﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.1 20151215//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">Explor Drug Sci</journal-id>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">EDS</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Exploration of Drug Science</journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">2836-7677</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Open Exploration Publishing</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.37349/eds.2026.1008172</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="manuscript">1008172</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Article</subject>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Prevalence, antimicrobial resistance patterns, and multidrug resistance profiling of bacterial pathogens isolated from human high vaginal swabs</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0009-0003-7261-8651</contrib-id>
<name>
<surname>Munazza</surname>
<given-names>Mahnoor</given-names>
</name>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/">Conceptualization</role>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/">Investigation</role>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/">Methodology</role>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/">Data curation</role>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/resources/">Resources</role>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/validation/">Validation</role>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/visualization/">Visualization</role>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/">Writing—original draft</role>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="I1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1">
<sup>*</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8010-3146</contrib-id>
<name>
<surname>Shah</surname>
<given-names>Syed Qaswar Ali</given-names>
</name>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/">Conceptualization</role>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/">Supervision</role>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/project-administration/">Project administration</role>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/">Methodology</role>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/resources/">Resources</role>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/validation/">Validation</role>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing—review &amp; editing</role>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="I1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3465-0960</contrib-id>
<name>
<surname>Naz</surname>
<given-names>Huma</given-names>
</name>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/">Conceptualization</role>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/">Supervision</role>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/">Investigation</role>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/">Data curation</role>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing—review &amp; editing</role>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="I1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hussain</surname>
<given-names>Firasat</given-names>
</name>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/">Conceptualization</role>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/">Investigation</role>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing—review &amp; editing</role>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="I2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0009-0004-3752-3195</contrib-id>
<name>
<surname>Ghani</surname>
<given-names>Muhammad Usman</given-names>
</name>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/">Investigation</role>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/resources/">Resources</role>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing—review &amp; editing</role>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="I3">
<sup>3</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0009-0004-9962-0572</contrib-id>
<name>
<surname>Gull</surname>
<given-names>Mubashra</given-names>
</name>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/">Data curation</role>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/visualization/">Visualization</role>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing—review &amp; editing</role>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="I4">
<sup>4</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0009-0005-4710-2113</contrib-id>
<name>
<surname>Arooj</surname>
<given-names>Memoona</given-names>
</name>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/">Formal analysis</role>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/software/">Software</role>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/">Investigation</role>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/visualization/">Visualization</role>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="I5">
<sup>5</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0009-0008-9901-4539</contrib-id>
<name>
<surname>Arshad</surname>
<given-names>Romana</given-names>
</name>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/">Formal analysis</role>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/software/">Software</role>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/visualization/">Visualization</role>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/">Writing—original draft</role>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing—review &amp; editing</role>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="I1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="editor">
<name>
<surname>Yi</surname>
<given-names>Wei</given-names>
</name>
<role>Academic Editor</role>
<aff>Guangzhou Medical University, China</aff>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="I1">
<sup>1</sup>Cholistan Institute of Biological Sciences, Cholistan University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Bahawalpur 63100, Punjab, Pakistan</aff>
<aff id="I2">
<sup>2</sup>Department of Microbiology, Cholistan University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Bahawalpur 63100, Punjab, Pakistan</aff>
<aff id="I3">
<sup>3</sup>Allama Iqbal Medical College (University of Health Sciences), Lahore 54550, Pakistan</aff>
<aff id="I4">
<sup>4</sup>Department of MBBS, Shahida Islam Medical and Dental College, Lodhran 59320, Pakistan</aff>
<aff id="I5">
<sup>5</sup>Department of Nuclear Medicine, Pakistan Institute of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan</aff>
<author-notes>
<corresp id="cor1">
<bold>
<sup>*</sup>Correspondence:</bold> Mahnoor Munazza, Cholistan Institute of Biological Sciences, Cholistan University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Bahawalpur 63100, Punjab, Pakistan. <email>mahnoormunazza722@gmail.com</email></corresp>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2026</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>22</day>
<month>07</month>
<year>2026</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>4</volume>
<elocation-id>1008172</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>31</day>
<month>05</month>
<year>2026</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>24</day>
<month>06</month>
<year>2026</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>© The Author(s) 2026.</copyright-statement>
<license xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<license-p>This is an Open Access article licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link>), which permits unrestricted use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, for any purpose, even commercially, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.</license-p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<sec>
<title>Aim:</title>
<p id="absp-1">Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) among vaginal bacterial pathogens is an increasing clinical concern, particularly where empirical therapy is common and local susceptibility data are limited. This study investigated the prevalence, resistance patterns, and multidrug resistance (MDR) burden of bacterial isolates recovered from human high vaginal swabs (HVSs).</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Methods:</title>
<p id="absp-2">A retrospective laboratory-based analysis was performed on 220 bacterial isolates recovered from HVS specimens. Organism distribution, antibiotic resistance prevalence, MDR status, MRSA/ESBL phenotypes, MDR scores, hierarchical clustering, heatmap patterns, and principal component analysis were evaluated using R-based statistical and multivariate methods.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Results:</title>
<p id="absp-3">
<italic>Staphylococcus aureus</italic> was the most frequent isolate (50.0%), followed by <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> (38.6%). The highest overall resistance was observed against ceftazidime (89.1%), clarithromycin (83.6%), erythromycin (80.9%), cefoxitin (79.1%), levofloxacin (77.7%), and penicillin (77.3%). In contrast, vancomycin (10.9%), chloramphenicol (11.4%), imipenem (11.8%), linezolid (15.5%), and amikacin (20.0%) retained comparatively better activity. MDR was detected in 95.0% of isolates, with a mean MDR score of 5.19. Clustering, heatmap, and PCA analyses demonstrated distinct resistance groupings and strong co-resistance patterns among the major pathogens.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Conclusions:</title>
<p id="absp-4">The study demonstrates a high burden of AMR and MDR among HVS-derived bacterial isolates, especially among <italic>S. aureus</italic> and <italic>E. coli</italic>. These findings support routine culture-based susceptibility testing and stronger antimicrobial stewardship in women with vaginal infections.</p>
</sec>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>antimicrobial resistance</kwd>
<kwd>multidrug resistance</kwd>
<kwd>high vaginal swab</kwd>
<kwd>vaginal infections</kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="s1">
<title>Introduction</title>
<p id="p-1">Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a major global health threat because it reduces treatment effectiveness and increases morbidity and mortality associated with bacterial infections [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">1</xref>]. Recent evidence indicates that AMR is no longer restricted to hospital-acquired infections but increasingly affects community and reproductive tract infections that are often managed empirically [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">2</xref>].</p>
<p id="p-2">The vaginal tract contains a complex microbial ecosystem influenced by hormonal, behavioral, and environmental factors. Healthy vaginal microbiota are typically dominated by <italic>Lactobacillus</italic> species, whereas disruption of this balance may promote bacterial vaginosis, aerobic vaginitis, and other inflammatory conditions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">3</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">4</xref>]. In addition, the vaginal microbiota may serve as a reservoir of AMR genes and resistant pathogens, particularly under conditions of repeated antibiotic exposure and microbial dysbiosis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">5</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">6</xref>].</p>
<p id="p-3">High vaginal swab (HVS) culture remains an important diagnostic tool because it allows direct identification of causative organisms and guides antimicrobial therapy. Previous studies have consistently reported <italic>Escherichia coli</italic>, <italic>Staphylococcus aureus</italic>, and <italic>Klebsiella pneumoniae</italic> among the most common bacterial isolates recovered from HVS specimens [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">7</xref>–<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">9</xref>]. The increasing prevalence of methicillin-resistant <italic>S. aureus</italic> (MRSA), extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing <italic>E. coli</italic>, and multidrug resistance (MDR) pathogens has further complicated the management of vaginal infections [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">10</xref>–<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">12</xref>].</p>
<p id="p-4">The emergence of MDR vaginal pathogens presents a serious challenge to empirical treatment and may contribute to adverse reproductive and obstetric outcomes. Despite this concern, local isolate-level data on resistance prevalence and resistance structure remain limited in many settings. Therefore, the present study was conducted to determine the prevalence, AMR patterns, and MDR profiling of bacterial pathogens isolated from human HVSs.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2">
<title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="t2-1">
<title>Study design and analytical framework</title>
<p id="p-5">The present study was designed as a retrospective laboratory-based analytical investigation aimed at evaluating AMR and MDR patterns among bacterial isolates recovered from HVS specimens. The study integrated conventional microbiological assessment with advanced statistical and multivariate computational analyses to comprehensively characterize resistance dynamics among clinically important vaginal bacterial pathogens. A total of 220 bacterial isolates were included in the final analytical dataset. The investigation focused primarily on the prevalence of bacterial species, antimicrobial susceptibility patterns, MDR burden, organism-specific resistance profiles, and clustering behavior of resistance phenotypes.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="t2-2">
<title>Study population and sample collection</title>
<p id="p-6">Clinical HVS specimens were collected from female patients presenting with clinical symptoms suggestive of vaginal infection, including abnormal vaginal discharge, irritation, and suspected bacterial vaginitis. Samples were processed consecutively during the study period from January 2024 to December 2024 to minimize selection bias.</p>
<p id="p-7">Only culture-positive, non-duplicate bacterial isolates with complete microbiological identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) records were included. Duplicate isolates obtained from the same patient, incomplete laboratory records, contaminated cultures, and samples without complete antimicrobial susceptibility data were excluded from analysis.</p>
<p id="p-8">The final dataset consisted of 220 eligible bacterial isolates recovered from HVS specimens. Each isolate represented a single patient episode and was considered an independent observational unit for statistical analysis. For patients showing multiple bacterial growth, the clinically significant predominant isolate was selected according to laboratory interpretation criteria. Only one representative isolate per infectious episode was included to maintain independence of observations.</p>
<p id="p-9">Because this was a retrospective isolate-based analysis, the study focused on eligible culture-positive bacterial isolates with complete antimicrobial susceptibility records. Complete information regarding total culture-negative specimens was not available from archived laboratory records.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="t2-3">
<title>Isolation and identification of bacterial pathogens</title>
<p id="p-10">All HVS specimens were processed according to standard clinical microbiology laboratory protocols. Initial assessment included direct microscopic examination and Gram staining to evaluate bacterial morphology and inflammatory characteristics.</p>
<p id="p-11">Samples were inoculated onto blood agar, MacConkey agar, and chocolate agar plates and incubated aerobically at 35–37°C for 18–24 hours. After incubation, bacterial growth was evaluated based on colony morphology, hemolytic characteristics, pigmentation, and Gram staining reactions.</p>
<p id="p-12">Bacterial identification was performed using conventional biochemical identification methods. <italic>S. aureus</italic> isolates were confirmed using catalase, coagulase, and mannitol fermentation tests. Gram-negative organisms including <italic>E. coli</italic>, <italic>Klebsiella</italic> spp., <italic>Citrobacter</italic> spp., and <italic>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</italic>, were identified using oxidase testing, indole production, citrate utilization, urease test, triple sugar iron (TSI) reaction, motility testing, and lactose fermentation characteristics following standard clinical microbiology identification procedures.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="t2-4">
<title>Antimicrobial susceptibility testing</title>
<p id="p-13">AST was performed using the Kirby–Bauer disc diffusion method on Mueller–Hinton agar (Oxoid Ltd., Basingstoke, Hampshire, United Kingdom; prepared according to the manufacturer’s instructions) following standard Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) interpretive guidelines. Antimicrobial susceptibility interpretation was performed according to CLSI M100 performance standards (2024 edition). Commercially prepared antibiotic discs (Oxoid Ltd., Basingstoke, Hampshire, United Kingdom) with manufacturer-recommended standard concentrations were used for susceptibility testing. Commercially prepared antibiotic discs with standard potencies were used, including penicillin (10 units), erythromycin (15 µg), clarithromycin (15 µg), cefoxitin (30 µg), ciprofloxacin (5 µg), levofloxacin (5 µg), gentamicin (10 µg), amikacin (30 µg), piperacillin (100 µg), ceftazidime (30 µg), meropenem (10 µg), imipenem (10 µg), chloramphenicol (30 µg), vancomycin (30 µg), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (25 µg), and linezolid (30 µg). Following inoculation, Mueller–Hinton agar plates were incubated aerobically at 35–37°C for 18–24 hours using a laboratory incubator (Memmert GmbH + Co. KG, Schwabach, Germany). Quality control of AST was performed using reference bacterial strains, including <italic>E. coli</italic> ATCC 25922 and <italic>S. aureus</italic> ATCC 25923, to ensure accuracy and reliability of susceptibility results. Antibiotic susceptibility results were categorized as sensitive, intermediate, or resistant according to standardized zone diameter breakpoints. The antibiotic panel included agents representing multiple clinically relevant antimicrobial classes commonly used for the treatment of bacterial and vaginal infections. The tested antibiotics included penicillin, erythromycin, clarithromycin, cefoxitin, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, gentamicin, amikacin, piperacillin, ceftazidime, meropenem, imipenem, chloramphenicol, vancomycin, sulphamethoxazole, and linezolid. Resistance prevalence for each antibiotic was calculated as the proportion of resistant isolates among the total number of tested isolates. Quality control of AST was performed according to CLSI recommendations using reference bacterial strains, including <italic>E. coli</italic> ATCC 25922 and <italic>S. aureus</italic> ATCC 25923, to ensure accuracy and reproducibility of susceptibility results.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="t2-5">
<title>Definition of multidrug resistance and resistance phenotypes</title>
<p id="p-14">MDR was defined as acquired non-susceptibility to at least one antimicrobial agent in three or more antimicrobial classes according to the international standardized criteria proposed by Magiorakos et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">13</xref>]. MDR classification was assigned individually to each isolate following evaluation of the complete susceptibility profile. To quantify organism-level resistance burden, an MDR score was calculated for each isolate based on the total number of antibiotics against which resistance was observed.</p>
<p id="p-15">MRSA status was determined phenotypically using cefoxitin resistance as the surrogate marker for methicillin resistance. Similarly, ESBL production among <italic>E. coli</italic> isolates was confirmed phenotypically using the combined disc diffusion method based on ceftazidime and ceftazidime-clavulanic acid discs according to CLSI recommendations. An increase of ≥ 5 mm in inhibition zone diameter in the presence of clavulanic acid was interpreted as ESBL-positive. These resistance-associated variables were incorporated into the subsequent statistical and multivariate analyses.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="t2-6">
<title>Data processing and management</title>
<p id="p-16">All microbiological and susceptibility data were compiled into a structured analytical dataset prior to statistical analysis. Data preprocessing involved removal of duplicate entries, correction of formatting inconsistencies, standardization of categorical variables, and harmonization of antimicrobial susceptibility coding. Categorical variables included organism type, MDR status, MRSA status, ESBL status, pregnancy status, and susceptibility outcomes. Antibiotic resistance profiles were transformed into binary numerical matrices for multivariate analyses, clustering procedures, and heatmap generation. The finalized dataset was formatted specifically for statistical computing and visualization within the RStudio environment.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="t2-7">
<title>Statistical analysis</title>
<p id="p-17">All statistical analyses were performed using R statistical software (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria) within the RStudio integrated development environment. Descriptive statistical analyses were conducted to summarize bacterial isolate frequencies, antibiotic resistance prevalence, MDR distribution, patient age characteristics, and organism-specific resistance burdens. Continuous variables were summarized using means, medians, and distributional measures, whereas categorical variables were expressed as frequencies and percentages.</p>
<p id="p-18">Inferential statistical analyses were conducted to evaluate associations between categorical variables. Chi-square tests were applied to assess relationships between organism type and MDR status, age category and resistance status, as well as MRSA and ESBL phenotypes. Statistical significance was considered at a <italic>p</italic>-value threshold of less than 0.05.</p>
<p id="p-19">Binary logistic regression analysis was additionally performed to identify potential predictors associated with MDR occurrence. Predictor variables incorporated into the regression model included organism category, patient age, and pregnancy status. Adjusted odds ratios (ORs), standard errors, <italic>z</italic>-values, and corresponding <italic>p</italic>-values were calculated to evaluate the relative contribution of each variable to MDR development.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="t2-8">
<title>Multivariate and computational resistance analysis</title>
<p id="p-20">To investigate global resistance structure and inter-isolate similarity patterns, several multivariate analytical approaches were employed. Hierarchical agglomerative clustering was performed using Euclidean distance matrices derived from isolate-level AMR profiles. Ward’s linkage method was applied to identify major resistance clusters among clinical isolates, and dendrogram visualization was subsequently used to interpret clustering relationships and resistance similarity structures.</p>
<p id="p-21">Heatmap analysis was conducted using binary AMR matrices to visualize organism-specific resistance signatures and co-resistance patterns. Hierarchical clustering of both isolates and antibiotics was integrated into the heatmap framework to facilitate interpretation of resistance clustering behavior across bacterial species.</p>
<p id="p-22">Principal component analysis (PCA) was further performed to reduce dimensional complexity and identify the major drivers of resistance variability among isolates. Antibiotic susceptibility variables were numerically transformed prior to ordination analysis. PCA loading vectors, explained variance percentages, and isolate clustering distributions were examined to determine the principal contributors to resistance differentiation within the study population.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="t2-9">
<title>Data visualization and figure preparation</title>
<p id="p-23">Publication-quality graphical visualizations were generated to support descriptive, inferential, and multivariate interpretation of the data. Visualization approaches included histograms, horizontal bar charts, MDR distribution plots, organism prevalence graphs, dendrograms, heatmaps, and PCA biplots. Figures were generated using R-based visualization packages and exported in high-resolution formats suitable for thesis preparation and submission to peer-reviewed Q1-indexed journals.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="t2-10">
<title>Software and computational packages</title>
<p id="p-24">Statistical analyses and graphical visualization were performed using R software version 4.4.1 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria) through RStudio version 2026.01.2+418 (Posit Software, PBC, Boston, MA, USA). Data processing and visualization were performed using tidyverse, ggplot2, dplyr, pheatmap, factoextra, cluster, dendextend, reshape2, and scales packages. The software environment and computational packages were used for data organization, statistical analysis, hierarchical clustering, PCA, heatmap construction, and generation of publication-quality graphical outputs.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="t2-11">
<title>Ethical considerations</title>
<p id="p-25">The study utilized anonymized laboratory-derived bacterial isolate data obtained during routine diagnostic procedures. No personally identifiable patient information was accessed during data processing or manuscript preparation. According to institutional policy governing retrospective laboratory-based studies using anonymized secondary microbiological data, formal ethical review and informed consent requirements were waived because no direct patient interaction or intervention was involved. All procedures were conducted in accordance with accepted ethical standards for retrospective microbiological research.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s3">
<title>Results</title>
<sec id="t3-1">
<title>Demographic characteristics of the study population</title>
<p id="p-26">A total of 220 bacterial isolates recovered from human HVS samples were included in the present investigation. The age distribution of participants ranged from late adolescence to approximately 50 years of age, representing predominantly women of reproductive age. The mean patient age was 32.5 years, while the median age was 33 years, indicating a relatively symmetrical age distribution without substantial skewness (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). The majority of isolates were recovered from women within the third and fourth decades of life, consistent with the increased susceptibility of reproductive-age women to vaginal bacterial infections reported in previous studies.</p>
<fig id="fig1" position="float">
<label>Figure 1</label>
<caption>
<p id="fig1-p-1">
<bold>Age distribution of patients included in the antimicrobial resistance study.</bold> The histogram illustrates the frequency distribution of patient ages, while dashed vertical lines indicate the mean and median age values.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="eds-04-1008172-g001.tif" />
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="t3-2">
<title>Distribution of clinical bacterial isolates</title>
<p id="p-27">Among the bacterial isolates recovered from HVS samples, <italic>S. aureus</italic> was the most predominant organism, accounting for 110 isolates (50.0%), followed by <italic>E. coli</italic> with 85 isolates (38.6%). Lower frequencies were observed for <italic>Klebsiella</italic> spp., <italic>Citrobacter</italic> spp., and <italic>P. aeruginosa</italic>. The predominance of <italic>S. aureus</italic> and <italic>E. coli</italic> is in agreement with several previous investigations identifying these organisms as the leading pathogens associated with vaginal infections and abnormal vaginal discharge.</p>
<p id="p-28">The marked abundance of <italic>S. aureus</italic> may reflect its ability to colonize the vaginal tract as both a commensal and opportunistic pathogen, whereas the high frequency of <italic>E. coli</italic> likely reflects fecal contamination and disruption of the normal vaginal microbiota. The recovery of additional Gram-negative organisms further demonstrates the polymicrobial nature of vaginal infections (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t1">Table 1</xref> &amp; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap id="t1">
<label>Table 1</label>
<caption>
<p id="t1-p-1">
<bold>Distribution of bacterial isolates recovered from HVS samples.</bold>
</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th>
<bold>Bacterial organism</bold>
</th>
<th>
<bold>Number of isolates (<italic>n</italic>)</bold>
</th>
<th>
<bold>Percentage (%)</bold>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<italic>Staphylococcus aureus</italic>
</td>
<td>110</td>
<td>50.0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<italic>Escherichia coli</italic>
</td>
<td>85</td>
<td>38.6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<italic>Klebsiella</italic> spp.</td>
<td>10</td>
<td>4.5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<italic>Citrobacter</italic> spp.</td>
<td>8</td>
<td>3.6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<italic>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</italic>
</td>
<td>7</td>
<td>3.2</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<fig id="fig2" position="float">
<label>Figure 2</label>
<caption>
<p id="fig2-p-1">
<bold>Frequency distribution of bacterial isolates among clinical samples.</bold> Bars represent the absolute number and relative proportion of each bacterial species identified in the study population.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="eds-04-1008172-g002.tif" />
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="t3-3">
<title>Overall antimicrobial resistance pattern</title>
<p id="p-29">The overall antimicrobial susceptibility analysis demonstrated extensive resistance against several commonly prescribed antibiotics among the recovered bacterial isolates. The highest resistance frequencies were observed for ceftazidime (89.1%), clarithromycin (83.6%), erythromycin (80.9%), cefoxitin (79.1%), levofloxacin (77.7%), and penicillin (77.3%). Similarly, elevated resistance levels were identified against ciprofloxacin (70.5%), meropenem (55.5%), and gentamicin (50.9%). In contrast, comparatively lower resistance rates were observed for sulphamethoxazole (29.5%), amikacin (20.0%), linezolid (15.5%), imipenem (11.8%), chloramphenicol (11.4%), and vancomycin (10.9%) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref> &amp; <xref ref-type="table" rid="t2">Table 2</xref>).</p>
<fig id="fig3" position="float">
<label>Figure 3</label>
<caption>
<p id="fig3-p-1">
<bold>Overall antimicrobial resistance pattern among bacterial isolates recovered from high vaginal swab specimens.</bold> Bars represent the percentage resistance observed for each tested antibiotic across all clinical isolates.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="eds-04-1008172-g003.tif" />
</fig>
<table-wrap id="t2">
<label>Table 2</label>
<caption>
<p id="t2-p-1">
<bold>Organism-specific antimicrobial resistance percentages among bacterial isolates recovered from high vaginal swab specimens.</bold>
</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th>
<bold>Antibiotic</bold>
</th>
<th>
<bold>
<italic>Citrobacter</italic> spp. (%)</bold>
</th>
<th>
<bold>
<italic>Escherichia coli</italic> (%)</bold>
</th>
<th>
<bold>
<italic>Klebsiella</italic> spp. (%)</bold>
</th>
<th>
<bold>
<italic>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</italic> (%)</bold>
</th>
<th>
<bold>
<italic>Staphylococcus aureus</italic> (%)</bold>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Amikacin</td>
<td>25.0</td>
<td>18.8</td>
<td>20.0</td>
<td>28.6</td>
<td>NT</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Cefoxitin</td>
<td>NT</td>
<td>NT</td>
<td>NT</td>
<td>NT</td>
<td>79.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Ceftazidime</td>
<td>87.5</td>
<td>88.2</td>
<td>90.0</td>
<td>100.0</td>
<td>NT</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Chloramphenicol</td>
<td>12.5</td>
<td>11.8</td>
<td>0.0</td>
<td>14.3</td>
<td>11.8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Ciprofloxacin</td>
<td>62.5</td>
<td>64.7</td>
<td>80.0</td>
<td>71.4</td>
<td>74.5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Clarithromycin</td>
<td>NT</td>
<td>NT</td>
<td>NT</td>
<td>NT</td>
<td>83.6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Erythromycin</td>
<td>NT</td>
<td>NT</td>
<td>NT</td>
<td>NT</td>
<td>80.9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Gentamicin</td>
<td>100.0</td>
<td>77.6</td>
<td>90.0</td>
<td>85.7</td>
<td>20.9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Imipenem</td>
<td>25.0</td>
<td>11.8</td>
<td>0.0</td>
<td>14.3</td>
<td>NT</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Levofloxacin</td>
<td>87.5</td>
<td>72.9</td>
<td>70.0</td>
<td>85.7</td>
<td>80.9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Linezolid</td>
<td>NT</td>
<td>NT</td>
<td>NT</td>
<td>NT</td>
<td>15.5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Meropenem</td>
<td>62.5</td>
<td>51.8</td>
<td>50.0</td>
<td>100.0</td>
<td>NT</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Penicillin</td>
<td>NT</td>
<td>NT</td>
<td>NT</td>
<td>NT</td>
<td>77.3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Piperacillin</td>
<td>37.5</td>
<td>31.8</td>
<td>60.0</td>
<td>14.3</td>
<td>NT</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Sulphamethoxazole</td>
<td>50.0</td>
<td>25.9</td>
<td>20.0</td>
<td>42.9</td>
<td>30.9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Vancomycin</td>
<td>NT</td>
<td>NT</td>
<td>NT</td>
<td>NT</td>
<td>10.9</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p id="t2-fn-1">NT: not tested.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p id="p-30">The overall resistance percentages should be interpreted with caution because not all antimicrobial agents were applicable to every bacterial group. Certain antibiotics, including vancomycin and linezolid, are primarily relevant for Gram-positive organisms, whereas some β-lactam agents are mainly interpreted among Gram-negative bacteria. Therefore, organism-specific resistance patterns provide more clinically meaningful interpretation.</p>
<p id="p-31">Organism-specific AMR analysis demonstrated substantial variability in resistance patterns among the recovered bacterial pathogens (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t3">Table 3</xref>). Among Gram-negative isolates, <italic>P. aeruginosa</italic> exhibited complete resistance to ceftazidime and meropenem (100%), while <italic>Citrobacter</italic> spp. demonstrated complete resistance to gentamicin (100%). <italic>Klebsiella</italic> spp. also showed markedly elevated resistance against ceftazidime (90.0%), gentamicin (90.0%), and ciprofloxacin (80.0%). In <italic>E. coli</italic>, high resistance frequencies were observed for ceftazidime (88.2%), gentamicin (77.6%), and levofloxacin (72.9%). Among Gram-positive isolates, <italic>S. aureus</italic> demonstrated pronounced resistance against clarithromycin (83.6%), erythromycin (80.9%), levofloxacin (80.9%), cefoxitin (79.1%), and penicillin (77.3%). Conversely, comparatively lower resistance rates were observed for chloramphenicol, imipenem, vancomycin, and linezolid among susceptible organism groups, indicating retained activity of selected reserve antibiotics.</p>
<table-wrap id="t3">
<label>Table 3</label>
<caption>
<p id="t3-p-1">
<bold>Mean multidrug resistance scores according to bacterial species.</bold>
</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th>
<bold>Organism</bold>
</th>
<th>
<bold>Mean MDR score</bold>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<italic>Staphylococcus aureus</italic>
</td>
<td>5.66</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<italic>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</italic>
</td>
<td>5.57</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<italic>Citrobacter</italic> spp.</td>
<td>5.50</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<italic>Klebsiella</italic> spp.</td>
<td>4.80</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<italic>Escherichia coli</italic>
</td>
<td>4.55</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<p id="p-32">The observed resistance profile demonstrates widespread antimicrobial non-susceptibility among vaginal bacterial pathogens, particularly against β-lactams, macrolides, and fluoroquinolones. Conversely, glycopeptides and selected reserve antibiotics retained comparatively better activity primarily against Gram-positive organisms, particularly <italic>S. aureus</italic>. Interpretation of antibiotics such as vancomycin and linezolid should therefore be considered organism-specific because these agents are not routinely applicable to Gram-negative pathogens.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="t3-4">
<title>Overall multidrug resistance burden</title>
<p id="p-33">A remarkably high prevalence of MDR was observed among the recovered isolates. Out of the total bacterial population, 209 isolates (95.0%) fulfilled MDR criteria, while only 11 isolates (5.0%) were categorized as non-MDR. The observed MDR prevalence was substantially higher than several previously published reports involving vaginal bacterial pathogens, indicating extensive selective pressure within the study environment.</p>
<p id="p-34">The MDR score distribution further demonstrated that most isolates were resistant to multiple antibiotic classes simultaneously. The mean MDR score was 5.19, while the median MDR score remained 5, indicating a consistently elevated resistance burden throughout the bacterial population (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t4">Table 4</xref> &amp; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap id="t4">
<label>Table 4</label>
<caption>
<p id="t4-p-1">
<bold>Distribution of multidrug-resistant isolates.</bold>
</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th>
<bold>MDR status</bold>
</th>
<th>
<bold>Number of isolates (<italic>n</italic>)</bold>
</th>
<th>
<bold>Percentage (%)</bold>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>MDR-positive</td>
<td>209</td>
<td>95.0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>MDR-negative</td>
<td>11</td>
<td>5.0</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<fig id="fig4" position="float">
<label>Figure 4</label>
<caption>
<p id="fig4-p-1">
<bold>Distribution of multidrug resistance scores among clinical isolates.</bold> Dashed vertical lines indicate mean and median MDR score values.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="eds-04-1008172-g004.tif" />
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="t3-5">
<title>Organism-specific multidrug resistance burden</title>
<p id="p-35">The MDR burden varied considerably among bacterial species. <italic>S. aureus</italic> demonstrated the highest average MDR score, followed by <italic>P. aeruginosa</italic> and <italic>Citrobacter</italic> spp. In contrast, <italic>E. coli</italic> showed a comparatively lower, though still clinically significant, MDR burden.</p>
<p id="p-36">The elevated MDR score among <italic>S. aureus</italic> isolates supports the high prevalence of MRSA observed through cefoxitin resistance. Similarly, the increased resistance burden among non-fermenting Gram-negative organisms indicates strong adaptive resistance mechanisms and extensive antimicrobial exposure (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t3">Table 3</xref> &amp; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>).</p>
<fig id="fig5" position="float">
<label>Figure 5</label>
<caption>
<p id="fig5-p-1">
<bold>Mean multidrug resistance burden among bacterial organisms isolated from HVS samples.</bold>
</p>
</caption>
<graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="eds-04-1008172-g005.tif" />
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="t3-6">
<title>Inferential statistical analysis of MDR associations</title>
<p id="p-37">Chi-square analysis demonstrated a statistically significant association between bacterial organism type and MDR status (χ² = 12.84, <italic>p</italic> = 0.012), indicating substantial variation in resistance burden among different bacterial taxa. <italic>S. aureus</italic> isolates showed significantly higher MDR frequencies compared with several Gram-negative organisms.</p>
<p id="p-38">Binary logistic regression analysis identified <italic>S. aureus</italic> isolation as an independent predictor of MDR occurrence (OR = 2.41, 95% CI: 1.18–4.92, <italic>p</italic> = 0.016). In contrast, patient age and pregnancy status were not statistically significant predictors of MDR burden within the final regression model (<italic>p</italic> &gt; 0.05).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="t3-7">
<title>Hierarchical clustering of antimicrobial resistance profiles</title>
<p id="p-39">Hierarchical clustering analysis demonstrated substantial heterogeneity among AMR phenotypes of the recovered isolates. Four major resistance clusters were identified based on Euclidean distance metrics, indicating the presence of distinct resistance signatures among vaginal bacterial pathogens.</p>
<p id="p-40">Certain isolate groups formed compact clusters characterized by short linkage distances, suggesting closely related resistance profiles and potentially shared resistance mechanisms. The clustering architecture additionally demonstrated that MDR isolates were widely distributed across different bacterial taxa, emphasizing the complexity of resistance dissemination within the study population (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>).</p>
<fig id="fig6" position="float">
<label>Figure 6</label>
<caption>
<p id="fig6-p-1">
<bold>Hierarchical clustering dendrogram showing relationships among bacterial isolates according to antimicrobial resistance characteristics.</bold>
</p>
</caption>
<graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="eds-04-1008172-g006.tif" />
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="t3-8">
<title>Heatmap visualization of antimicrobial resistance patterns</title>
<p id="p-41">The AMR heatmap revealed pronounced organism-specific resistance signatures and clear co-resistance patterns among several antibiotics. Strong resistance intensities were consistently associated with cefoxitin, macrolides, ceftazidime, penicillin, and fluoroquinolones, whereas lower resistance frequencies were observed for vancomycin, imipenem, chloramphenicol, and amikacin (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>).</p>
<fig id="fig7" position="float">
<label>Figure 7</label>
<caption>
<p id="fig7-p-1">
<bold>Heatmap visualization of antimicrobial resistance profiles among bacterial isolates recovered from HVS samples.</bold>
</p>
</caption>
<graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="eds-04-1008172-g007.tif" />
</fig>
<p id="p-42">Distinct clustered resistance blocks identified in the heatmap suggest coordinated MDR behavior among subsets of isolates. These patterns likely reflect selective antimicrobial pressure and possible accumulation of multiple resistance-associated phenotypes within vaginal bacterial populations.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="t3-9">
<title>Principal component analysis (PCA) of resistance profiles</title>
<p id="p-43">PCA demonstrated distinct segregation of bacterial organisms according to their AMR characteristics. The first principal component explained 35.5% of total variance, while the second component accounted for 7.1% of overall variability.</p>
<p id="p-44">
<italic>S. aureus</italic> isolates formed a relatively distinct cluster separated from Gram-negative organisms, reflecting their unique resistance characteristics dominated by β-lactam and macrolide resistance. In contrast, <italic>E. coli</italic>, <italic>Klebsiella</italic> spp., <italic>Citrobacter</italic> spp., and <italic>P. aeruginosa</italic> demonstrated partial overlap, suggesting similarities in MDR mechanisms among Gram-negative bacteria.</p>
<p id="p-45">The PCA loading vectors identified cefoxitin, clarithromycin, erythromycin, penicillin, levofloxacin, and ceftazidime as major contributors to variability within the dataset, indicating that these antibiotics were the principal drivers of resistance differentiation among isolates (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref>).</p>
<fig id="fig8" position="float">
<label>Figure 8</label>
<caption>
<p id="fig8-p-1">
<bold>Principal component analysis (PCA) biplot illustrating clustering of bacterial isolates according to antimicrobial resistance profiles and antibiotic loading vectors.</bold>
</p>
</caption>
<graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="eds-04-1008172-g008.tif" />
</fig>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s4">
<title>Discussion</title>
<p id="p-46">AMR has become a central threat to reproductive health because vaginal infections are often treated empirically, while the causative organisms and their susceptibility patterns vary widely across populations. In this study, <italic>S. aureus</italic> and <italic>E. coli</italic> dominated the isolate spectrum, and the thesis underlying this project reported the same two organisms as the principal HVS pathogens with similarly concerning resistance trends. This concordance supports the clinical relevance of these organisms as persistent vaginal pathogens and reinforces the need for local susceptibility-guided therapy rather than routine empirical prescribing [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">1</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">7</xref>].</p>
<p id="p-47">The pooled resistance analysis presented in this study should be interpreted cautiously because certain antibiotics, including vancomycin and linezolid, are primarily clinically relevant for Gram-positive organisms. Although overall resistance frequencies were calculated across the full isolate population for comparative analytical purposes, organism-specific susceptibility interpretation remains essential for therapeutic decision-making.</p>
<p id="p-48">The AMR patterns observed in the present study reflect the increasing global challenge of resistant reproductive tract pathogens. High resistance among <italic>S. aureus</italic> and <italic>E. coli</italic> isolates is consistent with recent regional and international reports showing increasing resistance to commonly used β-lactams, macrolides, and fluoroquinolones. Variations in resistance frequencies among studies may be influenced by differences in geographical location, antimicrobial prescribing behavior, healthcare practices, and local antimicrobial stewardship implementation. These findings emphasize the importance of continuous regional surveillance to guide effective empirical treatment strategies. These patterns are also consistent with earlier HVS studies showing that <italic>S. aureus</italic> and <italic>E. coli</italic> remain major vaginal isolates but increasingly display resistance to commonly used agents [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">9</xref>–<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">11</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">14</xref>].</p>
<p id="p-49">The very high MDR burden in the present dataset is clinically important because it suggests broad co-selection of resistance rather than isolated single-drug resistance. This is supported by the heatmap, clustering, and PCA results, which showed that resistance was structured into distinct phenotypic blocks rather than distributed randomly across isolates. Similar work has shown that the vaginal microbiota is shaped by host and lifestyle factors and may act as a reservoir for resistant organisms and resistance determinants, particularly when dysbiosis is present. The observed resistance clustering therefore fits well with the broader literature on vaginal dysbiosis, aerobic vaginitis, and the interaction between <italic>S. aureus</italic> and the vaginal ecosystem [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">5</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">15</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">16</xref>]. The high MDR prevalence observed in the present study should be interpreted carefully. Several factors may have contributed to this elevated resistance burden, including prior antimicrobial exposure, empirical antibiotic use, referral of complicated infection cases, and selection of culture-positive isolates submitted for laboratory investigation. Additionally, differences in antimicrobial panels and local prescribing practices may influence MDR estimates. Therefore, continuous surveillance studies involving larger populations are required to better define regional resistance patterns.</p>
<p id="p-50">Recent studies from different geographical regions have reported comparable AMR challenges among bacterial pathogens isolated from vaginal specimens. Kareem Raheem et al. (2023) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">17</xref>] reported a high frequency of MDR (60%) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) bacterial isolates among women with aerobic vaginitis, with Gram-positive organisms showing marked resistance toward penicillins and cephalosporins, whereas carbapenems and aminoglycosides retained better antimicrobial activity. Similarly, Ahabwe et al. (2023) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">18</xref>] demonstrated that <italic>S. aureus</italic> and Gram-negative bacteria were predominant pathogens among women with abnormal vaginal discharge and emphasized the importance of routine culture-based AST. Hussein et al. (2024) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">19</xref>] further reported considerable resistance among vaginal bacterial isolates, particularly against commonly prescribed antibiotics, highlighting the increasing burden of MDR organisms. Recent investigations by Rafat et al. (2025) and Noor et al. (2026) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">20</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">21</xref>] also demonstrated a high prevalence of AMR among vaginal pathogens and emphasized the necessity of continuous AMR surveillance, region-specific treatment guidelines, and antimicrobial stewardship programs. These recent findings support the observations of the present study and confirm the growing global concern regarding MDR among vaginal bacterial pathogens.</p>
<p id="p-51">Overall, the study indicates that vaginal bacterial infections in this setting are dominated by organisms with substantial MDR potential, especially <italic>S. aureus</italic> and <italic>E. coli</italic>. The combination of high isolate prevalence, strong resistance to common first-line drugs, and clustering of resistance phenotypes may reflect increased antimicrobial exposure patterns and highlight potential limitations of empirical treatment approaches in this setting. The thesis data support the same conclusion and highlight the need for routine culture, susceptibility testing, and stronger antimicrobial stewardship in women with vaginal infections.</p>
<p id="p-52">The findings of this study have important implications for empirical treatment practices. The high resistance observed against commonly used antimicrobial agents suggests that routine empirical therapy may result in treatment failure. Culture-based AST should therefore be encouraged before antibiotic selection, and local resistance surveillance data should be incorporated into antimicrobial stewardship programs and clinical treatment guidelines.</p>
<p id="p-53">This study has some limitations that should be acknowledged. The retrospective design limited access to detailed clinical information and patient follow-up data. In addition, isolates were obtained from a single geographical region, which may limit the broader applicability of the findings. Furthermore, MRSA and ESBL detection were based on phenotypic methods, and molecular confirmation of resistance-associated genes, including <italic>mecA</italic> and <italic>blaCTX-M</italic>, was not performed. Future multicenter studies incorporating molecular approaches are recommended to provide deeper insight into the genetic mechanisms driving AMR among vaginal bacterial pathogens.</p>
<p id="p-54">In conclusion, the present study demonstrates a high burden of AMR and MDR among bacterial pathogens isolated from HVS specimens, with <italic>S. aureus</italic> and <italic>E. coli</italic> emerging as the predominant organisms. Extensive resistance to commonly used antibiotics, particularly β-lactams, macrolides, and fluoroquinolones, highlights the increasing limitations of empirical therapy for vaginal infections. Multivariate analyses further revealed distinct resistance clustering and co-resistance patterns among clinical isolates. However, comparatively lower resistance against vancomycin, imipenem, linezolid, chloramphenicol, and amikacin suggests comparatively lower resistance frequencies among selected reserve antibiotics; however, organism-specific susceptibility testing remains essential before therapeutic consideration. Overall, the findings emphasize the need for routine culture-based susceptibility testing, continuous AMR surveillance, and strengthened antimicrobial stewardship to improve management of vaginal bacterial infections.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<glossary>
<title>Abbreviations</title>
<def-list>
<def-item>
<term>AMR</term>
<def>
<p>antimicrobial resistance</p>
</def>
</def-item>
<def-item>
<term>AST</term>
<def>
<p>antimicrobial susceptibility testing</p>
</def>
</def-item>
<def-item>
<term>CLSI</term>
<def>
<p>Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute</p>
</def>
</def-item>
<def-item>
<term>ESBL</term>
<def>
<p>extended-spectrum β-lactamase</p>
</def>
</def-item>
<def-item>
<term>HVS</term>
<def>
<p>high vaginal swab</p>
</def>
</def-item>
<def-item>
<term>MDR</term>
<def>
<p>multidrug resistance</p>
</def>
</def-item>
<def-item>
<term>MRSA</term>
<def>
<p>methicillin-resistant <italic>Staphylococcus aureus</italic></p>
</def>
</def-item>
<def-item>
<term>PCA</term>
<def>
<p>principal component analysis</p>
</def>
</def-item>
</def-list>
</glossary>
<sec id="s5">
<title>Declarations</title>
<sec id="t-5-1">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>MM: Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Data curation, Resources, Validation, Visualization, Writing—original draft. SQAS: Conceptualization, Supervision, Project administration, Methodology, Resources, Validation, Writing—review &amp; editing. HN: Conceptualization, Supervision, Investigation, Data curation, Writing—review &amp; editing. FH: Conceptualization, Investigation, Writing—review &amp; editing. MUG: Investigation, Resources, Writing—review &amp; editing. MG: Data curation, Visualization, Writing—review &amp; editing. MA: Formal analysis, Software, Investigation, Visualization. RA: Formal analysis, Software, Visualization, Writing—original draft, Writing—review &amp; editing. All authors contributed to the manuscript, reviewed the final version, and approved it for submission.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="t-5-2" sec-type="COI-statement">
<title>Conflicts of interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="t-5-3">
<title>Ethical approval</title>
<p>The study was conducted using anonymized retrospective laboratory-derived bacterial isolate data obtained during routine diagnostic procedures. No personally identifiable patient information was accessed during data collection, analysis, or manuscript preparation. According to institutional policies for retrospective studies using anonymized microbiological data, formal ethical approval was waived. All procedures were performed in accordance with the ethical principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="t-5-4">
<title>Consent to participate</title>
<p>Not required.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="t-5-5">
<title>Consent to publication</title>
<p>Not applicable.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="t-5-6" sec-type="data-availability">
<title>Availability of data and materials</title>
<p>The raw data supporting the conclusions of this manuscript will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation, to any qualified researcher upon reasonable request.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="t-5-7">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>Not applicable.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="t-5-8">
<title>Copyright</title>
<p>© The Author(s) 2026.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s6">
<title>Publisher’s note</title>
<p>Open Exploration maintains a neutral stance on jurisdictional claims in published institutional affiliations and maps. All opinions expressed in this article are the personal views of the author(s) and do not represent the stance of the editorial team or the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<label>1</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<collab>Collaborators GBD 2021 AR</collab>
</person-group>
<article-title>Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance 1990–2021: A systematic analysis with forecasts to 2050</article-title>
<source>Lancet</source>
<year iso-8601-date="2024">2024</year>
<volume>404</volume>
<fpage>1199</fpage>
<lpage>226</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0140-6736(24)01867-1</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<label>2</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ho</surname>
<given-names>CS</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wong</surname>
<given-names>CTH</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Aung</surname>
<given-names>TT</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lakshminarayanan</surname>
<given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mehta</surname>
<given-names>JS</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rauz</surname>
<given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<etal>et al.</etal>
</person-group>
<article-title>Antimicrobial resistance: a concise update</article-title>
<source>Lancet Microbe</source>
<year iso-8601-date="2025">2025</year>
<volume>6</volume>
<elocation-id>100947</elocation-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.lanmic.2024.07.010</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">39305919</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<label>3</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kalia</surname>
<given-names>N</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Singh</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kaur</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Microbiota in vaginal health and pathogenesis of recurrent vulvovaginal infections: a critical review</article-title>
<source>Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob</source>
<year iso-8601-date="2020">2020</year>
<volume>19</volume>
<elocation-id>5</elocation-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12941-020-0347-4</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31992328</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">PMC6986042</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<label>4</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Onderdonk</surname>
<given-names>AB</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Delaney</surname>
<given-names>ML</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fichorova</surname>
<given-names>RN</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>The Human Microbiome during Bacterial Vaginosis</article-title>
<source>Clin Microbiol Rev</source>
<year iso-8601-date="2016">2016</year>
<volume>29</volume>
<fpage>223</fpage>
<lpage>38</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/cmr.00075-15</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26864580</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">PMC4786887</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<label>5</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Morsli</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gimenez</surname>
<given-names>E</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Magnan</surname>
<given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Salipante</surname>
<given-names>F</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Huberlant</surname>
<given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Letouzey</surname>
<given-names>V</given-names>
</name>
<etal>et al.</etal>
</person-group>
<article-title>The association between lifestyle factors and the composition of the vaginal microbiota: a review</article-title>
<source>Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis</source>
<year iso-8601-date="2024">2024</year>
<volume>43</volume>
<fpage>1869</fpage>
<lpage>81</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10096-024-04915-7</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">39096320</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">PMC11405494</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<label>6</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Castellano</surname>
<given-names>P</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ceccarani</surname>
<given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ezekielle</surname>
<given-names>Djusse M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mazzetti</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Morselli</surname>
<given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Camboni</surname>
<given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
<etal>et al.</etal>
</person-group>
<article-title>Linking antibiotic resistance genes in the vaginal microbiota to health-related behaviors and antibiotic awareness in reproductive-age women: a cross-sectional study</article-title>
<source>Front Cell Infect Microbiol</source>
<year iso-8601-date="2025">2025</year>
<volume>15</volume>
<elocation-id>1640992</elocation-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fcimb.2025.1640992</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">41050748</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">PMC12488730</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<label>7</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Dykhuizen</surname>
<given-names>RS</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Harvey</surname>
<given-names>G</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gould</surname>
<given-names>IM</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>The high vaginal swab in general practice: clinical correlates of possible pathogens</article-title>
<source>Fam Pract</source>
<year iso-8601-date="1995">1995</year>
<volume>12</volume>
<fpage>155</fpage>
<lpage>8</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/fampra/12.2.155</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">7589937</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<label>8</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Jungmann</surname>
<given-names>E</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Johnson</surname>
<given-names>AM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ridgway</surname>
<given-names>G</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Durrant</surname>
<given-names>K</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Robinson</surname>
<given-names>AJ</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>How useful are high vaginal swabs in general practice? Results of a multicentre study</article-title>
<source>Int J STD AIDS</source>
<year iso-8601-date="2004">2004</year>
<volume>15</volume>
<fpage>238</fpage>
<lpage>9</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1258/095646204773557758</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15075016</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<label>9</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Tumuhamye</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Steinsland</surname>
<given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tumwine</surname>
<given-names>JK</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Namugga</surname>
<given-names>O</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mukunya</surname>
<given-names>D</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bwanga</surname>
<given-names>F</given-names>
</name>
<etal>et al.</etal>
</person-group>
<article-title>Vaginal colonisation of women in labour with potentially pathogenic bacteria: a cross sectional study at three primary health care facilities in Central Uganda</article-title>
<source>BMC Infect Dis</source>
<year iso-8601-date="2020">2020</year>
<volume>20</volume>
<elocation-id>98</elocation-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12879-020-4821-6</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32005177</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">PMC6995194</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<label>10</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Gajdács</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Urbán</surname>
<given-names>E</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Epidemiology and resistance trends of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from vaginal samples: a 10-year retrospective study in Hungary</article-title>
<source>Acta Dermatovenerol Alp Pannonica Adriat</source>
<year iso-8601-date="2019">2019</year>
<volume>28</volume>
<fpage>143</fpage>
<lpage>7</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.15570/actaapa.2019.35</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<label>11</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Safarpoor</surname>
<given-names>Dehkordi F</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tavakoli-Far</surname>
<given-names>B</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jafariaskari</surname>
<given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Momtaz</surname>
<given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Esmaeilzadeh</surname>
<given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ranjbar</surname>
<given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
<etal>et al.</etal>
</person-group>
<article-title>Uropathogenic Escherichia coli in the high vaginal swab samples of fertile and infertile women: virulence factors, O-serogroups, and phenotyping and genotyping characterization of antibiotic resistance</article-title>
<source>New Microbes New Infect</source>
<year iso-8601-date="2020">2020</year>
<volume>38</volume>
<elocation-id>100824</elocation-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.nmni.2020.100824</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33364031</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">PMC7750135</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<label>12</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Famojuro</surname>
<given-names>OB</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Famojuro</surname>
<given-names>TI</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Oluwatobi</surname>
<given-names>OB</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Olumide</surname>
<given-names>DD</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Occurrence of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) in Gram-negative bacterial isolates from high vaginal swabs in a teaching hospital in Nigeria</article-title>
<source>Ghana Med J</source>
<year iso-8601-date="2025">2025</year>
<volume>58</volume>
<fpage>294</fpage>
<lpage>302</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4314/gmj.v58i4.7</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">40585516</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">PMC12203749</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<label>13</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Magiorakos</surname>
<given-names>AP</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Srinivasan</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Carey</surname>
<given-names>RB</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Carmeli</surname>
<given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Falagas</surname>
<given-names>ME</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Giske</surname>
<given-names>CG</given-names>
</name>
<etal>et al.</etal>
</person-group>
<article-title>Multidrug-resistant, extensively drug-resistant and pandrug-resistant bacteria: an international expert proposal for interim standard definitions for acquired resistance</article-title>
<source>Clin Microbiol Infect</source>
<year iso-8601-date="2012">2012</year>
<volume>18</volume>
<fpage>268</fpage>
<lpage>81</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03570.x</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21793988</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<label>14</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Huppert</surname>
<given-names>JS</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bennett</surname>
<given-names>K</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kollar</surname>
<given-names>LM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pattullo</surname>
<given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mortensen</surname>
<given-names>JE</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>MRSA: Rare in the Vagina</article-title>
<source>J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol</source>
<year iso-8601-date="2011">2011</year>
<volume>24</volume>
<fpage>315</fpage>
<lpage>6</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jpag.2011.06.001</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21872776</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<label>15</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>De</surname>
<given-names>Seta F</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Campisciano</surname>
<given-names>G</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zanotta</surname>
<given-names>N</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ricci</surname>
<given-names>G</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Comar</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>The Vaginal Community State Types Microbiome-Immune Network as Key Factor for Bacterial Vaginosis and Aerobic Vaginitis</article-title>
<source>Front Microbiol</source>
<year iso-8601-date="2019">2019</year>
<volume>10</volume>
<elocation-id>2451</elocation-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2019.02451</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31736898</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">PMC6831638</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<label>16</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Maduta</surname>
<given-names>CS</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tuffs</surname>
<given-names>SW</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>McCormick</surname>
<given-names>JK</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dufresne</surname>
<given-names>K</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Interplay between Staphylococcus aureus and the vaginal microbiota</article-title>
<source>Trends Microbiol</source>
<year iso-8601-date="2024">2024</year>
<volume>32</volume>
<fpage>228</fpage>
<lpage>30</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.tim.2023.12.005</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">38182522</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<label>17</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kareem</surname>
<given-names>Raheem Z</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Abdulhamid</surname>
<given-names>Said L</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Antibiotic susceptibility profile of bacteria causing aerobic vaginitis in women in Iraq</article-title>
<source>Arch Razi Inst</source>
<year iso-8601-date="2023">2023</year>
<volume>78</volume>
<fpage>31</fpage>
<lpage>43</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.22092/ari.2022.358775.2307</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">37312716</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">PMC10258257</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<label>18</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ahabwe</surname>
<given-names>OM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kabanda</surname>
<given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Abesiga</surname>
<given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mugisha</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kayondo</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ngonzi</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<etal>et al.</etal>
</person-group>
<article-title>Bacterial isolates and antibiotic susceptibility among women with abnormal vaginal discharge attending the gynecology clinic at a tertiary hospital in southwestern Uganda: a cross-sectional study</article-title>
<source>BMC Women’s Health</source>
<year iso-8601-date="2023">2023</year>
<volume>23</volume>
<elocation-id>572</elocation-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12905-023-02746-w</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">37932705</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">PMC10629097</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<label>19</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hussein</surname>
<given-names>K</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tesfai</surname>
<given-names>B</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Frezgi</surname>
<given-names>O</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hayelom</surname>
<given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gebremeskel</surname>
<given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Werede</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<etal>et al.</etal>
</person-group>
<article-title>Antimicrobial Resistance Patterns in Patients with Vaginal Discharge: A 2019-2022 Analysis at the National Health Laboratory in Eritrea</article-title>
<source>BioMed Res Int</source>
<year iso-8601-date="2024">2024</year>
<volume>2024</volume>
<elocation-id>7193490</elocation-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1155/2024/7193490</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">38577704</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">PMC10994703</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<label>20</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Rafat</surname>
<given-names>D</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Agrawal</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Singh</surname>
<given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Khalid</surname>
<given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Khan</surname>
<given-names>AU</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nawab</surname>
<given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Impact of Glycemic Variability on Vaginal Flora Alterations and Concomitant Antimicrobial Resistance During Pregnancy: Implications for Fetomaternal Outcomes</article-title>
<source>J Obstet Gynecol India</source>
<year iso-8601-date="2025">2025</year>
<volume>75</volume>
<fpage>494</fpage>
<lpage>503</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s13224-024-02095-0</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">40390878</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">PMC12085722</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<label>21</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Noor</surname>
<given-names>K</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nazir</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Adhikary</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Amin</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Maroof</surname>
<given-names>P</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kaur</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Microbial profile and antimicrobial resistance patterns in high vaginal swabs from reproductive age women: A study from North India</article-title>
<source>IP Int J Med Microbiol Trop Dis</source>
<year iso-8601-date="2026">2026</year>
<volume>12</volume>
<fpage>109</fpage>
<lpage>15</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18231/j.ijmmtd.14579.1767782303</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>