis</italic> KFM 55 and KFM 60 strains from Epirus sheep milk in real cheese fermentation and ripening trials.</p>
<p id="p-40">Finally, it should be noted that the present study has certain limitations. First, the number of animal streptococci tested was small, originating from two sheep milk batches, which limits the strain variability at or within the species level. These sample size limitations further preclude the present results from being generalized to all native sheep breed milks produced in Epirus or other Greek regions. Second, biotyping supported by 16S rRNA gene identification only was insufficient to fully resolve the species and subspecies heterogeneity within the SESB complex, potentially leading to culture-dependent strain misidentifications. Culture-independent approaches are considered more suitable and powerful to map the complex microbial (LAB) ecology of sheep milk, particularly when it is raw. Whole-genome sequencing of promising or probably unsafe <italic>Streptococcus</italic> strains is needed.</p>
<sec id="t4-1">
<title>Conclusions</title>
<p id="p-41">Despite <italic>S. lutetiensis</italic> is a non-QPS species of the SESB complex that causes mastitis, selected aciduric or antagonistic strains of <italic>S. lutetiensis</italic> from artisanal cheeses lacking streptococcal virulence and AR genes have been proposed as starters or adjuncts. In alignment, the antibiotic susceptible (except ciprofloxacin) <italic>S. lutetiensis</italic> KFM 55 and KFM 60 strain biotypes from RM of native Epirus sheep breeds possess beneficial fermentative and enzymatic activities in vitro and antilisterial bacteriocin activity. The structural, either known or novel, bacteriocin gene/s or other antagonistic mechanism underlying the in vitro bacteriocin-mediated activity against <italic>L. monocytogenes</italic> has yet to be elucidated, along with a complete safety evaluation of these strains. Although both lack β-hemolytic activity and the <italic>vanA</italic>, <italic>vanB</italic>, <italic>gelE</italic>, <italic>hyl</italic> or <italic>cyl</italic> genes and are not MDR, the possibility of possessing other virulence genes associated with the SESB complex and the species <italic>S. lutetiensis</italic> in particular remains. Therefore, until their safety status is fully clarified, the inclusion of the phenotypically ciprofloxacin-resistant <italic>S. lutetiensis</italic> KFM 55 and KFM 60 strains in complex NSCs for commercial use in traditional Greek cheeses is hampered. Whole-genome sequencing and in situ cheese trials are required before recommending these strains for commercial NSC development.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<glossary>
<title>Abbreviations</title>
<def-list>
<def-item>
<term>AR</term>
<def>
<p>antibiotic resistant</p>
</def>
</def-item>
<def-item>
<term>BA</term>
<def>
<p>biogenic amine</p>
</def>
</def-item>
<def-item>
<term>CFS</term>
<def>
<p>cell-free supernatants</p>
</def>
</def-item>
<def-item>
<term>CLSI</term>
<def>
<p>Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute</p>
</def>
</def-item>
<def-item>
<term>GRAS</term>
<def>
<p>Generally Recognized as Safe</p>
</def>
</def-item>
<def-item>
<term>KAA</term>
<def>
<p>Kanamycin Aesculin Azide</p>
</def>
</def-item>
<def-item>
<term>LAB</term>
<def>
<p>lactic acid bacteria</p>
</def>
</def-item>
<def-item>
<term>MDR</term>
<def>
<p>multidrug resistant</p>
</def>
</def-item>
<def-item>
<term>NSCs</term>
<def>
<p>natural starter cultures</p>
</def>
</def-item>
<def-item>
<term>PDO</term>
<def>
<p>Protected Designation of Origin</p>
</def>
</def-item>
<def-item>
<term>QPS</term>
<def>
<p>Qualified Presumption of Safety</p>
</def>
</def-item>
<def-item>
<term>RM</term>
<def>
<p>raw milk</p>
</def>
</def-item>
<def-item>
<term>rRNA</term>
<def>
<p>ribosomal RNA</p>
</def>
</def-item>
<def-item>
<term>RSM</term>
<def>
<p>reconstituted skimmed milk</p>
</def>
</def-item>
<def-item>
<term>SESB</term>
<def>
<p>
<italic>Streptococcus equinus</italic>/<italic>Streptococcus bovis</italic></p>
</def>
</def-item>
<def-item>
<term>TM</term>
<def>
<p>thermized milk</p>
</def>
</def-item>
</def-list>
</glossary>
<sec id="s-suppl" sec-type="supplementary-material">
<title>Supplementary materials</title>
<p>The supplementary table for this article is available at: <uri xlink:href="https://www.explorationpub.com/uploads/Article/file/1010187_sup_1.pdf">https://www.explorationpub.com/uploads/Article/file/1010187_sup_1.pdf</uri>.</p>
<supplementary-material id="SD1" content-type="local-data">
<media xlink:href="1010187_sup_1.pdf" mimetype="application" mime-subtype="pdf"></media>
</supplementary-material>
</sec>
<sec id="s6">
<title>Declarations</title>
<sec id="t-6-1">
<title>Acknowledgments</title>
<p>The authors wish to thank Vasiliki Zafeiropoulou and Maria Mavropoulou, Veterinary Laboratory, Food Hygiene Department, Ministry of Agriculture, Athens, Greece, for identifying the API 20 STREP code numbers of the present <italic>Streptococcus</italic> isolates with the apiweb<sup>TM</sup> software, not available in our laboratory.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="t-6-2">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>JS: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Methodology, Validation, Resources, Data curation, Project administration, Writing—original draft, Writing—review &amp; editing, Investigation, Visualization. AK: Formal analysis, Validation, Writing—review &amp; editing. Both authors read and approved the submitted version.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="t-6-3" sec-type="COI-statement">
<title>Conflicts of interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="t-6-4">
<title>Ethical approval</title>
<p>Not applicable.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="t-6-5">
<title>Consent to participate</title>
<p>Not applicable.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="t-6-6">
<title>Consent to publication</title>
<p>Not applicable.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="t-6-7" sec-type="data-availability">
<title>Availability of data and materials</title>
<p>Data are contained within the article. Raw data will be made available on request.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="t-6-8">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>Not applicable.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="t-6-9">
<title>Copyright</title>
<p>© The Author(s) 2026.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s7">
<title>Publisher’s note</title>
<p>Open Exploration maintains a neutral stance on jurisdictional claims in published institutional affiliations and maps. All opinions expressed in this article are the personal views of the author(s) and do not represent the stance of the editorial team or the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<label>1</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Tilocca</surname>
<given-names>B</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Costanzo</surname>
<given-names>N</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Morittu</surname>
<given-names>VM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Spina</surname>
<given-names>AA</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Soggiu</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Britti</surname>
<given-names>D</given-names>
</name>
<etal>et al.</etal>
</person-group>
<article-title>Milk microbiota: Characterization methods and role in cheese production</article-title>
<source>J Proteom</source>
<year iso-8601-date="2020">2020</year>
<volume>210</volume>
<elocation-id>103534</elocation-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jprot.2019.103534</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<label>2</label>
<element-citation publication-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Stepaniak</surname>
<given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rukke</surname>
<given-names>EO</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Thermization of milk</article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname>Roginski</surname>
<given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fuquay</surname>
<given-names>JW</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fox</surname>
<given-names>P</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source>Encyclopedia of Dairy Sciences, London: Elsevier Science Ltd</source>
<comment>Academic Press; 2003. pp. 2619–23.</comment>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<label>3</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Eugster</surname>
<given-names>E</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jakob</surname>
<given-names>E</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Pre-treatments of milk and their effect on the food safety of cheese</article-title>
<source>Milk Sci Int</source>
<year iso-8601-date="2019">2019</year>
<volume>72</volume>
<fpage>45</fpage>
<lpage>52</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.25968/MSI.2019.8</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<label>4</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lindsay</surname>
<given-names>D</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Robertson</surname>
<given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fraser</surname>
<given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Engstrom</surname>
<given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jordan</surname>
<given-names>K</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Heat induced inactivation of microorganisms in milk and dairy products</article-title>
<source>Int Dairy J</source>
<year iso-8601-date="2021">2021</year>
<volume>121</volume>
<elocation-id>105096</elocation-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.idairyj.2021.105096</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<label>5</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Samelis</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lianou</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kakouri</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Delbès</surname>
<given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rogelj</surname>
<given-names>I</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bogovic-Matijasić</surname>
<given-names>B</given-names>
</name>
<etal>et al.</etal>
</person-group>
<article-title>Changes in the Microbial Composition of Raw Milk Induced by Thermization Treatments Applied Prior to Traditional Greek Hard Cheese Processing</article-title>
<source>J Food Prot</source>
<year iso-8601-date="2009">2009</year>
<volume>72</volume>
<fpage>783</fpage>
<lpage>90</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4315/0362-028x-72.4.783</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19435227</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<label>6</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Samelis</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bosnea</surname>
<given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kakouri</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Microbiological Quality and Safety of Raw Sheep Milks from Native Epirus Breeds: Selective Effects of Thermization on the Microbiota Surviving in Resultant Thermized Milks Intended for Traditional Greek Hard Cheese Production</article-title>
<source>Appl Microbiol</source>
<year iso-8601-date="2025">2025</year>
<volume>5</volume>
<elocation-id>11</elocation-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/applmicrobiol5010011</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<label>7</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Coelho</surname>
<given-names>MC</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Malcata</surname>
<given-names>FX</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Silva</surname>
<given-names>CCG</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Lactic Acid Bacteria in Raw-Milk Cheeses: From Starter Cultures to Probiotic Functions</article-title>
<source>Foods</source>
<year iso-8601-date="2022">2022</year>
<volume>11</volume>
<elocation-id>2276</elocation-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/foods11152276</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35954043</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">PMC9368153</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<label>8</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chessa</surname>
<given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Paba</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dupré</surname>
<given-names>I</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Daga</surname>
<given-names>E</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fozzi</surname>
<given-names>MC</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Comunian</surname>
<given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>A Strategy for the Recovery of Raw Ewe’s Milk Microbiodiversity to Develop Natural Starter Cultures for Traditional Foods</article-title>
<source>Microorganisms</source>
<year iso-8601-date="2023">2023</year>
<volume>11</volume>
<elocation-id>823</elocation-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/microorganisms11040823</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">37110245</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">PMC10142512</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<label>9</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chessa</surname>
<given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Daga</surname>
<given-names>E</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dupré</surname>
<given-names>I</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Paba</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fozzi</surname>
<given-names>MC</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dedola</surname>
<given-names>DG</given-names>
</name>
<etal>et al.</etal>
</person-group>
<article-title>Biodiversity and Safety: Cohabitation Experimentation in Undefined Starter Cultures for Traditional Dairy Products</article-title>
<source>Fermentation</source>
<year iso-8601-date="2024">2024</year>
<volume>10</volume>
<elocation-id>29</elocation-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/fermentation10010029</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<label>10</label>
<element-citation publication-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Švec</surname>
<given-names>P</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Devriese</surname>
<given-names>LA</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Genus I Enterococcus (ex Thiercelin and Jouhaud 1903) Schleifer and Klipper-Bälz 1984, 32VP</article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname>Whitman</surname>
<given-names>WB</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source>Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, The Firmicutes</source>
<edition>Vol</edition>
<publisher-loc>3. 2nd ed. New York</publisher-loc>
<publisher-name>Springer</publisher-name>
<year iso-8601-date="2009">2009</year>
<comment>pp. 594–607.</comment>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<label>11</label>
<element-citation publication-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Whiley</surname>
<given-names>RA</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hardie</surname>
<given-names>JM</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Genus I Streptococcus Rosenbach 1884, 22AL</article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname>Whitman</surname>
<given-names>WB</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source>Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, The Firmicutes, Vol</source>
<edition>3</edition>
<publisher-loc>2nd ed. New York</publisher-loc>
<publisher-name>Springer</publisher-name>
<year iso-8601-date="2009">2009</year>
<comment>pp. 655–711.</comment>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<label>12</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Dapkevicius</surname>
<given-names>MLE</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sgardioli</surname>
<given-names>B</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Câmara</surname>
<given-names>SPA</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Poeta</surname>
<given-names>P</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Malcata</surname>
<given-names>FX</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Current Trends of Enterococci in Dairy Products: A Comprehensive Review of Their Multiple Roles</article-title>
<source>Foods</source>
<year iso-8601-date="2021">2021</year>
<volume>10</volume>
<elocation-id>821</elocation-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/foods10040821</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33920106</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">PMC8070337</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<label>13</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Glajzner</surname>
<given-names>P</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Szewczyk</surname>
<given-names>EM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Szemraj</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Pathogenicity and drug resistance of animal streptococci responsible for human infections</article-title>
<source>J Med Microbiol</source>
<year iso-8601-date="2021">2021</year>
<volume>70</volume>
<elocation-id>001339</elocation-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1099/jmm.0.001339</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33750514</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<label>14</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Dimov</surname>
<given-names>SG</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>The Controversial Nature of Some Non-Starter Lactic Acid Bacteria Actively Participating in Cheese Ripening</article-title>
<source>BioTech</source>
<year iso-8601-date="2023">2023</year>
<volume>12</volume>
<elocation-id>63</elocation-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/biotech12040063</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">37987480</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">PMC10660856</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<label>15</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname>
<given-names>F</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>X</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Luo</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname>
<given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<etal>et al.</etal>
</person-group>
<article-title>Detection of antimicrobial resistance and virulence-related genes in <italic>Streptococcus uberis</italic> and <italic>Streptococcus parauberis</italic> isolated from clinical bovine mastitis cases in northwestern China</article-title>
<source>J Integr Agric</source>
<year iso-8601-date="2020">2020</year>
<volume>19</volume>
<fpage>2784</fpage>
<lpage>91</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/s2095-3119(20)63185-9</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<label>16</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname>
<given-names>P</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Qiu</surname>
<given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>G</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>X</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cheng</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>K</given-names>
</name>
<etal>et al.</etal>
</person-group>
<article-title>Characterization of <italic>Streptococcus lutetiensis</italic> isolated from clinical mastitis of dairy cows</article-title>
<source>J Dairy Sci</source>
<year iso-8601-date="2021">2021</year>
<volume>104</volume>
<fpage>702</fpage>
<lpage>14</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3168/jds.2020-18347</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33162075</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<label>17</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Rosa</surname>
<given-names>NM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Penati</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fusar-Poli</surname>
<given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Addis</surname>
<given-names>MF</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tola</surname>
<given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Species identification by MALDI-TOF MS and gap PCR–RFLP of non-aureus <italic>Staphylococcus</italic>, <italic>Mammaliicoccus</italic>, and <italic>Streptococcus</italic> spp. associated with sheep and goat mastitis</article-title>
<source>Vet Res</source>
<year iso-8601-date="2022">2022</year>
<volume>53</volume>
<elocation-id>84</elocation-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s13567-022-01102-4</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">36243811</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">PMC9569034</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<label>18</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>De</surname>
<given-names>Vuyst L</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tsakalidou</surname>
<given-names>E</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>
<italic>Streptococcus macedonicus</italic>, a multi-functional and promising species for dairy fermentations</article-title>
<source>Int Dairy J</source>
<year iso-8601-date="2008">2008</year>
<volume>18</volume>
<fpage>476</fpage>
<lpage>85</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.idairyj.2007.10.006</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<label>19</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Jans</surname>
<given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Meile</surname>
<given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kaindi</surname>
<given-names>DWM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kogi-Makau</surname>
<given-names>W</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lamuka</surname>
<given-names>P</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Renault</surname>
<given-names>P</given-names>
</name>
<etal>et al.</etal>
</person-group>
<article-title>African fermented dairy products – Overview of predominant technologically important microorganisms focusing on African <italic>Streptococcus infantarius</italic> variants and potential future applications for enhanced food safety and security</article-title>
<source>Int J Food Microbiol</source>
<year iso-8601-date="2017">2017</year>
<volume>250</volume>
<fpage>27</fpage>
<lpage>36</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2017.03.012</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28364623</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<label>20</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Özkan</surname>
<given-names>ER</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Öztürk</surname>
<given-names>Hİ</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Demirci</surname>
<given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Akın</surname>
<given-names>N</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Detection of biofilm formation, virulence factor genes, antibiotic-resistance, adherence properties, and some beneficial properties of cheese origin <italic>S. infantarius</italic>, <italic>S. gallolyticus</italic>, and <italic>S. lutetiensis</italic> strains belonging to the <italic>S. bovis/S. equinus</italic> complex</article-title>
<source>LWT</source>
<year iso-8601-date="2021">2021</year>
<volume>150</volume>
<elocation-id>112077</elocation-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.lwt.2021.112077</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<label>21</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Güley</surname>
<given-names>Z</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fallico</surname>
<given-names>V</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cabrera-Rubio</surname>
<given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cotter</surname>
<given-names>PD</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Beresford</surname>
<given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Identification of <italic>Streptococcus infantarius</italic> subsp. <italic>infantarius</italic> as the species primarily responsible for acid production in Izmir Brined Tulum Cheese from the Aegean Region of Türkiye</article-title>
<source>Food Res Int</source>
<year iso-8601-date="2022">2022</year>
<volume>160</volume>
<elocation-id>111707</elocation-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foodres.2022.111707</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">36076456</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<label>22</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>EFSA</surname>
<given-names>Panel on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ)</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Allende</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Alvarez-Ordóñez</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bortolaia</surname>
<given-names>V</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bover-Cid</surname>
<given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>De</surname>
<given-names>Cesare A</given-names>
</name>
<etal>et al.</etal>
</person-group>
<article-title>Update of the list of qualified presumption of safety (QPS) recommended microbiological agents intentionally added to food or feed as notified to EFSA 21: Suitability of taxonomic units notified to EFSA until September 2024</article-title>
<source>EFSA J</source>
<year iso-8601-date="2025">2025</year>
<volume>23</volume>
<elocation-id>e9169</elocation-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9169</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">39834754</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">PMC11744300</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<label>23</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sioziou</surname>
<given-names>E</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kakouri</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bosnea</surname>
<given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Samelis</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Antilisterial activity of raw sheep milk from two native Epirus breeds: Culture-dependent identification, bacteriocin gene detection and primary safety evaluation of the antagonistic LAB biota</article-title>
<source>Curr Res Microb Sci</source>
<year iso-8601-date="2024">2024</year>
<volume>6</volume>
<elocation-id>100209</elocation-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.crmicr.2023.100209</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">38116185</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">PMC10727937</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<label>24</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Samelis</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kakouri</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Antibiotic Susceptibility of Autochthonous <italic>Enterococcus</italic> Strain Biotypes Prevailing in Sheep Milk from Native Epirus Breeds Before and After Mild Thermization in View of Their Inclusion in a Complex Natural Cheese Starter Culture</article-title>
<source>Appl Microbiol</source>
<year iso-8601-date="2025">2025</year>
<volume>5</volume>
<elocation-id>125</elocation-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/applmicrobiol5040125</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<label>25</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kim</surname>
<given-names>EB</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kopit</surname>
<given-names>LM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Harris</surname>
<given-names>LJ</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Marco</surname>
<given-names>ML</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Draft Genome Sequence of the Quality Control Strain <italic>Enterococcus faecalis</italic> ATCC 29212</article-title>
<source>J Bacteriol</source>
<year iso-8601-date="2012">2012</year>
<volume>194</volume>
<fpage>6006</fpage>
<lpage>7</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/jb.01423-12</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23045510</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">PMC3486070</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<label>26</label>
<element-citation publication-type="book">
<source>CLSI</source>
<edition>Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing</edition>
<publisher-loc>26th ed. Supplement M100S. Wayne, PA</publisher-loc>
<publisher-name>Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute</publisher-name>
<year iso-8601-date="2016">2016</year>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<label>27</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Tsanasidou</surname>
<given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Asimakoula</surname>
<given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sameli</surname>
<given-names>N</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fanitsios</surname>
<given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vandera</surname>
<given-names>E</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bosnea</surname>
<given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
<etal>et al.</etal>
</person-group>
<article-title>Safety Evaluation, Biogenic Amine Formation, and Enzymatic Activity Profiles of Autochthonous Enterocin-Producing Greek Cheese Isolates of the <italic>Enterococcus faecium/durans</italic> Group</article-title>
<source>Microorganisms</source>
<year iso-8601-date="2021">2021</year>
<volume>9</volume>
<elocation-id>777</elocation-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/microorganisms9040777</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33917761</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">PMC8068099</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<label>28</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Samelis</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tsanasidou</surname>
<given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bosnea</surname>
<given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ntziadima</surname>
<given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gatzias</surname>
<given-names>I</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kakouri</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<etal>et al.</etal>
</person-group>
<article-title>Pilot-Scale Production of Traditional Galotyri PDO Cheese from Boiled Ewes’ Milk Fermented with the Aid of Greek Indigenous <italic>Lactococcus lactis</italic> subsp. <italic>cremoris</italic> Starter and <italic>Lactiplantibacillus plantarum</italic> Adjunct Strains</article-title>
<source>Fermentation</source>
<year iso-8601-date="2023">2023</year>
<volume>9</volume>
<elocation-id>345</elocation-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/fermentation9040345</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<label>29</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Parapouli</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Delbès-Paus</surname>
<given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kakouri</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Koukkou</surname>
<given-names>AI</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Montel</surname>
<given-names>MC</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Samelis</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Characterization of a Wild, Novel Nisin A-Producing <italic>Lactococcus</italic> Strain with an <italic>L. lactis</italic> subsp. <italic>cremoris</italic> Genotype and an <italic>L. lactis</italic> subsp. <italic>lactis</italic> Phenotype, Isolated from Greek Raw Milk</article-title>
<source>Appl Environ Microbiol</source>
<year iso-8601-date="2013">2013</year>
<volume>79</volume>
<fpage>3476</fpage>
<lpage>84</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/aem.00436-13</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23542625</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">PMC3648029</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<label>30</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bover-Cid</surname>
<given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Holzapfel</surname>
<given-names>WH</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Improved screening procedure for biogenic amine production by lactic acid bacteria</article-title>
<source>Int J Food Microbiol</source>
<year iso-8601-date="1999">1999</year>
<volume>53</volume>
<fpage>33</fpage>
<lpage>41</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/s0168-1605(99)00152-x</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10598112</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<label>31</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Schlegel</surname>
<given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Grimont</surname>
<given-names>F</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ageron</surname>
<given-names>E</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Grimont</surname>
<given-names>PAD</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bouvet</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Reappraisal of the taxonomy of the <italic>Streptococcus bovis/Streptococcus equinus</italic> complex and related species: description of <italic>Streptococcus gallolyticus</italic> subsp. <italic>gallolyticus</italic> subsp. nov., <italic>S. gallolyticus</italic> subsp. <italic>macedonicus</italic> subsp. nov. and <italic>S. gallolyticus</italic> subsp. <italic>pasteurianus</italic> subsp. nov</article-title>
<source>Int J Syst Evol Microbiol</source>
<year iso-8601-date="2003">2003</year>
<volume>53</volume>
<fpage>631</fpage>
<lpage>45</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1099/ijs.0.02361-0</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12807180</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<label>32</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Schlegel</surname>
<given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Grimont</surname>
<given-names>F</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Collins</surname>
<given-names>MD</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Régnault</surname>
<given-names>B</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Grimont</surname>
<given-names>PA</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bouvet</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>
<italic>Streptococcus infantarius</italic> sp. nov., <italic>Streptococcus infantarius</italic> subsp. <italic>infantarius</italic> subsp. nov. and <italic>Streptococcus infantarius</italic> subsp. <italic>coli</italic> subsp. nov., isolated from humans and food</article-title>
<source>Int J Syst Evol Microbiol</source>
<year iso-8601-date="2000">2000</year>
<volume>50 Pt 4</volume>
<fpage>1425</fpage>
<lpage>34</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1099/00207713-50-4-1425</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10939646</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<label>33</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Poyart</surname>
<given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Quesne</surname>
<given-names>G</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Trieu-Cuot</surname>
<given-names>P</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Taxonomic dissection of the <italic>Streptococcus bovis</italic> group by analysis of manganese-dependent superoxide dismutase gene (sodA) sequences: reclassification of <italic>'Streptococcus infantarius</italic> subsp. <italic>coli</italic>' as <italic>Streptococcus lutetiensis</italic> sp. nov. and of <italic>Streptococcus bovis</italic> biotype 11.2 as <italic>Streptococcus pasteurianus</italic> sp. nov</article-title>
<source>Int J Syst Evol Microbiol</source>
<year iso-8601-date="2002">2002</year>
<volume>52</volume>
<fpage>1247</fpage>
<lpage>55</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1099/00207713-52-4-1247</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12148636</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<label>34</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Morandi</surname>
<given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Silvetti</surname>
<given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Miranda</surname>
<given-names>Lopez J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Brasca</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Antimicrobial Activity, Antibiotic Resistance and the Safety of Lactic Acid Bacteria in Raw Milk Valtellina Casera Cheese</article-title>
<source>J Food Saf</source>
<year iso-8601-date="2014">2014</year>
<volume>35</volume>
<fpage>193</fpage>
<lpage>205</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/jfs.12171</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<label>35</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Pitkälä</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Koort</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Björkroth</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Identification and Antimicrobial Resistance of <italic>Streptococcus uberis</italic> and <italic>Streptococcus parauberis</italic> Isolated from Bovine Milk Samples</article-title>
<source>J Dairy Sci</source>
<year iso-8601-date="2008">2008</year>
<volume>91</volume>
<fpage>4075</fpage>
<lpage>81</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3168/jds.2008-1040</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18832235</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<label>36</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>McDonald</surname>
<given-names>WL</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fry</surname>
<given-names>BN</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Deighton</surname>
<given-names>MA</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Identification of <italic>Streptococcus</italic> spp. causing bovine mastitis by PCR-RFLP of 16S-23S ribosomal DNA</article-title>
<source>Vet Microbiol</source>
<year iso-8601-date="2005">2005</year>
<volume>111</volume>
<fpage>241</fpage>
<lpage>6</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.vetmic.2005.10.012</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16289400</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B37">
<label>37</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Alnakip</surname>
<given-names>MEA</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rhouma</surname>
<given-names>NR</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Abd-Elfatah</surname>
<given-names>EN</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Quintela-Baluja</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Böhme</surname>
<given-names>K</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fernández-No</surname>
<given-names>I</given-names>
</name>
<etal>et al.</etal>
</person-group>
<article-title>Discrimination of major and minor streptococci incriminated in bovine mastitis by MALDI-TOF MS fingerprinting and 16S rRNA gene sequencing</article-title>
<source>Res Vet Sci</source>
<year iso-8601-date="2020">2020</year>
<volume>132</volume>
<fpage>426</fpage>
<lpage>38</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.rvsc.2020.07.027</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32777539</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B38">
<label>38</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Quigley</surname>
<given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>O’Sullivan</surname>
<given-names>O</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Stanton</surname>
<given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Beresford</surname>
<given-names>TP</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ross</surname>
<given-names>RP</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fitzgerald</surname>
<given-names>GF</given-names>
</name>
<etal>et al.</etal>
</person-group>
<article-title>The complex microbiota of raw milk</article-title>
<source>FEMS Microbiol Rev</source>
<year iso-8601-date="2013">2013</year>
<volume>37</volume>
<fpage>664</fpage>
<lpage>98</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/1574-6976.12030</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23808865</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B39">
<label>39</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Krishnamoorthy</surname>
<given-names>P</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Suresh</surname>
<given-names>KP</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jayamma</surname>
<given-names>KS</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shome</surname>
<given-names>BR</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Patil</surname>
<given-names>SS</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Amachawadi</surname>
<given-names>RG</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>An Understanding of the Global Status of Major Bacterial Pathogens of Milk Concerning Bovine Mastitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (Scientometrics)</article-title>
<source>Pathogens</source>
<year iso-8601-date="2021">2021</year>
<volume>10</volume>
<elocation-id>545</elocation-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/pathogens10050545</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33946571</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">PMC8147236</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B40">
<label>40</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Meral</surname>
<given-names>Aktaş H</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Erdoğan</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Characterization of technological properties of lactic acid bacteria isolated from Turkish Beyaz (white) cheese</article-title>
<source>J Food Process Preserv</source>
<year iso-8601-date="2022">2022</year>
<volume>46</volume>
<elocation-id>e16837</elocation-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/jfpp.16837</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B41">
<label>41</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Demirci</surname>
<given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Akin</surname>
<given-names>N</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sözeri</surname>
<given-names>Atik D</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rabia</surname>
<given-names>Özkan E</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dertli</surname>
<given-names>E</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Akyol</surname>
<given-names>İ</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Lactic acid bacteria diversity and dynamics during ripening of traditional Turkish goatskin Tulum cheese produced in Mut region assessed by culturing and PCR-DGGE</article-title>
<source>LWT</source>
<year iso-8601-date="2021">2021</year>
<volume>138</volume>
<elocation-id>110701</elocation-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.lwt.2020.110701</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B42">
<label>42</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Tsuda</surname>
<given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kodama</surname>
<given-names>K</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Evaluating the technological properties of lactic acid bacteria in Wagyu cattle milk</article-title>
<source>J Dairy Res</source>
<year iso-8601-date="2021">2021</year>
<volume>88</volume>
<fpage>210</fpage>
<lpage>6</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1017/s0022029921000339</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33934726</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B43">
<label>43</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>de Oliveira</surname>
<given-names>IMF</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Godoy-Santos</surname>
<given-names>F</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Oyama</surname>
<given-names>LB</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Moreira</surname>
<given-names>SM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dias</surname>
<given-names>RG</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Huws</surname>
<given-names>SA</given-names>
</name>
<etal>et al.</etal>
</person-group>
<article-title>Whole-Genome Sequencing and Comparative Genomic Analysis of Antimicrobial Producing <italic>Streptococcus lutetiensis</italic> from the Rumen</article-title>
<source>Microorganisms</source>
<year iso-8601-date="2022">2022</year>
<volume>10</volume>
<elocation-id>551</elocation-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/microorganisms10030551</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35336126</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">PMC8949432</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B44">
<label>44</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Nowak</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Śliżewska</surname>
<given-names>K</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>β-Glucuronidase and β-glucosidase activity and human fecal water genotoxicity in the presence of probiotic lactobacilli and the heterocyclic aromatic amine IQ in vitro</article-title>
<source>Environ Toxicol Pharmacol</source>
<year iso-8601-date="2014">2014</year>
<volume>37</volume>
<fpage>66</fpage>
<lpage>73</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.etap.2013.10.014</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24309132</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B45">
<label>45</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Domingos-Lopes</surname>
<given-names>MFP</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Stanton</surname>
<given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ross</surname>
<given-names>PR</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dapkevicius</surname>
<given-names>MLE</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Silva</surname>
<given-names>CCG</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Genetic diversity, safety and technological characterization of lactic acid bacteria isolated from artisanal Pico cheese</article-title>
<source>Food Microbiol</source>
<year iso-8601-date="2017">2017</year>
<volume>63</volume>
<fpage>178</fpage>
<lpage>90</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fm.2016.11.014</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28040167</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B46">
<label>46</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Paventi</surname>
<given-names>G</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Di</surname>
<given-names>Martino C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Coppola</surname>
<given-names>F</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Iorizzo</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>β-Glucosidase Activity of <italic>Lactiplantibacillus plantarum</italic>: A Key Player in Food Fermentation and Human Health</article-title>
<source>Foods</source>
<year iso-8601-date="2025">2025</year>
<volume>14</volume>
<elocation-id>1451</elocation-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/foods14091451</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">40361534</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">PMC12072041</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B47">
<label>47</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sameli</surname>
<given-names>N</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Skandamis</surname>
<given-names>PN</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Samelis</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Application of <italic>Enterococcus faecium</italic> KE82, an Enterocin A-B-P–Producing Strain, as an Adjunct Culture Enhances Inactivation of <italic>Listeria monocytogenes</italic> during Traditional Protected Designation of Origin Galotyri Processing</article-title>
<source>J Food Prot</source>
<year iso-8601-date="2021">2021</year>
<volume>84</volume>
<fpage>87</fpage>
<lpage>98</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4315/jfp-20-278</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33411927</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B48">
<label>48</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zoumpopoulou</surname>
<given-names>G</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Georgalaki</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Anastasiou</surname>
<given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sakoulaki</surname>
<given-names>G</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vass</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gkitsaki</surname>
<given-names>I</given-names>
</name>
<etal>et al.</etal>
</person-group>
<article-title>Lesvos breed sheep milk: An unexplored source of lactic acid bacteria with probiotic potential</article-title>
<source>Int Dairy J</source>
<year iso-8601-date="2026">2026</year>
<volume>180</volume>
<elocation-id>106676</elocation-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.idairyj.2026.106676</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>