This article is a narrative review. Sources were identified through targeted searches of PubMed and Google Scholar using terms related to paediatric orthopaedics, imaging, regenerative medicine, implant design, and digital technologies. Additional references were identified through citation tracking of key articles. No formal systematic screening, risk-of-bias assessment, or meta-analytic synthesis was performed, consistent with the narrative review methodology. Where applicable, levels of evidence were assigned according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine framework.

The paediatric skeleton presents a formidable “moving target” for the contemporary clinician. The ubiquitous presence of cartilaginous precursors and open physes implies that conventional radiography frequently fails to reveal the true magnitude of a deformity or the subtlety of an injury [7]. In the context of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH), the Graf method of ultrasonography has rightfully ascended to the status of the gold standard for early diagnostic screening, offering a rigorous and standardised anatomical classification [8]. Meticulous assessment of limb alignment remains a cornerstone of preoperative planning, particularly when addressing deviations in the mechanical axis [9]. The complexity of imaging interpretation in the growing child demands awareness of specific pitfalls unique to this population [10, 11]. Published studies report only moderate inter-observer reproducibility for key paediatric radiographic measurements, with most kappa and ICC values falling within the mid-range depending on the parameter and measurement technique.

For children requiring serial radiographic monitoring, such as those with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), the cumulative burden of ionizing radiation is a significant epidemiological concern regarding long-term oncogenic potential (Table 1) [12]. The low-dose 3D imaging system (EOS) has addressed this by providing biplanar radiographs with a radiation dose up to 90% lower than conventional radiography (Table 1) [13–16].

Immersive virtual reality (VR) has demonstrated profound efficacy in the acquisition of complex orthopaedic surgical skills [17, 18]. Augmented reality (AR) takes this further by providing digital overlays during active surgery, revolutionising the safety of spinal navigation [19, 20].

AI is actively automating the most laborious tasks, such as the measurement of Cobb angles in spinal deformity [21]. Deep learning models have achieved diagnostic sensitivities in detecting fractures that rival human observers [22, 23]. Beyond detection, machine learning models are being employed to predict the risk of deformity progression in AIS, allowing for a more bespoke approach to bracing [24]. AI applications now span a broad range of domains in paediatric orthopaedics, including outcome prediction, surgical planning, and image classification [25–29]. While AI-based tools show promising accuracy, most models remain trained on limited, single-centre datasets and require external validation before routine clinical adoption in paediatric populations.

The evolution of MRI has transitioned from anatomical to biochemical evaluation. Advanced sequences such as dGEMRIC allow for the molecular evaluation of cartilage health [30, 31]. Furthermore, ultrashort echo time (UTE) MRI has proven invaluable for the detailed visualisation of the osteochondral junction [32]. Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) has emerged as a validated, radiation-free modality for paediatric fracture diagnosis and physeal assessment [33–35].

Rigorous radiation-reduction protocols are essential in preoperative planning for the growing child, where the cumulative dose from repeated imaging studies carries long-term oncogenic risk [36]. Virtual surgical planning (VSP) leverages CT or MRI data to construct patient-specific anatomical models that provide the surgeon with precise spatial understanding of pathological anatomy prior to any incision [37–39]. Three-dimensional bioprinting has further extended these capabilities by enabling the fabrication of patient-specific scaffolds and surgical guides from biocompatible materials with remarkable geometric fidelity [40].

The culmination of this digital planning workflow is patient-specific instrumentation (PSI)—individually designed 3D-printed cutting and positioning guides that conform to the patient’s unique skeletal anatomy with sub-millimetre accuracy, minimising intraoperative decision-making and reducing total procedure time [38, 41]. Despite their precision, traditional growth-friendly instrumentation strategies, such as growing rods, carry inherent hardware-related complication profiles over multi-year distraction periods [42]. To overcome these historical limitations, modern implementations are increasingly coupled with robotic-assisted navigation systems to secure complex anatomical trajectories, particularly for pelvic instrumentation in severe neuromuscular spinal deformities (Table 2) [43].

Computer-assisted navigation systems have fundamentally transformed the accuracy of implant placement across a spectrum of paediatric procedures, providing real-time three-dimensional spatial feedback that substantially reduces the risk of neurovascular injury [44–46]. Given that repeated intraoperative imaging remains a necessity in these complex spinal contexts, mitigating cumulative radiation exposure represents an uncompromised priority for the safety of the pediatric patient [47].

Robotic platforms have further elevated surgical precision by providing a mechanically stabilised and tremor-free arm for pedicle screw placement in complex paediatric spinal deformity surgery, with published data demonstrating significantly reduced rates of cortical breach and intraoperative radiation exposure compared with conventional freehand techniques [48–51]. Early applications of robotic assistance in paediatric trauma are also emerging, with preliminary data supporting its potential for achieving high-fidelity fracture reduction in complex periarticular injuries [51, 52].

Biological restoration is the current frontier of paediatric orthopaedic innovation, offering solutions that transcend the limitations of purely mechanical constructs. The inherent plasticity of the growing skeleton, while a remarkable biological asset, also predisposes it to a spectrum of pathological processes that conventional implants are ill-equipped to address. Among the most transformative departures from surgical dogma is vertebral body tethering (VBT), which represents a fundamental rethinking of the surgical correction of AIS. Rather than achieving correction through rigid fusion, VBT leverages the very principle of asymmetric growth modulation—applying a flexible cord under tension to the convex side of the scoliotic curve and harnessing the Hueter-Volkmann principle to guide corrective growth over time.

This dynamic, fusionless approach preserves segmental spinal mobility and avoids the long-term biomechanical consequences of solid fusion in a young spine, including adjacent segment disease and the “flatback” deformity [53]. Current VBT evidence is limited by relatively short follow-up, reoperation rates, and ongoing debate regarding optimal patient selection and timing of intervention.

Clinicians are increasingly turning to mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) as autologous biological augments for bone regeneration, offering the theoretical advantage of stimulating healing through the patient’s own reparative machinery without donor-site morbidity [54]. Recombinant bone morphogenetic proteins—BMP-2 and BMP-7—offer potent, well-characterised osteoinductive signals for recalcitrant non-unions and critical-size defects, with a substantial and growing body of evidence supporting their judicious use in complex paediatric skeletal defects where conventional grafting is insufficient [55].

The “Diamond Concept” integrates cells, signals, scaffolds, and stability into a unified framework for bone tissue engineering (Table 3) [56–58]. 3D-printed bioactive scaffolds mimic the architecture of the bone matrix, promoting rapid vascularization and cellular ingrowth [59–61].

Titanium implants have become the material of choice in paediatric fracture management, offering optimal biocompatibility and growth compatibility [71]. The unique biomechanical environment of the growing child requires implants that can adapt to rapid skeletal changes. The development of growth-modulating biological therapies has further expanded the armamentarium available to the paediatric orthopaedic surgeon. Magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGR) now permit non-invasive distraction in an outpatient setting, markedly reducing the frequency of general anaesthesia and the psychological trauma of repeated hospitalisations [6, 15]. These systems exemplify the “growth-aware” philosophy, where the implant serves as a temporary scaffolding for a biological process. Despite their advantages, MCGR systems remain associated with complications such as distraction failure (“stalling”), rod fracture, and high implant cost.

Elastic stable intramedullary nailing (ESIN) remains the gold standard for many long-bone fractures, as it respects the biological integrity of the physis [72, 73]. For older adolescents, rigid intramedullary nails utilizing a lateral entry point have effectively eliminated the risk of femoral head necrosis, which was a devastating complication of older piriformis-entry designs [74, 75]. In the management of angular deformities, the ‘eight-plate’ concept for guided growth has revolutionised clinical outcomes by providing a reversible and mechanically reliable method for correction [76].

The most transformative innovation in hardware is the move toward bioabsorbable materials, such as poly-L-lactide (PLLA) and advanced magnesium alloys, which dissolve after union is achieved. These materials are instrumental in minimising the lifetime surgical burden for children. For limb lengthening, internal motorized nails provide precise distraction while eliminating the risk of pin-site infections characteristic of external fixators. For magnesium‑based implants, precise control of degradation kinetics and gas formation remains a key challenge, particularly in small paediatric bones. A comparison of traditional implants with innovative implants and materials is presented in Table 4.

The digital revolution in orthopaedics extends well beyond imaging and navigation, encompassing an entirely new paradigm for patient-specific care. Eradicating inter-observer variability in radiographic measurements is a fundamental prerequisite for evidence-based care, yet remains an unsolved challenge. Discrepancies in the measurement of pelvic obliquity or Cobb angles lead to inconsistent surgical decisions, with clinically significant variation reported between experienced surgeons [12]. The emergence of the “Digital Twin”—a high-fidelity, patient-specific computational replica of a child’s unique anatomy, physiology, and biomechanics—represents a paradigm shift of profound significance.

By integrating multimodal imaging data, patient-specific material properties derived from quantitative MRI, and real-time motion capture, the Digital Twin enables unparalleled preoperative simulation and implant design optimisation. Surgeons can rehearse complex procedures, test alternative fixation strategies, and objectively predict postoperative alignment without a single incision, thereby transforming the subjective art of surgical planning into a rigorous, evidence-based science [38]. Implementation of Digital Twin platforms requires substantial computational infrastructure, specialised personnel, and integration with hospital IT systems, which currently restricts their use to highly specialised centres.

Wearable sensors provide continuous joint kinematics data from the patient’s natural milieu, offering a more ecologically valid, objective, and representative profile of functional movement than periodic clinical snapshots obtained under artificial laboratory conditions [67]. “Smart casts” with integrated pressure sensors now enable real-time monitoring of compartment pressures to prevent the devastating complication of compartment syndrome. Telemedicine platforms further ensure that specialist expert counsel is a global utility, vital for surgeons working in underserved, resource-limited, and geographically remote regions [16].

Contemporary trauma management focuses on accelerating biological healing while minimising the cumulative procedural burden. The paediatric skeleton’s extraordinary healing capacity is, paradoxically, both its greatest advantage and a source of clinical complexity, as rapid but disordered healing can result in malunion with growth-related consequences. Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) has emerged as a formidable non-invasive adjunct for augmenting bone healing, demonstrating profound immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory potential in preclinical and clinical models of complex fractures [66]. By mechanically stimulating transmembrane integrins and activating downstream osteoblastic signalling cascades—including the Wnt and BMP pathways—LIPUS significantly reduces the incidence of delayed union and shortens the period of immobilisation, translating directly into a reduced duration of the child’s absence from school and daily activities [68, 69].

The philosophical shift toward bioabsorbable materials is particularly consequential in periarticular trauma, where hardware removal surgery entails significant psychological distress and a non-trivial risk of iatrogenic physeal injury. Advanced magnesium-based alloys represent the current vanguard of this field, offering mechanical stability broadly comparable to titanium during the critical period of fracture healing, while degrading predictably through controlled corrosion to harmless inorganic by-products, thereby obviating the need for a secondary operative procedure entirely [71]. The optimisation of degradation kinetics—ensuring the implant maintains sufficient structural integrity during the entire healing phase before dissolving—remains an active area of materials science research with direct translational relevance to the paediatric orthopaedic and trauma surgeon.

A significant and often-overlooked dimension of orthopaedic innovation is the imperative to translate technological advances into globally accessible tools. In high-income settings, MRI, robotics, and digital planning represent the standard of care; in low- and middle-income countries, the absence of basic diagnostic infrastructure results in late-presenting deformities and preventable long-term disability. POCUS has transformed the clinical landscape in resource-limited settings by providing a portable, radiation-free, and cost-effective alternative for screening DDH and triaging fractures in remote regions [16]. Deployed by trained health workers, POCUS programmes have demonstrated feasibility and accuracy comparable to hospital-based imaging, enabling early diagnosis at the community level.

Solar-powered diagnostic devices and low-cost 3D printing are actively reshaping the delivery of orthopaedic care in regions with unstable infrastructure, ensuring that high-fidelity surgical planning is not restricted by geography or economics. Telemedicine platforms now connect remote surgeons with subspecialty paediatric orthopaedic expertise, enabling real-time case consultation that would previously have required international travel [16]. Crucially, the global scalability of AI-driven decision support tools—which can be deployed on low-cost mobile hardware—offers a realistic pathway to democratising the diagnostic precision currently available only in tertiary referral centres [28, 29]. These innovations collectively advance the ethical imperative of ensuring that every child, regardless of birth geography, has equitable access to evidence-based musculoskeletal care (Table 5).

The global burden of paediatric musculoskeletal conditions is disproportionately concentrated in low- and middle-income countries, where delayed diagnosis and limited access to specialist care frequently result in preventable disability. Scaling POCUS, telemedicine, and low-cost 3D printing requires not only technology but also structured training programmes, sustainable financing models, and integration into existing health systems. Future work should prioritise cost-effectiveness analyses and implementation research in resource-limited settings.